Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691913
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:57:41 -0500
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to build a F16 package under mock on my F15 system and I'm
getting the following error:
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package python-libs
/sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting
WHEN: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 08:00 PDT)
WHERE: #fedora-meeting
It's meeting time again! We'll be trying to finish up F16 testing, and
looking ahead to post-F16 times.
If anyone has anything to add to the agenda, please reply to this mail,
and whoever ends up running the
Compose started at Mon Oct 31 08:16:06 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PackageKit-zif-0.6.19-3.fc16.x86_64 requires zif = 0:0.2.5
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 - Request to fix CRITPATH update
Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the
same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm,
glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and
hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc17.rpm.
I did that because the source, thus far, is exactly
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:57:41 -0500
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to build a F16 package under mock on my F15 system and I'm
getting the following error:
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the
same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm,
glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
is waiting for a sponsor.
I'd like to sponsor it.
What is the procedure? Do I change the
Assigned To:
Timothy St. Clair (edit) (take)
By selecting 'take'? It is not clear if 'take' if for sponsoring the package,
or for the review.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
is waiting for a sponsor.
I'd like to sponsor it.
What is the procedure? Do I change the
Assigned To:
Timothy St. Clair (edit) (take)
By selecting 'take'? It is not clear if 'take' if for sponsoring the
package,
or for the review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
is waiting for a sponsor.
I'd like to sponsor it.
What is the procedure? Do I change the
Assigned To:
Timothy St. Clair (edit) (take)
By selecting 'take'? It is not clear if 'take' if for sponsoring the
package,
or for the
On 10/30/2011 06:37 PM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintaining the Finnish spell checking extension for Firefox called
Mozvoikko. Upstream recently released a Javascript-based version of the
extension, which I've now packaged in Rawhide. Spec file here:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am really unsure here, if this is a javac bug, or an eclipse glitch
or something plain strange. Consider the following interfaces:
public interface A {
A foo();
}
public interface B {
B foo();
}
public interface C extends A, B {
* Christoph Höger christoph.hoe...@tu-berlin.de [2011-10-31 11:37]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am really unsure here, if this is a javac bug, or an eclipse glitch
or something plain strange. Consider the following interfaces:
public interface A {
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 31.10.2011 17:00, schrieb Deepak Bhole:
It looks like a known bug in the 6 compiler related to interface
inheritance and covariant return types. I think this is the commit
that fixed it in 7:
commit b30f13274d349d89c813b9c22b321d77514b3886
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Oct 31 17:07:32 2011 +0100
requires 'patch'
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
Summary of changes:
b30f132... requires 'patch' (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b30f132... requires 'patch' (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b30f132... requires 'patch' (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8225d9192a46766ce72a78794fb7d55e58078bd1
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Oct 31 17:07:32 2011 +0100
requires 'patch'
(cherry picked from commit b30f13274d349d89c813b9c22b321d77514b3886)
Conflicts:
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
commit d56416bf4b53400c31ab8c09e8d2028a46d4331d
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Oct 31 17:07:32 2011 +0100
requires 'patch'
(cherry picked from commit b30f13274d349d89c813b9c22b321d77514b3886)
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+),
commit 73607c42e8284f22d2e1142d0a8f9bf1afa7fe68
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Oct 31 17:20:29 2011 +0100
workaround rhbz#750145
IPC::Cmd should require ExtUtils::MakeMaker, but doesn't
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0
One of my packages (xemacs) failed the final build in the f17-gmp
build target [1], and was marked FTBFS [2]. I see that the f17-gmp
builds are now being merged into Rawhide. As I pointed out on that
bug, the xemacs build failure was due to building against glibc
2.14.90-13. I don't know the
I need some advice for a package review I'm doing. The package owns
all the directories from /usr/share/icons/hicolor down to
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, where it stores its icons. When
I objected that these directories were already owned by
hicolor-icon-theme, the packager said:
This
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I need some advice for a package review I'm doing. The package owns
all the directories from /usr/share/icons/hicolor down to
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, where it stores its icons. When
I objected that these
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-31)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:21 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-31/fesco.2011-10-31-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Am 31.10.2011 17:00, schrieb Deepak Bhole:
It looks like a known bug in the 6 compiler related to interface
inheritance and covariant return types. I think this is the commit
that fixed it in 7:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/langtools/rev/4a3b9801f7a0
If you have code that
Sorry, I'm using the wrong terms. A BR was already opened by
Kapil Arya
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
I have discussed with upstream, and the asked me to take ownership of this
package, which I have agreed to.
What do I need to do?
--
devel mailing list
Sorry, I'm using the wrong terms. A BR was already opened by
Kapil Arya
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
I have discussed with upstream, and the asked me to take ownership of this
package, which I have agreed to.
What do I need to do?
If it will be your package,
mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:42:59AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Are the fedora-logos and setroubleshoot packages doing it the right
way, and other icon-installing packages need to be fixed? Are they
doing it the wrong way, and should be
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Mattias Ellert
mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se wrote:
mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas:
I guess the directory /usr/share/icons/hicolor and the usual
subdirectories should be owned by the filesystem package.
Regards
Till
hicolor-icon-theme is a
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:24:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 22:04, schrieb Lucas:
I do not understand why it places i915, eth0 and snd_hda_intel on the same
CPU
uname -a = 3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 24 12:18:13 UTC 2011 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Hi!
The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.4 in rawhide only.
Depending packages should rebuild:
- CGSI-gSOAP
- lcgdm
- voms
- VirtualBox-OSE (rpmfusion)
Mattias Ellert
gsoap co-maintainer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel mailing
On 16:48 Mon 31 Oct , Andrew Haley wrote:
Am 31.10.2011 17:00, schrieb Deepak Bhole:
It looks like a known bug in the 6 compiler related to interface
inheritance and covariant return types. I think this is the commit
that fixed it in 7:
Martin Stransky wrote:
On 10/30/2011 06:37 PM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
For now, I've only packaged the extension for Firefox, but I would like
to add Thunderbird support as well. What would be the best way to do
that? I could probably symlink the extension directory from
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl),
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750053
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-10-31 03:26:26
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Well - it is a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711486
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Missing dependency (perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker) in perl-IPC-Cmd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750145
Summary: Missing dependency
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750145
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-10-31 03:47:37 EDT ---
EL6 is affected.
perl-4:5.10.1-119.el6.x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750145
--- Comment #3 from RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com
2011-10-31 04:08:43 EDT ---
This request was
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750145
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749973
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750039
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-10-31 06:39:06 EDT ---
I'm happy to do Class::Load if Petr does
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXSLT:
82e9ac5c3cb68c5435e62fa88b1c9d71 XML-LibXSLT-1.75.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
47 matches
Mail list logo
