Re: Apple will use LLVM

2012-02-21 Thread Roman Rakus
On 02/16/2012 05:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: For just -O3 or -O2 -ftree-vectorize we could perhaps have some knob in the spec files to request those extra flags, for PGO it really requires some work from the packager (but e.g. bash/grep/awk, perhaps perl/python etc. would definitely improve, gcc

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Dimitris Glezos
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > We need (and in fact > every Open Source project should require) proper attribution for the > patches we merge into our projects, and that means that commits are > properly split up. Hey Lennart, I feel commits are not the best way to

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

2012-02-21 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Am 21.02.12 14:37, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Harald Hoyer >> wrote: >>> Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: > There is no reason to hav

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

2012-02-21 Thread Harald Hoyer
Am 21.02.12 14:37, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: >>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: There is no reason to have /usr/share// and /usr/lib/, even LSB specifies that

Re: Orphaning two Drupal modules

2012-02-21 Thread Jorge Gallegos
I can take drupal6-yubikey unless someone else wants it. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:37:05AM -0500, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >I am orphaning the following packages: > >drupal6-video >drupal6-yubikey > >Each module

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:20:32 +0100 Alan Pevec wrote: > Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team > approved on transifex? BTW, Aeolus Image Warehouse had to dump Transifex. It was impossible to build anything without having an account there, and that was unacceptable,

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:25:59AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On 02/21/2012 10:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>> File a ticket with FESCo with your proposed change in the policy. > >> > >> Why does it need a policy change at all to apply a 1

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:39:10 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On 02/21/2012 10:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>> File a ticket with FESCo with your proposed change in the policy. > >> > >> Why does it need a policy change at all to apply a 1-2 da

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 02/21/2012 06:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Do we really need a policy saying "Use common sense. In case of conflicts, this supersedes all other policies."? It's often hard to distinguish common sense from equally common nonsense. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

Re: Package review: SC - Script Collection

2012-02-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Simon Erat wrote: > What has been prepared so far: > * http://sf.net/p/seasc (source code, in sub projects) > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795696 (review request) > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/rpm.sc.template.spec > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/changelog > * http://sea.host

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 00:25 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Do we really need a policy saying "Use common sense. In case of conflicts, > this supersedes all other policies."? Absolutely not. > Why isn't this obvious? :-/ Because common sense is anything but common, and often not sense. -- Adam

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 02/21/2012 10:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> File a ticket with FESCo with your proposed change in the policy. >> >> Why does it need a policy change at all to apply a 1-2 day grace period? > > Any change in policy requires you to file a ticket

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 02/21/2012 10:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> File a ticket with FESCo with your proposed change in the policy. >> >> Why does it need a policy change at all to apply a 1-2 day grace period? > > Any change in policy requires you to file a ticket

Change in %cmake macro in rawhide

2012-02-21 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm going to be building a new cmake package (2.8.7-6.fc18) shortly for rawhide that will strip the following define from the macro: -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=%{_libdir} \\\ See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795542 for some background info. -- Orion Poplawski Technical

File Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.050.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2012-02-21 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib: 631b71ece01d148306c07f92f4f0fd06 Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.050.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: /usrmove? -> about the future

2012-02-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 12:31 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > - Original Message - > > On 02/10/2012 06:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > systemd was explicitly written to be 100% sysv-compatible > > > > Mostly compatible, but not 100%. > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Inc

Re: F16 how to install "less" ruby gem?

2012-02-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 21.2.2012 18:30, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): Hi, I want to install "less" gem. I switched to root account, and typed # gem install less Fetching: therubyracer-0.9.10.gem (100%) Building native extensions. This could take a while... ... And it's all - install process stops. When I check

[perl-Params-Classify] Created tag perl-Params-Classify-0.013-5.el5

2012-02-21 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Params-Classify-0.013-5.el5' was created pointing to: cb20467... Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin

Re: JPEG_LIB_VERSION in libjpeg-turbo

2012-02-21 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 20.02.2012 09:54, Christophe Fergeau pisze: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 09:46:56PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> Dear fellow Fedora packagers >> >> I was trying to get MAME [1] to use system libjpeg [2]. The problem is >> that MAME needs jpeg_mem_src, which is only defined if libjpeg-turbo

Re: F17 httpd 2.4?

2012-02-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : > Hi, > > Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 > http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html > ? > > This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features. Not likely this late in the cycle, though the timing is great for f18

F17 httpd 2.4?

2012-02-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html ? This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

[Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Andre Robatino
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing inst

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:38:05PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 21.02.12 02:09, Kévin Raymond (shai...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Heya, > > > It tooks me few hours as this is my first python script :) > > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projec

PyXML package - deprecate it?

2012-02-21 Thread Roman Rakus
Hi all, looks like PyXML package is deprecated since python itself provides xml mechanisms. When you look deeper, python's xml provides: "dom", "parsers", "sax", "etree" and PyXML provides: 'dom', 'marshal', 'parsers', 'sax', 'schema', 'utils', 'xpath', 'xslt' So, PyXML duplicates dom, parsers

Fedora 17: NTH fix for openldap available

2012-02-21 Thread Jan Vcelak
Hello, I just pushed fixed openldap to updates-testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.29-3.fc17 Please, test it and give it some karma! Especially SSSD users. Thanks & Regards, Jan > > Accepted NTH > > > 6. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771484

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:50:34AM +0800, Cheng-Chia Tseng wrote: > News from Lennart Poettering, comment on PulseAudio translation: > > "We disabled the Transifex hookup when Tx stopped to apply changes in > separate commits to git. We need proper attribution of translation changes, > and that al

[Bug 791078] perl-Config-IniFiles should require IO::Scalar

2012-02-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-21 12:36:49 EST --- perl-Config-IniFiles-2.68-3.fc15 has been submitted as an

[Bug 791078] perl-Config-IniFiles should require IO::Scalar

2012-02-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-21 12:36:22 EST --- perl-Config-IniFiles-2.68-3.fc16 has been submitted as an

[Bug 791078] perl-Config-IniFiles should require IO::Scalar

2012-02-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-21 12:36:41 EST --- perl-Config-IniFiles-2.68-3.fc17 has been submitted as an

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 02/21/2012 10:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> File a ticket with FESCo with your proposed change in the policy. > > Why does it need a policy change at all to apply a 1-2 day grace period? Any change in policy requires you to file a ticket with FESCo. If you just want t

Heads up: procps-ng 3.3.2 introduction (can break more than 30 packages)

2012-02-21 Thread Jaromir Capik
Hello, folks. I'm going to replace our current (legacy) procps tools with new generation procps tools (procps-ng) in next 2 weeks. The procps-ng tools are still pretty compatible with the old ones, but anyway, this change might have a negative impact on the following packages listed by the repoque

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Packages that were affected via rpm dependencies were listed as part of > the announcement. I looked through the list for packages I cared about and > in one case let the asterisk packers know about a dependency of asterisk > that was on the list that I didn't want to maint

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 18:26:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Half of the distro was affected by the indiscriminate mass orphaning done > this time. There was no way to know which packages would still have been > affected at the end. Packages that were affected via rpm dependencies were li

Re: /usrmove? -> about the future

2012-02-21 Thread Doug Ledford
- Original Message - > On 02/10/2012 06:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > systemd was explicitly written to be 100% sysv-compatible > > Mostly compatible, but not 100%. > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibilities You're both joking, right? That isn't 100% compati

F16 how to install "less" ruby gem?

2012-02-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I want to install "less" gem. I switched to root account, and typed # gem install less Fetching: therubyracer-0.9.10.gem (100%) Building native extensions. This could take a while... ... And it's all - install process stops. When I check what is happening with ps I get ps -aux : root

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Note that there already is a grace period. The policy used to be that a > review was needed after a package was orphaned. No. The policy used to be that a review was needed if the package was 1. orphaned AND 2. not updated for 3 months. And there was basically no enforce

Heads up: procps-ng 3.3.2 introduction (can break more than 30 packages)

2012-02-21 Thread Jaromir Capik
Hello, folks. I'm going to replace our current (legacy) procps tools with new generation procps tools (procps-ng) in next 2 weeks. The procps-ng tools are still pretty compatible with the old ones, but anyway, this change might have a negative impact on the following packages listed by the repoque

[perl-Config-IniFiles/f15] missing Requires

2012-02-21 Thread Tom Callaway
commit 5c5c946d476f8955de323d09584c83b6689110b1 Author: Tom Callaway Date: Tue Feb 21 12:20:16 2012 -0500 missing Requires perl-Config-IniFiles.spec | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Config-IniFiles.spec b/perl-Config-IniFiles.spec i

[perl-Config-IniFiles/el6] missing Requires

2012-02-21 Thread Tom Callaway
commit f54d7427232d213bfaa9aa0c692ca6e4d4777867 Author: Tom Callaway Date: Tue Feb 21 12:20:02 2012 -0500 missing Requires perl-Config-IniFiles.spec | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Config-IniFiles.spec b/perl-Config-IniFiles.spec i

[perl-Config-IniFiles/el5] missing Requires

2012-02-21 Thread Tom Callaway
commit ea76a1327d3fc8e00ecaf6c34549e830864d02c9 Author: Tom Callaway Date: Tue Feb 21 12:19:47 2012 -0500 missing Requires perl-Config-IniFiles.spec | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Config-IniFiles.spec b/perl-Config-IniFiles.spec i

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Nelson Marques
Adam, I understand, this is more a hype thing than testing marathon... either way everything worked out out of the box (on real hardware). The only glitch I noticed was on the first boot screen the buttons (and potentially some checkboxes) were off-screen and I couldn't see them. Tab + trial/error

[Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Andre Robatino
> For the record, we intentionally don't include a direct download link in > the announcement, because we want to strongly encourage people to read > the actual testing instructions before downloading. Actually, I don't use direct download links because it scales better. There are several test pag

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 17:55:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > File a ticket with FESCo with your proposed change in the policy. > > Why does it need a policy change at all to apply a 1-2 day grace period? > (More days have passed now, but that's just because we all lo

Re: rawhide/F17 broken dependencies: please stop spamming

2012-02-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rahul Sundaram wrote: > File a ticket with FESCo with your proposed change in the policy. Why does it need a policy change at all to apply a 1-2 day grace period? (More days have passed now, but that's just because we all lost a lot more time discussing this than it would have taken an admin to

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

2012-02-21 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:17:30PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 20:18, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:30:11PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> On Mon, 20.02.12 09:25, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote: > > >> > This sounds like the unit

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 21.02.12 02:09, Kévin Raymond (shai...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > Hi guys, Heya, > It tooks me few hours as this is my first python script :) > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects who appears > dead, here they are: > > (see bellow for the explaination) > @deve

Orphaning two Drupal modules

2012-02-21 Thread Eric "Sparks" Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am orphaning the following packages: drupal6-video drupal6-yubikey Each module has a bug (728803 and 728804) against them involving bundling of external source which was not caught during the packaging or review. Anyone wishing to take ownership f

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:11 +, Nelson Marques wrote: > Thanks a lot. Going for a ride with it now .) For the record, we intentionally don't include a direct download link in the announcement, because we want to strongly encourage people to read the actual testing instructions before downloadin

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Kévin Raymond
Le mardi 21 févr. 2012 à 12:05:01 (+0100), Petr Pisar a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:15:41AM +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote: > > you NEED to sign the Disclaimer with the FSF… > > This is not true. The disclaimer is required only for FSF projects becuase the > disclaimer is demanded by proje

Re: F17 Slowness

2012-02-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Tacking a .debug into EXTRARELEASE for the usual rawhide case might still be >> a >> good idea.  I'll look into that tomorrow. > > FYI, I committed a changed to do thi this morning.  It should be in tomorrow's > rawhide and whatever kernel we

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:54:13 + Nelson Marques wrote: > Hi, > > Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a > link to a .iso ? :) You can find the images at: - http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/17-Alpha.RC3/ Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature --

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Nelson Marques
Thanks a lot. Going for a ride with it now .) NM 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nelson Marques wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a >> link to a .iso ? :) >> >> Thx. >> >> 2012/2/21 Andre Robatino : >>> As per the Fed

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nelson Marques wrote: > Hi, > > Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a > link to a .iso ? :) > > Thx. > > 2012/2/21 Andre Robatino : >> As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 >> (RC3) is now available for

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi, Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a link to a .iso ? :) Thx. 2012/2/21 Andre Robatino : > As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 > (RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including > changes, can be found at htt

[Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2012-02-21 Thread Andre Robatino
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing inst

[perl-HTTP-Exception] Update to 0.04, move to Makefile.PL

2012-02-21 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit c0e61812e28c6c3f654bd3e7ee443d104a72e5d8 Author: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Tue Feb 21 14:51:31 2012 +0100 Update to 0.04, move to Makefile.PL .gitignore |1 + perl-HTTP-Exception.spec | 23 +++ sources |2 +- 3 files changed,

File Catalyst-Action-REST-0.98.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-21 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Action-REST: 67e9b0e0fd50c4f400426f4b5d0eceb8 Catalyst-Action-REST-0.98.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

[perl-threads/f17] rebuild on PPC

2012-02-21 Thread Karsten Hopp
commit b72c5827927a5947bf826cd231f9020b466652c1 Author: Karsten Hopp Date: Tue Feb 21 14:50:37 2012 +0100 rebuild on PPC perl-threads.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-threads.spec b/perl-threads.spec index 833e519..1e689d6 100644 --

Re: Fedora Engineering "Open House" IRC Meeting - Thursday, February 23, 2012 - 1800 UTC

2012-02-21 Thread Tom Callaway
On 02/20/2012 03:24 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Apologies in advance for the wide distribution of this message. > > The Fedora Engineering team is holding an "Open House" IRC meeting on > Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 18:00 UTC (12:00 PM EST). This will be a > moderated meeting in which we will bri

[perl-Test-utf8] update to 1.00

2012-02-21 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 36dc5747c67d5c4f87c515e7b4d22a70772d8248 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Tue Feb 21 06:46:13 2012 -0700 update to 1.00 .gitignore |1 + perl-Test-utf8.spec | 28 +--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

2012-02-21 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: >>> There is no reason to have >>> /usr/share// and /usr/lib/, even LSB specifies that >>> only a _single_ dir should be used, hence the one

Re: RATS: now in production

2012-02-21 Thread Kamil Paral
> On 02/21/2012 10:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > the rats_install test runs an entirely automated test of the Fedora > > installer daily, against the daily installer composes provided by > > release engineering. It provides detailed logs and pinpoints where > > failure occurs if the ins

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:15:41AM +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote: > you NEED to sign the Disclaimer with the FSF… This is not true. The disclaimer is required only for FSF projects becuase the disclaimer is demanded by project maintainer, not by Translation Project infrastructure. -- Petr pgpQIn

Package review: SC - Script Collection

2012-02-21 Thread Simon Erat
Hello everyone The last 17 years i've been self employee and built LAN and WAN's for small and medium companies as well as for private customers. Made their intranet pages, teached them how to use 'office' applications, wheter that may be mac or windows based, prepared document templates, set up s

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Kévin Raymond
Le mardi 21 févr. 2012 à 10:46:35 (+0100), Jim Meyering a écrit : > ... > > [D] iwhd > > I deliberately switched iwhd from transifex to http://translationproject.org > because the latter provides anonymous rsync access, while transifex requires > that one register and use an account merely to dow

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

2012-02-21 Thread Harald Hoyer
Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: >> /usr/share in our general understanding not to be used for >> package-private things. > Who is "we"? This is in direct conflict with the FHS: > > "Any program or package which contains or requir

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Kévin Raymond
Le mardi 21 févr. 2012 à 10:20:32 (+0100), Alan Pevec a écrit : > > Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team > approved on transifex? > I see few teams hanging in requested state at > https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora/ They have probably not done all nece

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Jim Meyering
Kévin Raymond wrote: > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects who appears > dead, here they are: ... > [D] iwhd I deliberately switched iwhd from transifex to http://translationproject.org because the latter provides anonymous rsync access, while transifex requires that one r

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Alan Pevec
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Kévin Raymond wrote: > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team approved on transifex? I see few teams hanging in requested state at https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fe