Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> All those packages should be in the buildroot overrides, unless I
> missed any.
>
> Strangely, the command at the end of this email shows only 67
> overrides, which can't be right because there are more packages than
> that.
>
> Yet:
>
> bodhi --buildroot-override=oca
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> I think I am with Remi on the above... shipping both for 1 release
> would be potentially helpful in seeing issues, we can ask people to
> migrate at that time and file bugs, if the bugs are stoppers they can
> go back to mysql until fixed. I guess it depends on the maintaine
On 12/14/2012 11:12 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 07:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> It's my understanding that when the update goes out, the build
>>> overrides are automatically expired, which is why I selected a very
>>> long expiry.
>>
>> AIUI, that's actuall
On 12/14/2012 07:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> It's my understanding that when the update goes out, the build
>> overrides are automatically expired, which is why I selected a very
>> long expiry.
>
> AIUI, that's actually not the case. But you can expire the stuff manu
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:52:17 +0100
Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 13/12/2012 18:32, Honza Horak a écrit :
>
> > 1. continue shipping only mysql
> > 2. ship mysql + mariadb, that would conflict
>
> Seems ok for 1 release.
>
> > 3. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names and using
> > alternative
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 21:45 +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
> On 11.12.2012 23:52, David Malcolm wrote:
> > We'd be able to run all of the code in Fedora through static analysis
> > tools, and slurp the results into the database
>
> Dave, I really do not know what to say first :-). The subject is so
>
Dear list readers!
The Spatialindex license changes in version 1.8. It used to be LGPLv2 or
later and is MIT from now on.
Affected packages are:
qgis -- is mine, GPVLv3+
python-Rtree -- LGPLv2
Therefore, no legal issues should arise.
Greetings,
Volker Fröhlich
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:36:05PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > As discussed, this list isn't quite correct, but it's the best
> > I've got at the moment.
>
> We need to rebuild kdeedu too, it links statically against ocaml-facile.
> (And ocaml-facile needs to be in
Dne 13.12.2012 22:52, Eric Sandeen napsal(a):
I just spent too many hours re-triaging and re-discovering bug
851970, in which systemd + PrivateTmp does weird things with
namespaces, thereby making it impossible to unmount filesystems under
certain circumstances.
851970 was closed NEXTRELEASE, be
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> We need to rebuild kdeedu too, it links statically against ocaml-facile.
> (And ocaml-facile needs to be in the buildroot overrides for that.)
Oops, actually, make that kalzium. kdeedu is now a metapackage, the apps are
built separately.
I'll take care of it.
Kevin
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> As discussed, this list isn't quite correct, but it's the best
> I've got at the moment.
We need to rebuild kdeedu too, it links statically against ocaml-facile.
(And ocaml-facile needs to be in the buildroot overrides for that.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailin
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It's my understanding that when the update goes out, the build
> overrides are automatically expired, which is why I selected a very
> long expiry.
AIUI, that's actually not the case. But you can expire the stuff manually
when it's done.
Kevin Kofler
--
deve
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:25:40PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > None of the Unison* packages.
>> > why
>
> Now I've done these too, so that's all the packages that I'm aware of.
>
> The mega-update is:
>
> https://admin.fedorapr
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:25:40PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > None of the Unison* packages.
> > why
Now I've done these too, so that's all the packages that I'm aware of.
The mega-update is:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20337
It's marked as [CRITPATH] for some r
On 12/14/2012 06:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
FTBFS:
plplot-5.9.9-10.svn12202.fc18.src.rpm
I'll take a look in a bit.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or
Compose started at Fri Dec 14 09:16:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[marble]
1:python-marble-4.9.4-1.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastru
As discussed, this list isn't quite correct, but it's the best
I've got at the moment.
I following are DONE:
> ocaml-4.00.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
> ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-9.fc18.src.rpm
> ocaml-augeas-0.5-2.fc18.src.rpm
> ocaml-bin-prot-2.0.9-2.fc18.src.rpm
> ocaml-bisect-1.1-3.fc18.src.rpm
> ocaml-bitstri
Il giorno ven, 14/12/2012 alle 09.28 +1000, Peter Hutterer ha scritto:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:26:14PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2012-09-21 at 01:14 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:48:34AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:28:41PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Assuming my repoquery command is correct, the full package list is
> > below:
>
> I rebuilt the following members of this list today:
>
> > alt-ergo-0.94-6.fc18.src.rpm
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
