Re: Yubikey single-factor authentication disabled

Thank you for the correction. My bad. Clearly I need another coffee before posting. Clive -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Yubikey single-factor authentication disabled

On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 07:09 +, Clive Hills wrote: > Spot's poll is interesting - I see SecureID hard tokens leading the > hard > tokens featured (7am UTC Thursday) but how does an individual buy one? If you are referring to https://sparkslinux.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/poll-what-multi-factor-au

Re: Yubikey single-factor authentication disabled

On 7 Mar 2013 07:09, "Clive Hills" wrote: > > I suppose I have to bite and ask why yubikey is regarded as single-factor? I guess it isn't something I know as well as something I have? > > Spot's poll is interesting - I see SecureID hard tokens leading the hard tokens featured (7am UTC Thursday) bu

Re: Yubikey single-factor authentication disabled

I suppose I have to bite and ask why yubikey is regarded as single-factor? I guess it isn't something I know as well as something I have? Spot's poll is interesting - I see SecureID hard tokens leading the hard tokens featured (7am UTC Thursday) but how does an individual buy one? Clive -- devel

Re: New list for QA development: qa-devel

On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 11:11:06 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: > A lot of wiki page should be updated. Thanks for the reminder - I haven't started on that yet. I'll make sure it gets done before we disable new posts on autoqa-devel@ Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing li

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? >> > > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't > immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or rea

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? > > > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't > immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or reall

Re: Fwd: [mirall] plasma client try3

Joseph Marrero wrote: > From: Joseph Marrero > Date: Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:40 PM > Subject: Re: [mirall] plasma client try3 > To: Kevin Fenzi > > > I am preparing the package for upstream merge between mirall and > owncloud-plasma-client Looks like the root cause is more likely this snippet

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

On 06/03/13 09:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:31:06 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: We do already have an AutoQA test which runs rpmguard, and rpmguard notes dependency/provision version changes. Here it is spotting an ABI bump for binutils: http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resu

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:31:06 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > We do already have an AutoQA test which runs rpmguard, and rpmguard > notes dependency/provision version changes. Here it is spotting an > ABI bump for binutils: > > http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/531743-autotest/qa02.qa/rpmgu

Fwd: [mirall] plasma client try3

From: Joseph Marrero Date: Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:40 PM Subject: Re: [mirall] plasma client try3 To: Kevin Fenzi I am preparing the package for upstream merge between mirall and owncloud-plasma-client This is are test builds, they are not going to be pushed to any kind of updates until the offi

Re: [mirall] plasma client try3

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 01:00:26 + (UTC) Joseph Marrero wrote: > commit 868b82191f2627c6f34d64abb554b06e53de41fb > Author: Joseph Marrero > Date: Tue Mar 5 20:59:46 2013 -0400 > > plasma client try3 > > mirall.spec |3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > --- > d

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

On 06/03/13 08:38 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I just tried fedpkg and failed duo to permissions, so I just want to mention that you can get the SRPM from koji at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=386408 /Palle Try fedpkg clone --anonymous net-snmp To avoid going through

Re: New list for QA development: qa-devel

On 06/03/13 07:11 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: A lot of wiki page should be updated. That is a true statement. I am also strongly in favour of world peace. Would you like to be just a bit more...specific? Detailed? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedor

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

On 06/03/13 06:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - On 05/03/13 10:39 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote: can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org . That's not really a question that makes sense. Fedora runs an OpenID provider which gives you an Ope

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

On 06/03/13 06:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I encountered an issue recently with pypi.org, where it was treating http://sgallagh.id.fedoraproject.org and https://sgallagh.id.fedoraproject.org as separate accounts (up to a point where they were causing tracebacks because they shared the same em

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and

Re: New list for QA development: qa-devel

A lot of wiki page should be updated. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

On 03/06/2013 10:41 AM, James Laska wrote: * Fedora 18 * mediawiki-validator - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086055 * mediawiki-semantic - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5086060 Thes

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

On 04/03/13 10:18 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: This is a proposal of changes to the way future Fedora cycles should work and integrate changes. So just a couple of notes on the proposal: It's phrased in very technical terms here - probably a wise choice - but I think it's worth noting one of the

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

On 06/03/13 04:40 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:48:29 -0500 (EST) From tooling perspective - that's the question if we want to enhance our tools, step into other similar project (for collaboration with our downstreams? other distros...). yeah,

New list for QA development: qa-devel

It occurred to me that it's just possible someone might find this interesting but not be subscribed to test@, so I thought I'd mention it here. We have recently created the new list 'qa-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org' for discussion of QA tool development. It will subsume the autoqa-devel l

Re: Python libraries and backwards compat [was Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?]

On 04/03/13 02:51 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly run organisation not devoting enough cycles to maintain the software it uses,

Fedora ARM weekly status meeting minutes 2013-03-06

Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today. For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-03-06/fedora-meeting-1.2013-03-06-21.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Non responsive state for systemd

Steve Clark (scl...@netwolves.com) said: > Well you can be as sarcastic as you want but I have been using UNIX/Linux > since 1985 and never had init hang or die on me. sysvinit and systemd have linked against libselinux since SELinux policy was introduced. upstart only didn't because policy was l

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said: > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 16:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > We don't ship in a way that easily allows this though, now. Admittedly, > > this is due to the sheer *amount* of stuff involved in just maintaining > > single versions of things, and how muc

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 588 - create MAN pages for command line scripts

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/588 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/588/0001-Ticket-588-Create-MAN-pages-for-command-line-scripts.patch -- Mark Reynolds Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

- Original Message - > > Gnome maintainers: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/polkit-gnome > > Complete orphan. Please add yourselves (halfline, mclasen, ajax, > mcann, whoever is interested) We don't need polkit-gnome anymore, gnome-shell has its own polkit agent bu

Re: Yubikey single-factor authentication disabled

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:58:00 +0100 Andreas Bierfert wrote: > Hi folks, > > anyone else seeing "Yubikey single-factor authentication has been > disabled." when logging into fas or any other fas based services? > > I checked in fas and yubikey is enabled for my account (and has been > for years).

Yubikey single-factor authentication disabled

Hi folks, anyone else seeing "Yubikey single-factor authentication has been disabled." when logging into fas or any other fas based services? I checked in fas and yubikey is enabled for my account (and has been for years). Test auth in fas works. Regards, Andreas -- BR Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc.

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-03-06)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-03-06) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:00:07 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-03-06/fesco.2

Fedora ARM weekly status meeting 2013-03-06

Good Afternoon all, Please join us today (Wednesday, March 6th) at 4PM EST (9PM UTC) for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. On the agenda so far.. 0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting 1) Problem packages 2) Aarch64 patching 3) Managing change

Re: Mediawiki 1.20.2 has landed

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 15:23 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > I was not able to use your updated package as the latest version of > > semantics now requires the Validator[1] extension. > > > > [1] http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Validator > > More specifically:

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2013 11:07 AM, Palle Ravn wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher > mailto:sgall...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > That said, for applying a patch to the source locally, you > probably want to install the 'fedora-packager' pack

RE: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd/udev Predictable Network Interface Names

> -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel- > boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michal Schmidt > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 10:22 PM > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd/udev Predictable Network

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd/udev Predictable Network Interface Names

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 03/04/2013 04:01 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: >> >> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena.c: efx->net_dev->dev_id = >> EFX_OWORD_FIELD(reg, FRF_CZ_CS_PORT_NUM) - 1; > > > I think sfc does not really *need* to set dev_id. > Yes, these are multi-po

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > That said, for applying a patch to the source locally, you probably > want to install the 'fedora-packager' package and then clone the > net-snmp build tree. > > fedpkg clone net-snmp > > Then you can modify the spec file in that directo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:26:13 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Would be good if emacs-rpm-spec-mode could be kept. > Taking it over. Great! Thanks. -- Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc0.git15.1.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.31 0.21 0.24 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

File perl-NOCpulse-Utils-1.14.12.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by msuchy

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NOCpulse-Utils: c454ff9f71e9a1d0aff2aa6be00c384b perl-NOCpulse-Utils-1.14.12.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

[Bug 914285] perl-HTML-TableExtract: FTBFS in rawhide

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914285 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||918612 -- You are receivi

[Bug 867266] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.14 is available

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867266 Wes Hardaker changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE -- You ar

Re: eigen3 license change

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Rich Mattes wrote: > Hi all, > > I have updated the eigen3 package[1] to release 3.1.2 in rawhide. This > update comes with a license change: eigen3 is now licensed as MPLv2.0 with > parts licensed as LGPLv2+ and BSD. > > Affected packages include: > fawkes (GPLv2+

[Bug 867266] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.14 is available

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867266 Wes Hardaker changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution

[Bug 867266] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.14 is available

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867266 --- Comment #1 from Wes Hardaker --- pushed a while ago. 0.14 is current in most branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token

Re: Testing valgrind in rawhide (separate valgrind-debuginfo package)

On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 14:38 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > BTW can you clear up a peculiarity I've noticed in valgrind in > Rawhide? > > The symbols reported in the stack traces seem to be mangled in a > strange way, eg: > > ==11843== 56 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

On Wed 06 Mar 2013 09:24:02 AM EST, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > - Original Message - >> On 05/03/13 10:39 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote: >>> can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org >>> . >> >> That's not really a question that makes sense. Fedora runs an OpenID >> p

[Bug 914285] perl-HTML-TableExtract: FTBFS in rawhide

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914285 --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata --- BRs are all wrong. I'll also update this to 2.11. The package also basically needs HTML::ElementTable which is not in Fedora yet. I'll package that, too. -- You are receiving this mail becau

Re: Testing valgrind in rawhide (separate valgrind-debuginfo package)

BTW can you clear up a peculiarity I've noticed in valgrind in Rawhide? The symbols reported in the stack traces seem to be mangled in a strange way, eg: ==11843== 56 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 6 ==11843==at 0x4A06409: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_

[Bug 914285] perl-HTML-TableExtract: FTBFS in rawhide

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914285 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

- Original Message - > On 05/03/13 10:39 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote: > > can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org > > . > > That's not really a question that makes sense. Fedora runs an OpenID > provider which gives you an OpenID associated with your 'Fedora >

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> We also propose to build up automated tests to verify the tier 1 and >> tier 2 functionality, and use those tests on newly-built packages to >> gate inclusion in rawhide. > > Please no! Extending the already painful re

Re: Testing valgrind in rawhide (separate valgrind-debuginfo package)

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:15:30PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for some valgrind users that want to try out the latest > valgrind package in rawhide. > > If you use valgrind please try out the new valgrind-3.8.1-10.fc19 > version in rawhide. It is the first version that put

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 08:32:27 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:39 -0700, Kurt Seifried wrote: > > can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org. > > If you run your own openid server then of course you can use your > openid to login on website that requires *an* openid

Re: guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 06 Mar 2013 09:02:36 AM EST, Fulko Hew wrote: > I need some help/guidance on how to re-build a (normally) > distributed package (net-snmp) using the latest Fedora spec file, > but using the latest (upstream git head) version of the source; or >

guidance needed for rebuilding an RPM

I need some help/guidance on how to re-build a (normally) distributed package (net-snmp) using the latest Fedora spec file, but using the latest (upstream git head) version of the source; or alternatively, the current Fedora version _with my_ fix applied. You see, it may be some time before upstre

Re: Error dependencies

FIxed. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20130306 changes

Compose started at Wed Mar 6 08:15:15 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit) [condor] condor-plumage-7.9.1-0.1.fc19.4.x86_64 requires

Re: MariaDB replacing MySQL

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote: > In practice, this means that it will be almost impossible to install MySQL > in Fedora. The recipe in the feature page [1] requires the user to > > 1. edit yum.conf to set excludes=mariadb* and obsoletes=0, > 2. run yum shell to replace the

Re: MariaDB replacing MySQL

On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:14:25 +0100, Honza Horak wrote: On 03/05/2013 11:07 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:17:00 +0100, Tom Lane wrote: The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL", "MySQL-serv

eigen3 license change

Hi all, I have updated the eigen3 package[1] to release 3.1.2 in rawhide. This update comes with a license change: eigen3 is now licensed as MPLv2.0 with parts licensed as LGPLv2+ and BSD. Affected packages include: fawkes (GPLv2+ and GPLv2+ with exceptions) [Pulled into via a development me

Re: Issue creating systemd service files

On Tue, 05.03.13 19:48, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com) wrote: > [Unit] > Description=sshdfilter Daemon > Documentation=file://usr/share/doc/sshdfilter-1.5.7/INSTALL.Fedora > DefaultDependencies=no DefaultDependencies=no is unlikely what you want here. That's an option for early-

Re: Non responsive state for systemd

On 03/06/2013 07:08 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 06.03.13 06:55, Steve Clark (scl...@netwolves.com) wrote: On 03/04/2013 07:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 04.03.13 10:24, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com) wrote: "Lennart Poettering wrote:" On Mon, 04.03.13

Re: Fedora 18 and new version of Gnome (3.7.x)

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:27:50PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > I don't suggest you doing that. > > Upgrading to Fedora 19 is not good for end users. That's rather negative. We want to encourage testers. I would suggest to the original poster: (1) Create a Fedora 18 virtual machine. (2) I

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

- Original Message - > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:48:29 -0500 (EST) > > From tooling perspective - that's the question if we want to > > enhance > > our tools, step into other similar project (for collaboration with > > our downstreams? other distros...). > > yeah, I don't know. > > Perhaps so

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently >> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17. >> >> The following packages are curren

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17. > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If > you have a need for

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/03/13 18:32, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:45:12 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > >> On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >>> Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan) >> That's a curious package, it lasted a few mo

Re: Non responsive state for systemd

On Wed, 06.03.13 06:55, Steve Clark (scl...@netwolves.com) wrote: > On 03/04/2013 07:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >On Mon, 04.03.13 10:24, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com) > >wrote: > > > >>"Lennart Poettering wrote:" > >>>On Mon, 04.03.13 07:56, David Highley (dhigh...@high

Re: rawhide report: 20130305 changes

Fedora Rawhide Report píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 14:07 +: > [libgda] > 1:libgda-tools-5.1.1-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.5()(64bit) tracked as FTBFS in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914131 - caused by a change in graphviz Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedo

Re: OK to bump soname for a lesser-used library?

Dan Horák writes: > Josh Stone píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 09:44 -0800: >> Is that feasible for C++ APIs? I mean, it might be possible if you're >> *really* careful about hiding class changes, but this project is not >> structured that way. > > it is, see eg. the wxWidgets library, they are really

Re: Non responsive state for systemd

On 03/04/2013 07:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 04.03.13 10:24, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com) wrote: "Lennart Poettering wrote:" On Mon, 04.03.13 07:56, David Highley (dhigh...@highley-recommended.com) wrote: Twice now we have one Fedora 18 system where systemd s

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:45:12 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On 05/03/13 01:20, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Package emacs-rpm-spec-mode (orphan) > That's a curious package, it lasted a few months, was never branched, > and then is gone. And rpm-spec-mode.el has been provided by > emacs-co

Re: MariaDB replacing MySQL [was Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?]

On 5. 3. 2013 at 19:14:25, Honza Horak wrote: > On 03/05/2013 11:07 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:17:00 +0100, Tom Lane wrote: > >> The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other > >> distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL", "MySQL-ser

Re: [emelfm2] remove vendor tag from desktop file. https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/247

On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 06:10:20 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > [...] but it appears that any change including dropping very old obsoletes > is considered controversial or needless change or personal preference now > and frankly, it is just less work for me to not care about other packages > much. I f

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

On 5 March 2013 17:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:44:39 -0500 > Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> This is local testing that has been done in concert with the feature >> to add enterprise login support to Anaconda/firstboot. There's >> currently no way to actually install from Rawhide

Re: Error dependencies

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:55:05 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Error: Package: policycoreutils-newrole-2.1.14-16.fc19.i686 (rawhide) >Requires: policycoreutils = 2.1.14-16.fc19 >Installed: policycoreutils-2.1.14-17.fc19.i686 (@rawhide) >policycoreutils = 2.1.1

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:18:04PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > This is a proposal of changes to the way future Fedora cycles should > work and integrate changes. > > Some of the things we want to achieve: > * Make rawhide to be reliably installable and usable by developers by > coherently intro

Re: Issue creating systemd service files

在 2013-3-6 PM3:33，"Pierre-Yves Chibon" 写道： > > On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:49 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Wrong list, please. > > How so? > > Pierre Weird, I didn't reply to this thread... Sorry... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

On 05/03/13 10:39 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote: can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org . That's not really a question that makes sense. Fedora runs an OpenID provider which gives you an OpenID associated with your 'Fedora identity' - ultimately, it's backed by yo