Once again I've a number of small audio packages up for review that I'm
willing to swap. They are:
rtirq - realtime IRQ threading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
Add64 - an additive synthesizer for JACK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
samplv1 -A polypho
>
>> On 07/15/2012 06:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> C. I tried to dispatch the Arabic variants in the Latin family they
> were
> >> designed to complement, but I may have misunderstood the design
> info
> >> available online.
>
> Please clarify 'dispatch' :-)
>>> Ku
Looks like another week where we can skip the meeting - there's no
significant ongoing business besides the anaconda new UI testing, and
we've already discussed that. No-one proposed any topics. If anyone's
feeling terribly sad about missing meetings, do let me know...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
> On 07/15/2012 06:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
C. I tried to dispatch the Arabic variants in the Latin family they
were
>> designed to complement, but I may have misunderstood the design
info
>> available online.
>>> >
>>> > Please clarify 'dispatch' :-)
>> Kufi with San
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Chris Adams writes:
>
>> Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
>> > Chris Adams writes:
>> > >Is there anything that actually does that and depends on the result?
>>
>> You skipped this part. Can you name something that tries this? I b
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> Chris Adams writes:
> >Is there anything that actually does that and depends on the result?
You skipped this part. Can you name something that tries this? I bet
somebody can break it if so.
When the code is ready, I'll name it,
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> Can you explain how two completely different executables could possibly end
> up having the same absolute pathname?
chroot for one.
That would require root's environment, in order to set one up. A non-
privileged process cannot s
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> Chris Adams writes:
> >Is there anything that actually does that and depends on the result?
You skipped this part. Can you name something that tries this? I bet
somebody can break it if so.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY In
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> Can you explain how two completely different executables could possibly end
> up having the same absolute pathname?
chroot for one.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> I would expect that /proc/self/exe symlink gives the name of the running
> executable. I don't think it's an unreasonable expectation.
There are lots of ways that can fail already; prelink is just one.
Running "yum update" can break
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> A means for authenticating a filesystem domain socket's peer. Receive the
> peer's credentials, then check /proc/pid/exe and /proc/self/exe. If they're
> same, the daemon is talking to another instance of itself.
Is there anything t
Garrett Holmstrom writes:
On 2012-07-15 15:00, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Benny Amorsen writes:
Perhaps it's just me, but why would the daemon stat /proc/self/exe? I
presume prelink writes a new file and renames into place as a proper
Unix program should, which still leaves the original program in
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> I would expect that /proc/self/exe symlink gives the name of the running
> executable. I don't think it's an unreasonable expectation.
There are lots of ways that can fail already; prelink is just one.
Running "yum update" can break it as well (not ever
Hi,
python-certifi has certificate bundle generated from mozilla. This package
was needed previously by python-requests. Now python-requests no longer
needs this package, it uses system wide cert bundle. I am retiring
python-certifi for good.
--
Arun S A G
http://zer0c00l.in/
--
devel mailing l
Jef Spaleta writes:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> A means for authenticating a filesystem domain socket's peer. Receive the
> peer's credentials, then check /proc/pid/exe and /proc/self/exe. If they're
> same, the daemon is talking to another instance of itself.
T
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> A means for authenticating a filesystem domain socket's peer. Receive the
> peer's credentials, then check /proc/pid/exe and /proc/self/exe. If they're
> same, the daemon is talking to another instance of itself.
Is there anything that actually does th
On 2012-07-15 15:00, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Benny Amorsen writes:
Perhaps it's just me, but why would the daemon stat /proc/self/exe? I
presume prelink writes a new file and renames into place as a proper
Unix program should, which still leaves the original program intact on
disk until the last
On 07/15/2012 01:10 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
Generally speaking do we have a cron-like service that knows how to
taste for onbattery in a high level way? Or do we have to encode that
check into each script that fires from a cron-like service?
In /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron there is a test using /u
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> A means for authenticating a filesystem domain socket's peer. Receive the
> peer's credentials, then check /proc/pid/exe and /proc/self/exe. If they're
> same, the daemon is talking to another instance of itself.
The "same" in what sense?
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the quick answer!
> On 15 July 2012 21:42, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
>> A. I used a few hundred MiBs of Android git checkout as source.
>
> That's the canonical source for Droid, yes.
>
> (The Roboto fonts in that repo has another canonical source,
> http://developer.android.c
Benny Amorsen writes:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
> It took me a while to figure out why my daemon kept breaking all the
> time, when it couldn't stat its /proc/self/exe any more.
Perhaps it's just me, but why would the daemon stat /proc/self/exe? I
presume prelink writes a new file and renames i
Sam Varshavchik writes:
> It took me a while to figure out why my daemon kept breaking all the
> time, when it couldn't stat its /proc/self/exe any more.
Perhaps it's just me, but why would the daemon stat /proc/self/exe? I
presume prelink writes a new file and renames into place as a proper
Uni
--Simone
Sent from my phone!
On Jul 15, 2012 10:42 PM, "Nicolas Mailhot"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just pushed new Droid font packages to Fedora Rawhide.
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=330644
>
> Droid are complex font families with a difficult upstream and the
> following ca
Hi,
I've just pushed new Droid font packages to Fedora Rawhide.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=330644
Droid are complex font families with a difficult upstream and the
following caveats apply:
A. I used a few hundred MiBs of Android git checkout as source. The fonts
are als
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:19:23 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> It took me a while to figure out why my daemon kept breaking all the
> time, when it couldn't stat its /proc/self/exe any more.
This is a bug of the daemon. While it is already suspicious it needs to mess
with
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> That prelink is being run on battery I repeat is a bug of cron.
>
> I had a script to disable such jobs automatically, I do it by hand nowadays.
Generally speaking do we have a cron-like service that knows how to
taste for onbattery in a hi
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:37:26 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> you must start openoffice damned often that the benfit beats out
> the overhead of the /etc/cron.daily/prelink
When you prelink it nightly on AC and run it at least once on battery, the
saving has been done.
> to beat the battery drain o
Am 15.07.2012 19:31, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:50:39 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> only prelink is good with zero benefit?
>
> Yes, without that "zero benefit". prelink has provable startup performance
> improvement and runtime memory savings.
not practically
>> i did
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:50:39 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> only prelink is good with zero benefit?
Yes, without that "zero benefit". prelink has provable startup performance
improvement and runtime memory savings.
> i did not notice ever any benfit of prelink even by
> starting large applicatio
Am 15.07.2012 15:45, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:19:23 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> It took me a while to figure out why my daemon kept breaking all the
>> time, when it couldn't stat its /proc/self/exe any more.
>
> This is a bug of the daemon
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:4
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:19:23 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> It took me a while to figure out why my daemon kept breaking all the
> time, when it couldn't stat its /proc/self/exe any more.
This is a bug of the daemon. While it is already suspicious it needs to mess
with "/proc/self/exe" stat work
On Saturday, July 14, 2012, 7:25:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> See:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware
> Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
>> Question about that: The first requirement is that the file is
>> non-executable. Does that mean that Fe
Hello,
blitz-0.10 has updated its license terms.
It has changed from either LGPLv3+ or BSD
to either LGPLv3+ or BSD or Artistic 2.0
It was Artistic 1.0 febore, but as this is not allowed in Fedora, it
wasn't mentioned.
This new version will arrive at rawhide soon.
Regards, Sergio
--
devel mail
33 matches
Mail list logo
