The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
430
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
325
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-6608/Django-1.1.4-2.el5
20
Dne 25.6.2013 22:37, Björn Persson napsal(a):
Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2013-06-25, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific
header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any
such place.
I dont't think so. SDL
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:13:01 +0100
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Apology for self-reply
Any further thoughts on this.
Can we split the SRPMS dvd ourselves over two?
Found something Boardy from 2008:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.advisory-board/4277
--
Regards,
Compose started at Wed Jun 26 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[0ad]
0ad-0.0.13-3.fc20.x86_64 requires libenet-1.3.8.so()(64bit)
[chmsee]
chmsee-2.0-5.git0acc572a.fc20.x86_64 requires libxpcom.so()(64bit)
[cxf]
Hi community,
can anybody make the review request of libtiff3 compatibility package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978345
Thanks in advance
--
Best regards / S pozdravem
Petr Hracek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 22:17:12 -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
We had said that the new FESCo should attend if possible. I'm still
hoping the election results are announced in time, but we should
probably add an agenda item for this.
They were available for a short period
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 22:17:12 -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
We had said that the new FESCo should attend if possible. I'm still
hoping the election results are announced in time, but we should
probably
Hi,
It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
in rawhide.
Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily
mails about broken deps, already posted to $pkg-owner@ asking
what I could help, but still no response neither problems corrected.
Remi Collet told
Le 26/06/2013 14:36, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
Hi,
It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
in rawhide.
Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily
mails about broken deps, already posted to $pkg-owner@ asking
what I could
Compose started at Wed Jun 26 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:46:05PM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Jun 25 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
2013/6/26 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com:
Le 26/06/2013 14:36, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
Hi,
It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
in rawhide.
Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily
mails about broken deps, already
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 22:17:12 -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
We had said that the new FESCo should attend if possible. I'm still
hoping the election results are
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 09:52 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2013/6/26 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com:
Le 26/06/2013 14:36, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
Hi,
It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
in rawhide.
Could a
commit 0b89c9e3e3c085a53a268cf122a0ae62dbbe7324
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 26 16:01:10 2013 +0200
Update license and dependencies
perl-Exception-Class.spec | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 17:07 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On the other hand, having NetworkManager available all the time enables
things like management tools to use its API to query system status,
instead of guessing it from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:23:32 +0100
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:13:01 +0100
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Apology for self-reply
Any further thoughts on this.
Can we split the SRPMS dvd ourselves
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:44:36 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
no, because pungi the tool that creates the source dvd doesnt
support split media. I actually want to stop making source dvds all
together. but that will need legal approval first. note we don't
actually make and
Hello list!
As discussed a few days ago [1] there's a _severe_ bug in autotool's
libtool known for ages [2] preventing libs not to be build fully
hardened (partial RELRO), even if you have included `%global
_hardened_build 1` into you rpm-spec.
There was some LDFLAGS-hack [3] mentioned by me
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-06-27 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-06-27 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
2013-06-27 12:00 Thu US/Eastern
2013-06-27 16:00 Thu UTC -
2013-06-27 17:00
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, June 26th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 - Status
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 08:44:36 -0500,
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
no, because pungi the tool that creates the source dvd doesnt support
split media. I actually want to stop making source dvds all together.
but that will need legal approval first. note we don't actually make and
Hi there,
I setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a
Fedora 19 as a domU client.
Unfortunately the domU client failed to boot. After some investigation
it turned out to be the grub.cfg file in the client that caused XEN
pygrub to fail.
The fix is not to difficult and I
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-06-26)
===
Meeting started by notting at 18:00:55 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-06-26/fesco.2013-06-26-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Greetings, extra-patient friends:
The elections for the Fedora Board, Fedora Engineering Steering
Committee (FESCo), and Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee (FAmSCo)
have concluded, and the results are shown below.
* * *
FESCo is electing 5
What happened to my post. It seems liek most lines are yanked together
making it unreadable.
That is not the way I posted it (using mutt)!
-Marcel
--
== Marcel J.E. MolMESA Consulting B.V.
===-ph. +31-(0)6-54724868 P.O.
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
Hi there,
I setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a
Fedora 19 as a domU client.
You may want to check these bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=977974
In case you're asking the question in the topic: you may notice there is
now an 'RC2.1' in the TC/RC download directory.
This is a respin of only the KDE live (and one non-blocking spin that's
based on it), including this update:
Am 26.06.2013 21:10, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
* #1128switching from -fstack-protector to
-fstack-protector-strong in Fedora 20 (notting, 18:10:54)
* AGREED: Will switch from -fstack-protector to
-fstack-protector-strong in Fedora 20. Any reversion based on poor
benchmarks
Thank you everybody for joining today's Fedora-ARM meeting. For those
who were unable to attend the minutes are below. If you have an ARM
device that is supported by Fedora 19 please participate in RC2 testing
at the links provided. Thank you!
Minutes:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 26.06.2013 21:10, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
* #1128switching from -fstack-protector to
-fstack-protector-strong in Fedora 20 (notting, 18:10:54)
* AGREED: Will switch from -fstack-protector to
These m4 scripts (used by libvirt) may also be of interest
to upstream developers:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=m4/virt-compile-pie.m4;hb=HEAD
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=m4/virt-linker-relro.m4;hb=HEAD
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: Hi there, I
setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a Fedora 19
as a domU client.
You may want to check these bugs:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 23:21 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: Hi there, I
setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a Fedora
19 as a domU client.
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 14:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 23:21 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: Hi there, I
setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates)
Am 26.06.2013 23:10, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 26.06.2013 21:10, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
* #1128switching from -fstack-protector to
-fstack-protector-strong in Fedora 20 (notting, 18:10:54)
* AGREED: Will
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:31:47 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
-fstack-protector-strong would *not* be enabled anywhere with
what i requested - it would only be *possible* to use it within
Fedora 18 - IMHO a big difference
Please file a RFE bug on gcc and see what the
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:50 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:46:05PM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Jun 25 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
Am 26.06.2013 23:37, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:31:47 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
-fstack-protector-strong would *not* be enabled anywhere with
what i requested - it would only be *possible* to use it within
Fedora 18 - IMHO a big difference
Please
Il 26/06/2013 17:39, Björn Esser ha scritto:
# dirty hack to force immediate binding with hardenend build having
# autocrap's libtool pass the need gcc-specs to linker.
sed -i -e 's! \\\$compiler_flags !\\\$CFLAGS \\\$LDFLAGS !' libtool
Weird, I didn't see any mention of this on the autocrap's
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
In case you're asking the question in the topic: you may notice there is
now an 'RC2.1' in the TC/RC download directory.
This is a respin of only the KDE live (and one non-blocking spin that's
based on it), including this update:
In Fedora 19 the Firefox version is 21.
In Rawhide the Firefox version is still 20. xulrunner-22.0-2.fc20.x86_64
is available but the old Firefox will not allow it to update which also,
it appears, does not allow the Thunderbird update to 17.0.7 to happen.
--
David
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:30:56 -0400
David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
In Fedora 19 the Firefox version is 21.
In Rawhide the Firefox version is still 20.
xulrunner-22.0-2.fc20.x86_64 is available but the old Firefox will
not allow it to update which also, it appears, does not allow the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977592
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
The missing parenthesis are just simple warnings. The real problem are the
other bugs. E.g. I wasn't even able to clone and import new repository into
SVK.
What I say is I have no time to hunt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977592
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Regarding $$, there was a change in Perl 5.16.0 in caching the value. It's not
cached anymore across threads. So there can be bad assumptions in SVK code. See
more using `perldoc perlvar'.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978233
Bug ID: 978233
Summary: perl-5.18: Regex \8 and \9 after literals no longer
work
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Severity: unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892597
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 99dda5fff00b0d7cd0c321046a9ccff7d2b8cdef
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 26 12:14:36 2013 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 1393856e5c3465d6dd0b4e55aa7274676c612cec
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 26 13:12:11 2013 +0200
Update dependencies; Modernize spec
perl-Email-Address.spec | 28 +---
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit b6a4ed31f4a8d844bc9bf041d9cd4df847c4ee6d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 26 13:15:33 2013 +0200
Commit a typo in the local patch level text
perl.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index
commit b88a3262a29d13c94a69fe4e21c3d6f1459f175a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 26 13:14:45 2013 +0200
Edit local patch level before compilation
perl.spec | 71 +++--
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 35
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892597
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
You'll need to buildrequire the following:
- perl (called in spec)
- perl(Getopt::Long), ./configure:26
- perl(POSIX), ./configure:27
Don't use absolute paths in your spec.
Call perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952589
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910272
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj |
59 matches
Mail list logo
