Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may work on the required patches if time allows me). After that,
guile (now version 1.8) will
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 06:51:26PM +0200, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
The ultimate software center is a web application, like Google playstore.
+1
Why to waste time creating a desktop app when this could be in the cloud
already. Plus this could be turned into a desktop web app easily,
Fedora Infrastructure has begun using ansible for some system setup
and other orchestration/automation tasks.
Our (just beginning) public repos of it are here:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/
Just out of my curiosity, is Fedora Infra going to replace Puppet with
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:35:28PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
* Move EPEL 6, Fedora = 17 to use Puppet 3.0.
Speaking for my previous job, it would really be unfortunate to have a
non-compatible update of puppet in EPEL. Unless accompanied by very loud
trumpets and fireworks beforehand, the
I'm sure that 2.6 won't last for the life of EL5, let alone EL6. At
the same time, I didn't push to get 2.7 in EPEL because it isn't a
completely compatible update. And 3.0 was coming so I figured we
could wait to see what things looked like when it did. The
alternative would have been
I've written a bash script to turn a directory, directory tree, or
list of files into an XML file suitable for use with the Desktop
Background gallery construct in GNOME.
I could not find one @GNOME.org or freedesktop.org, so I wrote one for
myself based on the Cosmos gallery definition and
Hello,
I have noticed that latest tig update in Fedora 17 changed it's
behavior. Default key binding is different, j and k keys now
automatically change from change-list to change-content, therefore I
need to hit the tab key. Annoying, I want the mutt-like behavior
back :-)
Anyone noticed the
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may work on the required patches if time
Hello,
yesterday I had some invalid channel policy errors when trying to
build packages with koji. Tasks were never ending with the building
status on.
I canceled the builds after few hours and today I tried again to build them.
The jobs always fail because I have errors like the following (3
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may
On this Asus EeePC seashell series Notebook:
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_e9f34fbb-dd9d-4b7d-8c77-027292c81297
After kernel update to 3.6.[12] (plus relative kmod-wl* module) the WiFi
stop work
I have found this article:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1176829
then I have
commit aa5091e31dcb2f09ed0f9894d6aeae31af8c1200
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 11:35:44 2012 +0200
2.0008 bump
This update fixes XML::LibXML builds with libxml2 in non-standard
locations.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
On 10/23/2012 11:42 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I
On 10/23/2012 11:55 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
I agree, updating 21 packages is a bit too much at this point in F18
schedule.
However, a way to make this work for F18 would be creating a parallel
installable guile20 package. So instead of what you are planning now:
guile-2.0.x
commit adc9f1d12e8f1a6ba1f8154f2b8e95b5524e8f1b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 12:13:26 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
perl-Test-Memory-Cycle.spec | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 11
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
seem
right. The problem is that a lot of things have to be renamed, including some
autotools
Dne 23.10.2012 09:55, Lukas Zapletal napsal(a):
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:35:28PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
* Move EPEL 6, Fedora = 17 to use Puppet 3.0.
Speaking for my previous job, it would really be unfortunate to have a
non-compatible update of puppet in EPEL. Unless accompanied by
Compose started at Tue Oct 23 09:15:30 UTC 2012
Compose finished at Tue Oct 23 12:07:10 UTC 2012
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello, mate-screensaver maintainer:
leigh123linux wrote, at 10/23/2012 04:13 PM +9:00:
commit e8b3798a18387d3e05675f40c4ee5998e94d0dfd
Author: leigh123linux leigh123li...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 08:13:31 2012 +0100
Initial import
.gitignore|1 +
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I vote for having puppet3 and not touching the default version. This
will be more challenging, but we all know a bit about puppet upgrades
and transitions - it can be big pain.
Lets have puppet-3.x and puppet2 for whoever wants to
Dne 23.10.2012 15:10, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I vote for having puppet3 and not touching the default version. This
will be more challenging, but we all know a bit about puppet upgrades
and transitions - it can be big pain.
Lets
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
yesterday I had some invalid channel policy errors when trying to
build packages with koji. Tasks were never ending with the building
status on.
I canceled the builds after few hours and today I tried again to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.10.2012 15:10, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Lets have puppet-3.x and puppet2 for whoever wants to use old version.
But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Parallel installable guile interpreters:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both new and old guile scripts need to be patched to call
the right binary?
- Original Message -
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be
Dne 23.10.2012 15:37, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just introduces
complication into the packaging.
Introducing new package is complication anyway, so what is the point?
See
On 23 October 2012 15:25, Eric Sparks Christensen
spa...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
yesterday I had some invalid channel policy errors when trying to
build packages with koji. Tasks were never ending with the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 23.10.2012 15:37, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just
introduces
complication into the packaging.
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Fedora Infrastructure has begun using ansible for some system setup
and other orchestration/automation tasks.
Our (just beginning) public repos of it are here:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/
Just out of my curiosity,
For years... pear have its metadata database stored in /usr/share/pear
This will move soon to /var/lib/pear (to be FHS compliant).
(feature approved/merged by upstream)
With this last change, we'll have only libraries in /usr/share/pear
(which is part of the default php include_path)
WARNING :
Il giorno mar, 23/10/2012 alle 11.41 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
After kernel update to 3.6.[12]
Sorry, kernel is 3.6.x and not 2.6.x as erroneously reported in the
subject
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 17 Gnome3)
--
devel mailing list
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:50:59AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 17.10.12 18:02, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
I'd like to see the current binary format officially documented
upstream, and a promise not maintain backwards compatibility forever
(and some forwards
On 10/22/2012 07:52 PM, Michael Weiner wrote:
Did you try re-installing rJava within R (i.e.
install.packages(rJava)) ?? I wasnt aware these contrib packages
were available through yum
rJava is included as a subpackage of R. (yum install R-java)
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
On 10/22/2012 09:39 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
sorry I mistakenly deleted the R discussion from my inbox. Here is what
Based on your errors, I'm wondering if you're using the R packages in
Fedora, or if you've built R from source. I did a fresh install of R:
(yum install R R-java), then ran
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Yes, I understand that ... therefore you need two versions of puppet
installed in parallel. There was proposal to prepare puppet3
package, while I think that the correct way is to move puppet to
version 3 and prepare new puppet2 or
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm commandline,
rpmbuild --define %{nil} ?
Huh, I swear I knew that once. :) Attached is a patch
Please use the Fedora users list for user questions:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network
Here's what I get:
$ sudo yum install R-java
[sudo] password for :
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-i386 | 951 B 00:00
google-chrome| 951 B 00:00
rpmfusion-free-updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 23/10/2012 16:44, Reindl Harald a écrit :
does pear update pear this also know?
Currently we have latest pear 1.9.4 in fedora.
As this feature have been merged by upstream,
yes next version will be aware of this feature.
And pear, in fedora,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
because i never found all used packages as RPM
And ?
What are you waiting for ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
Am 23.10.2012 16:40, schrieb Remi Collet:
For years... pear have its metadata database stored in /usr/share/pear
This will move soon to /var/lib/pear (to be FHS compliant).
(feature approved/merged by upstream)
With this last change, we'll have only libraries in /usr/share/pear
(which
Am 23.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Remi Collet:
in the real life mostly even as RPM packed pear packages are
updated with pear upgrade because the RPM's are way behind by
design
I disagree.
RPM maintainers keep a consistent PEAR stack and add more QA.
Before running any pear update ... you
Am 23.10.2012 17:57, schrieb Remi Collet:
Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
because i never found all used packages as RPM
And ?
What are you waiting for?
what should i wait for?
pear install whatever
pear itself is a package-system which should not be wrapped
in another one
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it wrote:
On this Asus EeePC seashell series Notebook:
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_e9f34fbb-dd9d-4b7d-8c77-027292c81297
After kernel update to 3.6.[12] (plus relative kmod-wl* module) the WiFi
stop work
I have found
On 10/23/2012 06:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.10.2012 17:57, schrieb Remi Collet:
Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
because i never found all used packages as RPM
And ?
What are you waiting for?
what should i wait for?
pear install whatever
pear itself is a
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/22/2012 09:39 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
sorry I mistakenly deleted the R discussion from my inbox. Here is what
Based on your errors, I'm wondering if you're using the R packages in
Fedora, or if you've built R
I am still not in favor of a puppet3 package. This is largely due to
overall compatibility. Puppet is a distributed system. Having the
package be called puppet in some repositories and puppet3 in others
(along with bin files/utils) will only the make the overall
user-experience of Puppet worse
Hi,
when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I think
would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I would then collect
up push what I have done, etc.
I have looked at the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Alain Williams a...@phcomp.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I
think
would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
attention of a package maintainer if he likes the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Michael Stahnke wrote:
I am still not in favor of a puppet3 package. This is largely due to
overall compatibility. Puppet is a distributed system. Having the
package be called puppet in some repositories and puppet3 in others
(along with bin
On 10/23/2012 12:39 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
Hi,
when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I think
would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I would then collect
up
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
We can make the new package available, and do something to publicize that
there is going to be a change. When 2.6.x is no longer maintained for
security updates, the new package gets the old name and obsoletes the
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:49:01 -0600
Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
You should be able to email packagename-ow...@fedoraproject.org and
it will get to whoever owns the package. One caveat is make sure its
the *package name* as the src.rpm would be named, not the
sub-packages it
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Parallel installable guile interpreters:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both
LZ == Lukas Zapletal lzap+...@redhat.com writes:
LZ Hello, I have noticed that latest tig update in Fedora 17 changed
LZ it's behavior.
tig has not ever been updated in F17; it still has the same 0.18-2
release that was there when F17 was spun.
- J
--
devel mailing list
Am 23.10.2012 19:03, schrieb Matthias Runge:
On 10/23/2012 06:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.10.2012 17:57, schrieb Remi Collet:
Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
because i never found all used packages as RPM
And ?
What are you waiting for?
what should i wait for?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869160
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-PAR-1.007-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869158
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Michael Stahnke wrote:
I am still not in favor of a puppet3 package. This is largely due to
overall compatibility. Puppet is a distributed system. Having the
package be
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:57:37 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 October 2012 15:25, Eric Sparks Christensen
spa...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Simone Caronni
negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
yesterday I had some invalid channel
On 10/23/2012 08:40 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
For years... pear have its metadata database stored in /usr/share/pear
This will move soon to /var/lib/pear (to be FHS compliant).
(feature approved/merged by upstream)
With this last change, we'll have only libraries in /usr/share/pear
(which is part
From: Greg Swift xa...@fedoraproject.org
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: 10/23/2012 15:51
Subject: Re: Fixing Puppet in Fedora/EPEL
Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Matthew Miller
Lo!
On 23.10.2012 17:23, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm commandline,
rpmbuild --define %{nil} ?
Huh,
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:47 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Once you introduce version into the name, you will never be able to get
rid of it,
Of course you can. In fact we've done this more than once in Fedora.
There was a gtk+3 package parallel installable with with 'gtk+' (which
was a 2.x
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Puppet in the Fedora/EPEL ecosystem is a bit wonky currently.
I'd really like to fix it.
Problems:
* Fedora 17 (and higher) ships with Ruby 1.9.x and Puppet 2.7.x. 2.7.x is not
100% compatible with 1.9.3. The
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 19:39 +0100, Alain Williams wrote:
Hi,
when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I
think
would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I would
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Compat Package Conflicts
It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
These are the cases where it is not feasible to patch applications to look
in alternate locations for the -compat files, so the
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
if ALL pear packages would be in the repos this whould be
a diffeent story - but taht is unlikely because who
would maintain all this packages really?
It seems like something that should be automatable, really. Don't we
already have
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com
wrote:
Puppet in the Fedora/EPEL ecosystem is a bit wonky currently.
I'd really like to fix it.
Problems:
* Fedora 17 (and higher) ships
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Compat Package Conflicts
It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
These are the cases where it is not feasible to patch
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 16:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Compat Package Conflicts
It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:46 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
Hi all
I have a number of outstanding reviews that are available for swap.
All
are fairly trivial so shouldn't take too much time:
Hey Brendan,
ams - ALSA Modular Synth - a port from the CCRMA repo
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 06:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
if ALL pear packages would be in the repos this whould be
a diffeent story - but taht is unlikely because who
would maintain all this packages really?
It seems like
# F18 Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-10-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net
Keeping with what we've done for the last couple of weeks, we're
planning to stop around the 3 hour mark if we're not done by then and
resume on
Dne 23.10.2012 17:21, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
Once you introduce version into the name, you will never be able to
get rid of it, although puppet 4 might be 100% compatible with
That's not true. In the future, puppet can obsolete puppet3 -- for example,
in EPEL 7.
Yes, it can, but I doubt
Le 23/10/2012 23:02, Nathanael D. Noblet a écrit :
I presume php-pecl packages are un-affected by this?
Right.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869158
Bug ID: 869158
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869160
Bug ID: 869160
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869162
Bug ID: 869162
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869164
Bug ID: 869164
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869158
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This release fixes internal tests. Suitable for F≥18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode-JP-Mobile:
9bc17f7979be5fcf2de912ae1ceb0f25 Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5aebf3c9c44c5d08a77e6c31d019c3e88e680fe1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 09:56:53 2012 +0200
0.30 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
5aebf3c... 0.30 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869158
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 10/22/2012 10:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
perl-Coro.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869158
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-1.fc18
--
You are
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PAR:
eff0397dc552f52f071908f3cc178637 PAR-1.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit bdd07be82bcfb70b6fcfe64c544f8312f7d53132
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 10:23:24 2012 +0200
1.007 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-PAR.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
Summary of changes:
9471aac... 1.006 bump (*)
bdd07be... 1.007 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869164
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP:
d7a3791b473f095aac3ac9f1632ca35e POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-2.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 2f9ef048b4af4de56e806fbadd43033bd28e42b5
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 10:27:45 2012 +0200
2.16 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP.spec |7 +--
sources |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ScanDeps:
f01f36a25bf372712ff6b1e4aad8d89c Module-ScanDeps-1.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869160
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PAR-1.007-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PAR-1.007-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869162
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit 7d6ded30c43458ac72bf1c782859ab10d49e71b7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 10:37:45 2012 +0200
1.10 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec | 11 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5
commit 3cec759fa5d3fb41620fd71e05823602b09a9ea0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 10:38:41 2012 +0200
Modernize spec file
perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec |4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
commit a2f0e0160147322b3149c92070e9158331453c69
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 23 11:29:46 2012 +0200
Unbundle inc/* and correct dependencies
perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec | 30 --
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
