Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 08:27 +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:00:30 -0700 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: I realize this isn't a very constructive mail, and the point has been raised before, but I'm hoping at some point the sheer weight of complaints will cause

Re: SELinux-related Rawhide breakage today

2012-02-02 Thread Jim Meyering
Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 01/31/2012 12:07 PM, Jerry James wrote: After installing today's Rawhide updates on an x86_64 VM, I started having troubles running programs. Nothing linked with libselinux.so.1 could actually open that library; the programs were getting EACCESS on the attempt. I

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On jue, 2012-02-02 at 05:26 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: Because it is the job of people who are proposing a spec to answer the objections of the people who perform critical analysis of the spec They did answer. You just didn't like their answer. Their answer was

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On mié, 2012-02-01 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Yay cross-desktop maybe, but still a freaking disaster from a UI point of view, and the only thing I really dislike about GNOME 3 I don't think it's that bad, but that might just be me having different use patterns (for instance a

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On jue, 2012-02-02 at 01:28 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Florian Müllner wrote: No, but it would require that circle is drawn as circle and not a square (or just discarded without notice). The NotifyIcon spec explicitly allows either absurdity. If your icon theme thinks a square is a good

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On jue, 2012-02-02 at 00:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: So the argument that you're refusing to implement a cross-desktop protocol in order to ban random applications from adding themselves to the panel is bogus. Nobody said that. Florian Müllner did: Not really. We didn't implement

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On jue, 2012-02-02 at 01:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Then your implementation in gnome-shell would just be half-assed and crappy, just like your implementation of the XEmbed-based spec is. Unlike the XEmbed-based spec, the status notifier spec actually allows apps to specify whether their

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-02 Thread Tomáš Smetana
Hello, I've taken these: pfscalibration pfstmo pfstools I do use them occasionally but I know nothing about their internals. I just don't want those packages to be purged out of Fedora. I will happily pass them to somebody else or welcome any co-maintainers. Regards, -- Tomáš

@ Harald Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-02-02 Thread Frank Murphy
On 27/01/12 13:10, Harald Hoyer wrote: Hello Testers and rawhide Users, Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The directories /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks: /bin → /usr/bin /sbin → /usr/sbin /lib → /usr/lib /lib64 → /usr/lib64 if before the

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Dan Winship
On 02/01/2012 01:04 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Matthias Clasen wrote: After the fruitless discussion on xdg-list, we decided that the spec was not going to help us in implementing the desired user experience. That's not up to you to decide.

Re: @ Harald Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-02-02 Thread Rex Dieter
Frank Murphy wrote: On 27/01/12 13:10, Harald Hoyer wrote: Hello Testers and rawhide Users, Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The directories /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks: /bin → /usr/bin /sbin → /usr/sbin /lib → /usr/lib /lib64 →

Re: @ Harald Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-02-02 Thread Frank Murphy
On 02/02/12 12:42, Rex Dieter wrote: Would the /usrmove script replace the hardlink with the softlink? no. -- rex Thanks Rex, Unfortunatly I'm not a scripter. -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject UTF_8 Encoded -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Genes MailLists
Let it go kevin ... I know there are a bunch of gnome happy users (and of course the devs), but there are probably less now than earlier ... A limited sample but everyone I know - all of whom were gnome users - no longer use gnome - they have all switched to either kde or xfce (each with its own

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:26:15AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: Because it is the job of people who are proposing a spec to answer the objections of the people who perform critical analysis of the spec They did answer. You just didn't like their answer. The answer

Re: Random koji problems

2012-02-02 Thread Tom Callaway
On 02/01/2012 10:57 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: On 02/01/2012 12:24 PM, Jerry James wrote: Yes, the buildroots are both fine now. Thanks for fixing them. I was just responding to spot's apparent surprise that an updated libvpx in the buildroot should have broken package building for other

[Test-Announce] 2012-02-02 @ 17:00 UTC - F17 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #2

2012-02-02 Thread Tim Flink
# F17 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #2 # Date: 2012-02-03 # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST) # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net The second F17 alpha blocker bug review meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll be running through the final

Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-02-02 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 14:10, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: Hello Testers and rawhide Users, Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The directories /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:  /bin → /usr/bin  /sbin → /usr/sbin  /lib → /usr/lib  

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dan Winship wrote: http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2008/12/free-dektop-notifications.html That's not a fair comparison: * The KDE Plasma Workspace actually *implements* the Galago (notification) spec now (and has done so for a while), as does Unity. KDE actually *cares* about interoperability with

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Florian Müllner wrote: I actually agree to that - if we used the notifier spec in the top bar, we would either compromise on the intended experience, or provide a crappy implementation. Or in other words: the spec is a poor fit for what we try to achieve, so it makes sense to not use it. How

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 2 February 2012 12:12, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Stijn Hoop wrote: Is there a bug we can vote on? I also agree 100% with this, I rather like gnome-shell except for this 'notification system'. You seriously still think that GNOME will listen to its users??? You gotta be

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 20:12 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Stijn Hoop wrote: Is there a bug we can vote on? I also agree 100% with this, I rather like gnome-shell except for this 'notification system'. You seriously still think that GNOME will listen to its users??? You gotta be kidding!

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Florian Müllner wrote: I was talking about a supposed property called circle, not a property themedIcon with a value of circle. The spec actually contains language like this (quoting from memory, as the link to the draft on freedesktop.org is dead): Tooltip: a descriptive string which the

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthew Garrett wrote: The answer still resulted in a spec that permitted compliant implementations to have no practical interoperability. You keep repeating that, yet I still don't see ANYTHING backing that assertion. Interoperability depends only on the protocol (which is clearly

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On jue, 2012-02-02 at 20:11 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Florian Müllner wrote: I actually agree to that - if we used the notifier spec in the top bar, we would either compromise on the intended experience, or provide a crappy implementation. Or in other words: the spec is a poor fit for

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On jue, 2012-02-02 at 20:17 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: And the thing is, renaming Tooltip to Description will break all the existing implementations and provide no benefit whatsoever to the end user. It's just an internal identifier the user will never see. For all I care it could be called

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread drago01
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: The answer still resulted in a spec that permitted compliant implementations to have no practical interoperability. You keep repeating that, yet I still don't see ANYTHING backing that

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:19:44PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: The answer still resulted in a spec that permitted compliant implementations to have no practical interoperability. You keep repeating that, yet I still don't see ANYTHING backing that assertion.

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 02/03/2012 12:42 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Stijn Hoop wrote: Is there a bug we can vote on? I also agree 100% with this, I rather like gnome-shell except for this 'notification system'. You seriously still think that GNOME will listen to its users??? You gotta be kidding! You are not

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Florian Müllner wrote: It is not implemented with XEmbed. If the user runs non-GNOME software which tries to bring up a system tray icon, it is. The icon will not only be hidden in your legacy compatibility grace popup, but also be rendered using XEmbed. As I explained, both kdelibs and

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthew Garrett wrote: Samba is a project written specifically to interoperate with Windows, because the developers involved felt that interoperability was more important than the flaws in the SMB spec (to the extent that any such thing existed). My point is that interoperability between the

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:04:03PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: Samba is a project written specifically to interoperate with Windows, because the developers involved felt that interoperability was more important than the flaws in the SMB spec (to the extent that any

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Müllner
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Florian Müllner wrote: It is not implemented with XEmbed. If the user runs non-GNOME software which tries to bring up a system tray icon, it is. The discussion was about GNOME shell's top bar. No application

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthew Garrett wrote: And the people working on Gnome feel that adopting a bad specification would cost more than enhancing this interoperability would provide. And that's exactly my complaint: GNOME doesn't give a darn about compatibility with other desktops and isn't willing to make ANY

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Florian Müllner wrote: The discussion was about GNOME shell's top bar. No application (GNOME, KDE, Unity or whatever) can add anything there (using XEmbed, NotifierIcon, libnotify or whatever). That's exactly the source of the complaint: Only stuff hardcoded inside gnome-shell (or written as

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Florian Müllner wrote: [0] http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2005/04/stupidity-of-dconf.html KDE might actually adopt dconf for KDE Frameworks 5, though this seems to be still under discussion: http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/Platform_11/Settings Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list

Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
There's various issues with the hfsplus utilities we ship at the moment, including the fact that fsck.hfsplus crashes on 64-bit. I'd like to update this to the latest upstream, but code to generate legacy HFS (ie, pre-HFS+) filesystems has been dropped. HFS+ was introduced in MacOS 8.1 in

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread David Lehman
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 00:15 +, Matthew Garrett wrote: There's various issues with the hfsplus utilities we ship at the moment, including the fact that fsck.hfsplus crashes on 64-bit. I'd like to update this to the latest upstream, but code to generate legacy HFS (ie, pre-HFS+)

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread John Reiser
Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]? Plain HFS has no journal, so there are workloads where HFS is faster than HFS+ which has a journal. Is it economical to cater to such cases? Probably not. However, I do have a PowerPC Mac Mini that runs plain HFS and Fedora 10 with ext3. --

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:45:38 -0800 John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com escribió: Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]? Plain HFS has no journal, so there are workloads where HFS is faster than HFS+ which has a journal. Is it economical to cater to such cases? Probably not.

Fedora Kernel Meeting 02-03-2012

2012-02-02 Thread Josh Boyer
Hi All, Just a reminder that we'll be holding a Fedora kernel meeting in #fedora-meeting tomorrow at 18:00 UTC. We'll be chatting about the current state of the Fedora kernel, where we're heading in F17 and what we're going to be looking at otherwise. Feel free to stop by and ask questions or

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:25:50PM -0600, David Lehman wrote: My understanding is that the so-called Apple Bootstrap filesystem required for ppc Macs to boot is HFS. That's what anaconda uses for it. If we could be using HFS+ instead, fine. Is that created with hfsplus-utils or with parted?

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:45:38PM -0800, John Reiser wrote: Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]? Plain HFS has no journal, so there are workloads where HFS is faster than HFS+ which has a journal. Is it economical to cater to such cases? Probably not. However, I do have a

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:25:50PM -0600, David Lehman wrote: My understanding is that the so-called Apple Bootstrap filesystem required for ppc Macs to boot is HFS. That's what anaconda uses for it. If we could be

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-02 Thread David Lehman
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 02:43 +, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:25:50PM -0600, David Lehman wrote: My understanding is that the so-called Apple Bootstrap filesystem required for ppc Macs to boot is HFS. That's what anaconda uses for it. If we could be using HFS+

[Bug 786785] New: perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.004 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.004 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786785 Summary: perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.004 is available

[Bug 786790] New: perl-ORLite-Migrate-1.10 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-ORLite-Migrate-1.10 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786790 Summary: perl-ORLite-Migrate-1.10 is available Product:

[Bug 784256] perlbrew-0.41 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784256 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed

[Bug 786789] New: perl-ORLite-1.52 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-ORLite-1.52 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786789 Summary: perl-ORLite-1.52 is available Product: Fedora

[Bug 786791] New: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.43 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.43 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786791 Summary: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.43 is available Product:

[Bug 786789] perl-ORLite-1.52 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786789 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

File ORLite-1.52.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ORLite: d6b8edfb4b1912685fbbaa3c4ce8fc4d ORLite-1.52.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-ORLite] 1.52 bump

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Šabata
commit a85c61b39bff54b224999cab1bce973bec7aea8f Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 2 13:34:36 2012 +0100 1.52 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-ORLite.spec | 16 ++-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- diff

[Bug 786789] perl-ORLite-1.52 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786789 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 786790] perl-ORLite-Migrate-1.10 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786790 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

File ORLite-Migrate-1.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ORLite-Migrate: a397c8cecde0ed2ecbe5461f8064bbcb ORLite-Migrate-1.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-ORLite-Migrate] 1.10 bump

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 993851c83eda243f1374b16879ab581417c730b1 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 2 13:53:53 2012 +0100 1.10 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-ORLite-Migrate.spec | 11 --- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4

[Bug 786790] perl-ORLite-Migrate-1.10 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786790 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

File RT-Client-REST-0.43.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-RT-Client-REST: d6c4a47ba1c8f3cdc2ee6eb84754a62c RT-Client-REST-0.43.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-RT-Client-REST] 0.43 bump

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 8ecace5df87cdecf4779b965dc155f2a378b6bba Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 2 14:25:04 2012 +0100 0.43 bump .gitignore |1 + .rpmlint |2 + perl-RT-Client-REST.spec | 71 -- sources

[Bug 247250] Conflicting Provides

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247250 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[perl-RT-Client-REST] Disable Test::Kwalitee tests

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Pisar
commit e97107c2aa0c58434d01471ab4cde25a115ce6dc Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 2 16:01:16 2012 +0100 Disable Test::Kwalitee tests perl-RT-Client-REST.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-RT-Client-REST.spec

[Bug 786791] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.43 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786791 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

File Devel-CallChecker-0.004.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-CallChecker: 18d9aca107d6852b2597efc897fb3577 Devel-CallChecker-0.004.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Devel-CallChecker] 0.004 bump

2012-02-02 Thread Petr Pisar
commit ed01497d5177e9e58d1492aeecb491a660f10ea0 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 2 16:23:28 2012 +0100 0.004 bump .gitignore |1 + .rpmlint|2 ++ perl-Devel-CallChecker.spec |7 +-- sources |2

[Bug 786785] perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.004 is available

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786785 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 785732] Upgrade to new upstream version

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785732 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[rt3] Fix typo.

2012-02-02 Thread corsepiu
commit e3c498c4752f264025acac84a6444c4ce4162ce6 Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Feb 2 05:21:52 2012 +0100 Fix typo. README.tests |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/README.tests b/README.tests index 78b6c76..e8e633d

[rt3] Fix shebangs.

2012-02-02 Thread corsepiu
commit 9e46a6d572ab5fe802cf8e521811476122c4aa06 Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Feb 2 06:29:54 2012 +0100 Fix shebangs. - Make testsuite files executable (enables rpm's perl module dep tracking). - Build *-tests, iff devel_mode was given. - Misc.

[rt3] New.

2012-02-02 Thread corsepiu
commit 24e4097bfdd45aac61db3674cd26ee9a456050dc Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Feb 2 18:58:23 2012 +0100 New. rt-3.8.11-shebang.diff | 360 1 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 786849] False results for Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage since F17 mass rebuild

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786849 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

File System-Command-1.06.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-System-Command: 461468487acdbe0317a5729973f91bf2 System-Command-1.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-System-Command] initial import (rhbz#781705)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 8cb958ce68e6dd8ced3664e6db3b44fc3cc5cd7c Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 06:15:20 2012 +0100 initial import (rhbz#781705) .gitignore |1 + perl-System-Command.spec | 46 ++ sources

[perl-System-Command/f16] initial import (rhbz#781705)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 8cb958c... initial import (rhbz#781705) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-System-Command/f15] initial import (rhbz#781705)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 8cb958c... initial import (rhbz#781705) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File String-ToIdentifier-EN-0.06.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN: 262602c5b29b3a62fbf8ebc005bfebee String-ToIdentifier-EN-0.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN] initial import (rhbz#781793)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 4f87622752b1c1b03523b023e8ba5bade8125142 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 06:19:28 2012 +0100 initial import (rhbz#781793) .gitignore |1 + perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN.spec | 52 ++ sources

[perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN/f16] initial import (rhbz#781793)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 4f87622... initial import (rhbz#781793) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN/f15] initial import (rhbz#781793)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 4f87622... initial import (rhbz#781793) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File String-CamelCase-0.02.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-String-CamelCase: 74885aa8756fda9ff039c350214a4c09 String-CamelCase-0.02.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-String-CamelCase] initial import (rhbz#781706)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 782ecfc7c794e2218dcb1f8143cc640bbe1692f9 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 06:21:15 2012 +0100 initial import (rhbz#781706) .gitignore |1 + perl-String-CamelCase.spec | 45 sources

[perl-String-CamelCase/f16] initial import (rhbz#781706)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 782ecfc... initial import (rhbz#781706) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-String-CamelCase/f15] initial import (rhbz#781706)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 782ecfc... initial import (rhbz#781706) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M-0.001001.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M: 9c05959fdb632062ec827ec0c7335eae DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M-0.001001.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M] initial import (rhbz#781795)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 1bbc7834319e2d6eec2133f0ed70c5b1edd198bb Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 06:23:07 2012 +0100 initial import (rhbz#781795) .gitignore |1 + perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M.spec | 48 sources

[perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M/f16] initial import (rhbz#781795)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 1bbc783... initial import (rhbz#781795) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File MooseX-Attribute-Chained-1.0.1.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained: 407a3638e2eccc4a4657f2cb2b2f2378 MooseX-Attribute-Chained-1.0.1.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M/f15] initial import (rhbz#781795)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 1bbc783... initial import (rhbz#781795) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained] initial import (rhbz#784167)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 8f1c65fad3c15205c32c830d0ab3c161bd7fdeb0 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 06:24:42 2012 +0100 initial import (rhbz#784167) .gitignore |1 + perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained.spec | 71 sources

[perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained/f16] initial import (rhbz#784167)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 8f1c65f... initial import (rhbz#784167) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained/f15] initial import (rhbz#784167)

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 8f1c65f... initial import (rhbz#784167) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors] renamed to perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit c7ee3614139787731a70957de8130388ebaf59e0 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 06:42:27 2012 +0100 renamed to perl-MooseX-Attribute-Chained .gitignore|1 - dead.package |1 + perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors.spec |

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors (un)retirement

2012-02-02 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors in Fedora devel has been retired by iarnell To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

File DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.09.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch: acefd2acdf4cd66433f2c52320eb8924 DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.09.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File Devel-Declare-0.006009.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-Declare: 4914f467b86c62109d1bebc6c04a90fe Devel-Declare-0.006009.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch] update to 0.09

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 1b8bf4782329387d291534811fc25c65220bc444 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 07:26:11 2012 +0100 update to 0.09 .gitignore |1 + perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files

[perl-Devel-Declare] update to 0.006009

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit b8f70691bb4bb7e3115aa33d7d687c2336b73c21 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 07:29:42 2012 +0100 update to 0.006009 .gitignore |1 + perl-Devel-Declare.spec | 11 +++ sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5

File MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.05070420.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar: 566bc8ac848296243d5f09a41c1844d0 MooseX-Has-Sugar-0.05070420.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Email-Sender] update to 0.110003

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit d309ab025b261acc039e7e4c16b14908802f26e5 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 07:34:57 2012 +0100 update to 0.110003 .gitignore |1 + perl-Email-Sender.spec |7 +-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

[perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar] update to 0.05070420

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 156f44bc202aa44ac6807c699a25368f024cfa01 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 07:37:39 2012 +0100 update to 0.05070420 .gitignore |1 + perl-MooseX-Has-Sugar.spec |8 +--- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader] update to 0.07015

2012-02-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 32c32bf0eb57427a3f65ba620c64a929c19da57f Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Fri Feb 3 07:45:00 2012 +0100 update to 0.07015 .gitignore |1 + perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec | 28 +++- sources

  1   2   >