Compose started at Fri Apr 12 08:15:37 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[amide]
amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
which is exactly the goal ASLR is desigend for
It's designed to make certain types of attacks more difficult. It
doesn't make them impossible, just much harder.
Here is an example.
When you write a security
Compose started at Fri Apr 12 09:15:15 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[alexandria]
alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) =
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:19:46PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
With the current setup, we get mutating ASLR when compiled as PIE,
Surely ... you get mutating ASLR only when compiled as PIE
*and* the server process
Am 12.04.2013 13:44, schrieb Josh Bressers:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
which is exactly the goal ASLR is desigend for
It's designed to make certain types of attacks more difficult. It
doesn't make them impossible, just much harder.
FYI,
libreswan 3.2 will hit rawhide later today. Everyone who has openswan
installed and who update their system will automatically get migrated
to libreswan.
The configuration of openswan should be fully compatible with libreswan,
but if you run into issues, please hunt me down and complain
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Björn Persson wrote:
Paul Wouters wrote:
Why does the _hardened_build macro for the spec file use -z,relro and not
-z,relro,-z,now ?
Huh? As far as I can see _hardened_build adds -z now, not relro.
-Wl,-z,relro is supposed to be included in LDFLAGS. Or has this changed
Hi,
During 2010-2011, I used to generate 15 day report for package reviews
and post it[1]. There were yearly report as well[2].
In case anyone is interested in taking it up again, feel free to do
so. Script is available at:
https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzReviewReport.py
In
Hi,
i have found that code snippets contained in tmpfiles.d packaging
guidelines [1] lead to rpmlint error
E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/tmpfiles.d.
Could those snippets be updated to make use of correct macro %{_tmpfilesdir}?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tmpfiles.d
Credits goes to Tomasz Torcz that pointed me to correct macro in a
package review he is doing for me. :)
2013/4/12 Lorenzo Dalrio lorenzo.dal...@gmail.com:
Hi,
i have found that code snippets contained in tmpfiles.d packaging
guidelines [1] lead to rpmlint error
E: hardcoded-library-path in
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
During 2010-2011, I used to generate 15 day report for package reviews
and post it[1]. There were yearly report as well[2].
In case anyone is interested in taking it up again, feel free to do
so. Script is
I propose to create QtDesktop group - for qt-only applications.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups?rd=PackageMaintainers/CompsXml#New_groups
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
Has someone used fedora-packager-setup behind a proxy successfully?
I keep getting network connection failures even after I specify HTTP_PROXY or
ALL_PROXY env vars.
Google is also not giving good suggestions. Could you please suggest me any way
to work around it?
Thanks,
Ravindra
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:42:25PM -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
I keep getting network connection failures even after I specify
HTTP_PROXY or ALL_PROXY env vars.
Shouldn't it be http_proxy and all_proxy, in lower case?
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
On 12 April 2013 20:55, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Hi,
During 2010-2011, I used to generate 15 day report for package reviews
and post it[1]. There were yearly report as well[2].
In case anyone is interested in taking it up again, feel free
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:02 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Björn Persson wrote:
Paul Wouters wrote:
Why does the _hardened_build macro for the spec file use -z,relro and
not -z,relro,-z,now ?
Huh? As far as I can see _hardened_build adds -z now, not relro.
Hi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
[..]
Couldn't infrastructure team just automate this?
[..]
If infrastructure team agrees to do it, script will need some adjustment.
Yeah. Part of the reason I suggested this to you long back was that it
keeps the idea of
Eugene Pivnev (ti.eug...@gmail.com) said:
I propose to create QtDesktop group - for qt-only applications.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups?rd=PackageMaintainers/CompsXml#New_groups
What is the use case for 'toolkit used' as being used as the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:59:21PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:42:25PM -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
I keep getting network connection failures even after I specify
HTTP_PROXY or ALL_PROXY env vars.
Shouldn't it be http_proxy and all_proxy, in lower case?
I
Thanks Toshio, https_proxy=proxy helped me to go little further. I got a
different error, here is the traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/fedora-packager-setup, line 108, in module
main()
File /usr/bin/fedora-packager-setup, line 82, in main
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3 through RC2 are over their
size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live
SoaS). Also, note that this is the first time a TC follows an RC (namely
RC2). This is due to several new unaddressed blockers. Hopefully, the
next
On Apr 12, 2013 4:25 PM, Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.com wrote:
Thanks Toshio, https_proxy=proxy helped me to go little further. I
got a different error, here is the traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/fedora-packager-setup, line 108, in module
main()
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires
libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires
libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
28 matches
Mail list logo
