On 24 Apr 2013 01:22, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/04/13 10:55 AM, Rave it wrote:
Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout
having more infomation what the
On 04/23/2013 03:27 PM, Richard Marko wrote:
This allows us to get accurate statistics of crashing applications while
not forcing every user to report to bugzilla. This is a trade-off
between getting accurate statistics and quality of the reports as
automated reports are anonymous which is also
On 04/23/2013 07:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:27:50 +0200
Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'll try to explain how crash reporting currently works in Fedora.
Typical reporting process looks like this:
- crash is reported to Faf server which responds with
Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works
just fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite:
7) Error:
test_proxy_eh_ENV_no_proxy(TestNetHTTP):
Errno::ECONNREFUSED: Connection refused - getaddrinfo
On 04/23/2013 09:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:45:34 -0400
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
Well, here's an example why I think such information is highly
useful: currently on my system every program using 3D (openGL/Mesa)
crashes; that means everything:
On 04/24/2013 09:43 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/23/2013 03:27 PM, Richard Marko wrote:
This allows us to get accurate statistics of crashing applications while
not forcing every user to report to bugzilla. This is a trade-off
between getting accurate statistics and quality of the reports
Hello,
I don't know if I'm doing something wrong regarding a package which
includes file capabilities support or if I've hit a bug.
I've added libcap-devel as BuildRequires (probably it's already part of a
base system) and replaced the %attr tags in the file section (to remove
setuid) with a
On 24 April 2013 11:53, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
A segfault is always a bug. This would seem to be the same as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877512 but I had assumed this
was only present in the pre-release versions of rpm 4.11.
Thanks; I've tested a mock
On 04/24/2013 01:13 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 24 April 2013 11:53, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
A segfault is always a bug. This would seem to be the same as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877512 but I had assumed this
was only present in the pre-release
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
BZ filed asking maintainer to branch and build for EL6, or otherwise indicate
he's happy for me to do so here: BZ #956138
But really, this is ridiculous
On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works just
fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite:
7) Error:
test_proxy_eh_ENV_no_proxy(TestNetHTTP):
Hi,
I have three pending review requests for font packages: 956120, 956127,
and 956134. I'm willing to exchange reviews for those.
These are my first font packages, so I'd prefer to review something
else in return.
Cheers,
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 24.4.2013 13:03, Harald Hoyer napsal(a):
On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works just
fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite:
7) Error:
Dne 24.4.2013 13:11, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 24.4.2013 13:03, Harald Hoyer napsal(a):
On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it
works just
fine for F19. I observe following 4
Compose started at Wed Apr 24 08:15:32 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Seems to be due to systemd-202:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035
It's a bug in glibc actually:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339
I found it in gnulib testing yesterday:
Dne 24.4.2013 13:35, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Seems to be due to systemd-202:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035
It's a bug in glibc actually:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339
I found it in
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:43:53PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24.4.2013 13:35, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Seems to be due to systemd-202:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035
It's a bug in glibc actually:
Compose started at Wed Apr 24 09:15:20 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[accerciser]
accerciser-3.8.0-2.fc19.noarch requires python3-ipython-console
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires
On 24 April 2013 12:39, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
Feel free to clone #904818 for Fedora 17 and 18, but dont reopen #877512
as the issue in rpm 4.11-pre was slightly different (although closely
related)
Bug created; I've referenced all the others and the information you
Hi, my name is David Beveridge. my username is bevhost (Beveridge
Internet Hosting)
I have been using redhat since about version 3. After version 9, it
split into fedora core and enterprice linux, I used fedora for while
until centos came out and I've pretty much been using that ever since.
Hello,
I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at it and (my guess) it will be
probably fixed for RHEL 6.5. Note that the bug has been tagged as EasyFix-
The
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
--- Comment #1 from Martin Kyral mky...@redhat.com ---
Description of problem:
perl scripts can't send messages with the LOG_EMERG log level to syslog.
Version:
perl-5.16.3-241.fc18
Steps to Reproduce:
0 [mkyral@ ~ ]$ perl -e
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956263
Bug ID: 956263
Summary: perl scripts do not sent LOG_EMERG log messages
(Sys::Syslog)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.0
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956263
--- Comment #1 from Martin Kyral mky...@redhat.com ---
Version:
perl-5.16.3-267.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
Martin Kyral mky...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956263
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
Martin Kyral mky...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956264
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
Bug ID: 956264
Summary: perl scripts do not sent LOG_EMERG log messages
(Sys::Syslog)
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
Version: RHSCL-1
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
--- Comment #1 from Martin Kyral mky...@redhat.com ---
Verison:
perl516-perl-5.16.3-4.el6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:35:24PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at it and (my guess) it will be
probably fixed for
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:35:24PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at it and (my guess) it will be
probably fixed for
The lightweight tag 'perl-ExtUtils-Helpers-0.019-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
55b6b3d... Update to 0.019
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-ExtUtils-Helpers-0.019-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
55b6b3d... Update to 0.019
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956010
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On 04/23/2013 07:40 PM, Florian Müllner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
Since clock-applet is a default install on every Fedora, I thought this
would be widely reported
While it is installed on every (default desktop spin) Fedora
On 04/24/2013 05:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:35:24PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:42:55PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
%attr(755,root,root) /%{_lib}/*
and the latter
lrwxr-xr-x mode is not what is expected for symlinks.
I'm guessing because the %attr has been applied to the symlink.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, April 24th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) F19 ARM Alpha planning - Defining
Hi
Upstream has been dead for a really long time (last commits were in
2011) and the software is not functional without third party patches. I
have retired this package
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-04-24/fedora-meeting-1.2013-04-24-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956009
Bug ID: 956009
Summary: perl-LDAP-0.55 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-LDAP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956010
Bug ID: 956010
Summary: perl-Module-Install-XSUtil-0.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-Install-XSUtil
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956138
Bug ID: 956138
Summary: Please branch and build for EL6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTML-Tiny
Severity: unspecified
Priority:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956138
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires
libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956009
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-LDAP:
ce97feca024387b448a108be9ab19f8f perl-ldap-0.55.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8f52f556ecc52261f6d2b89c81cc38f17277d5fb
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Apr 24 14:59:32 2013 +0200
0.55 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-LDAP.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956009
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-Helpers:
c6f55eb606c3639eedb634172168f155 ExtUtils-Helpers-0.019.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 55b6b3d0be8ca4297b3dc2faefddc10d36f6dd7e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Apr 24 15:07:56 2013 +0100
Update to 0.019
- New upstream release 0.019
- Fix make_executable for '#!/usr/bin/perl'
perl-ExtUtils-Helpers.spec |6 +-
sources
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
Bug ID: 956257
Summary: perl scripts do not sent LOG_EMERG log messages
(Sys::Syslog)
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl
Keywords:
Summary of changes:
789c0e9... Update to 0.018 (*)
55b6b3d... Update to 0.019 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956010
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
This requires Test::Spellunker which is not yet in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956010
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||956297
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950017
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956263,
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956263
Bug 956263 depends on bug 956257, which changed state.
Bug 956257 Summary: perl scripts do not sent LOG_EMERG log messages
(Sys::Syslog)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
What
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
Bug 956264 depends on bug 956257, which changed state.
Bug 956257 Summary: perl scripts do not sent LOG_EMERG log messages
(Sys::Syslog)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
What
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956263
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956263
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This has been fixed by unbundling the module in Fedora 18 and later. RHCSL
maintainer can merge the necessary changes from Fedora tree.
--
You are
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955687
--- Comment #2 from Ben Higgins bjhigg...@wpi.edu ---
perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.090-1.el6.rf.noarch
perl-Params-Validate-0.92-3.el6.x86_64
It appears that Getopt 0.090-1.el6.rf was loaded from rpmforge without my
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
Debi Rieden drie...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
Brian Gollaher bri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|Regression
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955687
--- Comment #3 from Ben Higgins bjhigg...@wpi.edu ---
Well - work is a strong word . . . the error went away. I now receive the
following error:
Couldn't load class (Hello) because: Error parsing
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955687
--- Comment #4 from Ben Higgins bjhigg...@wpi.edu ---
Please ignore the git behind the keyboard Config::Any was loaded from
another rpmforge RPM . . . the version in EPEL is correct.
Sorry for the inconvenience - we
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864102
Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Event:
4d33213b1f671e2b9f829d3861801943 IO-Event-0.812.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e78b344ef471b2537da24fb3a0f791fc8988ec12
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Wed Apr 24 23:48:01 2013 +0200
Update to 0.812
.gitignore |1 +
perl-IO-Event.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Starman:
f4c3e866b72274666214f647afd68312 Starman-0.3010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.3-242.fc18, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora
18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950017
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.3-242.fc18, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora
18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859910
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.3-242.fc18, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora
18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947444
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.3-242.fc18, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora
18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47332
Fedora:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47332/0001-Ticket-47332-389-ds-base-package-should-be-built-wit.patch
Redhat DS:
#361: Redirect after login not working properly
---+---
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 19
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Fedora 19 Schrödinger's Cat alpha release has arrived with a
preview of the latest fantastic, free, and open source technology
currently under development. Take a peek inside:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
*** What is the Alpha
86 matches
Mail list logo
