Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: > [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test > i could rm -rf ~/ here > > [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /usr/local/bin/mkdir > #!/bin/bash > echo "i could rm -rf ~/ here" If I can write to files you own, it doesn't matter if there's a directory in the PATH or not. I can wr

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.10.2013 01:11, schrieb drago01: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: >>> a *hidden* *user writeable* directory *in front* of PATH is >>> plain stupid security wise and there is not but and not if >> >> Not really. Anything that ca

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread drago01
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: >> a *hidden* *user writeable* directory *in front* of PATH is >> plain stupid security wise and there is not but and not if > > Not really. Anything that can write to that directory can also write to > s

Re: Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping

2013-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.10.2013 00:55, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:49:36 +0100 > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> and will this ever be fixed? >> >> Original-Nachricht >> Betreff: Anacron job 'cron.daily' on srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net >> Datum: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:08:53 +0100 (CET) >> Von

Re: Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping

2013-10-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:49:36 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > and will this ever be fixed? > > Original-Nachricht > Betreff: Anacron job 'cron.daily' on srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net > Datum: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:08:53 +0100 (CET) > Von: Anacron > An: r...@srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net > > /etc/c

Re: Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping

2013-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.09.2013 03:37, schrieb Theodore Lee: > On 14/09/13 08:51, Reindl Harald wrote: >> a few days ago i upgraded to F19 and my cron-script checking >> for updates as well as "yum check-update" reports these >> warnings - unsure where to report a bug because it's not >> a specific package, so i p

Re: [Fwd: F19: "yum groups mark convert" problem]

2013-10-29 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 10/29/2013 02:07 PM, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mar, 29/10/2013 alle 09.38 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto: Sorry for cross post, but I would avoid to reinstall my notebook Someone can help me? Since I had not gotten any suggestion, today I have tray this command: # yum update --bugfix --s

Re: unretiring json

2013-10-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Seg, 2013-10-28 at 22:40 +0100, punto...@libero.it wrote: > Il 28/10/2013 22:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > according to > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers > > I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the json package [1

Re: [Fwd: F19: "yum groups mark convert" problem]

2013-10-29 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno mar, 29/10/2013 alle 09.38 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > Sorry for cross post, but I would avoid to reinstall my notebook > Someone can help me? > Many thanks Since I had not gotten any suggestion, today I have tray this command: # yum update --bugfix --security The system have sho

Re: Ocaml rpath issue

2013-10-29 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/25/2013 04:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:28:53AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: plplot has an OCaml interface, but I see: plplot-ocaml.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllplplot_stubs.so ['/usr/lib64/ocaml', '/builddir/build/B

Re: unretiring json

2013-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:52:11PM +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 10/28/2013 10:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > according to > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers > > I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the json package [1], > > whi

Re: unretiring json

2013-10-29 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 10/28/2013 10:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers > I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the json package [1], > which is needed it for closure-compiler [2]. > > According to dead.package fil

Re: [AutoQA] #445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases

2013-10-29 Thread AutoQA
#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases +- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues Component: tests | Resolution:

Re: [fedora-java] Headless JRE in Fedora

2013-10-29 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Quoting Florian Weimer (2013-10-28 14:42:47) > On 10/24/2013 04:19 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > Quoting Fernando Nasser (2013-10-24 16:06:27) > >> Also, will this change be ackported into the Java packages of RHEL_5 and > >> RHEL-6? > > > > Doesn't matter. Fedora != RHEL > > I think we nee

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

2013-10-29 Thread Phil Knirsch
On 10/29/2013 04:47 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: On 10/29/2013 04:25 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: On 10/29/2013 03:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - Jon then took th

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

2013-10-29 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: > On 10/29/2013 04:25 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Phil Knirsch >> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/29/2013 03:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - > > > Jon then took the b

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

2013-10-29 Thread Phil Knirsch
On 10/29/2013 04:25 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: On 10/29/2013 03:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - Jon then took the ball and sent out an initial day/time proposal for Thursday 17:00 - 18:00 UTC. Unfortunately some peo

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

2013-10-29 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: > On 10/29/2013 03:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> >> - Original Message - >>> >>> Jon then took the ball and sent out an initial day/time proposal for >>> Thursday 17:00 - 18:00 UTC. Unfortunately some people won't be able to >>> make

Re: libodb-devel not available for arm?

2013-10-29 Thread Dave Johansen
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:51:48 -0700 > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > I'm packaging odb ( http://codesynthesis.com/products/odb/ ) for > > Fedora/RHEL and I've run into a bit of a problem. Everything worked > > fine for f18 and f19, but when I try t

pairing static analysis results with known crashes

2013-10-29 Thread Martin Milata
Hi devel, it was suggested to me to repost here two messages originally sent to firehose-devel list. Hopefully someone might find them interesting. Martin - Forwarded message from Martin Milata - Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:14:57 +0200 To: firehose-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:

Meeting Minutes for Workstation WG (2013-10-29)

2013-10-29 Thread Josh Boyer
== #fedora-meeting: Fedora Workstation WG == Meeting started by jwb at 14:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-29/fedora-workstation.2013-10-29-14.00.log.html .

[Bug 993106] perl-Rose-DB-0.773 is available

2013-10-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993106 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Rose-DB-0.773-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-0.773-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the C

[perl-Rose-DB/el6] Update to version 0.773

2013-10-29 Thread Bill Pemberton
commit 0879667ab49037d09a4346b41689d4b9d4c9b5b1 Author: Bill Pemberton Date: Tue Oct 29 10:46:31 2013 -0400 Update to version 0.773 .gitignore|1 + perl-Rose-DB.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.g

Re: [389-devel] Proof of concept: mocking DS in lib389

2013-10-29 Thread thierry bordaz
On 10/29/2013 02:18 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote: Hello Thierry, I am not rewriting ldapadd,... methods of "real" DS class, I am in fact creating MockDS class with custom ldapadd,... methods, _just_ like you suggest :) Furthermore, you can view it as a subclass of "real_ds" - even though it is not

[Bug 993106] perl-Rose-DB-0.773 is available

2013-10-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993106 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Rose-DB-0.773-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-0.773-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: [389-devel] Proof of concept: mocking DS in lib389

2013-10-29 Thread Jan Rusnacko
On 10/29/2013 03:30 PM, thierry bordaz wrote: > On 10/29/2013 02:18 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote: >> Hello Thierry, >> >> I am not rewriting ldapadd,... methods of "real" DS class, I am in fact >> creating MockDS class with custom ldapadd,... methods, _just_ like you >> suggest :) >> >> Furthermore, yo

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

2013-10-29 Thread Phil Knirsch
On 10/29/2013 03:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - Jon then took the ball and sent out an initial day/time proposal for Thursday 17:00 - 18:00 UTC. Unfortunately some people won't be able to make that time and day, so Josh Boyer then proposed to use whenisgood.net to mak

File HTTP-Tiny-0.037.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-10-29 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Tiny: fa395229fc092c400f6589bd2986b67c HTTP-Tiny-0.037.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

2013-10-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Jon then took the ball and sent out an initial day/time proposal for > Thursday 17:00 - 18:00 UTC. Unfortunately some people won't be able to > make that time and day, so Josh Boyer then proposed to use > whenisgood.net to make sure we get the best possible time for t

Re: FYI: UPower soname bump

2013-10-29 Thread Lukáš Tinkl
Dne 29.10.2013 15:05, Bastien Nocera napsal(a): It will need changes then. See: http://www.hadess.net/2013/10/more-power-management-changes.html and: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.devicekit.devel/1473 Yup, thanks for the pointer, I will be porting KDE's powerdevil in the follo

Re: FYI: UPower soname bump

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien Nocera
It will need changes then. See: http://www.hadess.net/2013/10/more-power-management-changes.html and: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.devicekit.devel/1473 - Original Message - > Dne 29.10.2013 14:10, Richard Hughes napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > Although all interested parties p

Re: [AutoQA] #445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases

2013-10-29 Thread AutoQA
#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases +- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues Component: tests | Resolution:

Re: [389-devel] Proof of concept: mocking DS in lib389

2013-10-29 Thread Jan Rusnacko
On 10/28/2013 02:52 PM, Roberto Polli wrote: > Hi @all, > > Jan wrote: > as I promised, I am sending you a proof-of-concept code that > demonstrates, how we can mock DS in unit tests for library function > Ok, that's clear. > > instead of sending command to real DS instance, > the

Re: FYI: UPower soname bump

2013-10-29 Thread Lukáš Tinkl
Dne 29.10.2013 14:10, Richard Hughes napsal(a): Hi, Although all interested parties probably know (previously announced on the devkit-devel mailing list a few times) UPower has branched from 0.9 and is now being tidied up for the journey to version 1.0.0. Part of this was fixing some of the deep

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2013-10-29 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.

Re: [389-devel] Proof of concept: mocking DS in lib389

2013-10-29 Thread Jan Rusnacko
Hello Thierry, I am not rewriting ldapadd,... methods of "real" DS class, I am in fact creating MockDS class with custom ldapadd,... methods, _just_ like you suggest :) Furthermore, you can view it as a subclass of "real_ds" - even though it is not a proper Python subclass, it inherits all func

Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

2013-10-29 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
Hi, I'm on the CC list of the review request for rubygem-vagrant [1] and randomly found a new review request for vagrant [2]. The two packages are AFAICT the same, and the former is stalled due to missing dependencies, the last one being rubygem-log4r [3]. Ironically, the two submitters (CC'ed) m

FYI: UPower soname bump

2013-10-29 Thread Richard Hughes
Hi, Although all interested parties probably know (previously announced on the devkit-devel mailing list a few times) UPower has branched from 0.9 and is now being tidied up for the journey to version 1.0.0. Part of this was fixing some of the deeper architectural flaws, and my thanks go to Bastie

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: > a *hidden* *user writeable* directory *in front* of PATH is > plain stupid security wise and there is not but and not if Not really. Anything that can write to that directory can also write to shell init scripts, desktop environment autostart settings, etc

F-20 Branched report: 20131029 changes

2013-10-29 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 29 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng] bwm-ng-0.6

Agenda for Today's Workstation WG Meeting (2013-10-29 14:00 UTC)

2013-10-29 Thread Josh Boyer
My apologies for the last minute agenda. We'll be holding our initial WG meeting today at 14:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. We'll cover the various items below. I will try and keep the meeting under 1 hour. == Logistics == - mailing list(s) - IRC channel(s) - Meeting frequency and time

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread Alec Leamas
On 2013-10-29 11:44, Alec Leamas wrote: [cut] BTW, don't we also lack a default, user-controlled directory for manpages? Shouldn't ~/.local/share/man be part of user's default MANPATH? Same usecase, basically same solution... [Answering myself...] We, we don't lack that. As of f20, this

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread Alec Leamas
On 2013-10-29 10:56, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/29/2013 08:07 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 10/28/2013 09:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:28:01AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: * Tue Jun 07 2011 Roman Rakus <…> - 4.2.10-3 - Added $HOME/.local/bin to PATH in .bash_profile (#

File Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.118.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-10-29 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated: 1b7fc22927e26ec338f28be46c639358 Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.118.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/29/2013 08:07 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 10/28/2013 09:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:28:01AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: * Tue Jun 07 2011 Roman Rakus <…> - 4.2.10-3 - Added $HOME/.local/bin to PATH in .bash_profile (#699812) An invisible directory in everyone'

Re: Orphaning ghemical and related packages

2013-10-29 Thread Christopher Meng
Some of them are being developed again on GitHub. If no one want to take care of them, I can take. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Fwd: F19: "yum groups mark convert" problem]

2013-10-29 Thread Dario Lesca
Sorry for cross post, but I would avoid to reinstall my notebook Someone can help me? Many thanks --- Messaggio inoltrato --- Da: Dario Lesca Reply-to: Community support for Fedora users A: Fedora Users Oggetto: F19: "yum groups mark convert" problem Data: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:43:34 +020

Re: libodb-devel not available for arm?

2013-10-29 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:51:48 -0700 Dave Johansen wrote: > I'm packaging odb ( http://codesynthesis.com/products/odb/ ) for > Fedora/RHEL and I've run into a bit of a problem. Everything worked > fine for f18 and f19, but when I try to build libdodb-boost for f20 I > get an error that libodb-devel

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

2013-10-29 Thread Matthias Runge
On 10/28/2013 09:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:28:01AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: >>> * Tue Jun 07 2011 Roman Rakus <…> - 4.2.10-3 >>> - Added $HOME/.local/bin to PATH in .bash_profile (#699812) >> An invisible directory in everyone's PATH. That's rather unfortunate. >