Hello,
Upstream synfig has updated ETL to 0.04.14. The new version of synfig
and synfigstudio depend on the recent update of that package. Is it
possible to update it?
Regards,
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic& Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
--
devel ma
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-02-13
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's Monday, and you know what that means. We don't have any
non-standard topics on the agenda this w
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>> While it may make sense to make KDE the default DE for fedora - I
>> suspect that this cannot happen in fedora due to pressures from the
>> large number of gnome devs associated with Fedora - or could it? Should
>>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:19:45AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-95/desktop-environment-of-the-year-919888/
This one had 12000 votes apparently:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/slideshow/readers-choice-2011?page=3
htt
Genes MailLists wrote:
> While it may make sense to make KDE the default DE for fedora - I
> suspect that this cannot happen in fedora due to pressures from the
> large number of gnome devs associated with Fedora - or could it? Should
> it?
IMHO, not only should the KDE spin become the default,
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> template command error in x86.tmpl:
runcmd mkefiboot --label=ANACONDA
--apple
--icon=/tmp/treebuild.20120212/output/work/x86_64/installroot/usr/share/pixmaps/bootloader/fedora.icns
/tmp/treebuild.20120212/output/17/x86_64/os/EFI/BOOT
/
A web poll from linuxquestions.org? Surely you can't be serious with
this mail?
--
Evandro
Em Dom, 2012-02-12 às 11:35 -0500, Genes MailLists escreveu:
> On 02/12/2012 06:19 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-95/deskto
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:00:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>> I always try out packages first via easy_install or pip (after checking they
>> are not already available via yum).
>>
>> Yes, I could try things via virtualenv, but I'm just not in that habit - and
>> I
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:09:11 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wrote:
> > > Compose started at Sun Feb 12 08:15:07 UTC 2012
> >
> > Think this compose worked as now see all the images/efi an
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Sun Feb 12 08:15:07 UTC 2012
>
> Think this compose worked as now see all the images/efi and everything
> else got created. Gonna try a test install to see w
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:46:18 -0600
> Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wrote:
> > > > Compose started at Sun Feb 12 08:15:07 UTC 2012
>
v/loop0',
'/tmp/lorax.imgutils.OEZeQF']' returned non-zero exit status 32
template command error in x86.tmpl: runcmd mkefiboot --label=ANACONDA
--apple
--icon=/tmp/treebuild.20120212/output/work/x86_64/installroot/usr/share/pixmaps/bootloader/fedora.icns
/tmp/treebuild.20120212/outp
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:46 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wrote:
> > > Compose started at Sun Feb 12 08:15:07 UTC 2012
> >
> > Think this compose worked as now see all the images/efi and
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Sun Feb 12 08:15:07 UTC 2012
>
> Think this compose worked as now see all the images/efi and everything
> else got created. Gonna try a test install to see wh
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 12:57:40 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:41:48AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 11, 2012 11:32:09 AM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:42:53AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > > On Monday, February 06, 2
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Sun Feb 12 08:15:07 UTC 2012
Think this compose worked as now see all the images/efi and everything
else got created. Gonna try a test install to see what happens.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:35:17AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Interesting poll - of course some will jump on it as a non-scientific
> and why it's inadequate because it either is too broad an audience or
> too narrow .. :-) Or perhaps with only 600+ participants the std error
> may be too h
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Interesting poll - of course some will jump on it as a non-scientific
> and why it's inadequate because it either is too broad an audience or
> too narrow .. :-) Or perhaps with only 600+ participants the std error
> may be too high (what
On 02/12/2012 06:19 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-95/desktop-environment-of-the-year-919888/
>
> Shows an interesting result in terms of DE popularity - though given
> the many discussions not only on Fedora lists bu
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 16:43:47 +0100,
Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > It doesn't look like Bohdi isn't set up for branched yet.
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-February/000889.html
>
> On Feb 14 will be the "
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> It doesn't look like Bohdi isn't set up for branched yet.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-February/000889.html
On Feb 14 will be the "use bodhi and do updates" switch.
Greetings,
Tom
--
devel mailing lis
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 13:52 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> c) If we want to have as many Python packages packaged in RPMs (the
> terminology is going to kill me soon) do we have some pip2spec (in the
> same manner as there is cpan2spec)?
Reading this I wrote that: https://github.com/pypingou/pypi2sp
Dear all,
I have just built python-twisted* 12.0.0 for rawhide. Please check if
everything still works as intended.
Regards,
Julian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
It doesn't look like Bohdi isn't set up for branched yet. I thought we had
made the switch over at essentially the same time we branched the source
repositories in the past. Also it looks like bugzilla hasn't been updated
yet to allow f17 as a distro version.
It looks like branched package updates
Hi
I can take up jmeters ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789251 )
I have xcftools for review. This package was recently deprecated and I am
reviving it for phatch. Here is the review request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789660
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Brendan
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-95/desktop-environment-of-the-year-919888/
Shows an interesting result in terms of DE popularity - though given
the many discussions not only on Fedora lists but on other lists for
other distros also I am not rea
What's the reason pyorbit is orphaned and deprecated? It was not part of
the recent mass orphaning and is a dep for many packages.
I just would like to know if it's worth reviving it since one of my
packages is indirectly depending on it and now refuses to build in rawhide.
Thanks
johannes
--
d
27 matches
Mail list logo
