On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:43 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
Il giorno ven, 02/03/2012 alle 14.41 +0200, Jonathan Dieter ha scritto:
I've orphaned buoh and libsoup22 in all active branches of Fedora. Buoh
is a GTK online comics reader that I haven't used in forever and
libsoup22 is a compat
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:05 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Ok, as it's been a week, I'm going to go ahead and retire buoh. I won't
retire libsoup22 as it appears that at least one other package is using
it.
Jonathan
And it appears that I can't commit my changes in git. I'm assuming it's
On Mar 9, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
if your file system places data inefficiently on disk/storage, you want
to measure this, too. If you're comparing file system speed, I think,
you should measure the whole thing and be sure to create comparable
data.
The source files are
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:46:58 +, SB (Sérgio) wrote:
Hi,
I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora.
I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version.
The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to
review , or is already
As smb4k is a KDE Platform based app, I can also help with review,
just we will have to find a sponsor.
Also please go through the current packaging guidelines as Michael
already pointed you to it.
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
Hi,
I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 09:52 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
2012/3/8 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz:
The lazy answer to both is fail, or not, the same way as cups
currently fails, or not (in fact, could the session printing service
simply be cups that treats the system instance as another remote
Quoting Garrett Holmstrom (2012-03-08 23:11:26)
On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Remove mention of maven2 in guidelines since all supported versions
have maven-3.x. Some other small cleanups as well perhaps
Is there already a separate set of java
On 03/09/2012 08:12 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:05 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Ok, as it's been a week, I'm going to go ahead and retire buoh. I won't
retire libsoup22 as it appears that at least one other package is using
it.
Jonathan
And it appears that I can't
- Original Message -
From: Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 11:58:39 AM
Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora
Quoting Garrett Holmstrom
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:20 +, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 03/09/2012 08:12 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
If a provenpackager could help me, please, I'd like to retire buoh in
master and f17 (if possible).
Done. All that's left for you to do is to file a rel-eng ticket to get
the package to
I've got a lot of messages like this:
Mar 9 07:31:49 nbecker1 dbus-daemon[987]: ** (upowerd:1208): WARNING **:
Property get or set does not have an interface string as first arg
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as 'complete'
long before the data is ever written, sometimes?
I'm
On 03/09/2012 08:42, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as
'complete'
long
The lightweight tag 'perl-constant-boolean-0.02-5.el6' was created pointing to:
e708c4f... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, David Quigley seli...@davequigley.com wrote:
On 03/09/2012 08:42, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
Summary of changes:
ab75957... Update to 0.0504 (*)
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On 03/09/2012 11:00, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, David Quigley
seli...@davequigley.com wrote:
On 03/09/2012 08:42, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, exactly, and that is what I'm suggesting. For printing entirely in
the user session it is a case of using an alternative to using CUPS
running on the local machine, so that means:
a) no filters or drivers; the job
Hello,
I have submitted the application[1] on-behalf the Fedora project for GSoC 2012.
Thanks for supporting and volunteering to mentor the ideas[2].
Please feel free to explore the GSoC portal in Fedora wiki[3] and the
use the Talk: page for discussions.
The selected organizations list will be
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:15:07 +0530
Buddhike Kurera bckur...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Anuj More anujmo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I was thinking of porting something like AUR (Arch User Repository)
to Fedora. I have blogged about it, and any feedback about
* Mattia Verga [09/03/2012 23:26] :
why
bugzilla should accept to create bugs for unmaintained versions? Is
there a logic that I cannot see, or it could be a thing to tweak?
Bugzilla did not have the ability to retire versions until
Hi.
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:58:16 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote
Confirming:
/usr/bin/qemu-kvm -cdrom Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-DVD.iso -boot d -m
2048 -vga vmware fails to initialize X and falls back to text.
It works with any of -vga cirrus/std/qxl. I have not found Anaconda
Bug for it, if it
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:03 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
When's the last time this has been confirmed to work?
It always worked, for example for:
Fedora-16-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso
It crashes even with /usr/bin/X and xorg-x11-drv-vmware-11.0.3-13.fc17.x86_64
(not just in the installer):
In the process of updating the muParser package to the latest upstream
release, I am unable to construct a proper Sourceforge URL for the
upstream release that meets the Fedora packaging guideline. Can someone
more expert about Sourceforge URLs please give me a hand?
The file I want is
Eric Smith writes:
I'm probably doing something dumb, but I can't seem to get that file from
any variant of a download.sourceforge.net URL that I've tried, using
different variations of the case of the P in the project name, etc.
On 03/09/2012 08:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
In the process of updating the muParser package to the latest upstream
release, I am unable to construct a proper Sourceforge URL for the
upstream release that meets the Fedora packaging guideline. Can someone
more expert about Sourceforge URLs please
Orion Poplawski wrote:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/muparser/muparser_v2_2_2.zip
Thanks! I could have sworn that I tried that one, but I guess I must
have screwed it up somehow.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 3/9/12 10:18 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/muparser/muparser_v2_2_2.zip
Thanks! I could have sworn that I tried that one, but I guess I must have
screwed it up somehow.
When all else fails, there is always the documentation ;)
(of course
Hey, folks. We made a fairly significant call at the blocker review
meeting today, and agreed to notify devel list and FESCo (I'll file a
FESCo ticket also) so everyone's aware and can raise objections if they
wish.
The bug under discussion was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591630 .
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 20:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. We made a fairly significant call at the blocker review
meeting today, and agreed to notify devel list and FESCo (I'll file a
FESCo ticket also) so everyone's aware and can raise objections if they
wish.
The bug under
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 20:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. We made a fairly significant call at the blocker review
meeting today, and agreed to notify devel list and FESCo (I'll file a
FESCo ticket also)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801738
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2012-03-09 05:27:41
EST ---
This issue affects the version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801738
--- Comment #2 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2012-03-09 06:12:12
EST ---
CVE Request:
[5]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801738
Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Runtime:
8e13bec8a75f363ae7adada5e8d48866 Catalyst-Runtime-5.90011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 30c3af9ba17eb9ce089c37dfd1bbff1c6c4a6aab
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Mar 9 06:18:52 2012 -0700
update to 5.90011
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Catalyst-Runtime.spec |8 ++--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 8
Summary of changes:
30c3af9... update to 5.90011 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
30c3af9... update to 5.90011 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-8.el6' was created pointing to:
c54e665... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
05a4bdd... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
ab75957... Update to 0.0504 (*)
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
8009c18... Perl mass rebuild (*)
05a4bdd... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
ab75957... Update to 0.0504 (*)
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
Summary of changes:
ab75957... Update to 0.0504 (*)
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-2.el6' was created pointing to:
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-2.fc15' was created pointing to:
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-2.fc16' was created pointing to:
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-2.fc17' was created pointing to:
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-2.fc18' was created pointing to:
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800241
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-09
11:59:20 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800241
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-09
11:59:29 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800241
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-Package-DeprecationManager:
f81ae3c0f9bcac048eb4bff348b79f67 Package-DeprecationManager-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 20a967eefae64ce67a69d82de0f82ae4479f85be
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Mar 9 18:50:34 2012 +
Update to 0.13
- New upstream release 0.13:
- Fix dist.ini to not add Test::Spelling as a requirement
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
-
Summary of changes:
20a967e... Update to 0.13 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.13-1.fc17' was created
pointing to:
20a967e... Update to 0.13
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.13-1.fc18' was created
pointing to:
20a967e... Update to 0.13
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720744
Ed Santiago santi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Rebuild required to work correctly with perl 5.14.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801898
Summary: Rebuild required to work correctly with perl
Summary of changes:
b1a3ebb... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801898
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-Cover-0.78-3.fc16' was created pointing to:
b1a3ebb... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801898
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-09
17:19:23 EST ---
perl-Devel-Cover-0.78-3.fc16 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801738
Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
62 matches
Mail list logo
