Re: [HEADS UP] rename cryptsetup-luks to cryptsetup and libcrypsetup version bump

2011-10-18 Thread Milan Broz
On 10/18/2011 06:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > So I did discover a weird problem with this update. When running > the libguestfs test suite, cryptsetup sometimes hangs on this > command: > > cryptsetup -q -d /tmp/luksFbnt2j --key-

[Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup tomorrow at 18UTC (2011-10-19)

2011-10-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC. Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes for testing updates. * Intro/gather more agenda items * Recruiting more proventesters/testers. * One stop page for upda

[Test-Announce] Note on live installs of F16 TC1

2011-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. So we pinned down that mysterious 'F16 Desktop live x86_64 install boots to a black screen' bug. Turns out that liveinst will always corrupt a small amount of data on install with anaconda 16.21; it's actually also happening in all the other live images that 'aren't affected', it's just

transmission-remote-cli package

2011-10-18 Thread Ben Thompson
I've taken an interest in the development of this project and would like to help maintain it. Therefore I'm looking for someone involved to sponsor/mentor me. Regards, -Ben -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Josh Boyer wrote: > Chrony is in Fedora, so I'm not entirely sure what you mean there. I mean other systems (even not Linux-based) that may run in virtual machines. > >> The real solution can be adding kernel parameter like cpufreq=disable >> that can disable using built-in cpufreq modules. > >

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM, wrote: > > Thanks, I will try makestep directive with F16 kernel. > This is workaround may work or may not because chrony not always available. > For example chrony can be not installed on Live images (not from Fedora) or > other systems which don't have chrony.

[dspam] removed sysconfig/dspam file

2011-10-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Summary of changes: 9f63873... removed sysconfig/dspam file (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapr

[dspam/f16] removed sysconfig/dspam file

2011-10-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit 9f63873b7f1607fece81ede931436e66a7232ca4 Author: Nathanael D. Noblet Date: Tue Oct 18 15:01:41 2011 -0600 removed sysconfig/dspam file dspam.spec |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec index 3aa7f80..b23cdbc 100644 ---

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Adam Jackson wrote: > 4.2.27 makestep > --- > > Normally chronyd will cause the system to gradually correct any time > offset, by slowing down or speeding up the clock as required. In > certain situations, the system clock may be so far adrift that this > slewing process would take a

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:02 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > Both ntpd and chrony can't synchronize time in VM's because of large offset. False. From chrony.txt: --- 4.2.27 makestep --- Normally chronyd will cause the system to gradually correct any time offset, by slowing

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:57 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > >> Changing governor can't help me, I need frequency scaling completely >> disabled. > > Have you filed a bug for the problem which frequency scaling causes for > you (system time going out of whack)?

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:57 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > Changing governor can't help me, I need frequency scaling completely disabled. Have you filed a bug for the problem which frequency scaling causes for you (system time going out of whack)? Have you tried alternative workarounds

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello wrote: > Let's hope the CPU modaliases stuff get done some day. > > Marcos As workaround now I can use in F16 kernel from F15. But when F15 will be EOL no more kernel updates will be available and using old kernels forever is not good idea. Is there any chance that

Re: [HEADS UP] rename cryptsetup-luks to cryptsetup and libcrypsetup version bump

2011-10-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > Hi, > > cryptsetup-luks name was old relict, so I decided to rename > it back to cryptsetup (as in upstream and all other distros). > > With this change comes also update to 1.4.0 version which > removes old API (not used for years) an

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
2011/10/18 : > Changing governor can't help me, I need frequency scaling completely disabled. > cpupower.service starts cpupower which can't set frequency > which I set in BIOS (slightly overclocked). > This is cpufreq modules problem because frequency which > I set is not in range which can be de

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Marcos Mello wrote: > googlemail.com> writes: >> >> Kernel don't have parameter which can disable using cpufreq built-in modules. >> This is the main problem because it makes using frequency scaling >> unconditional. >> > > Here's what I use. I hope it can help you. > > - Install kernel-tool

[Bug 746940] perl-App-cpanminus-1.5002 is available

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746940 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 746940] perl-App-cpanminus-1.5002 is available

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746940 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[perl-App-cpanminus] 1.5002 bump

2011-10-18 Thread Petr Sabata
commit d46dc012399666ea1aa215ebdfb75b09f51051ae Author: Petr Sabata Date: Tue Oct 18 17:05:02 2011 +0200 1.5002 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-App-cpanminus.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a

File App-cpanminus-1.5002.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2011-10-18 Thread Petr Sabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus: 8382fd84fceaf151f9b05bd10724815e App-cpanminus-1.5002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Marcos Mello
googlemail.com> writes: > > Kernel don't have parameter which can disable using cpufreq built-in modules. > This is the main problem because it makes using frequency scaling > unconditional. > Here's what I use. I hope it can help you. - Install kernel-tools package - Start/enable cpupower.se

rawhide report: 20111018 changes

2011-10-18 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 18 08:15:13 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-18 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Instead of trying to come up with clever hacks, please look at how existing > kernel modules are packaged in RPM Fusion. They always have 2 SRPMs, by > design, a -common package with the userspace parts (if there's no userspace > code at all,

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: >> Frequency scaling have negative effects for me >> so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. > What negative effects does frequency scaling have for you when using > governor performance? > > -- > Vratisl

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 07:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:49 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > > > Frequency scaling have negative effects for me > > > so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. > > What negati

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:49 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > > Frequency scaling have negative effects for me > > so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. > What negative effects does frequency scaling have for you when using > gov

F-16 Branched report: 20111018 changes

2011-10-18 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 18 08:15:25 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) cluster-s

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Petr Sabata wrote: > The right thing to do is to fix the kernel logic, not to bring back the > userspace initscript hacks we used to have. > > Maybe there is a kernel argument to disable cpufreq stack completely for users > who really don't want it (i.e. you)? ... Kernel don't have parameter whi

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > Frequency scaling have negative effects for me > so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. What negative effects does frequency scaling have for you when using governor performance? -- Vratislav Podzimek > > I think that this is no

Re: How to update GMP-using packages

2011-10-18 Thread Peter Schiffer
Hello, it will be better, if you could wait until the f17-gmp tag will be merged into rawhide. In general, it's not a problem, when you make build _between_ our two builds, but it's problem, when you make build after our second build and before merging f17-gmp into rawhide. In that case, we ha

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Petr Sabata
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:54:53PM +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > Hi, > > The purpose of this bug was to provide native systemd script for cpuspeed in > Fedora 16 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713572 > > But instead of adding systemd script which should load cpufreq modu