Re: Arduino firmware permissible to include?

Il 23/05/2013 15:25, Peter Oliver ha scritto: > Arduino is an electronics prototyping board, and also a GNU > GPL2-licenced IDE for writing and uploading code to such boards. Fedora > has packages for the IDE. > > Recent versions of the IDE include WiFi firmware for Arduino > (http://arduino.cc/e

Re: Arduino firmware permissible to include?

On Sat, 25 May 2013 09:59:00 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 23/05/2013 15:25, Peter Oliver ha scritto: > > Arduino is an electronics prototyping board, and also a GNU > > GPL2-licenced IDE for writing and uploading code to such boards. > > Fedora has packages for the IDE. > > > > Recent version

Re: Arduino firmware permissible to include?

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 23/05/2013 15:25, Peter Oliver ha scritto: >> Arduino is an electronics prototyping board, and also a GNU >> GPL2-licenced IDE for writing and uploading code to such boards. Fedora >> has packages for the IDE. >> >> Recent versions of the

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 à 07:08 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > On 05/23/2013 06:05 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > > On 23 May 2013 17:38, James Antill > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 13:52 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: > > > mv /etc/nagios/nagios.cf

rawhide report: 20130525 changes

Compose started at Sat May 25 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [bochs] bochs-2.6.1-1.fc20.x86_64 requires vgabios [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [ekiga] ekiga-4.0.1-1.

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Michael Ekstrand wrote: > Performance improvement: improve scaling to 5K+ installed packages. * Amen. This is particularly compounded by poor caching default behavior, so that a few yum commands in a row each wind up reaching out to downloading metadata again, an

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:52 AM, wrote: >> From: Rahul Sundaram >> What I would like to see is >> solid git integration. Git has become the standard distributed vcs >> and github and google code etc have stopped hosting tarballs and/or >> discouraging it and GNOME is planning to do that as well.

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Hi, > > I would like better integration with domain-specific package managers. > By which I mean npm (for node.js), gem (for ruby), pip (for python), > cpan (for perl), pecl/pear (for PHP), CRAN (for R), CTAN (for TeX), and > many more I'm sure.

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 24 May 2013 22:02, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 05/23/2013 07:52 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > > I fiddle around with a new Nagios installation, then something stops >> working. I'm pretty sure it is some modifications in >> /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg but I cannot track it down. >> As an example I

Re: Build control-center in mock fail

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 22:48 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > >> > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, I know that,

Re: Build control-center in mock fail

On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 11:15 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: [The build hosts do not have outside network access] > That's very specific to the Fedora build environment. Difficult to > replicate in the field without a huge local build structure! If you do it using firewalls, yes, quite annoying.

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 05/24/2013 09:26 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 à 07:08 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : On 05/23/2013 06:05 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: On 23 May 2013 17:38, James Antill mailto:ja...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 13:52 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Sat, 25 May 2013 01:42:44 +0300 Oron Peled wrote: > I think you missed the whole point of Debian's multi-arch -- instead > of special handling for "sister" architectures (e.g: x86/x86_64), or > proving there aren't (e.g: aarch64/armv7) -- it creates a symmetric > world. > > The *huge* benefit

Re: Build control-center in mock fail

On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:15:22 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > [ Sorry for the late reply, I've been at a family funeral this week. ] :( > That's very specific to the Fedora build environment. Difficult to > replicate in the field without a huge local build structure! And > enforced by a specif

Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-05-25

Broken upgrade path report for tags f19 -> f20: R-RUnit: f19 > f20 (R-RUnit-0.4.26-7.fc19 R-RUnit-0.4.26-6.fc20) R-Rcompression: f19 > f20 (R-Rcompression-0.93.2-8.fc19 R-Rcompression-0.93.2-7.fc20) R-zoo: f19 > f20 (R-zoo-1.7.9-1.fc19 R-zoo-1.7.6-5.fc20) bind10: f19 > f20 (bind1

Re: Build control-center in mock fail

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:15:22 -0400 > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> [ Sorry for the late reply, I've been at a family funeral this week. ] > > :( > >> That's very specific to the Fedora build environment. Difficult to >> replicate in the field

Re: Build control-center in mock fail

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm sure we could ask the FPC to add this to guidelines. > > I've filed such a ticket, please feel free to add comments: > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/295 > > It's reasonable, but is missing an import