Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> I'd rather help others with transition to Gnome3, as some active
members of our local
> community (Russian Fedora) does.
I've spent months trying to get used to Gnome 3, and had lots of help
from various people, and I still can't stand it. Yes, I know that there
are p
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 09:24 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2011/12/9 Eric Smith :
> > I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> > desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> > GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months
Hello
2011/12/9 Eric Smith :
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
> remaining MATE packages.
Mate is unmaintained (e.
On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
> remaining MATE packages.
>
> Would
I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
remaining MATE packages.
Would anyone like to see the MATE desktop environment as an
> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 12:33:38 -0500
> From: seth vidal
>
> I answered Denis immediately at the first post and he concurred it was
> a problem. I like to think the conversation evolved as we discussed.
>
Yes, the conversation has shifted... Indeed, I mixed two distinct ideas:
1. One correspondi
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:14:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:06 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:01:45PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:58:29 +
> > > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 08,
Hi, all:
I no longer have to deal with Exchange (yay), so I am no longer suited
to be the maintainer of pidgin-sipe.
Please, someone pick it up.
Best,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Systems Administrator
Linux Foundation, kernel.org
Montréal, Québec
pgpkH0bB5S112.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
d
Il giorno gio, 08/12/2011 alle 19.41 +0100, Martin Bacovsky ha scritto:
> On 12/07/2011 09:50 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:23:05PM +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
>>[...]
> >
> > Except.. the URL is for a user visible string (just like a menu entry). At
> > least, that
Am 08.12.2011 22:03, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 21:55 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 08.12.2011 21:42, schrieb Jef Spaleta:
>>> I'm saying this as politely as I can. Move this into the appropriate
>>> rpmfusion development communication channel and out of here.
>>
>> a
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 21:55 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.12.2011 21:42, schrieb Jef Spaleta:
> > I'm saying this as politely as I can. Move this into the appropriate
> > rpmfusion development communication channel and out of here.
>
> and i am saying it NOT polite
>
> WAS I THE PERSON W
Am 08.12.2011 21:42, schrieb Jef Spaleta:
> I'm saying this as politely as I can. Move this into the appropriate
> rpmfusion development communication channel and out of here.
and i am saying it NOT polite
WAS I THE PERSON WHO RESTARTED THIS THREAD?
NO I WAS NOT!
so please pissoff people who d
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> nonsense
>
> they HAD the manpower to do this rebuilds for so.114 to so.115
> so WTF why they jumping to a outdated version instead so.119?
>
> doing such nonsense and after that whine about to few manpower
> is a little bit strange - the reb
As of this week, bodhi is using the Fedora Package Database to determine the
critical path package list.
As part of this effort, the critical path package lists have been
regenerated for Fedora 15, Fedora 16, and rawhide. Various errors in the
generation process have been fixed, causing the critic
2011/12/8 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 08.12.2011 17:04, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number
>>> in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.115 for F15
>>> and currently the .120 to 115
>>
>> Changing soversions is a ver
Am 08.12.2011 21:10, schrieb Stijn Hoop:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:02:26 +0100
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 08.12.2011 17:04, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number
in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.11
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:06 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:01:45PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:58:29 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:31:58PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 0
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:02:26 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 08.12.2011 17:04, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number
> >> in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.115 for F15
> >> and currently the .120 to 115
> >
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:01:45PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:58:29 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:31:58PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:10:17PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > # conditionaliz
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 12:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> I answered Denis immediately at the first post and he concurred it was
> a problem. I like to think the conversation evolved as we discussed.
It's probably not worth pursuing this much further, but I'd just note
that the specific sub-thread I
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:58:29 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:31:58PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:10:17PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > > # conditionalize Ocaml support
> > > %ifarch sparc64 s390 s390x
> > > %bcond_with ocaml
> >
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:31:58PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:10:17PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > # conditionalize Ocaml support
> > %ifarch sparc64 s390 s390x
> > %bcond_with ocaml
> > %else
> > %bcond_without ocaml
> > %endif
> >
> > #...
> >
> > %if %{with
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 09:51 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:45 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > > polkit-0.103-1.fc17
> > > ---
> > > * Tue Dec 06 2011 David Zeuthen 0.103-1.fc17
> > > - Update to upstream release 0.103
> > > - Drop upst
On 12/07/2011 09:50 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:23:05PM +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
>> Il giorno sab, 03/12/2011 alle 22.58 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi ha scritto:
>>> Yep. This is a pseudo-bug. Because of the way people have been
>>> interpreting the spec for .desktop
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:10:17PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> # conditionalize Ocaml support
> %ifarch sparc64 s390 s390x
> %bcond_with ocaml
> %else
> %bcond_without ocaml
> %endif
>
> #...
>
> %if %{with ocaml}
> BuildRequires: ocaml
> BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel
> %endif
>
>
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 04:34:57 +0900
> From: 夜神 岩男
>
> Each time a build is made, the building system makes a hash of the set
> of RPMs in $wherever/mock/result/{foo,bar} and sends the completed data
> back to the Fedora build system.
> [...]
> This system depends chiefly on one thing: Having a
I've got a specfile (hivex.spec) which has this:
# conditionalize Ocaml support
%ifarch sparc64 s390 s390x
%bcond_with ocaml
%else
%bcond_without ocaml
%endif
#...
%if %{with ocaml}
BuildRequires: ocaml
BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel
%endif
This code correctly disables OCaml support on a
Am 08.12.2011 17:04, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number
>> in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.115 for F15
>> and currently the .120 to 115
>
> Changing soversions is a very bad idea, upstream probably bumpe
Reindl Harald wrote:
> my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number
> in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.115 for F15
> and currently the .120 to 115
Changing soversions is a very bad idea, upstream probably bumped them for a
reason.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel
Outage: unplanned nfs server outage - 2011-12-08
Our nfs01 server which holds packages and repos for release engineering
had a failure at approximately 08:05 UTC on 2011-12-08. The server has
been restarted and a filesystem check has been started. Service will be
restored as soon as that check is
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:25:18 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Well, yes, but only because you shifted the entire terms of the thread
> without telling anyone else. All of the above - about how the idea was
> to build packages with untrusted build dependencies in trustworthy
> places - may have b
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:13:09PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:52 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> > It certainly has a different soname, so yeah, we can have a -compat
> > package. But that would still mean a ton of stuff busted for rebuilds
> > while packages get fixed
Hi,
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:45 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> David,
>
> > polkit-0.103-1.fc17
> > ---
> > * Tue Dec 06 2011 David Zeuthen 0.103-1.fc17
> > - Update to upstream release 0.103
> > - Drop upstreamed patch
> > - Drop Fedora-specific policy, it is now upstream (fdo #4
Am 08.12.2011 12:27, schrieb Stijn Hoop:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:07:10 +0100
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> but they are often way behind current versions (ffmpeg, x264,
>> open-vm-tools) and then throw out a new x264, rebuild all packages
>> depending on it and rais only from .114 to .115 is a bad
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:07:10 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> but they are often way behind current versions (ffmpeg, x264,
> open-vm-tools) and then throw out a new x264, rebuild all packages
> depending on it and rais only from .114 to .115 is a bad joke
> while .119 exists since months
>
> and yes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.78 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761470
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.78 is available
Product
Am 08.12.2011 05:09, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> I know the post I'm replying to is off-topic, but just to clarify the part
> which may be relevant for Fedora packages:
>
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> below a list of packages which i maintain locally
>> mots of them only cpu-optimized rebuilds
>> many
David,
> polkit-0.103-1.fc17
> ---
> * Tue Dec 06 2011 David Zeuthen 0.103-1.fc17
> - Update to upstream release 0.103
> - Drop upstreamed patch
> - Drop Fedora-specific policy, it is now upstream (fdo #41008)
There's some issues with the obsoletes on this, its pulling in 32bit
p
38 matches
Mail list logo
