On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
There are many review requests here.
Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be reviewing
other packages yourself.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
--
everything's in place and we're all ready to test.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130429
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting
On 04/29/2013 08:59 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
There are many review requests here.
Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be reviewing
other packages yourself.
Matthias
On 04/29/2013 09:12 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 04/29/2013 08:59 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
There are many review requests here.
Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be
Upstream has mis-matched licensing in Makefile.PL and in the source code. I
corrected the License in specfile following the source code.
robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts
are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora
webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files.
Trying to package the webfonts as dependencies I have
On 04/29/2013 11:04 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts
are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora
webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files.
Trying
Compose started at Mon Apr 29 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires
Compose started at Mon Apr 29 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[clementine]
clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
Hi,
On 04/27/2013 11:48 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
It looks like all of the gnome games are still at v3.6.1 in Fedora 19...
I guess because they were split into multiple packages upstream. I guess
it's too late to get these into F19 since they are basically new
packages now, but I wanted to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957639
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Hi,
From time to time, when setting up virtual machines for testing, I miss a
fast way to install the minimal set of packages which allows me to boot
into the desktop of a desktop environment. Currently, I do a minimal
install, then install some core component, i.e. gnome-shell, and then hunt
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Should be a simple review. Let me know if anyone is interested.
Rahul, it would be helpful to put a link to the review ticket in
request emails like this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:07:58 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From time to time, when setting up virtual machines for testing, I miss a
fast way to install the minimal set of packages which allows me to boot
into the desktop of a desktop environment. Currently, I do a
On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
this one is no longer relevant and if there would be a karma-option
in koji i would have given as i rolled out 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64
in production
But 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64 is not pushed to updates-testing .
Meanwhile
Hi
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Should be a simple review. Let me know if anyone is interested.
Rahul, it would be helpful to put a link to
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments which
pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa drivers + displaymanager + bare desktop
shell?
Do the groups already provided in comps.xml[1] not work for this
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments which
pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa drivers + displaymanager + bare desktop
We have a new fedora-review release with quite a lot of bugfixes and update for
current Java guidelines.
Excerpt from NEWS file:
- Updated and improved Java checks for latest packaging guidelines
* Automate buildarch check
* Do CheckNoArch per subpackage instead of buildarch
* Add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2013 10:55 AM, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com
mailto:manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what about creating groups for the various desktop
environments which pull in basesystem +
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.comwrote:
So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments
On 2013-04-29 15:07 (GMT+0200) Sandro Mani composed:
From time to time, when setting up virtual machines for testing, I miss a
fast way to install the minimal set of packages which allows me to boot
into the desktop of a desktop environment. Currently, I do a minimal
install, then install some
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2013 10:55 AM, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com
mailto:manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what about
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 14:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hmm, there seem to be 2 issues here:
1) The original built from the unsplit 3.6.1 sources gnome-games-* packages
need to be blocked, ie:
[hans@shalem ~]$ sudo yum list '*mahjong*'
...
gnome-games-mahjongg.x86_64
On 04/29/2013 10:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
That said, if someone wanted to do the exploration, come up with those
minimal package sets and propose them for inclusion to comps.xml (with
the blessing of the related desktop SIG), I have no problems with it
myself.
To a certain extent, this
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
Nicolas (kwizart)
2013/4/28 Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important
On 27/04/13 23:48, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
It looks like all of the gnome games are still at v3.6.1 in Fedora 19...
I guess because they were split into multiple packages upstream. I guess
it's too late to get these into F19 since they are basically new
packages now, but I wanted to give a
On 04/29/2013 10:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Yes, except it's more than just glchess (now known as gnome-chess) that
is missing; it seems only about half of the games got updated.
If I were you, I would create a bug report against gnome-games with the
list of games. Once created, provide a
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro
mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, except it's more than just glchess (now known as gnome-chess) that
is missing; it seems only about half of the games got updated.
The new gnome-chess package is still waiting for a review[1]. It looks
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
That's doesn't appear to be true.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity
Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways to
Whether it is possible to sane gsteamer and try to remove gtk?
And gvfs - removing *gnome*.
29.04.2013 01:07, Farkas Levente:
On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
I tested - what about Fedora
Dear testers, a new test day awaits! This time it is MariaDB test day, which is
scheduled tomorrow (2013-04-30).
As some of you might know, Fedora 19 is going to experience an interesting
change in default implementation of MySQL RDBMS. MariaDB is a fork of original
MySQL and in comparison to
Le lundi 29 avril 2013 à 16:58 +0200, Sandro Mani a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani
manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what about creating groups for the
Outage: lists.fedoraproject.org migration - 2013-05-01 21:00UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2013-05-01 21:00UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 20:59 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
Whether it is possible to sane gsteamer and try to remove gtk?
And gvfs - removing *gnome*.
It appears that out of the entire gvfsd package, only:
/usr/libexec/gvfsd-recent
requires GTK libraries. Everything else is strictly non-GUI.
On 29.04.2013 19:21, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le lundi 29 avril 2013 à 16:58 +0200, Sandro Mani a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani
manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/23/#review30
---
Code looks good but I'd like to see some test cases for this
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.comwrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
That's doesn't appear to be true.
On 2013-04-29 19:49 (GMT+0200) Sandro Mani composed:
Michael Scherer wrote:
minimal is not well defined.
I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which
allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be usable
without the user installing additional
I still have it on my system and use it, what else is there to use?
Thanks,
Phillip Lynn
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 17:55 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
Nicolas (kwizart)
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review
request?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:49:23PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which
allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be
usable without the user installing additional packages he or she
wishes. So such groups would not
On 29.04.2013 20:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:49:23PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which
allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be
usable without the user installing additional
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux
environments.
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment.
On 04/26/2013 08:28 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 04/26/2013 07:43 AM, José Matos wrote:
As you can see this package is present and available at texlive and since it
is an updated version while maintained it should be the standard.
I think that last year we had this same discussion at
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment. A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that
work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open
source mp3 en/decoder.
Hi,
After my changes today, the latest SRPM should be
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm instead of
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm .
Could someone please tell me how do I get this page
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/o/
updated?
Thanks in
My minimal desktop is OpenBox with fbpanel and lightdm. I'm guessing
there are others; openSUSE has a minimal desktop using a stripped
IceWM. I've lived comfortably with WindowMaker and even twm.
The key to minimizing a desktop IMHO is getting a lighter browser.
It's really hard to use a machine
On 29.04.2013 20:10, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-04-29 19:49 (GMT+0200) Sandro Mani composed:
Michael Scherer wrote:
minimal is not well defined.
I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which
allows the shell to load. This resulting setup is not meant to be usable
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough licenses for the linux
environment. A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that
work on the
Greetings.
I'm happy to announce that our sticky-notes pastebin service is fully
live and in service for any of your Fedora Project related pastebin
needs.
A pastebin is a web application that allows you to temporarily store
small blocks of text or code for sharing to others.
You can find it
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
After my changes today, the latest SRPM should be
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm instead of
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm . Could someone please tell me how
do I get this page
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 16:30 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Hi Ravindra,
After my changes today, the latest SRPM should be
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm instead of
open-vm-tools-9.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm.
Could someone please tell me how do I get this page
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software
copyright issues. Mind you, Most of these patents are finally
expiring, and the existing court cases have been oddm and usually
settled out of
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to
get this particular build working?
What do you mean with Audacity mp3 build is broken ,
Sandro Mani wrote:
I would define minimal as the absolute minimal set of packages which
allows the shell to load
For kde, at least, that pretty much matches what 'kde-workspace' is.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/30/2013 03:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to
get this particular build working?
What do you mean
On 04/29/2013 08:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review
request?
Thanks,
Richard
Sure.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review
request?
Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I probably won't have time
to review it until Wednesday, so take your time. :-)
BTW, it looks
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 05:36:22PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
Hello list,
I use Fedora (and CentOS) on some systems but I am not interested in
packaging for Fedora.
However I have noticed a problem with many of your perl spec files that
causes builds to fail on some non fedora systems.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957638
Bug ID: 957638
Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.6907 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-cpanminus
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957639
Bug ID: 957639
Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9136 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPANPLUS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957641
Bug ID: 957641
Summary: perl-Encode-2.50 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Encode
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957642
Bug ID: 957642
Summary: perl-Exporter-Declare-0.112 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Exporter-Declare
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957643
Bug ID: 957643
Summary: perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.21 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IO-Socket-IP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957644
Bug ID: 957644
Summary: perl-Log-Message-0.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Log-Message
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957645
Bug ID: 957645
Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MIME-EncWords
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957646
Bug ID: 957646
Summary: perl-Module-Build-0.4005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-Build
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914316
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957649
Bug ID: 957649
Summary: perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Perldoc
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Exporter-Declare:
ee3dc296a3d50d8cc06cab7b7411647b Exporter-Declare-0.112.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-IP:
6541131d9cfc898d3da400f4a3e3166d IO-Socket-IP-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7fe63abe7ec8427c5ced8bebda77edc327c2ef0f
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Apr 29 11:01:08 2013 +0200
0.21 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957646
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
commit ad5e6053fc3869209cb747ecec8ed3af45ad2827
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Apr 29 11:03:14 2013 +0200
0.112 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Exporter-Declare.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957643
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957642
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build:
5f5c1609779773d28a61b2691b17f313 Module-Build-0.4005.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4bf6559dae104d1bbe885bb7def245cf5dc43e11
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Apr 29 11:48:17 2013 +0200
0.4005 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Build.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957646
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode:
84ffd77682b5a7cf7c898164f01c1f8c Encode-2.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
commit 3738f5d0b341249983679c922b54894d69274fc0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Apr 29 14:05:26 2013 +0200
2.50 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
3738f5d... 2.50 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957641
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Bug-fix release suitable for F≥19.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Exception:
50e985a335842540b69ea886eeed8a7f Test-Exception-0.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957641
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
commit 05fc94196ec221b3eadf3348d07b0b3c31c49238
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Apr 29 13:24:40 2013 +0100
Update to 0.32
- New upstream release 0.32
- Fixed tests that broke due to diagnostic changes in Test::More 0.99
- Don't use macros for commands
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPANPLUS:
c7f54d07a01814cff9dbec8227ef8fc7 CPANPLUS-0.9136.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b98e5573e025e416511c8791d2a1d21ea4b0a378
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Apr 29 14:43:29 2013 +0200
0.9136 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPANPLUS.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
Summary of changes:
05fc941... Update to 0.32 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Message:
406fe7d1e37980afa105b663c436c4af Log-Message-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e63944142a3e79f2d94c4ddd796d963bb38fcd9d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Apr 29 14:56:31 2013 +0200
0.08 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...-0.06-Open-configuration-file-for-reading.patch | 30
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Exception-0.32-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
05fc941... Update to 0.32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Exception-0.32-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
05fc941... Update to 0.32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
e639441... 0.08 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957749
Bug ID: 957749
Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18: S_sv_unmagicext_flags:
Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11
(SIGSEGV)
Product: Fedora
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo