On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hey,guys...
>
> Will there have a MATE spin later?
>
> Thanks...
>
>
> --
>
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Christopher Meng
Yes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:57:38 +0100, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I wouldn't read it that rigidly. Its more along the lines of, its more
> helpful to file bug reports and post them for discussions because its
> easier to keep track of.
I have already filed enough stopper Bugs for btrfs and nothing happ
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Andy Lawrence writes:
>
> >Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank
> >you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you!
>
> Agreed. This also seems to be a convenient place to add my own
>
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
> wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the desktop.
I just hit "Enter" or "Return" to achieve the same.
--
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Co
How to reach the package maintainers?
[...]
Begin forwarded message:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797838
gtk3-3.6.4-1.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gtk2-immodules-2.24.13-1.fc18.i686
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Le Mer 16 janvier 2013 20:48, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
> Sorry for that problem. It solved the problems I was having
> but created at least yours problem. I am having an almost live
> conversation right now about related issues at
BTW the Fedora font packaging guidelines have b
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
> > wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the desktop.
>
> I just hit
On 01/19/2013 10:25 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
I am aware the best way to fix known Bugs is ... to just fix those Bugs.
Maybe I am pronouncing the obvious, but I am wondering, whether you guys
have a "required feature" list and a regression test-suite?
At least to me, having both and complyi
2013/1/19 Nicolas Mailhot :
>
> Le Mer 16 janvier 2013 20:48, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
>
>> Sorry for that problem. It solved the problems I was having
>> but created at least yours problem. I am having an almost live
>> conversation right now about related issues at
>
> BTW the F
i am Abhinav , an undergraduate from India
i was going through GSoC 2012 idea list
i want to take " integrate proxy setting and network manager " as my
project for GSoC 2013.
i know C, python and currently learning java and i am most wiling to learn
anything that is required for this project.
I wa
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:46:35PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the
> > > display
> > > wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the desktop.
> > I just hit "Enter" or "Return" to achieve the same.
> Or "Esc".
It
Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to
Fedora 18 (as well as F17, F16, F15) have a number of patches in the
source rpm which do not appear to have been forwarded upstream. These
patches (four of them) are a little skimpy as to documentation but they
all appear to be bug fixes (to me anyway).
In the spirit of passing fixes upstream
On Friday, January 18, 2013 10:55:23 Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> I used btrfs on my personal desktop for about a year now and it
> works fine for me, other than a nagging suspicion that there's an
> occasional performance problem at high load.
Yes, this is familiar. I too have used it for over a y
On 01/19/2013 10:23 AM, ABHINAV MISRA wrote:
i am Abhinav , an undergraduate from India
i was going through GSoC 2012 idea list
i want to take " integrate proxy setting and network manager " as my
project for GSoC 2013.
i know C, python and currently learning java and i am most wiling to
learn an
On 01/16/2013 12:18 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Jochen Schmitt
mailto:joc...@herr-schmitt.de>> wrote:
Hallo,
for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the
standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered
because the fsck utitlities for b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
If I try to build a rpm on Fedora 17 ARM (installed on a RaspberryPi
Model B) from a src.rpm fc18, rpmbuild compiles a binary file
'.rpfr.armv6l' .
But almost all RPMs from repositories are 'armv5tel'.
Why ?
Does a specific command exist in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 19/01/2013 18:29, David A. Marlin ha scritto:
> On 01/19/2013 11:21 AM, Sean Omalley wrote:
>> I'm having the same issue along with the build was looking for
>> armv6 repo in the build requires even though the armv5 versions
>> were installed.
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I don't have a RPi to try this on, but can you just use:
>
> rpmbuild -ba --target=armv5tel
yum install moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Examining moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm:
moc-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> yum install moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm Loaded plugins:
> langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Examining
> moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm:
> moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel Cannot add package
> moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm t
On 18/01/13 16:12, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> The most helpful approach would be provide bug reports, when btrfs will
> be proposed as a default file system (again). Without bug reports, real
> numbers etc. is hard to make any decision. I don't wish to test on my
> machine, so I would be glad for h
On 01/18/2013 04:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me.
>
> What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to
> do with it the first time I saw it, and then every time after that it just
> gets in the w
On 01/19/2013 12:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to
>> 20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this?
>> Are the first 200 numbers reserved for something?
>
I have tried the following from :-
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide
# yum install fedora-release-rawhide
# yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync
gives :-
...
--> Running transaction check
---> Package NetworkManager.i686 1:0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19 will be a
dow
On 20 January 2013 00:58, Aaron Gray wrote:
> I have tried the following from :-
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide
>
> # yum install fedora-release-rawhide
>
> # yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync
>
> gives :-
>
> ...
>
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Pac
On 01/19/2013 04:58 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Error: Package: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19.i686 (fedora)
Requires: libnl-genl-3.so.200
Removing: libnl3-3.2.14-1.fc18.i686 (@anaconda/18)
libnl-genl-3.so.200
Updated By: libnl3-3.2.19-1
Hi
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Richard Vickery <
richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> I backed up some sensitive files with DUP and upgraded to F18. Now calling
> up the Deja DUP program sends the computer into a mode where nothing is
> available; it doesn't respond to any key
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
> >On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >>
> >>>I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a p
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:46 PM, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
>> >On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> >>On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchi
29 matches
Mail list logo
