Hey all,
I wonder if maintainer of fping is available or not.I took a look at the
spec file and see that since f12 rebuild nobody has updated the package.
But I can't say nobody is its maintainer,so I want to find that guy.
Thanks.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Hi, Meng.
If you would like to help, you can go through [1] to take over the package
ownership.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
cheers,
robin
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey all,
I wonder if
On 2012-08-23 04:34, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
source /usr/share/doc/git-1.7.12/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
because upstream split the prompt stuff out from the bash_completion
script. Perhaps the git packagers could consider providing
git-prompt.sh in a more
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On 2012-08-23 04:34, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
source /usr/share/doc/git-1.7.12/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
because upstream split the prompt stuff out from the bash_completion
script. Perhaps
Ok,I'll try
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok,I'll try
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fping/
Seems to me that there is some action on the package. I don't know if I
miss something here.
Especially the Changelog is not so dead as you describe it.
On 2012-08-23 15:12, Jon Ciesla wrote:
things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation
True, but there are other considerations in favour of unversioned dirs
such as bookmarkability and general referenceability, consistency with
other distros, and general cleanliness. But this
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On 2012-08-23 15:12, Jon Ciesla wrote:
things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation
True, but there are other considerations in favour of unversioned dirs
such as bookmarkability and general
Summary of changes:
c17745c... 1.3099 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
why not update to 3.x?
Do you think major version upgrade is impossible?
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sorry I forgot that I mean the 'fping' is the package in EPEL, not Fedora,
sorry!
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Then you may file a bug against the EPEL branch to ask the maintainer to
make an upgrade.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry I forgot that I mean the 'fping' is the package in EPEL, not Fedora,
sorry!
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
I know,of course.I've been told many times,now I manage to avoid saying
like why not httpd 2.4? or why not collectd5? or blablabla..
Therefore I think there aren't ant conflicts after upgrade.
Thanks.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 21:22 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've filed.
if there aren't any response, I'll try to take the ownership.
You'll have to become a packager before you can take the ownership.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I said I'll try,
Thanks.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Rave it wrote:
For your information.
I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your
future
On 08/23/2012 08:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2012-08-23 15:12, Jon Ciesla wrote:
things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation
True, but there are other considerations in favour of unversioned dirs
such as bookmarkability and general referenceability, consistency with
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild one of my packages (mrpt), and I'm running into a TLS
mismatch error that I am having issues troubleshooting. The offending build
is at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847657
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On 08/22/2012 06:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 22.08.12 19:17, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
On Wed, 22.08.12 09:25, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I'll add a me too here.
Any word on if the macros can/will be
Hi everyone,
my name is Jos de Kloe, I am working for the Dutch Met. Office (KNMI) as
a scientist and doing a lot of programming work, mainly in python and
fortran.
For this reason I am interested in adding some python modules to Fedora
that can handle some fileformats commonly used in
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com writes:
3) We'll adjust the guidelines like this:
If your service is explicitly enabled by default in Fedora 16 or 17, and
you wish to have a shared spec file, you will need to add a
conditionalized call to the %systemd_post_enable macro, as follows:
%post
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848997
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
---
On 08/23/2012 12:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Surely F18 could define %systemd_post_enable as a synonym for
%systemd_post. The entire point of this thread is to make things
simpler for packager maintainers, not load them down with cross-branch
differences. (If I wanted to have a version-dependent
Hey, folks - it's probably obvious from the lack of any publicity or a
wiki page, but the Fedora Jam test day that's on the schedule for today
is delayed, since F18 isn't really in shape for building a test spin. We
will come up with a specific date later. See the trac ticket -
I wrote:
This is definitely planned. I mailed Adam (the other Adam) today to
point out that this was broken by the 1.7.12 update. I don't have
time to work on a fix though. But certainly, git-prompt.sh should be
placed in a more permanent location in the next build.
I placed git-prompt.sh
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:23:48PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
because upstream split the prompt stuff out from the bash_completion
script. Perhaps the git packagers could consider providing git-prompt.sh
in a more permanent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:40:10 -0400 (EDT)
Dave Anderson ander...@redhat.com escribió:
- Original Message -
Is there something I need to change so that a simple fedpkg
build will work again?
I believe you need a new version of
...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20120823 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mozilla-CA:
86c4949fa7c15d24a06af662ee94865c Mozilla-CA-20120823.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
commit e6aee658d21d4e0662036ecaba6b7c995bae30fd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 23 12:04:17 2012 +0200
20120823 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...120823-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch | 34 ++-
perl-Mozilla
||perl-Mozilla-CA-20120823-1.
||fc19
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-08-23 06:15:00
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
commit 3d8ee9c6fbce3d796fb7b024e0920c13b4d5190c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Aug 23 11:06:19 2012 +0100
Spec clean-up
- Be more selective about what to exclude when bootstrapping
- Don't use macros for commands
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
Summary of changes:
733226f... Update to latest upstream 1.35 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Install-0.926-6.fc19' was created pointing to:
3d8ee9c... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dancer:
7b17a35f132cf98fd95f96f6d52d84b1 Dancer-1.3099.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c17745c3075591be31199b57c356e4b5c7e29114
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 23 14:29:19 2012 +0200
1.3099 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Dancer.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847657
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3099-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3099-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DateTime-0.537-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847299
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Template-Toolkit:
c25fdab1beebf8818c2e624bc9f9d212 Template-Toolkit-2.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Template-Toolkit:
434a70bb50915e5c2baf5c3fd6ce673e TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e5dba96b7173d50e787b19444b4abf39216dc4b4
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Aug 23 15:21:11 2012 -0500
update to 2.24
.gitignore |2 ++
perl-Template-Toolkit.spec | 10 +++---
sources|4 ++--
3 files changed, 11
commit 16893710a4237627cede98df3f5c0d1e9bb5ab31
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Aug 23 15:21:38 2012 -0500
update to 2.24
perl-Template-Toolkit.spec | 48 +++
sources|4 +-
2 files changed, 41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849686
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc18
--
You are
commit 46c0367ae13129229f6e89b01b9bd8b656f8b9c3
Author: Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Aug 24 00:49:47 2012 +0200
Don't create *.old files that get installed during %install
perl-Razor-Agent.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849686
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
49 matches
Mail list logo
