On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> Debian already uses /usr/share/javascript for this purpose, and it
> would be really nice if we both could coordinate on getting some
> upstream support for this in certain cases. I'm very strongly -1
> against pointless Fedoraisms here.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:10:07PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> [subsurface]
> subsurface-3.1.1-2.fc20.i686 requires libosmgpsmap.so.2
This is going to be hard to fix for the moment.
lib-osm-gps-map has been updated to the version 1.0 which is gtk3+ while
subsurface is gtk2 only.
T
PyOpenGL taken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 23:13:52 +0200,
Erik Schilling wrote:
Back then manaplus was supposed to replace mana as the client for
TMW. However TMW does not seem to be dropping mana support now.
For the time being tmw requires manaplus, so that dropping manaplus
would require dropping tmw as
On 08/07/2013 04:38 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
I don't understand why manaplus was orphaned just after 8 months it
got into Fedora.
If you can't keep it, don't package it.
Hello,
I was the maintainer of manaplus and the one who brought it into Fedora.
Back then manaplus was supposed to repl
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 20:50:26 +0200,
Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package
On 08/08/2013 05:12 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.24.0 at 19th of August.
> There are several changes and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.37 to
> libpoppler.so.43). It also adds support for Qt5.
If you already have everything prepared, perhaps it's worth do
Il 10/08/2013 00:48, D Haley ha scritto:
Dear List,
I would like to orphan the cpptasks package, which is currently in use
by gluegen and gluegen2. I do not have the time to maintain the
package in its current state.
cpptasks is currently affected by a FTBFS :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
Welcome Matt,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:03:40PM -0700, Matt Eskes wrote:
> wondering how I should go about the packaging. Should I break it into
> a "Free" and "non-free" component, as is done in Debian and/or Ubuntu,
> or is that sill going to cause issues? I'm also looking into maybe
Non-free
Hello contributors,
I am looking for a review swap on gimp-paint-studio[1] which is a set of
brushes for Gimp.
In addition, it would be nice if someone can sponsor Peter Hanecak[2], a
new Fedora contributor who package some
Gimp application for OpenMamba. Unfortunately, I am ineligible because
11 matches
Mail list logo
