On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:43AM +0100, poma wrote:
Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
Whoops, sorry; forgot about that. I don't think the default should change
since, since I think the most common use is active Fedora contributors. If
you find yourself using this a
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 02/21/2013 02:47 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to build the recent released version of blender. But
unfotunately,
I have got the following odd error message:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh
I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the build
logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong.
What does this mean?
GenericError: upload path
exists: /mnt/koji/work/tasks/9923/423/naev-data-0.5.3-7.fc19.noarch.rpm
Jonathan
[1]
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914296
Bug ID: 914296
Summary: perl-Mail-GnuPG: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-GnuPG
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914292
Bug ID: 914292
Summary: perl-Ima-DBI: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Ima-DBI
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914293
Bug ID: 914293
Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914300
Bug ID: 914300
Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914301
Bug ID: 914301
Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
In Ghostscript 9.07, the license for the majority of the package is
changing from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+ (the Affero General Public License). I
intend to update to 9.07 in rawhide shortly.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914303
Bug ID: 914303
Summary: perl-Net-IP-CMatch: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-IP-CMatch
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914302
Bug ID: 914302
Summary: perl-Net-Domain-TLD: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Domain-TLD
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914307
Bug ID: 914307
Summary: perl-PDL: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PDL
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
In Ghostscript 9.07, the license for the majority of the package is
changing from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+ (the Affero General Public License). I
intend to update to 9.07 in rawhide shortly.
Tim.
*/
[Fixed subject line to include new license shortname]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On 02/22/2013 11:05 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
In Ghostscript 9.07, the license for the majority of the package is
changing from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+ (the Affero General Public License). I
intend to update to 9.07 in rawhide shortly.
Is there some exception (like for the database with the unspeakable
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there some exception (like for the database with the unspeakable
name), or does this affect CUPS? Will CUPS be extended to allow
downloading the Ghostscript source code?
Good question: CUPS is licensed as GPLv2, which is listed on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/2013 12:14 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there some exception (like for the database with the
unspeakable name), or does this affect CUPS? Will CUPS be
extended to allow downloading the
If all you want is the spec file, then this probably the easiest way:
$ wget http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firefox.git/plain/firefox.spec
However, this way you miss patches, and other auxiliary files.
- Thomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I've just updated perl-SQL-Translator in rawhide and f18. It comes with a
license change from GPLv2 to GPL+ or Artistic (aka the same terms as Perl 5
itself).
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Summary of changes:
92dbec4... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*)
9fc7031... Upstream update. (*)
4a2b3f0... Upstream update. (*)
22b9bb6... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 22b9bb6e4a5f704f46b194867aa73d8d7a310fed
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Feb 22 15:42:22 2013 +0100
Merge cleanup.
rt3.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/rt3.spec b/rt3.spec
index 9043c78..fca720a 100644
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:58:18 +0200
Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the
build logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong.
What does this mean?
GenericError: upload path
exists:
Broken upgrade path report for tags f18 - f18-updates - f19:
cmpi-bindings:
f18-updates f19 (cmpi-bindings-0.5.2-5.fc18 cmpi-bindings-0.5.2-4.fc19)
darktable:
f18-updates f19 (darktable-1.1.3-1.fc18 darktable-1.1-0.1.rc1.fc19)
fedora-release-notes:
f18 f19
Bill Nottingham wrote:
The feature submisson deadline was never preliminary. The schedule was
not finalized until after all features were submitted.
But it's clear that there was a misunderstanding there, and that all the
other criteria for an exception are satisfied.
Kevin Kofler
--
On 02/22/13 10:19, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:43AM +0100, poma wrote:
Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
Whoops, sorry; forgot about that. I don't think the default should change
since, since I think the most common use is active Fedora
Hi,
I am hereby orphaning agg in all Fedora branches. (In EPEL, it is owned by
orion.) I had picked up agg long ago as a dependency of Gnash, but I handed
over Gnash to hicham months ago and so I don't have any personal interest in
agg anymore. And now it fails to build yet again:
I'm not reporting, cause kernel was tainted by virtualbox, but should I be
worried?
Feb 22 09:21:58 nbecker1 kernel: [76101.244542] [ cut here
]
Feb 22 09:21:58 nbecker1 kernel: [76101.244582] WARNING: at
fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xf4/0x100
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Hi,
I am hereby orphaning agg in all Fedora branches. (In EPEL, it is owned by
orion.) I had picked up agg long ago as a dependency of Gnash, but I handed
over Gnash to hicham months ago and so I don't have any
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 22:41 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 21 February 2013 18:24, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:04 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 19 February 2013 12:13, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Question: does a python segfault from a
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914276
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914275
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hello,
I am going to be orphaning the PycURL package... Upstream is dead,
the last new release was in 2008. Yet, PycURL is a critical part of
Fedora as Yum uses it to download metadata and packages.
The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass rebuild:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 07:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:58:18 +0200
Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the
build logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong.
What does this mean?
On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
I wanted to use the onboard FDE but didn't find docs on how to do it.
Yeah small problem. They even make it difficult to figure out if it's an OPAL
variety of SED. If it is, it's always encrypting, it's just unlocked by
default.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:32:29AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I'm not reporting, cause kernel was tainted by virtualbox, but should I be
worried?
I don't think you should be worried. I think it was a relatively
harmless warning that reservations were a little sloppy. Josef says
it's been
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone
wants to take over upstream development more power to them.
I use pycurl as well. Do you have a suggestion for an alternative
package to use that has similar capabilities?
--
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone
wants to take over upstream development more power to them.
I use pycurl as well. Do you have a suggestion for an
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone
wants to take over upstream development more power to them.
I use pycurl
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work?
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/curlish/
It's calling out to curl via subprocess - that doesn't feel like a good
idea
-sv
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work?
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/**curlish/https://pypi.python.org/pypi/curlish/
It's calling out
On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass
rebuild:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411
Thanks for heads up! This is a bug in the latest upstream release of libcurl.
I will apply the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass
rebuild:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411
Thanks for heads up! This
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent! Jeffrey, will you be picking python-pycurl up again, then?
No. While this was an easy fix that was actually in another package,
PycURL has other problems. I think that the most obvious one is
handling errors
On Friday, February 22, 2013 14:54:04 Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent! Jeffrey, will you be picking python-pycurl up again, then?
No. While this was an easy fix that was actually in another package,
PycURL has other
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com wrote:
I have taken the ownership for now.
Thanks!
--
Jeff Ollie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:00 PM, poma wrote:
deco grub2-2.00-16.fc19.src.rpm
13020 blocks
[backtrace cut]
Aborted
--
Hmm, the crash does not happen here. How reproducible is this? Can you debug?
Although the extraction is successful, checksums are OK. :)
Thanks for pointing out an
On Sex, 2013-02-22 at 00:36 +0100, poma wrote:
On 02/21/13 10:39, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:16:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to download a spec file using yum
or rpm only (without downloading the rpm)?
No, but there's a
Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado wrote:
Hi, everyone
I've a problem that has kept me worried about three weeks ago and i do
not know how to solve, when I try to test any package on koji (in any
instance, ppc, arm, s390, x86 ) that has a higher weight to a mega, it
refuses to even begin the
Thanks Johannes, but I mean, really in the first case that I show in my
email, the load never reaches 100% or even begins. Whichever wait time
2013/2/23 Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado wrote:
Hi, everyone
I've a problem that has kept me worried about
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914241
Bug ID: 914241
Summary: perl-Array-Diff: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Array-Diff
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914242
Bug ID: 914242
Summary: perl-Authen-CAS-Client: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Authen-CAS-Client
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914243
Bug ID: 914243
Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit: FTBFS in
rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914244
Bug ID: 914244
Summary: perl-CGI-Untaint: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CGI-Untaint
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914245
Bug ID: 914245
Summary: perl-CGI-Untaint-date: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CGI-Untaint-date
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914246
Bug ID: 914246
Summary: perl-CGI-Untaint-email: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CGI-Untaint-email
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914247
Bug ID: 914247
Summary: perl-Carp-Assert: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Carp-Assert
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914248
Bug ID: 914248
Summary: perl-Carp-Assert-More: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Carp-Assert-More
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914249
Bug ID: 914249
Summary: perl-Class-Accessor: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-Accessor
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914250
Bug ID: 914250
Summary: perl-Class-Accessor-Chained: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-Accessor-Chained
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914251
Bug ID: 914251
Summary: perl-Class-DBI: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914252
Bug ID: 914252
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-AbstractSearch: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-AbstractSearch
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914253
Bug ID: 914253
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-AsForm: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-AsForm
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914254
Bug ID: 914254
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-FromCGI: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-FromCGI
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914255
Bug ID: 914255
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-Loader: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-Loader
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914256
Bug ID: 914256
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-Loader-Relationship: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-Loader-Relationship
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914257
Bug ID: 914257
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-Pager: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-Pager
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914258
Bug ID: 914258
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-RetrieveAll: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-RetrieveAll
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914259
Bug ID: 914259
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914260
Bug ID: 914260
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-SQLite: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-SQLite
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914261
Bug ID: 914261
Summary: perl-Class-DBI-mysql: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-DBI-mysql
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914264
Bug ID: 914264
Summary: perl-Class-Whitehole: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-Whitehole
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914266
Bug ID: 914266
Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite2: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-SQLite2
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914265
Bug ID: 914265
Summary: perl-DBD-AnyData: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-AnyData
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914267
Bug ID: 914267
Summary: perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914269
Bug ID: 914269
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914270
Bug ID: 914270
Summary: perl-Email-MIME: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-MIME
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914271
Bug ID: 914271
Summary: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914268
Bug ID: 914268
Summary: perl-Data-Page: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Data-Page
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914272
Bug ID: 914272
Summary: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914273
Bug ID: 914273
Summary: perl-Email-MessageID: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-MessageID
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914274
Bug ID: 914274
Summary: perl-Email-Reply: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Reply
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914275
Bug ID: 914275
Summary: perl-Business-CreditCard-0.32 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Business-CreditCard
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914276
Bug ID: 914276
Summary: perl-Email-Valid: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Valid
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914280
Bug ID: 914280
Summary: perl-Encode-JIS2K: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Encode-JIS2K
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914281
Bug ID: 914281
Summary: perl-Exporter-Lite: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Exporter-Lite
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914282
Bug ID: 914282
Summary: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914277
Bug ID: 914277
Summary: perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914278
Bug ID: 914278
Summary: perl-Encode-HanExtra: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Encode-HanExtra
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914283
Bug ID: 914283
Summary: perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-MMagic-XS
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914284
Bug ID: 914284
Summary: perl-GD-SVG: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-GD-SVG
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914285
Bug ID: 914285
Summary: perl-HTML-TableExtract: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTML-TableExtract
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914286
Bug ID: 914286
Summary: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914287
Bug ID: 914287
Summary: perl-HTTP-Recorder: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTTP-Recorder
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914294
Bug ID: 914294
Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Number: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Number
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914295
Bug ID: 914295
Summary: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914288
Bug ID: 914288
Summary: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914309
Bug ID: 914309
Summary: perl-PPI-Tester: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PPI-Tester
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914304
Bug ID: 914304
Summary: perl-OLE-Storage_Lite: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-OLE-Storage_Lite
Severity: unspecified
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914306
Bug ID: 914306
Summary: perl-Olson-Abbreviations: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Olson-Abbreviations
Severity: unspecified
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
