On 06/02/2012 11:32 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You are responsible as a package maintainer for bugs against
the package. If you don't want to deal with it, give up the package or
find a co-maintainer who will deal with such issues. When you
On 06/03/2012 12:12 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
At the same time I don't want to be obliged to support something I
don't want to. There are many more important things to deal with in
the distribution than a stupid secure boot feature.
Let's narrow it down. Can you give a clear and specific
On 06/03/2012 07:05 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
But don't you think that if they are determined enough to go to bugzilla
and make an entry they
are smart enough to turn off secure boot? I guess my feeling is that
people that have the where
withall to attempt to load another OS on their Windows
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:12 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
At the same time I don't want to be obliged to support something I
don't want to. There are many more important things to deal with in
the distribution than a stupid secure boot feature.
Let's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Accidentally sent the earlier message to the old Red Hat-hosted devel
list.
- Original Message
Subject: Review swap requests for Lars Wirzenius' new Obnam backup tool
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:45:12 +0700
From: Michel Alexandre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2012 01:45 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
I've just packaged Obnam, Lars Wirzenius' new B-tree-based backup
tool (think btrfs for backup), whose 1.0 release was recently
announced on Linux Weekly News on Friday, June 1st:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Two more Python packages, if anyone is interested in swapping:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827722 - for
python-qrcode, a dependency for GNU Health
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827723 - GNU Health
Feel free to
fre 2012-06-01 klockan 09:48 -0700 skrev Adam Williamson:
Frankly, I'd prefer it if we more strongly recommended that people do
DVD/netinst upgrades. That path is less complex than preupgrade and
involves fewer moving parts; it's easier to test and easier to fix and
more likely, in general,
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:00 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:25:43PM +0200, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 19:31 +0200, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
Hello,
I have a couple of packaging questions for a new package, the FPS game
redeclipse[0], which
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 14:47 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827722 - for
python-qrcode, a dependency for GNU Health
Don't forget to check the bugzilla before submitting a package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824628
Pure python
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 11:48 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Plus, there are comments on your spec file which you apparently did
not read.
I should have said, that you forgot.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
drago01 wrote:
We have to make our software better then the competition being free by
itself is not enough to gain market traction. Having a complicated
installation procedure sure does not help this case.
Our goal is freedom, not market share!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Just because people have the ability to install Fedora and post in a
forum doesn't mean that you can reliably assume that they are willing to
fiddle with BIOS settings on their system or they would prefer that over
a installation that just works. We have worked for years
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Create a pre-bootloder. If secureboot is enabled only permitting this
boot because it's signed with the msft key, then display the most
helpful instructions WRT secureboot we can display and then halt. If
secureboot is not enabled, pass control to grub.
This
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
As long as the secure boot is detectable in runtime, the maintainer
(I) will have the choice to support or not support users using or
not using this feature. This is the freedom I was afraid to lose. But
I learned that this is not the case.
Uh, it IS the case. Arbitrarily
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
drago01 wrote:
We have to make our software better then the competition being free by
itself is not enough to gain market traction. Having a complicated
installation procedure sure does not help this case.
Our goal
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
The goal you've set—Fedora working out of the box on this hardware
without user fuss—can't be accomplished via technical means, except by
restricting the bootloader and kernel. There is no law of nature
which says that this must be your goal, however.
There's at least
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates.
This time f16-f17. Used preupgrade.
I'd like to share with you my
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:21:55PM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates.
The discussion has been very interesting, and it is probably being followed
by a lot of non-Fedora developers as well.
[To be honest, I first bought the
pro-find-a-simple-enough-work-around-to-SecureBoot-issue arguments. But,
reading through the arguments from KK, Adam and some others, I must
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I am more concerned about the package maintenance level. At the
package maintenance level, it does not make sense to patch against the
upstream decision.
It does. If upstream arbitrarily refuses to support a use case we
On 06/02/2012 12:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
What happens if you try and boot an unsigned image? I assume the error
you get is up to the BIOS folks? So, it could be misleading, confusing,
depressing or all three. It may be that people will see just Failed to
secure boot and think there's
On 06/02/2012 05:47 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
There is no additional security provided by the feature as so far
described—only security theater. So I can't modify the kernel or
bootloader, great—but the kernel wouldn't have let me do that in the
first place unless it had an exploit. So I just
On 06/02/2012 03:28 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Matthew Garrettmj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Per spec the machine simply falls back to attempting to execute the next
entry in the boot list. An implementation may provide some feedback that
that's the case, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2012 04:48 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 14:47 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827722 - for
python-qrcode, a dependency for GNU Health
Don't forget to check the
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 21:37 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Exchanged against:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821267 Review Request:
R-BiocGenerics - Generic functions for Bioconductor
Assigning to myself; will do that tomorrow. Thanks!
Thank you :)
Pierre
--
devel
Compose started at Sun Jun 3 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
Hi,
I'm looking for sponsor for the following proposed packages:
Lithuanian dictionaries for StarDict
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781766
Double-array trie implementation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733925
Thanks.
--
Aurimas
signature.asc
Description:
First - If this is the wrong place for this please tell me where.
Rawhide (Fedora 18)
I have never been able to install and configure any of the 3.5.0
kernels. They install but fail to create a initramfs file. Hence they
will not boot.
I have seen two different 'failed' messages. One from today
Adam Williamson wrote:
Frankly, I'd prefer it if we more strongly recommended that people do
DVD/netinst upgrades.
I refuse to buy writable DVDs or CDs, because if I did I would be giving money
to the copyright lobby, helping to finance its campaign for ever-increasing
mass surveillance and
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:56:48PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Frankly, I'd prefer it if we more strongly recommended that people do
DVD/netinst upgrades.
I refuse to buy writable DVDs or CDs, because if I did I would be giving
money
to the copyright lobby,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/3/2012 1:56 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Frankly, I'd prefer it if we more strongly recommended that
people do DVD/netinst upgrades.
I refuse to buy writable DVDs or CDs, because if I did I would be
giving money to the
David dgboles at gmail.com writes:
In all cases I did not get an initramfs. In all cases these kernels will
not boot.
I have
kernel-3.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64
kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc18.x86_64
kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git12.1.fc18.x86_64
installed, I have an initramfs for all of them, and testing
Pavel,
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it
was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and
then ask help to push updates too.
I think in that turn now I can do all that myself, so it
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:02 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
First - If this is the wrong place for this please tell me where.
Rawhide (Fedora 18)
I have never been able to install and configure any of the 3.5.0
kernels. They install but fail to create a initramfs file. Hence they
will
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
David dgboles at gmail.com writes:
In all cases I did not get an initramfs. In all cases these kernels will
not boot.
I have
kernel-3.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64
kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc18.x86_64
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
You can write .iso image to USB key¹ and boot from it, you know.
Even the installation DVD images? What I've heard is that that only works with
the live CD images.
(The copyright lobby taxes even USB keys in Sweden now, but I have some that I
bought before they started
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
You can write .iso image to USB key¹ and boot from it, you know.
Even the installation DVD images? What I've heard is that that only works with
the live CD images.
Indeed, even the DVD images.
On 6/3/2012 4:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:02 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
First - If this is the wrong place for this please tell me where.
Rawhide (Fedora 18)
I have never been able to install and configure any of the 3.5.0
kernels. They install but fail to
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
You can write .iso image to USB key¹ and boot from it, you know.
Even the installation DVD images? What I've heard is that that only works
with the live CD images.
Josh Boyer jwboyer at gmail.com writes:
That sounds like a deltarpm problem. The kernel-devel package has that
file in it, and it's a normal file not a symlink or something. If you
download the full RPM and install it via RPM (not yum, or disable the
deltarpm plugin) does it exist?
On 03/06/12 21:26, Josh Boyer wrote:
In all cases I did not get an initramfs. In all cases these kernels will
not boot.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826689
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824981
I've had this a while, as discussed on test list.
I blame dracut,
On Qui, 2012-05-31 at 14:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 22:21 +0200, Caterpillar wrote:
I would like to share my experience about upgrading from Fedora 16 to
17 a quiet number of machines.
100% percenteage computer base have putted my hands on, had problems
Hi all,
I've installed F17 x86_64 on my Thinkpad T400s and have not been able
to pair my razer orochi bluetooth mouse. When I put my F16 x86_64 HDD
back in and boot, the mouse works fine over bluetooth.
When I put the mouse into pairing mode, the bluetooth applet sees the
mouse.
On 06/04/2012 02:30 AM, Digimer wrote:
I can confirm that selinux is disabled (as sestatus shows 'disabled').
Any idea what I should next?
File a bug report against Gnome-Bluetooth you can try running this
hciconfig hci0 sspmode 0 from the command line as root which was the
only way I
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 10:21 -0400, Randall Berry wrote:
Does anyone plan to package MATE 1.2[1] for Fedora? MATE is a promising
A Gnome 2.3 fork. If so I would like to be a co-maintainer. Or if
nobody is planning on it I'll gladly start the project with a
Hello,
I am trying to install to install fedora 17 from 3 days.But failed due
to some warning.
I have downloaded the fedora 17 32 bit image from torrent.
I burned its image file and start installing fedora 17.
already Window 7 is installed in in my laptop /dev/sda1.
So, i am installing fedora 17
On 06/03/12 at 01:34pm, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:21:55PM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically the same kind of
perl-Net-OpenSSH has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
On i386:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
Please resolve
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Daemonize:
49311a9d08079308f37aa2bcbb43f9dc MooseX-Daemonize-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7bf053a01ffb2e241b0f252b4f5e6e6bd5aa5933
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Jun 3 12:06:31 2012 -0600
update to 0.15
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-Daemonize.spec | 10 ++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 8
Summary of changes:
7bf053a... update to 0.15 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
7f99c1b... update to 0.13 (*)
72fc0f6... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
7bf053a... update to 0.15 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827944
Bug ID: 827944
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
54 matches
Mail list logo
