On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:24:33AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/08/2013 08:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 03:29:57AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Shall we talk about how Red Hat employees have been granted all
kinds of privileges within our community without as
On 8. 10. 2013 at 19:06:21, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I was looking for examples of nice packages for upcoming packaging workshop
we are doing in Brno. I made the terrible mistake of doing fedpkg clone
python-urlgrabber.
If there was some normal packaging issue I'd most likely just file a
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets
I spotted the `nas' package license declaration was wrong since the very
beginning. So I changed it from `Public Domain' to 'MIT'.
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hello,
I want to orphan Launchy, MacOS-like launcher. If you want to adopt,
please contact me off-list, thank you.
LZ
--
Later,
Lukas lzap Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On 3 Oct 2013 16:48, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:31 +0100,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
that you can do successfully complete a graphical DVD default package
install with 512MB of RAM, or a text network default package install. I
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:38 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between
provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Even if it does not seem to be, it is just a minor version update, see
NEWS file in tarball (new versioning scheme).
To sum actual changes up for distro POV: no
= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
Note: Change requested by FESCo in advance for targeted Fedora.
Change owner(s): Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com, Matej Stuchlik
mstuc...@redhat.com
Up until now,
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:40:17 +0100,
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
At least on Fedora 18 on the olpc xo-1 with 256mb of ram and no swap fedora
runs OK with a full GUI. Not had the time to check later releases but I'm
not sure much has changed in that regard.
The 512mb laptop
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 13:00:07 +0200,
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Is this just for rawhide? It may not be the best timing for f20 as we
are
Hi,
This Thursday, 10th of October, is Fedora Gnome Test day. Check out the
test day page [1] if you are interested.
You can test new Gnome 3.10 features [2] from Fedora 20 Live images and
help to make this release better.
Only YOU can test some new exciting features, including, but not only:
*
Hi,
On 10/09/2013 01:08 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:38 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between
Let's see how many bugs are existed now:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/bodhi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Is this just for rawhide? It may not be the best timing for f20 as we
are close to beta freeze and if there is a risk of breaking package builds,
this
Yes, I should have mentioned that. Thanks for comment.
I mean, yes, it is mentioned to be rebased only in Rawhide. :)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:07:12 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
** Request Koji side tag and encourage packagers to rebuilt their
packages with Python 3 there
python is not in the minimal build root python-libs is pulled in by
deps.
the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team
adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why
there has been no upstream release.
yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, instead of adding very
large patches to latest git HEAD.
yum-utils
I'm trying to track down a btrfs regression and need to revert a ~10 month old
patch using 3.12.0-rc4 as the basis.
This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has ApplyPatch
examples in the spec file, which works fine. Is there an inverse command? Or do
I need to do it
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
I'm trying to track down a btrfs regression and need to revert a ~10 month
old patch using 3.12.0-rc4 as the basis.
This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has ApplyPatch
examples in the spec
On 10/9/13 10:25 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has
ApplyPatch examples in the spec file, which works fine. Is there an
inverse command? Or do I need to do it manually with patch -p0 -R
?
You could generate the reverse patch with:
$ git
Quoting tim.laurid...@gmail.com (2013-10-09 16:48:31)
the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team
adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why
there has been no upstream release.
yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, instead
Is DNF ready for prime time, the is no API at the moment, so it is not
possible to convert tool using the yum api to use a DNF api
I am working on a Python 3 version af yumex, there is package manager for
the XFCE spin, I have isolated all the yum actions in DBUS services, but
they will require
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
3.5.8.2 was released time ago with
several bugs fixed: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/959946
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.5.8.1
Welcome to phpMyAdmin 3.5.8.2, a security release.
I updated all branches in fedora and epel to 3.5.8.2. These are now
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-10-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-10-10 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-10-10 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-10-10
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora (your review, but also my packages). It's
only
On 09.10.2013 18:56, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, October 9th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Kernel Status Update
2) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Koji Update
3) F20 Beta TC2 Testing
4) Open Floor
If
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-10-09)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-09/fesco.2013-10-09-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Hi folks.
It's taking a bit of time, but I plan to start packaging a couple of
packages that are not currently available for either Red Hat nor Fedora.
The main reason for it taking a bit longer really has to do with
personal infrastructure and setting up my build host, etc.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:32:08PM -0700, Matt Eskes wrote:
Will using mock in this environment be more beneficial to using
fakeroot? Will it be harder for lack of a better word, to build from
within the build system using fakeroot , once I get to that point or, is
Koji flexible enough
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Matt Eskes mes...@gmail.com wrote:
As I am more familiar with fakeroot, I'd like to keep using that,
but
at the same time, I'd like to do it the Red Hat way to ensure that the
package conforms to both Red Hat and Fedora packaging standards.
Mock would
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-10-09/fedora-meeting-1.2013-10-09-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
Hi All,
The Fedora SSD Cache is this sunday October 13th 2013. This Fedora Test
Day will focus on bcache based SSD Caching in Fedora 20.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-13_SSD_Cache
If you're interested in trying out the new bcache SSD caching
functionality step by step
Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might.
If your package has:
BuildArch: noarch
It will set %{_target_cpu} to noarch.
If you also use %ifarch in that spec file, you might be expecting it to
match %{_arch} (the architecture of the build server). It does not. It
matches %{_target_cpu}.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010057
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for testing. This bug report gets closed automatically once the
updated packages become into stable repository. There is not action needed from
you.
--
You are receiving this
commit e145d57cf55ca344861552baeb4062c873b08544
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 9 09:28:48 2013 +0200
0.20 bump
File-MimeInfo-0.19-exe_files.patch | 11 ---
perl-File-MimeInfo.spec|9 -
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-MimeInfo:
e87420787db163c03e5dd7fb47a3ef27 File-MimeInfo-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9d875f7e7b028d97dffbd4babb19d8aa34378b7d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 9 09:32:19 2013 +0200
0.20 bump
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016898
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016693
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992666
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||woodsj...@gmail.com
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb =
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
commit d95f4077248f258fcd76333a6eaf1106f7dbea26
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 9 15:33:46 2013 +0200
Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
perl-BerkeleyDB.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
commit d584b7d3b1b5b038264c464631839aad9e1c708d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:45:48 2013 +0200
Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
perl-BerkeleyDB.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012402
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Future-0.18-1.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006785
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013089
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny:
a7169251b8d72c02eef51e0a356f97a4 Path-Tiny-0.040.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
201e3e3... Update to 0.040 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.040-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
201e3e3... Update to 0.040
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 201e3e3bcb673d6941eef70ecfd1b759c36b91b3
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 15:54:53 2013 +0100
Update to 0.040
- New upstream release 0.040
- The 'filehandle' method now offers an option to return locked handles
based on the file mode
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.040-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
201e3e3... Update to 0.040
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Changes:
f123c91e84b8c4596bb1542d20a5d36f CPAN-Changes-0.25.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f710ec1edfdbc1590b30e764efa4003e8966a8cb
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:18:06 2013 +0100
Update to 0.25
- New upstream release 0.25:
- Fix Dist::Zilla date parsing: now puts timezone data in note section
(Github #17)
- Move
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IPC-System-Simple:
9e8c9ad98aa04b39eb27f850eae700ad IPC-System-Simple-1.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
f710ec1... Update to 0.25 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f62ffa171eb13a4395715761c57f4dddca1c4f19
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:44:15 2013 +0100
Update to 1.23
- New upstream release 1.23
- Silence Statement unlikely to be reached warning
- Repository information fix, and typo fixes
-
The lightweight tag 'perl-CPAN-Changes-0.25-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
f710ec1... Update to 0.25
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-CPAN-Changes-0.25-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
f710ec1... Update to 0.25
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
f62ffa1... Update to 1.23 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.23-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
f62ffa1... Update to 1.23
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.23-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
f62ffa1... Update to 1.23
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CheckDeps:
c1893b187e9b2efee7d40b1799218576 Test-CheckDeps-0.010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
970a1e5... Update to 0.010 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.010-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
970a1e5... Update to 0.010
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.010-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
970a1e5... Update to 0.010
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005986
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013089
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-1.99
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005991
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.38-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012103
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005991
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.38-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005986
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-TreeBuilder:
5549d05bb87b862c31b64d9d21ef34a0 XML-TreeBuilder-5.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c7767933d7d103c7304e51a8427e9bef34b3b95b
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 10 11:31:36 2013 +1000
new upstream
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec | 74 +---
sources |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017480
Bug ID: 1017480
Summary: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F18
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-XML-Catalog
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017481
Bug ID: 1017481
Summary: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F19
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl-XML-Catalog
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017482
Bug ID: 1017482
Summary: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F20
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-XML-Catalog
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gtk2:
bc037a6eb12eeb7992962a67b94eb52f Gtk2-1.248.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f4588787d1a0576541918c4e99902c6c414b097e
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 22:21:28 2013 -0400
update to 1.248
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Gtk2.spec | 29 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14
commit 9a3b768d70277510d6f6f54630bf221bd4a03ee9
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 22:21:59 2013 -0400
update to 1.248
perl-Gtk2.spec | 29 -
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828221
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gtk2-1.248-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-1.248-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
commit b08b6471e1957dafb73fad1ceb5fa38650c3a840
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 10 14:21:10 2013 +0900
0.06 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-IP-Minimal.spec | 18 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-IP-Minimal:
249981458e9502b877145153dac3b9cf Net-IP-Minimal-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6ed88d121c74164af32f133f25e0060f7ff5e175
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 10 14:55:16 2013 +0900
Update source URL
- Modernize the spec a bit
perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec | 19 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok with
switching to using F19 to run autogen?
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok
with switching to using F19 to run autogen?
Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we could update the version
checks in autogen.sh to require the F19 versions as a minimum.
(2013年10月09日 15:24), Rich Megginson wrote:
On 10/09/2013 04:12 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok
with switching to using F19 to run autogen?
Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we
100 matches
Mail list logo
