Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update
Hello,
there is currently ongoing rebase of gmp package in f17-gmp dist tag
targeting rawhide.
Because of this, we have to rebuild all dependencies twice (at first
with compatibility package, then without it).
All packages depending on gmp can be found here:
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:18 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in
that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld
start,
Hum...
Could that be
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload
the
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 10/07/2011 12:19 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I don't doubt it's btrfs, but bootchart will tell me which one of our
kernel threads is running so I can tell_what_ in btrfs is taking it's
sweet time. Thanks,
Here you go:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Bio-Graphics has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
On i386:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
Compose started at Mon Oct 10 08:16:15 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my bootchart link before making any modifications:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:07:17 -0600
Peter Gueckel wrote:
Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
Yeah sometimes is okay of course. Happening every two or three weeks
it isn't.
So, why are you using devel?
This happened on F-15.
-Tom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:41:43 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/10/2011 03:33 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial
packages.
Thomas Spura wrote:
So, why are you using devel?
This happened on F-15.
This is the devel list, not the general list. Sorry.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
From d39d500dadf640ac47f04370e9bb7b18e9bab9aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:46:34 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Change referential integrity to be a betxnpostoperation plugin
This changes referential integrity to be a betxnpostoperation
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:03:34AM -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
Thomas Spura wrote:
So, why are you using devel?
This happened on F-15.
This is the devel list, not the general list. Sorry.
Although the branch for rawhide was once named devel, the naming of this as
devel does not
On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA
1.0 as a post
Updated NSS in Rawhide to the upstream's NSS_3_13_RC0 and with it NSPR to
NSPR_4.9_BETA3.
The bug fixes in NSPR 4.9 BETA3 and NSS 3.18 RC0 can be found by these Bugzilla
queries:
For nspr:
ack to both.
On 10/10/2011 09:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks,
I've written these service files for deluge. Could someone please review
them and tell me what corrections I need to do here?
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluged.service
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluge-webui.service
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
extensions are still compatible?
The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200
Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all extensions
are still compatible?
Anyone with a FAS account can pull updates from updates-testing and
provide karma to those updates.
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated
mozilla-noscript to the firefox update, when I notice, that the new
firefox upadate in testing breaks it.
Otherwise, firefox is pushed to stable more
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable directly
like it was without the forced period in updates-testing or a heads up
before doing such an update.
I think
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-10)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 17:01:11 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-10/fesco.2011-10-10-17.01.log.html
Meeting summary
On Sat, 08.10.11 16:01, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload
the chart somewhere so I can see what's going on. Thanks,
Here's my bootchart
Am 10.10.2011 18:03, schrieb Peter Gueckel:
This is the devel list, not the general list. Sorry.
...which doesn't solve the problem either. Sorry.
Regards,
--
Vinzenz Vietzke
Fedora Events Ninja / Coordination German L10N Team
Mail: viet...@b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 /
Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
criterion read:
The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a
On 10/10/2011 11:40 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
On the bright side, I don't see how AutoQA could help in this situation
so my answer isn't that's the job of AutoQA. On the down side, I
don't really have any good answers on how to improve the situation.
How do we encourage people to use
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
criterion
On Mon, 10.10.11 22:33, Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi folks,
I've written these service files for deluge. Could someone please review
them and tell me what corrections I need to do here?
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluged.service
I am not a big fan of the
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
SNIP
I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
Amazon, RackSpace, Linode, Tata, IDCF, and virtually every other major
compute cloud
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:30:19 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200
Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
extensions are still compatible?
Anyone with a FAS account can pull updates from
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
SNIP
I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
Amazon,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Sat, 08.10.11 16:01, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744551
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 10.10.11 15:58, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 10.10.11 15:13, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
/var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/adobe-linux-i386
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable directly
like it was without the forced period in updates-testing or a
Am 10.10.2011 20:27, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
Unless really necessary please drop After=network.target. Applications
that just bind on 0.0.0.0 don't need to synchronize on the network.
more general as question to the topic:
how we do know exactly if they really bind to 0.0.0.0 if the user
On Mon, 10.10.11 23:06, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 10.10.2011 20:27, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
Unless really necessary please drop After=network.target. Applications
that just bind on 0.0.0.0 don't need to synchronize on the network.
more general as question to
On Wed, 05.10.11 09:55, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote:
The more complicated conversion is the gfs2 script. This has been used
historically to mount gfs2 filesystems (rather than using the system
scripts for this). I assume that under the new systemd regime it should
be
Am 10.10.2011 23:52, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
systemd guarantees you that 0.0.0.0 and 127.0.0.1 are always bindable
(and the IPv6 equivalents, too). To ensure this we'll actually configure
the loopback device very very early at boot already
thank you for the information
this can relax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744946
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=527335action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Short question:
PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
layer
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
wine
On Tue, 11.10.11 00:03, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
But anyway, I am aware that not all daemons are netlink aware and we
need to support that daemons like that and making them more dynamic is
not realistic in the short term. So what we could do is introduce a new
target
Hmm seems like there is either a spammer or an non-spam account's user has
got a virus or so.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, nayan kumar nayankum...@hotmail.comwrote:
.Do you want to be a sex-machine?
http://lelunapark.com/com.friend.php?xID=37si9
--
devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736604
Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
c5f0c24... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
79c0fc8... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
c833d7c... Update to 0.24 and fix BR (*)
b46888f... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
7a5b6a3... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
734d11c...
commit 61995d254f6d8431f4397facd4f25d0c2e274ed1
Merge: 8b88d49 49cfb09
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:33:00 2011 +0100
Merge branch 'master' (early part) into el6
Conflicts:
.gitignore
.gitignore |2 +-
The lightweight tag 'perl-Exception-Base-0.2401-1.el6' was created pointing to:
61995d2... Merge branch 'master' (early part) into el6
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744553
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-IRC:
d9d0bc02adfc87eae477e122213e4b12 POE-Component-IRC-6.74.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit dfdf07dcafef958118c157a2b315539d45ccc5e6
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 10 14:04:10 2011 +0200
6.74 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744553
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:10:05AM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
The only remaining package is perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule which is broken
for long time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015,
upstream is dead and current
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-JSON-RPC should no depend on mod_perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744904
Summary: perl-JSON-RPC should no depend on mod_perl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-Lite-HTML:
6ca475aaa73328f8c51b7002d828fe7e MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
02079cb... update to 1.24
5249156... Merge branch 'master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 02079cbb9f8c0f486d9e28b5f7034efa66a51ba6
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Mon Oct 10 21:52:21 2011 +0200
update to 1.24
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+),
commit 52491561264efaf6c194a6319407f00fdf8f73c4
Merge: 02079cb af50062
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Mon Oct 10 22:00:21 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
Conflicts:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741777
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2011-10-10
17:35:01 EDT ---
Created attachment 527333
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744904
Frédéric Buclin lpso...@netscape.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718870
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732587
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone:
74c7fe73d43b4bea845283980a8fc86a DateTime-TimeZone-1.40.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9a1b6e166fdf6b89614468fafecf804bf4c10f81
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 11 05:46:09 2011 +0200
update to 1.40 - olson 2011l
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
9a1b6e1... update to 1.40 - olson 2011l (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
9a1b6e1... update to 1.40 - olson 2011l (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
9a1b6e1... update to 1.40 - olson 2011l (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741777
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 10/10/2011 10:08 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Reduce the number of DN normalization
. Replacing SLAPI_TARGET_DN with SLAPI_TARGET_SDN (also its macros,
e.g., SLAPI_SEARCH_TARGET_SDN and SLAPI_ADD_TARGET_SDN).
I haven't reviewed the entire patch yet, but I am concerned about
changing the APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744945
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=527345action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=527345action=edit
Description: nsslapd-counters (cn=config) is allowed to have the
value off. Once it's set, cache monitor would not
73 matches
Mail list logo
