Re: Review swap

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > I'd like to offer a review swap. I've taken both. In return, you may choose from: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699 h

Re: Login to Koji

On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 15:05 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:17:13 -0700 (PDT) > Ravindra Kumar wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have setup my certificate today using "fedora-packager-setup". > > However, when I try to login to https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ > > after importin

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 04/17/2013 02:35 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still > oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3). > > As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 > (RC4) is now available for testing. Content informa

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > Whatever you think. But it means you can't just write: > > $dom = Sys::Virt->get_domain_by_name ("foo"); > $g = Sys::Guestfs->create (); > $g->add_libvirt_domain ($dom); And that has nothing to do with what you said, languages being able (or no

Package-split upgrade path

Hello, In python-pillow (the python imaging fork which replaced PIL in F19+), there is a module (ImageQt) which requires PyQt4, but that dependency is missing in python-pillow (and in python-imaging before). I don't really like adding PyQt4 as a dependency to the main package, since it pulls i

Review swap

I'd like to offer a review swap. Here are my review requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947492 Let me know. Thanks, -- Lokesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

Whatever you think. But it means you can't just write: $dom = Sys::Virt->get_domain_by_name ("foo"); $g = Sys::Guestfs->create (); $g->add_libvirt_domain ($dom); Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.

Re: Login to Koji

> We are adjusting anything that tells you you need to set this up. > Where did you see it? From fedora-packager-setup? Yes. It generates a cert for browser and asks it to be imported in the browser. BTW, fedora-packager-setup has not generated ~/.koji directory for me, https://fedoraproject.or

Re: Login to Koji

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Ravindra Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I have setup my certificate today using "fedora-packager-setup". > However, when I try to login to https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ > after importing "fedora-browser-cert.p12" into Firefox, it keeps > timing out. > >

Re: Appropriate location for cmake support files

On 04/18/2013 02:23 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Mario Ceresa wrote: Hi all, does anybody know where should I put cmake support files such as: OpenIGTLinkBuildSettings.cmake OpenIGTLinkConfig.cmake UseOpenIGTLink.cmake in order for cmake to find them automatically? Can I put them in /usr/share/cmake

Re: Fedora 19 Alpha status, karma requests

On 17/04/13 04:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! So, good news: following the blocker review meeting this morning, we're looking quite close to signing off on Alpha. We just need to fill out the RC4 test matrices before tomorrow's go/no-go meeting, and hope we don't find any more blocker b

Re: Appropriate location for cmake support files

On 04/18/2013 07:55 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Mario Ceresa mailto:mrcer...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, does anybody know where should I put cmake support files such as: OpenIGTLinkBuildSettings.cmake OpenIGTLinkConfig.cmake UseOpenIGTLink.cmake

Re: Appropriate location for cmake support files

Mario Ceresa wrote: > Hi all, > does anybody know where should I put cmake support files such as: > > OpenIGTLinkBuildSettings.cmake > OpenIGTLinkConfig.cmake > UseOpenIGTLink.cmake > > in order for cmake to find them automatically? Can I put them in > /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ ? > > I read a l

Re: kdm sessions in EL6

Eugene Pivnev wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101 > As for Fedora - I can remove %_datadir}/apps/kdm/ (in my package) - > %_datadir/xsessions/* still works. > What about EL6? It is the same -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > I shouldn't say "not possible", but not very easy. A virDomainPtr in > Sys::Virt is wrapped in some object which is very specific to the > internals of Sys::Virt, thus cannot be extracted by Sys::Guestfs. It > would require Sys::Virt to have a separat

Login to Koji

Hi, I have setup my certificate today using "fedora-packager-setup". However, when I try to login to https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ after importing "fedora-browser-cert.p12" into Firefox, it keeps timing out. I have tried with Firefox 19.0.2 on Windows and 17.0.1 on Fedora 18. Any ide

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 01:14:33AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > [...] > > > Passing pointers to objects from one language to another is likely > > > *not* possible however. > > > > Ada imports and exports C pointers just fine, including pointers to > > functions and re

Re: [RFE] lua 5.2

On Wed 17 Apr 2013 08:13:31 AM PDT, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > lua bug with the current status and work being done: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815263 > > -Toshio > > Thanks Toshio, Lets hope the issue will be resolved soon. It is a shame such issue prevents updating other packa

Re: Using fedora-packager-setup behind a proxy

> This looks like a bug that we recently closed in python-requests. See if > there's an update for that package available. Thanks Toshio. "yum update python-requests" solved it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:39:43AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > > We also suffer this problem in reverse: passing a pointer between two > > C libraries is not possible in another non-C language. eg. Passing a > > libvirt virDomainPtr from (Perl) Sys::V

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > I should have been clearer. I meant passing pointers between non-C > languages is likely not possible. Well, it depends on the language, but it is probably possible with some glue code (not necessarily practical though). For example, giving perl code

Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:10:20PM +0900, Florian Festi wrote: > For limiting the change log entries in the binary packages > %_changelog_trimtime can be used that take a unix time stamp as an > integer value. This way the whole history is still available in the spec > file. IIUC, this (untested)

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 01:14:33AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: [...] > > Passing pointers to objects from one language to another is likely > > *not* possible however. > > Ada imports and exports C pointers just fine, including pointers to > functions and records. I should have been clearer. I m

Re: Appropriate location for cmake support files

Thanks Richard, I'll include them in cmake modules then! Mario On 18 April 2013 15:55, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> does anybody know where should I put cmake support files such as: >> >> OpenIGTLinkBuildSettings.cmake >> OpenIGTLin

File Debug-Client-0.25.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Debug-Client: b4e55a7d2111c8599b03cbd78d10be28 Debug-Client-0.25.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Review Request 20: Rework Logging Mechanisms

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/ --- (Updated April 18, 2013, 3:03 p.m.) Review request for blockerbugs. C

Re: Review Request 20: Rework Logging Mechanisms

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/#review22 --- blockerbugs/__init__.py

Re: OSSD motivations

On Apr 18, 2013 7:48 AM, "Richard Vickery" wrote: > > > On Apr 18, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mohamed Lamine Aknouche" wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > Don't know if this is a bit off topic, but I am in real need of you. Thing is, I am a frequent user of open source software, and I am often amazed by the effort

Re: OSSD motivations

On Apr 18, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mohamed Lamine Aknouche" wrote: > > Hi > > > Don't know if this is a bit off topic, but I am in real need of you. Thing is, I am a frequent user of open source software, and I am often amazed by the efforts people make in order to provide me with products and services for

Re: Bundled copies of the Porter stemmer library

On 2013-04-17, Florian Weimer wrote: > Ugh, hit "Send" too soon. > > I found some packages which embed copies of the Porter stemmer library > (PostgreSQL, tracker, pl, etc.). Should I file bugs once I have the > full list, or should I apply for a bundling exception? > > I don't know if the existi

[Bug 952184] perl-Test-Class-0.39 is available

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952184 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC

Re: Appropriate location for cmake support files

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote: > Hi all, > does anybody know where should I put cmake support files such as: > > OpenIGTLinkBuildSettings.cmake > OpenIGTLinkConfig.cmake > UseOpenIGTLink.cmake > CMake upstream doesn't mind including them upstream as long as you're willing t

Appropriate location for cmake support files

Hi all, does anybody know where should I put cmake support files such as: OpenIGTLinkBuildSettings.cmake OpenIGTLinkConfig.cmake UseOpenIGTLink.cmake in order for cmake to find them automatically? Can I put them in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ ? I read a lot of tutorials on how cmake's find_package

F-19 Branched report: 20130418 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 18 09:15:19 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=

rawhide report: 20130418 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 18 08:15:41 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [amide] amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit

OSSD motivations

* Hi Don't know if this is a bit off topic, but I am in real need of you. Thing is, I am a frequent user of open source software, and I am often amazed by the efforts people make in order to provide me with products and services for free. I am now conducting research for a masters' thesis trying

Re: Broken dependencies: rubygem-pam

Dear Bryan, If you think you fixed your package by changing ruby(abi) to ruby(release) then you don't. Quick look on the RPMs will reveal: $ rpm -qp -l http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/rubygem-pam/1.5.4/15.fc19/x86_64/rubygem-pam-1.5.4-15.fc19.x86_64.rpm /builddir/.gem/ruby/cache/

kdm sessions in EL6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101 As for Fedora - I can remove %_datadir}/apps/kdm/ (in my package) - %_datadir/xsessions/* still works. What about EL6? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Plan to drop php-pecl-apc from Fedora - Urgent review needed

Le 16/04/2013 20:50, Jared K. Smith a écrit : > 1/ php-pecl-zendopcache, the Zend OPcache for php 5.3 / 5.4 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91 > > Target version is EPEL-6 and Fedora <= 18 as Fedora >= 19 already have > php-opcache (subpackage of main