As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:4 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the full package list is
> below:
I rebuilt the following members of this list today:
> alt-ergo-0.94-6.fc18.src.rpm
> apron-0.9.10-8.fc18.src.rpm
> coq-8.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
> gappalib-coq-0.18.0
Current state:
> freewrl-1.22.13.1-3.fc18.src.rpm
Failed to rebuild, but not my fault:
world_script/JScript.c: In function 'JSCreateScriptContext':
world_script/JScript.c:407:3: warning: implicit declaration of function
'JS_NewCompartmentAndGlobalObject' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
world_
> It sounds like your entry in your UEFI boot manager was erased. Did
> you perform a UEFI update or clear it?
>
> To fix it in the future run "efibootmgr -c" to reinsert the entry.
Aaaah. Thanks for pointing me at efibootmgr.
-benjamin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:43:23PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 22:03 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > I don't think any of the packages are going to be an issue. None of
> > them are critical path packages or anything especially important,
> > except possible llvm.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:26:14PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2012-09-21 at 01:14 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:48:34AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:44:48PM +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 23:16 -0700,
I see, thanks.
Miro Hrončok
Jabber: m...@hroncok.cz
Telefon: +420777974800
2012/12/13 Jochen Schmitt :
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 08:19:57PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote> Hi,
>> I am new to this, so now I really don't know, what steps should I make.
>>
>> After the rebuild, openscad package is no lo
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 22:03 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I don't think any of the packages are going to be an issue. None of
> them are critical path packages or anything especially important,
> except possible llvm.
Also xen. We have a release criterion relating to it. Maybe not critpath
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 01:58:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 16:16 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
> >
> > It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which alr
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:50:21PM +0200, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:38:26 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > There will probably be about 70-80 packages in all. I'm planning
> > > to do the others
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 16:16 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
>
> It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which already went into
> OCaml 4.00.1 upstream some months ago fixes this. However
Orion Poplawski writes:
> BR of libjpeg-devel now pulls in libjpeg-turbo-compat-devel, but this doesn't
> really work as a drop in replacement because those headers are in
> /usr/include/libjpeg-turbo-compat/.
Yeah, I just whinged about that at bz #887013.
> Shouldn't libjpeb-turbo-devel provid
I just spent too many hours re-triaging and re-discovering bug 851970, in which
systemd + PrivateTmp does weird things with namespaces, thereby making it
impossible to unmount filesystems under certain circumstances.
851970 was closed NEXTRELEASE, because:
>> Michal - is there any reason why th
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:38:26 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > There will probably be about 70-80 packages in all. I'm planning
> > to do the others tomorrow.
>
> Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the full package
Hi,
1 - Here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Input_device_configuration#system-setup-keyboard
we need update this because:
Command system-setup-keyboard is not present in F18, now we got
localectl set-x11-keymap.
And need review system-config-keyboard ?
2 - as wrote and suggest in other email,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> There will probably be about 70-80 packages in all. I'm planning
> to do the others tomorrow.
Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the full package list is
below:
$ repoquery -s --alldeps --recursive --whatrequires ocaml
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:21 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
>> Le dimanche 09 décembre 2012 à 15:18 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> There's no way I can run my laptop on Rawhide - it's dual-booted with
>>> Windows 8 Pro
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:19:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-findlib-1.3.3-3.fc18,ocaml-4.00.1-1.fc18
> (that link will probably go stale unfortunately ...)
Indeed. For now it is:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-camlidl-1.05-17
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> BR of libjpeg-devel now pulls in libjpeg-turbo-compat-devel, but this
> doesn't really work as a drop in replacement because those headers are in
> /usr/include/libjpeg-turbo-compat/. Shouldn't libjpeb-turbo-devel provide
> libjpeg-devel a
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:20:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:16:12 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
> >
> > It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch
On 10/18/2012 07:13 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
Hello all,
I've just created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which
contains plan how to successfully move from current jpeg6 API/ABI to more recent
jpeg8 API/ABI for Fedora 19.
All packages which depends on libjpeg.so
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 08:19:57PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote> Hi,
> I am new to this, so now I really don't know, what steps should I make.
>
> After the rebuild, openscad package is no longer working, it seems it
> requires libGLEW.so.1.7 as it was builded agains this version, but
> nothing provi
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 08:19:57PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> After the rebuild, openscad package is no longer working, it seems it
> requires libGLEW.so.1.7 as it was builded agains this version, but
> nothing provides it, is that right?
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=
On 11.12.2012 23:52, David Malcolm wrote:
We'd be able to run all of the code in Fedora through static analysis
tools, and slurp the results into the database
Dave, I really do not know what to say first :-). The subject is so
important and there are so many aspects and application fields - IM
Hi,
I am new to this, so now I really don't know, what steps should I make.
After the rebuild, openscad package is no longer working, it seems it
requires libGLEW.so.1.7 as it was builded agains this version, but
nothing provides it, is that right?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?task
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> What is the difficult on adding a file to yum.repo.d ?
>
> It is designed for that. Each initial page for an aditional repo would
> have instructions on how to activate it and provide a repo file to copy
> from.
The difficulty is that,
Le 13/12/2012 18:32, Honza Horak a écrit :
> 1. continue shipping only mysql
> 2. ship mysql + mariadb, that would conflict
Seems ok for 1 release.
> 3. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names and using alternatives
> 4. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names but not using alternati
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:16:12 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
>
> It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which already went into
> OCaml 4.00.1 upstream some months ago fixes this.
This, like all GLEW updates, is a soname break. I'll kick rebuilds for
dependent packages, which are:
% repoquery --whatrequires --qf=%{sourcerpm} libGLEW libGLEWmx | sort -u
amanith-0.3-22.fc18.src.rpm
avogadro-1.0.3-12.fc18.1.src.rpm
bino-1.4.1-2.fc18.src.rpm
blender-2.64a-3.fc18.src.rpm
bzflag
On 10/29/2012 04:36 AM, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:31:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many things
require mysql-libs, and even mysql-server is required for Akonadi, and
mysql-embedded or Amarok), why isn't the for
Unfortunately we found a bug in the code generator:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877128
It seems likely (comment 20) that a patch which already went into
OCaml 4.00.1 upstream some months ago fixes this. However it requires
that every OCaml package be rebuilt in Fedora 18 (since a
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
Stefan Cornelius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(vda...@redhat.com |
Good. Then we should use this model more frequently.
And in these third party repos, Software Collections could be used
by them to avoid conflicts with base, allow installations of multiple of
their versions etc.
So, SC _for_ Fedora as opposed as _in_ Fedora.
--Fernando
- Original Message
I have submitted an RFE bugzilla report asking for improvements in how
anaconda deals with btrfs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886691
There have been promises (threats?) to make btrfs the default starting
with (IIRC) Fedora 16, then 17, and again 18. In each case it did not
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:33:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> What I'm confused about is how this would work in terms of Fedora
> policy (not in terms of the software).
Yes, that's important to cover too.
> Let's say that we decided that OCaml was non-core. It would be in a
> collection,
What is the difficult on adding a file to yum.repo.d ?
It is designed for that. Each initial page for an aditional repo would
have instructions on how to activate it and provide a repo file to copy from.
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
> To: "Development discussions
Compose started at Thu Dec 13 09:15:48 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[marble]
1:python-marble-4.9.4-1.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastru
Compose started at Thu Dec 13 08:15:11 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[Agda]
Agda-2.3.0.1-4.fc19.x86_64 requires
ghc(Agda-2.3.0.1-ad754944fc95f11aa3b4710387ff959a)
[ansible]
ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires pyt
38 matches
Mail list logo
