> "IRP" == Itamar Reis Peixoto writes:
IRP> Summary of changes: 73f7b54... Migrate to systemd. (*)
I'm sure you already know this, but just in case, please note that
migrating to systemd within a release is forbidden. You really
shouldn't even be committing any kind of systemd migration to
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-3.fc17.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: gcc = 4.7.0
DEBUG util.py:257: Installed: gcc-4.7.1-1.fc18.x86_64
(@build/$releasever)
DEBUG util.py:257: gcc = 4.7.1-1.fc18
DEBUG util.py:257: You could
Jonathan Underwood (jonathan.underw...@gmail.com) said:
> On 26 June 2012 21:11, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > For each legacy option (such as "xyzzy") supported by your init script (such
> > as "frobozz"), package an executable script named:
> >
> > /usr/libexec/initscripts/legacy-actions/frobozz/
I have three package reviews up, but would like to minimally get the one
for perl-qpid [1] reviewed if someone wants to do a swap.
[1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #
On 06/27/2012 12:26 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
> Looking trough the exceptions lists on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases:
>
> Things that would make it more likely to grant a request:
>
> * The package is a "leaf" node. Nothing depends on it or requires
>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ?
>
> I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote
> -1
> The
There was a little inconsistency between the Fedora and Everything
repositories requiring a last minute respin, but the Fedora 17 GA
release for the IBM System z is finally here. This time again a bit
closer the primary when we count the number of available packages.
The links to the actual releas
