On 8. 10. 2013 at 19:06:21, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> I was looking for examples of nice packages for upcoming packaging workshop
> we are doing in Brno. I made the terrible mistake of doing fedpkg clone
> python-urlgrabber.
>
> If there was some normal packaging issue I'd most likely just fil
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
I spotted the `nas' package license declaration was wrong since the very
beginning. So I changed it from `Public Domain' to 'MIT'.
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/c
Hello,
I want to orphan Launchy, MacOS-like launcher. If you want to adopt,
please contact me off-list, thank you.
LZ
--
Later,
Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On 3 Oct 2013 16:48, "Bruno Wolff III" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:31 +0100,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>
>> that you can do successfully complete a graphical DVD default package
>> install with 512MB of RAM, or a text network default package install. I
>> believe a text install
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:38 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between
>>> provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they touch [1]?
>
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday & Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Even if it does not seem to be, it is just a minor version update, see
NEWS file in tarball (new versioning scheme).
To sum actual changes up for distro POV: no
= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
Note: Change requested by FESCo in advance for targeted Fedora.
Change owner(s): Slavek Kabrda , Matej Stuchlik
Up until now, Fedora has used Python 2 as the defau
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:40:17 +0100,
Peter Robinson wrote:
At least on Fedora 18 on the olpc xo-1 with 256mb of ram and no swap fedora
runs OK with a full GUI. Not had the time to check later releases but I'm
not sure much has changed in that regard.
The 512mb laptop runs Fedora OK. I wa
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 13:00:07 +0200,
Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday & Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Is this just for rawhide? It may not be the best timing for f20 as we
are close to beta freeze
Hi,
This Thursday, 10th of October, is Fedora Gnome Test day. Check out the
test day page [1] if you are interested.
You can test new Gnome 3.10 features [2] from Fedora 20 Live images and
help to make this release better.
Only YOU can test some new exciting features, including, but not only:
*
Hi,
On 10/09/2013 01:08 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:38 PM, M A Young wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between
provenpackagers and the maintainers o
Let's see how many bugs are existed now:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/bodhi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> >Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
> >during Thursday & Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
>
> Is this just for rawhide? It may not be the best timing for f20 as we
> are close to beta freeze and if there is a risk of breaking package builds,
>
> Yes, I should have mentioned that. Thanks for comment.
I mean, yes, it is mentioned to be rebased only in Rawhide. :)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:07:12 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> ** Request Koji side tag and encourage packagers to rebuilt their
> packages with Python 3 there
python is not in the minimal build root python-libs is pulled in by
deps.
So all the koji pa
the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team
adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why
there has been no upstream release.
yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, instead of adding very
large patches to latest git HEAD.
yum-utils
I'm trying to track down a btrfs regression and need to revert a ~10 month old
patch using 3.12.0-rc4 as the basis.
This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has ApplyPatch
examples in the spec file, which works fine. Is there an inverse command? Or do
I need to do it manually
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I'm trying to track down a btrfs regression and need to revert a ~10 month
> old patch using 3.12.0-rc4 as the basis.
>
> This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has ApplyPatch
> examples in the spec file, which works fine.
On 10/9/13 10:25 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has
> ApplyPatch examples in the spec file, which works fine. Is there an
> inverse command? Or do I need to do it manually with patch -p0 -R <
> ?
You could generate the reverse patch with:
$ g
Quoting tim.laurid...@gmail.com (2013-10-09 16:48:31)
> the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team
> adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why
> there has been no upstream release.
> yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, inste
Is DNF ready for prime time, the is no API at the moment, so it is not
possible to convert tool using the yum api to use a DNF api
I am working on a Python 3 version af yumex, there is package manager for
the XFCE spin, I have isolated all the yum actions in DBUS services, but
they will require yum
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
3.5.8.2 was released time ago with
several bugs fixed: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/959946
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.5.8.1
Welcome to phpMyAdmin 3.5.8.2, a security release.
I updated all branches in fedora and epel to 3.5.8.2. These are now in
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-10-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-10-10 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-10-10 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-10-10 1
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora (your review, but also my packages). It's
only today
On 09.10.2013 18:56, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora (yo
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, October 9th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Kernel Status Update
2) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Koji Update
3) F20 Beta TC2 Testing
4) Open Floor
If th
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-10-09)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-09/fesco.2013-10-09-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
Hi folks.
It's taking a bit of time, but I plan to start packaging a couple of
packages that are not currently available for either Red Hat nor Fedora.
The main reason for it taking a bit longer really has to do with
personal infrastructure and setting up my build host, etc.
How
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:32:08PM -0700, Matt Eskes wrote:
> Will using mock in this environment be more beneficial to using
> fakeroot? Will it be "harder" for lack of a better word, to build from
> within the build system using fakeroot , once I get to that point or, is
> Koji flexible eno
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Matt Eskes wrote:
> As I am more familiar with fakeroot, I'd like to keep using that,
> but
> at the same time, I'd like to do it the "Red Hat way" to ensure that the
> package conforms to both Red Hat and Fedora packaging standards.
Mock would be recomme
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-10-09/fedora-meeting-1.2013-10-09-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1
Hi All,
The Fedora SSD Cache is this sunday October 13th 2013. This Fedora Test
Day will focus on bcache based SSD Caching in Fedora 20.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-13_SSD_Cache
If you're interested in trying out the new bcache SSD caching
functionality step by step instr
Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might.
If your package has:
BuildArch: noarch
It will set %{_target_cpu} to "noarch".
If you also use %ifarch in that spec file, you might be expecting it to
match %{_arch} (the architecture of the build server). It does not. It
matches %{_target_cpu}.
34 matches
Mail list logo
