git rebase request on a project

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I cannot find any information. I would like to have "git rebase master" on f16, f17, and f18 branches of http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/megaglest.git I once messed it a bit by adding a commit only to branches and later merging master, now I cannot mer

Feature page cleanup (Was: Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature)

On 1/17/13 2:16 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category, thanks. Shouldn't be the feature page just deleted? Or archived in some better category such as "deferred"? There is 256 (nice number ;) incomplete feature pages, some of them are probabl

Rebuild of all pkgs which depends on libjpeg.so starts

Hello all, as announced on http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176354.html, I'm going to rebuild libjpeg-turbo with ".62.0.0" ABI and then start rebuilds of all dependant pkgs. Please excuse intermittent rawhide buildroot breakage which can happen. Regards, Adam -- Adam

taking over ownership of glusterfs

Matthias Saou has released ownership so that I can take over. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests indicates that I can use the https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb to request ownership changes, but I don't see any way to do this. Am I not looking in the right place? It

Re: Fedora 18: Lock up on boot of kernel 3.7.2-201 on Dell Optiplex 755 -- KMS

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:00:02 -0500, "Josh Boyer" wrote: On Jan 17, 2013 10:03 AM, "Robert Knight" wrote: After installation of F18 from DVD and an update, several Dell Optiplex 755's failed on reboot with a garbled display and frozen system. These all have the "Intel Corporation 82Q35 Expres

Re: taking over ownership of glusterfs

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Matthias Saou has released ownership so that I can take over. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Package_SCM_admin_requestsindicates > that I can use the > https://admin.fedorapr

Re: taking over ownership of glusterfs

On 01/18/2013 09:10 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY mailto:kkeit...@redhat.com>> wrote: Matthias Saou has released ownership so that I can take over. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/__Package_SCM_admin_requests

Re: git rebase request on a project

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri 18 Jan 2013 06:55:26 AM EST, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I cannot find any information. > > I would like to have "git rebase master" on f16, f17, and f18 > branches of http://pkgs.fedoraproj

Re: taking over ownership of glusterfs

Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > Yes, I am signed in. There is no 'Take Ownership' link or button. > Perhaps because Matthias somehow hasn't actually relinquished ownership? He has orphaned EPEL5 ownership if that is what you are looking for. Scroll down to the very bottom of the page. He still has F

File Sub-Override-0.09.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Override: 6889e2526c0e4f70da157fdf712542d3 Sub-Override-0.09.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

[rawhide] Re: [libnl3] Update to 3.2.19

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:33:00 + (UTC) Jiří Pírko wrote: > commit e777186ba0255c8049a51ac84156fd97060541c3 > Author: Jiri Pirko > Date: Thu Jan 17 14:32:38 2013 +0100 > > Update to 3.2.19 This is a ABI bump it seems? Can you please announce these in advance and coordinate with any de

[perl-Sub-Override] update to 0.09

commit 1e40b1f865d7f807655d4d8372119965420ca815 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Fri Jan 18 07:52:39 2013 -0700 update to 0.09 .gitignore |1 + perl-Sub-Override.spec | 18 +++--- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --

Re: [rawhide] Re: [libnl3] Update to 3.2.19

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:47:16AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:33:00 + (UTC) > Jiří Pírko wrote: > > > commit e777186ba0255c8049a51ac84156fd97060541c3 > > Author: Jiri Pirko > > Date: Thu Jan 17 14:32:38 2013 +0100 > > > > Update to 3.2.19 > > This is a ABI bum

File Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.15.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy: 62cc91a27f9388f238ea070c230bb5d5 Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.15.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Jaroslav Reznik writes: > >> See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/986 >> >> = Features/Fix Network Name Resolution = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution > > > Why would this be a Fedora issue or a featur

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/18/2013 01:00 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Marc Deop Argemí wrote: On Wednesday 16 January 2013 12:18:19 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689127 (performance problem with virtual machines) I must add that, in my

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 18 January 2013 01:19, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/17/2013 07:00 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: >> >> Yes, I'd veto btrfs as the default as well. I lost a huge chunk of >> data on a btrfs partition a while back, with *no* diagnostics, >> recovery tools, help from Google, etc. Screw speed -

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/17/2013 08:19 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 01/17/2013 07:00 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: Yes, I'd veto btrfs as the default as well. I lost a huge chunk of data on a btrfs partition a while back, with *no* diagnostics, .. You don't have the power to veto it although highlighting cri

Re: Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 05:11:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: > > I've since done some work to fix bugs and speed up the new app and would > > like > > some feedback if you could provide it. It is up in our staging environment > > at: > > > >

F19 upgrade ICU to 50.1.1 in sync with Boost upgrade

Hi, I plan to upgrade ICU to version 50.1.1, best next week to have that ready before the Boost upgrade will happen to avoid having to rebuild the entire chain twice. So don't get overly alarmed by broken dependencies of other packages.. but still fix them in time for the Boost upgrade. Thanks

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/18/2013 10:50 AM, Ian Malone wrote: I suggest sdfs as the new default filesystem, you cannot veto it, but highlighting critical bugs will be beneficial. Please post bugzilla links rather than descriptions of the issues. Or: Bugs are not a replacement for discussion. A discussion by def

[perl-Boost-Geometry-Utils/f18] Initila import (#876408)

Summary of changes: 83e3230... Initila import (#876408) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraprojec

Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

Nick Jones wrote: > One feature I would like to see added to future glibc, is a fully > asynchronous version of getaddrinfo, and also getnameinfo. > > Asynchronous for non filesystem fds at least. > > The glibc maintainers don't seem to be against this idea and I am > willing to put time into d

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

On Fri, 18.01.13 20:20, Björn Persson (bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote: > If your functions get added to GlibC, then they will only be available > in GNU systems (unless other vendors decide to clone them) and programs > that use them will be tied to GNU or will need workarounds in their > configuratio

mediawiki package split

The current "mediawiki" package is several years old at version 1.16. A new package, named "mediawiki119" at version 1.19 has been reviewed[1] and imported into Fedora. I understand some packages require multiple versions to be available, but mediawiki does not require multiple packages. Why was "

Re: mediawiki package split

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri 18 Jan 2013 01:50:12 PM CST, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > The current "mediawiki" package is several years old at version 1.16. A > new package, named "mediawiki119" at version 1.19 has been reviewed[1] > and imported into Fedora. I understand s

Re: mediawiki package split

On 18 January 2013 13:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri 18 Jan 2013 01:50:12 PM CST, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> The current "mediawiki" package is several years old at version 1.16. A >> new package, named "mediawiki119" at version 1.19 ha

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

On Jan 18, 2013 8:48 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote: > > On Fri, 18.01.13 20:20, Björn Persson (bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote: > > > If your functions get added to GlibC, then they will only be available > > in GNU systems (unless other vendors decide to clone them) and programs > > that use them wil

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:49 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: > Maybe glib is a better place for these kinds of functions? Already exists: http://developer.gnome.org/gio/2.34/GResolver.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:49 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: > I think you have a good point, but adding every imaginable featw into > glibc is not really a good solution. Maybe glib is a better place for > these kinds of functions? If glibc didn't already have DNS API, that might be a more reasonable

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:49 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2013 8:48 PM, "Lennart Poettering" > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 18.01.13 20:20, Björn Persson (bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote: > > > > > If your functions get added to GlibC, then they will only be > available > > > in GNU systems (un

debugedit: .debug_line CU does not fit into section

I'm trying to build a package for EL6 and it appears to be failing here: /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nx-libs-3.5.0.17-1.20130115gitc8a5fdd.el6.x86_64/usr/lib64/nx/X11/libNX_SM.so.6.0: .debug_line CU does not fit into section Can anyone give me some insight in to this an

To the Mate package maintainers

Mate package maintainers, testers and any developers on the dev list: Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you! Not to start a war, but I sincerely hope Mate makes it into RHEL 7 vs Gnome. I have WAY too man

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 18 January 2013 17:19, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/18/2013 10:50 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> I suggest sdfs as the new default filesystem, you cannot veto it, but >> highlighting critical bugs will be beneficial. Please post bugzilla links >> rather than descriptions of the issues. Or: Bugs a

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

On Fri, 18.01.13 22:49, Andreas Tunek (andreas.tu...@gmail.com) wrote: > I think you have a good point, but adding every imaginable featw into glibc > is not really a good solution. Maybe glib is a better place for these kinds > of functions? Because doing this externally is really hard. I wrote

Why do we have a kernel with version number - 20X?

Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to 20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this? Are the first 200 numbers reserved for something? --joshua -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Why do we have a kernel with version number - 20X?

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Joshua C. wrote: > Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to > 20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this? > Are the first 200 numbers reserved for something? Yes, read the kernel meeting notes and I believe an e

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

Hi On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > Or in other words, don't bring up anything here unless it's not in > bugzilla, if it's not in bugzilla go and put it there before we'll > discuss it. > I wouldn't read it that rigidly. Its more along the lines of, its more helpful to file

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

Hi On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote: > > Not to start a war, but I sincerely hope Mate makes it into RHEL 7 vs > Gnome. I have WAY too many machines riding on it. > Unlikely that MATE will be part of EL. If you depend on it, I would suggest getting it into EPEL Rahul --

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

Andy Lawrence writes: Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you! Agreed. This also seems to be a convenient place to add my own snarky comment, that doesn't really merit its own thread. I see that Gnom

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Andy Lawrence writes: > >> Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you >> Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you! > > > Agreed. This also seems to be a convenient place to add my own snarky > c

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC (was: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution)

On Friday, January 18, 2013 23:35:24 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 18.01.13 22:49, Andreas Tunek (andreas.tu...@gmail.com) wrote: > > I think you have a good point, but adding every imaginable featw into > > glibc > > is not really a good solution. Maybe glib is a better place for these > > k

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the >display wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the >desktop. Somehow (and this would be the snarky

Re: Adding asynchronous name resolution to GlibC

Lennart Poettering wrote: > Because doing this externally is really hard. I wrote a library for that > named "libasyncns", and glib's async resolver is based on that. > > libasyncns is different from other libraries for resolving host names in > that i actually uses the NSS, rather than just imple

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:13:16PM -0600, Dan Mashal wrote: > You're welcome. > It's not happening. So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me. What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to do with it the first time I saw it, and the

Deja DUP

Hi Gang, I backed up some sensitive files with DUP and upgraded to F18. Now calling up the Deja DUP program sends the computer into a mode where nothing is available; it doesn't respond to any key-strokes. Is there anything I can so at the command-line to correct this? I really need these one of t

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

Hey,guys... Will there have a MATE spin later? Thanks... -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Got problems with Windows? - ReBoot Got problems with Linux? - Be Root Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

Matthew Miller writes: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:13:16PM -0600, Dan Mashal wrote: > You're welcome. > It's not happening. So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me. What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to do with it the fi

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

On 01/18/2013 06:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to > do with it the first time I saw it, and then every time after that it just > gets in the way of what I want to do. Why *can't* I turn it off? It's part of the nefarious ma

Re: Deja DUP

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gang, > > I backed up some sensitive files with DUP and upgraded to F18. Now calling > up the Deja DUP program sends the computer into a mode where nothing is > available; it doesn't respond to any key-stro