On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 08:22 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Could you provide a list of the dependent packages that you don't have
> commit rights to, so we can organize a provenpackager to help handle it?
Hi,
they are all built since yesterday, those which broke. I expected higher
numbe
On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
There really is very little difference between the com.sun.* classes
in OpenJDK and the proprietary JDK, as far as I know. Of course, I
haven't really checked, but... ;-)
So, what is the root cause of (infrequent, but persistent) alarms about
incompat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769476
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le Mer 21 décembre 2011 19:22, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> On 18:09 Wed 21 Dec , Matej Cepl wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Also, on the theme of stupid programmers, see
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741821 (although I am not
>>> sure w
Hey all-
I've got this little utility icfg, I'd like to package for fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932
I'll gladly swap with anyone that wants to review this for me.
Thanks!
Neil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
commit 95d5df76626e382d6b5677b8c26f6d29d69b0a6a
Author: Luis Bazán
Date: Wed Dec 21 13:53:08 2011 -0500
the new version does not need this patch
perl-SVN-Simple.spec |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SVN-Simple.spec b/perl-SVN-Simple.spec
ind
On 12/21/2011 05:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
Well, hold on. Both the proprietary JDK and OpenJDK meet the
specification, and we try very hard to be compatible with all
the things
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 10:27 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>
>>
>> polybori
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388
>> This is a package rename review. The original package,
>> python-polybori, ships the C++ and Python interfaces in the same
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Scott Tsai wrote:
> I'll trade you js-of-ocaml:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767042
> for gap.
Sounds great. Thanks, Scott.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 18:09 Wed 21 Dec , Matej Cepl wrote:
>>
>> Also, on the theme of stupid programmers, see
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741821 (although I am not
>> sure where the stupidity lies in this issue).
>
> With whoever decid
On 18:09 Wed 21 Dec , Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
>
> I am afraid that most of these problems are caused by stupid developers
> who are using (against all advices they were given)
The latest rawhide/kernel leaves the system clock stuck on UTC. My local
time shows up as what is really UTC. This has happened on two different
systems I've updated.
I'm using ntp which appears to be running just fine. Still looking for the
cause.
darrell
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
I am afraid that most of these problems are caused by stupid developers
who are using (against all advices they were given) com.sun.* classes
(which I am said is the most commo
2011/12/21 Sérgio Basto :
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 11:37 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> pida-0.6.2-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-gtkhtml2
>
> I also have this problem on F16 .
gtkhtml2 is long dead. The pida upstream needs to migrate it to
something else, likely webkit.
Peter
--
d
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 11:37 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> pida-0.6.2-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-gtkhtml2
I also have this problem on F16 .
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:04:21AM +0900, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
> Darryl L. Pierce wrote, at 12/21/2011 11:23 PM +9:00:
> >I have a package [1] I'd like to get through the review process, and am
> >willing to trade reviews with someone else with a Ruby package to get
> >reviewed.
> >
> >[1] https://
Darryl L. Pierce wrote, at 12/21/2011 11:23 PM +9:00:
I have a package [1] I'd like to get through the review process, and am
willing to trade reviews with someone else with a Ruby package to get
reviewed.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752089
If you would review my review re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768613
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
commit 140b7cc171f1764350ff5e439f421aa68de3dbce
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Wed Dec 21 15:30:34 2011 +0100
1.350 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Test-Loops.spec | 10 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Test-Loops:
0ac7131832b3cd9f03edfcae53d634c0 POE-Test-Loops-1.350.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768394
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar 2011-12-21 09:27:03 EST ---
Created attachment 549039
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768394
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2011-12-21 09:28:51 EST ---
Maybe IO::Socket::SSL cuts the response to early. However I have not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768394
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-12-21 09:25:02 EST ---
Created attachment 549038
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen
I have a package [1] I'd like to get through the review process, and am
willing to trade reviews with someone else with a Ruby package to get
reviewed.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752089
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after yea
Compose started at Wed Dec 21 08:15:44 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.i686 requires libLLVM-2.9.so
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.
On 12/20/2011 10:27 PM, Jerry James wrote:
polybori
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388
This is a package rename review. The original package,
python-polybori, ships the C++ and Python interfaces in the same
package. The package is being renamed to facilitate splitting the C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768613
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768612
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:27:07 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> gap
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756635
I'll trade you js-of-ocaml:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767042
for gap.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
29 matches
Mail list logo
