Re: Reminder on how to EOL a package

2013-09-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:35AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:12:31PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Error: Auth was requested but no way to perform auth was given. > > Please set username and password or session_id before calling this > > function with auth=True > > Coul

Re: About F19 Firewall

2013-09-16 Thread P J P
- Original Message - > From: P J P > Subject: About F19 Firewall > It doesn't have to be so complicated that even if one tries to understand it, > he/she can not. :(    This small script seems to work good. === #!/bin/sh # # fw.sh: a basic drop unless allowed firewall. FW='iptables -t

Re: Reminder on how to EOL a package

2013-09-16 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:12:31PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > Error: Auth was requested but no way to perform auth was given. > Please set username and password or session_id before calling this > function with auth=True > Could not retire package: Command '['pkgdb-cli', 'orphan', '--retire', > 'q

Re: polkit rules for virt administration

2013-09-16 Thread Rolf Fokkens
I agree, this is useful. I'm currently also having my own polkit rules to achieve this. I'm currently using the groep wheel for this, but that's not the right choice. Would be good to have a solution in f20. Rolf Op 17 sep. 2013 om 05:55 heeft Rolf Fokkens het volgende geschreven: > Hi, > >

Re: polkit rules for virt administration

2013-09-16 Thread Rolf Fokkens
Hi, Op 17 sep. 2013 om 04:49 heeft William Brown het volgende geschreven: > > Was just wondering if any more discussion or action had been taken with > this. Would be good to see included in F20. > > -- > Sincerely, > > William Brown > > pgp.mit.edu > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op

Re: Reminder on how to EOL a package

2013-09-16 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > As the procedure recently changed a little and many people have gotten > it wrong for a long time I wanted to bring to everyones attention the > proper procedure to retire a pa

polkit rules for virt administration

2013-09-16 Thread William Brown
Hi, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957300 Was just wondering if any more discussion or action had been taken with this. Would be good to see included in F20. -- Sincerely, William Brown pgp.mit.edu http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x3C0AC6DAB2F928A2 signat

Reminder on how to EOL a package

2013-09-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, As the procedure recently changed a little and many people have gotten it wrong for a long time I wanted to bring to everyones attention the proper procedure to retire a package that is no longer useful. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2013-09-16 Thread Andre Robatino
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their respective size targets. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including cha

Re: Broken dependencies: python-osmgpsmap

2013-09-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, reviving this old thread. I got distracted by life and a few other > things until now. > > I saw some other activities going on with gramps but here's my latest > source RPM with the new build requires and requires as far as I can tell.

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:08:02 -0400 (EDT) Jakub Filak wrote: > > I wonder if someday it would make sense to customize this per user? > > Possibly too much complexity... > > > > kevin > > ABRT provides per component customization. > > https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/FAQ#component-specific-bu

Unretiring gpx-viewer / Review Swap

2013-09-16 Thread Christian Krause
Hi, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the package gpx-viewer. The package was retired because it didn't build for multiple Fedora releases: https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gpx-viewer.git/tree/dea

Update notes referring to files within the package

2013-09-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hi, lately, I have seen an increasing number of update notes like this: > See [some file in the package] for more information. While done with noble intentions, unfortunately, this is not of much use, because update notes are read BEFORE updating the package, whereas the file being referred to

Re: Atlas update

2013-09-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Orion Poplawski wrote: > I think you can do -latlas -llapack. I don't think that's a great idea, as long as ATLAS replaces some LAPACK routines with optimized versions (and dropping that would be a major disservice to our users). Linking in multiple libraries with conflicting symbols is always

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:05:45AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > This is a compiler-internal error with using the -g option. > > > > It means that the (file, line) location number has line == 0 and the > > compiler refuses to emit DWARF

GNOME 3.9.92 megaupdate

2013-09-16 Thread Kalev Lember
Hi all, GNOME 3.9.92 release is this week and we're going to collect all the builds together and file them as a single Bodhi megaupdate for F20. As usual, the spreadsheet for collecting all the builds together is at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2V

Re: orphaning/retiring perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-09-16 Thread Alex Lancaster
Note that I'm retiring from F-19 onwards. - Original Message - > This package is currently causing broken deps in any case. > > It's not very useful without perl-bioperl, see my previous > post, which has seen been removed: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-Novembe

[pkgdb] perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene (un)retirement

2013-09-16 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene in Fedora 19 has been retired by alexlan To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@

[pkgdb] perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene (un)retirement

2013-09-16 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene in Fedora devel has been retired by alexlan To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de.

[pkgdb] perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene (un)retirement

2013-09-16 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene in Fedora 20 has been retired by alexlan To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@

[Bug 970604] perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies because of perl-bioperl removal

2013-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970604 --- Comment #2 from Alex Lancaster --- (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #1) > Please either ressurect perl-bioperl or remove perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene. I don't have time to maintain this package either, so I will remove it. Hopefully som

orphaning/retiring perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-09-16 Thread Alex Lancaster
This package is currently causing broken deps in any case. It's not very useful without perl-bioperl, see my previous post, which has seen been removed: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/174435.html Hopefully somebody else can pick these packages up (including perl-bi

Re: Broken dependencies: python-osmgpsmap

2013-09-16 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, reviving this old thread. I got distracted by life and a few other things until now. I saw some other activities going on with gramps but here's my latest source RPM with the new build requires and requires as far as I can tell. I left the old ones in commented incase they are actually needed.

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:26:55PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > > For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add > > > > > > unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bu

[perl-Tree-DAG_Node] Update to 1.17

2013-09-16 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 241e54e09c60dd40d07c930e764e3e3c50ffa73b Author: Paul Howarth Date: Mon Sep 16 15:38:41 2013 +0100 Update to 1.17 - New upstream release 1.17 - Write test temp files in :raw mode as well as utf-8, for MS Windows users - Take the opportunity to change all utf8 to

Reproducible Builds in Fedora

2013-09-16 Thread Dhiru Kholia
Hi, I have been working on having Reproducible Builds in Fedora for some time. At this point, I think I have something demoable. Ensuring Reproducible Builds is a big task and I want your feedback, ideas, code and support. Please see https://github.com/kholia/ReproducibleBuilds for details. I w

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:36:41 +0200 Karel Zak wrote: > Please, fix/improve your email client UI. All bugzilla emails > contain all necessary information in email header: ...snip... > For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add > > unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component

[Bug 1008491] Dependency issues - requires an older version of libstatgrab.so.6

2013-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt --- That's caused by an incompatible libstatgrab upgrade: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-16806/libstatgrab-0.90-1.fc19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/libstatgrab -- Y

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Jakub Filak
> I wonder if someday it would make sense to customize this per user? > Possibly too much complexity... > > kevin ABRT provides per component customization. https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/FAQ#component-specific-bugzilla-bug-formatting -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

packaging guidelines again

2013-09-16 Thread Reindl Harald
i get somehow tired to report bugs for several packages, refresh them at each release because maintainers ignore guidelines all the time some of them responded and fixed their packages some insist to ignore them https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#PIE If y

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-09-16 Thread nobody
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 0 packages were orphaned 12 packages unorphaned -- ecashin unorphaned : aoetools [EL-5] mpolacekunorphaned : libmpc [EL-6,devel,f18,f19,f20] jstanek

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

2013-09-16 Thread Kamil Paral
> On 09/09/2013 11:48 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > >> On 09/06/2013 10:15 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > >>> Can this not be done automatically? If the system fails to boot because > >>> of significant hardware changes, it's an obvious option to regenerate > >>> initramfs. I can't image a normal user go t

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-16 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This is a compiler-internal error with using the -g option. > > It means that the (file, line) location number has line == 0 and the > compiler refuses to emit DWARF info with line == 0 because (according > to the comment in the source)

Re: Self Introduction

2013-09-16 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/16/2013 09:30 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:48:50AM +0930, William Brown wrote: >> I generally focus on server and networking systems, but I am willing to >> contribute to anything that I see that needs fixing. (IE writing

dnf-0.4.1

2013-09-16 Thread Ales Kozumplik
Hello, A new version of DNF was built for F20[1] and Rawhide today. It fixes a couple of bugs, improves support for Anaconda to foster the development of DNFPayload there and starts on the project to get us rid of urlgrabber dependency en route to Py3. Please check out the release notes at [2

Re: SSD caching

2013-09-16 Thread Rolf Fokkens
Things are progressing well with the SSD cache feature, so I'd like to give a brief update. dm-cache & bcache - Initially both dm-cache and bcache were in scope to provide users with the SSD caching feature in Fedora 20. Both are supported by the latest Linux kernels, but unfor

Re: Self Introduction

2013-09-16 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:48:50AM +0930, William Brown wrote: > I generally focus on server and networking systems, but I am willing to > contribute to anything that I see that needs fixing. (IE writing SELinux > policy) Hi William, It's great to have you in Fedora! Could you look at follow

Re: Self Introduction

2013-09-16 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/13/2013 09:18 PM, William Brown wrote: > Hi, > > I am a student of computer science, and systems administrator for a > University using el. I have been using Fedora as my primary OS for a number > of years now. > > I have had some intermittent

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Karel Zak
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:58:47AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > It's pretty common that we don't have component name in BZ summary... > > Which does not make it less annoying. Well, then we have more generic problem rather than abrt specific one :-) Karel -- Karel Zak http://ka

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Karel Zak
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > > For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add > > > > unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component > > > > to your .muttrc. > > > > It's pretty common

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add > > unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component > > to your .muttrc. > > It's pretty common that we don't have component name in BZ summary... But this does not show t

Re: ibus-typing-booster Obsoletes failure

2013-09-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:51:41 +0200, Mike FABIAN wrote: > > What is going on in package "ibus-typing-booster"? > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ibus-typing-booster.git/plain/ibus-typing-booster.spec > > > > It attempts at obsoleting various packages, but since it does that with a > > spec

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 10:58 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200 > > > Jakub Filak wrote: > > > > a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a bet

Re: Mouse focus stealing bug

2013-09-16 Thread Maros Zatko
On 09/10/2013 09:47 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 31/08/13 09:36 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Maros Zatko wrote: Hello dear Fedora comunity, I've hit very weird bug which happen to get very urgent now. Something (very likely GTK{2,3} but not sure at all) i

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200 > > Jakub Filak wrote: > > > a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text > > > produced by abrt has been filed.

Re: Orphaning Package: cfengine

2013-09-16 Thread Christopher Meng
I've taken f19+ branches, if anyone want to maintain el5+ branches, please go ahead. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200 > Jakub Filak wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text > > produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug > > summary format

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

2013-09-16 Thread Ales Kozumplik
On 09/13/2013 05:35 PM, Jakub Filak wrote: 1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005762 Perhaps you can drop the "Process" word but it's a good idea to keep the NVR in the summary (the VR part isn't reflected in the component field). Ales -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr