Il 26/09/2013 21:32, Tim St Clair ha scritto:
Any takers? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Depends on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994152
yes when available rhbz#994152 at least in rawhide
but you should install java lubraries manually in javadir with proper
Hi,
cherrytree-0.30.5 license changed from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+
-robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 21:04 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> All the actual logic of DNF is written in C, so I really don't see why
> we should be stuck with that Python wrapper.
...it's not just a "wrapper". DNF have replaced yum's depsolver but ~90%
of the code in yum *isn't* depsolving.
To repla
Any takers? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Depends on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994152
--
Cheers,
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CheckDeps:
e854b2b6ba40c90286131eb4320effbd Test-CheckDeps-0.008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
I wrote:
> FYI, the author of netlib-java filed an issue with OpenBLAS for that:
> https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/296
I'm going to reproduce here the comment that I posted there:
| Well, I'm also a Fedora packager, and I think that, as long as we want to
| support multiple implementati
Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/math-atlas/mailman/message/28515215/
So this was back in 2011 (!), why is that change hitting Fedora now?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedor
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic:
0adf1dcf3e749e007cde2670ae259506 Perl-Critic-1.119.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Dan Horák wrote:
> Missing support for s390/s390x is a problem for us (with my red hat
> on). Is there no fallback implementation?
>
> Does is OpenBLAS fail completely when CPU not listed above is found?
> Because for Power7 and up anything written for Power < 7 will work.
Unfortunately, from wha
commit 7be6ed4c1c61b19874a2ab1b6d5bed2c5a007d61
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu Sep 26 15:08:10 2013 +0100
Update to 1.006
- New upstream release 1.006
- Compile test could hang on Windows
- Dropped configure_requires for ExtUtils::MakeMaker to 6.17
perl-Perl-OSType.sp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-OSType:
934bb12fc58b29366acc9bace4b8216c Perl-OSType-1.006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012352
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> >Authentication is based on WEP/WPA/WPA2 passphrase, possibly a MAC
> >address (BSSID), and 802.1 authentication.
>
> There were no protests and no warning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012402
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Emmanu
I don't actually use my Yubikey's for the Fedora infrastructure, so
I'm not sure, but might it be possible that this is related to this
bug[1]? This is a bug in fedora-burn-yubikey that is specific to the
second slot.
Maxim
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956955
Maxim Burgerhout
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012103
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Emmanu
Hi,
I'm new to these parts of the woods and hope that I can contribute to
the Fedora project in any way that I can.
I have used Fedora since FC6. For the last 5 years I've also used RHEL
in my line of work as a sysadmin and consultant.
I have made a bunch of rpms for work and for my persona
commit 11cee991c9df190de7fba9e9984ab9a1935a27c4
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Sep 26 15:53:12 2013 +0200
0.036 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011814
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Spell-1.09-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Spell-1.09-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012359
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Spell-1.09-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Spell-1.09-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Tiny:
f785f74508566787a30762cf0c2c8802 HTTP-Tiny-0.036.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008407
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Spell-1.09-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Spell-1.09-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003383
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
On 09/26/2013 01:46 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Can somebody help me diagnose what I'm doing incorrectly, please?
It seems that slot2 is the cause. It does not work for me, nor 2 other men.
Slot 1 seems to work fine. I'm not sure if this problem of ykpersonalize or
youbikey itself.
:(
fedora-bur
Jan Horak venit, vidit, dixit 24.09.2013 16:00:
> On 09/24/2013 10:16 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I can see that thunderbird 24 had been built successfully and then
>> reverted on the fc18 branch (and others). The git commit log and the
>> spec changelog say
>>
>> Revert to 17.0.
I used Yubikey for some time (slot 1) for non-Fedora related stuff.
I just tried to use slot 2 for Fedora services, but whenever I try to use:
test auth
on
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/yubikey
it yell:
auth Failed: Unauthorized/Invalid OTP
What I did:
sudo fedora-burn-yubikey
Hi,
as some of you already noticed ABRT started filling a private bugs which
are only readable by reporter and assigned developer. This is an
unfortunate UX design together with [1]&[2]. Fixing those two bugzillas
should help, but there will always be a possibility that user will
create a priv
Hi,
Like I did on the 14th on the linux-bcache list I'd like to send an
update on the progress of bcache related packages. While focussing on
Fedora packaging of bcache-tools, I had some good collaboration with
other packagers resulting in improved bcache support in other packages
as well. Ot
On 09/26/2013 09:36 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
Missing support for s390/s390x is a problem for us (with my red hat
on). Is there no fallback implementation?
Does is OpenBLAS fail completely when CPU not listed above is found?
Because for Power7 and up anything written for Power < 7 will work.
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-09-25)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 18:01:13 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-09-25/fesco.2013-09-25-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On 09/26/2013 05:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Susi Lehtola wrote:
OpenBLAS, ATLAS, ACML and MKL only ship one monolitchic library, so this
is not really an option.
FYI, the author of netlib-java filed an issue with OpenBLAS for that:
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/296
Unfortunately,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:19:13 +0200
Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 09:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
> >> People with interest in secondary architectures might oppose that.
> >
> > Which architectures are the problem? OpenBLAS currently supports:
> > | 2. S
On 09/25/2013 09:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
People with interest in secondary architectures might oppose that.
Which architectures are the problem? OpenBLAS currently supports:
| 2. Supported Architecture
|
|X86 : Pentium3 Katmai
|Coppermine
33 matches
Mail list logo