On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 17:54 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Steps:
> 1. File ticket at infra to set up fedora-join mailing list
> 2. Set up IRC channel #fedora-join
> 3. File ticket with websites SIG to make tiny changes to join.fp.o
> to list Fedora-Join IRC and mailing list channels.
Good day all,
Thanks to everyone who was able to participate in our VFAD this afternoon.
Below is a summary of the results:
The following RC1 images
(http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/arm-nightlies/vault/to-mirrors/RC1/) worked as
expected and all tests were successful:
Pandaboard w/serial con
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic ticket 861 - Cleanup of maintainers with b
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I'm having a problem with building the coq package for the new OCaml
> 4.00.0, and I'm at my wits' end. There were some bad interactions
> between the new OCaml, camlp5, and coq which I think I have
> successfully worked around. (It isn't pr
On Jun 15, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> They are using PBKDF2 with SHA-256, default 500 rounds up to 100,000 rounds.
>> The database is locally encrypted. Offline access is possible. The free
>> version supports Google Authenticator for TFA, other forms of TFA are
>> available in the
I poked a little bit and I got quickly up and running partially on an
F16 system.
I say partially because I can't use all the exposed commands in the
ubuntu application template because some of the commands aimed at
publication require a coherent debian system configuration to make a
local .deb fi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, not so much exit as shutdown. It seems to frequently throw an
> exception of some kind on shutdown, which seems to block up the shutdown
> process until you dismiss the error dialog. Maybe it's Just Me (TM)
Successful rawhide sc
So yeah... revelation is back to being entirely noarch python again.
Is bouncing a package from arch to noarch as an update going to cause
problems?
-jef
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:14 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:14 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 10:56 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> >> It seems there is a new upstream for revelation as of March this year.
> >> I'll poke at them a little bit to see what's
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 10:56 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>>> It seems there is a new upstream for revelation as of March this year.
>>> I'll poke at them a little bit to see what's goi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 10:56 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>> It seems there is a new upstream for revelation as of March this year.
>> I'll poke at them a little bit to see what's going on. It's been a
>> while since there has been an active
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 10:56 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> It seems there is a new upstream for revelation as of March this year.
> I'll poke at them a little bit to see what's going on. It's been a
> while since there has been an active upstream for this codebase.
Have they fixed the crash-on-exit
It seems there is a new upstream for revelation as of March this year.
I'll poke at them a little bit to see what's going on. It's been a
while since there has been an active upstream for this codebase.
Here's a thought... what's Debian's policy concerning security issues
is packages with a dead
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 3:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I'd recommend KeePassX as an impressive alternative to Revelation,
>> with much more advanced & flexible functionality
>
> I've been using Lastpass for a few months and like t
On Jun 15, 2012, at 3:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> FWIW, I'd recommend KeePassX as an impressive alternative to Revelation,
> with much more advanced & flexible functionality
I've been using Lastpass for a few months and like the automatic
synchronization between computers and browsers re
On 06/14/2012 03:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I spent some time today trying to package up julia. It's pretty messy and
this is no where near complete (it still downloads packages and fails to build
due to https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/933), but thought I'd put it
out there in case
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:36:15AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 10:31 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> > +1
>
> This really isn't adding anything to the discussion, just noise. Please
> stop replying to large emails, quoting the entire thing, and just adding
> a "+1". It's not helpful.
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 12:05 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> In the case of ARM devices Microsoft's statement of its position
> is different: If the ARM device is shipped with a Microsoft OS,
> then Fedora will never be installed on the device. No putting
> one's own key in, no getting a special
>
On 06/15/2012 12:05 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:46 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
Please forgive this top posting.
I will not answer now your radical defense of Microsoft, except to
say two things:
1. Your defense would apply a
On 06/14/2012 07:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defeat
ARM just like it defeated all the previous attempts at changing the
instruction set, even Intel's own IA-64. The fastest x86 CPUs are still
worlds faster than the fastest ARM C
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:46 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> Please forgive this top posting.
>
> I will not answer now your radical defense of Microsoft, except to
> say two things:
>
> 1. Your defense would apply also to the decades long fraud o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Karel Srot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ks...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving this
On 06/14/2012 07:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Hi,
I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
based smartphone:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
So even smartphones are going x86 now.
It's probably best not to extrapolate the extent of a
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>
>> The point in which you find yourself arguing over the semantics of
>> Goodwin's law is also a clear indication that the thread has lost any amount
>> of usefulness.
>
>
> Godwin's Meta-Law? Or maybe Keating's Corollary
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Kratochvil"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:35:19 AM
> Subject: Re: redhat-rpm-config and rpm-build (fwd)
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:03:59 +0200, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > Well I tend to agree: it wo
On 06/15/2012 05:03 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
dependancy on redhat-rpm-config.
Well I tend to agree: it would be the least surprising behaviour for most
f
commit cab930586b939289877c09fab22fb5a780681ebb
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jun 15 11:35:57 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader.spec | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader.spec b/perl-XML-
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:03:59 +0200, Jens Petersen wrote:
> Well I tend to agree: it would be the least surprising behaviour for most
> fedora packagers.
> Though I understand the point about keeping rpmbuild generic -
> I don't see how pulling in redhat-rpm-config would break generic rpms?
> Surel
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 09:30 +0200, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> Fedora still has quite strict printing policies even if users choose
> to be a part of Administrator group during installation still need to
> input passwords while changing even the minor printer settings (like
> unpausing
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:24:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 17:21 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Bressers wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I suspect this is going to be a weird problem to figure out.
> > >
> > > Relevation pas
Jesse Keating wrote:
The point in which you find yourself arguing over the semantics of
Goodwin's law is also a clear indication that the thread has lost any
amount of usefulness.
Godwin's Meta-Law? Or maybe Keating's Corollary to Godwin's Law?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86
> (Atom)
> based smartphone:
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
>
> So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to
> defeat
> ARM just like i
On 15 June 2012 01:57, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> So I would urge Fedora not to waste our time on a low-end architecture
> filling a temporary niche which will become obsolete as demand for
> performance increases. We should rather support only one primary
> architecture (x86, i.e.: x86_64, and legacy
Hi,
Fedora still has quite strict printing policies even if users choose
to be a part of Administrator group during installation still need to
input passwords while changing even the minor printer settings (like
unpausing). This is still an issue on Fedora 16 and 17, is has been in
bugzilla for ove
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:57:18AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> So I would urge Fedora not to waste our time on a low-end architecture
>> filling a temporary niche which will become obsolete as demand for
>> performance increases. We sho
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
> based smartphone:
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
>
> So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defe
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Linux is about choices
No it isn't:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html
(I do disagree with Kevin though).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
37 matches
Mail list logo
