Re: rawhide report: 20120728 changes

2012-07-28 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:36:26 + Fedora Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: [...] --- * Fri Jul 27 2012 - Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com - 2:4.0.0-132.beta4 - Don't define an Epoch in RHEL releases. May I ask why? This makes it harder to compare

OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Damian Ivanov
Hello all, Any chance Fedora moves from Koji to OBS? Why should they? OBS has a web interface so one can easily fix packages even from an internet cafe/work/windows pc. Projects can be developed separately and packages can be easily branched and submitted. openSUSE is entirely build by OBS.

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Damian Ivanov damianator...@gmail.com wrote: What would stop Fedora from doing this switch? First, I'll completely ignore the question of what's wrong with what we have now. Second, speaking as one who tried to port OBS to a RHEL platform once [1]: because of

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Damian Ivanov
First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am one of the maintainers of the experimental unity for Fedora and I do a few

ipv6-only success - thanks people!

2012-07-28 Thread Paul Wouters
Hi, I just wanted to confirm that for the first time ever, I could connect to the IETF-v6 only network out of the box. Great job! I have complained about this a lot in the last two years, so I figure I will also praise the fix :) Paul ps. I'd mention the bugzilla item, but bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/28/2012 09:53 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am one of the maintainers of

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Michael Scherer
Le samedi 28 juillet 2012 à 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov a écrit : First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Yes, but that doesn't mean this is sustainable. from my experience, the

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov damianator...@gmail.com wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface.

Re: Anyone noticed strange signals (segfaults?) delivered to processes in latest Rawhide in Koji?

2012-07-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Coq has now been rebuilt .. although I suspect that's largely by luck. In any case you can go ahead and rebuild any dependencies that you wanted to. Thanks, Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny

Re: ipv6-only success - thanks people!

2012-07-28 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:32:09PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: Hi, I just wanted to confirm that for the first time ever, I could connect to the IETF-v6 only network out of the box. Great job! I have complained about this a lot in the last two years, so I figure I will also praise the fix

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

2012-07-28 Thread Richard Fearn
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. findbugs failed to build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=333451), but I've now fixed and rebuilt it (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=344787). eclipse-findbugs rebuilt OK without any changes

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread devzero2000
Sorry for the top posting. Just my 1 cent , i follow only fedora. But the answer could be only: political in first place. But this is the same for every distro, and this is true, in particular, for every distro rpm based for some reason. Every major rpm distro have its buildsystem, its

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am one of the

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 17:50 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov damianator...@gmail.com wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Jef Spaleta
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: He seems to be talking about a web interface that lets you edit specs and submit builds - some kind of basic text editor webapp hooked up to the spec repository, I guess. I don't know if we need a webapp. But some

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote: why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ? Really ? But no. Launchpad is not a build system. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote: why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ? Really ? But no. Launchpad is not a build system. Well, no, not now, but once it becomes self-aware, who

Re: ipv6-only success - thanks people!

2012-07-28 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Chuck Anderson wrote: I just wanted to confirm that for the first time ever, I could connect to the IETF-v6 only network out of the box. Great job! I have complained about this a lot in the last two years, so I figure I will also praise the fix :) Paul ps. I'd mention the

[Bug 844055] New: perl-Config-IniFiles-2.77 is available

2012-07-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844055 Bug ID: 844055 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC:

[Bug 844056] New: perl-Module-Build-0.4002 is available

2012-07-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844056 Bug ID: 844056 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC:

[Bug 844057] New: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0003 is available

2012-07-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844057 Bug ID: 844057 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC:

Broken dependencies: perl-SOAP-Transport-TCP

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-SOAP-Transport-TCP has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-SOAP-Transport-TCP-0.715-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(IO::SessionSet) perl-SOAP-Transport-TCP-0.715-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(IO::SessionData) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible.

Broken dependencies: perl-Class-InsideOut

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-Class-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as

Broken dependencies: perl-eperl

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-eperl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl

Broken dependencies: cpanspec

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
cpanspec has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: cpanspec-1.78-6.el6.noarch requires perl(Parse::CPAN::Packages) On i386: cpanspec-1.78-6.el6.noarch requires perl(Parse::CPAN::Packages) On ppc64: cpanspec-1.78-6.el6.noarch requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Simple

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2012-07-28 Thread buildsys
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora