On 05/23/2012 02:12 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 05/22/2012 12:33 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
True, I agree now. It is just so slow (0m2.693s now, 0m4.222s with
drop_caches=3) I expected it waits for network.
Just out of curiosity, which package is that? I'm seeing a much bigger
difference
On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:10:17 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 23:30:27 +0300
Otherwise this sounds like great stuff to talk to rpm upstream
about. ;)
Since the discussion is pretty much done here, I'll talk to RPM guys and see if
they find this to be a good
Hey,
I am looking for some kind people to review the following packages:
Carbon: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824348
graphite-web: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824357
whisper: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824361
--
Aditya Patawari
Compose started at Wed May 23 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires
As you have (hopefully) heard by now, elections for the Fedora Board,
FESCo, and FAmSCo are quickly approaching.
In each election cycle, a series of town hall meetings is held to give
community members and opportunity to ask candidates questions - and hear
their answers - via IRC.
The town
Please join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this
important meeting, wherein we shall determine the shipment readiness of
F17 Final.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 @ 17:00 UTC (13:00 EDT/10:00 PDT)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if
Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2012, 16:19:22 schrieb Aditya Patawari:
Hey,
I am looking for some kind people to review the following packages:
Carbon: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824348
graphite-web: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824357
whisper:
Compose started at Wed May 23 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:48 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote
So I'd like to submit a new msp430mcu package for review.
I've now submitted this for review. Thanks for the feedback everyone.
It'd be great if someone could find the time to review it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824478
On 05/22/2012 11:53 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Well, here's what I see after drop_caches=3 from 'strace -tt fedpkg
verrel' on kernel.spec which is one of the most complicated specs in
Fedora land:
09:09:06.928011 fedpkg exec
09:09:12.699345 python imports done
09:09:13.510192
Hi,
There are an increasing number of ARM Cortex-M based boards around, and
I'd like to get a cross-compilation toolchain for them into the Fedora
repositories. I'd like to make it just as easy to compile for Cortex-M
chips under Fedora as it is to compile for AVR or MSP430 targets right
now
On 05/23/2012 06:07 PM, Rob Spanton wrote:
Hi,
There are an increasing number of ARM Cortex-M based boards around, and
I'd like to get a cross-compilation toolchain for them into the Fedora
repositories. I'd like to make it just as easy to compile for Cortex-M
chips under Fedora as it is to
I just got caught in having two different validate commands in my
path.
The /usr/bin/validate version is from the dnssec-tools package. It has a
man page and usage info and is a tool to diagnose dnssec lookups.
The /usr/sbin/validate version is from the mod_auth_shadow package. It
has no man
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 14:22 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
I just got caught in having two different validate commands in my
path.
The /usr/bin/validate version is from the dnssec-tools package. It has a
man page and usage info and is a tool to diagnose dnssec lookups.
The /usr/sbin/validate
Short story:
I'm working on creating kernel module packages for the ZFS file system
from zfsonlinux.org to be hosted at RPM Fusion and will utilize the
akmods utility to make sure that new modules are built on kernel
update.
Problem:
The zfs package also needs the SPL (Solaris Porting Layer)
For both Fedora branches and EPEL. If anyone wants it, let me know. Or,
you know where to pick it up.
--
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:03:25PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
For both Fedora branches and EPEL. If anyone wants it, let me know. Or,
you know where to pick it up.
Scratch that.
--
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA |
On Wed, 23.05.12 14:23, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
Short story:
I'm working on creating kernel module packages for the ZFS file system
from zfsonlinux.org to be hosted at RPM Fusion and will utilize the
akmods utility to make sure that new modules are built on kernel
update.
What does Fedora do currently, if anything, to optimize for solid-state drives
(SSD).
Things like swap and logging can generate a huge number of writes. So I
suppose those should maybe be placed on a
rotating drive if one is available but if not does Fedora do anything to reduce
the amount of
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
The whole idea of akmods (to compile kernel modules early at boot) is
simply flawed. If you want to do such a thing then compile the modules
when you install the updated kernel, not at boot, when it is too
late.
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-05-23/fedora-meeting-1.2012-05-23-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
The Fedora ARM team is pleased to announce that the Fedora 17 Beta for ARM is
now available
for download from:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/17-Beta/Images/
Please visit the announcement page for additional information and links to
specific hardware images
as
Rob Spanton wrote:
There are an increasing number of ARM Cortex-M based boards around, and
I'd like to get a cross-compilation toolchain for them into the Fedora
repositories.
I hope you're more successful with that than I was. I found a
resounding lack of interest when I put an
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:22:35PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
I just got caught in having two different validate commands in my
path.
The /usr/bin/validate version is from the dnssec-tools package. It has a
man page and usage info and is a tool to diagnose dnssec lookups.
I humbly suggest
Summary of changes:
a508249... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
94065c2... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
a05396d... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
323d99c... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
7bdc939... dist-git conversion (*)
4514731... Merge
commit 45147316af7ceb6821939a789d07763fa32461d2
Merge: 4ecc2ac 7bdc939
Author: Mark Chappell mchap...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 23 09:21:14 2012 +0200
Merge up the version that's in use
.gitignore|1 -
perl-namespace-autoclean.spec | 10 --
sources
perl-Net-OpenSSH has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
On i386:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
Please resolve
- Original Message -
On 05/23/2012 04:57 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Regarding pyp2rpm itself, running pip install pyp2rpm (or
easy_install pyp2rpm) on my Fedora 16 workstation gives me a
traceback
with RuntimeError: That compression method is not supported.
Hmm, that is
As you have (hopefully) heard by now, elections for the Fedora Board,
FESCo, and FAmSCo are quickly approaching.
In each election cycle, a series of town hall meetings is held to give
community members and opportunity to ask candidates questions - and hear
their answers - via IRC.
The town
Please join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this
important meeting, wherein we shall determine the shipment readiness of
F17 Final.
Thursday, May 24, 2012 @ 17:00 UTC (13:00 EDT/10:00 PDT)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if
30 matches
Mail list logo
