Hello,
This might be the starting point:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join
- Original Message -
From: Simon Farnsworth si...@farnz.org.uk
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 5:28:21 PM
Subject:
Hi Ales,
I've put https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034341 up for review -
I've not had time yet to go and review other people's packages.
Upstream know I'm doing this; they've taken a patch from me already that fell
out of the review, to fix the FSF's address in their files.
Simon
Compose started at Wed Nov 27 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
Sorry for not responding to this before, but lots of other things to do and
this packaging business obviously needs more than just an hour here or there of
reading READMEs.
I see you want to make things even more difficult for me by giving me *several*
options to choose from, are you *trying*
Hi,
I would like to reopen the discussion about packaging web fonts since
its conclusion(below) is not very usable.
The issue I'm dealing with is that we want FreeIPA Web UI to use Open
Sans and Font Awesome(FA) font. FA is being packaged and I planned to
package Open Sans (Apache license
Hi all,
so I started to work on packaging Python 3.4 beta 1 and I wanted to create
ensurepip patch also acceptable for upstream - Toshio and Nick talked about
that at [1]. I tried to analyze the situation and here is what I have. First
some facts:
- with ensurepip, Python 3.4 bundles setuptools
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Tako Schotanus tscho...@redhat.com wrote:
Sorry for not responding to this before, but lots of other things to do and
this packaging business obviously needs more than just an hour here or there
of reading READMEs.
I see you want to make things even more
For one package for which I am part of upstream, we are talking about
adding TLS support. The upstream project is GPLv3+. We're looking at
the preferred list of crypto implementations on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation and have a
couple of questions.
The most preferred
On 11/26/2013 03:13 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Nov 26 05:15:08 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[openmpi]
openmpi-1.7.3-1.fc21.i686 requires libpapi.so.5.2.0.0
Broken deps for x86_64
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 09:27 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
For one package for which I am part of upstream, we are talking about
adding TLS support. The upstream project is GPLv3+. We're looking at
the preferred list of crypto implementations on
Dan Williams wrote:
libgcrypt is actually just basic crypto, not TLS. gnutls is based on
libgcrypt. So it's not an alternative to anything above for TLS stuff,
but you'll get it anyway if you choose gnutls.
I'd also like to add that GnuTLS 3.x (Fedora 19+) defaults to using nettle
instead
Jerry James wrote:
The third option is OpenSSL, whose license is GPL-incompatible, and so
not an option for us.
at least in fedora, openssl is considered a system library (for gpl
purposes).
Probably a good idea to consult fedora legal list instead (you'll likely get
a better answer there)
Hi,
while cleaning up retired packages (which I did not yet finish), I came
up with an idea to simplify the retirement procedure to avoid
inconsistencies. With the help of fedmsg I would like to make it enough
wrt to koji and pkgdb to add a dead.package file to dist git to
retire a package. When
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100,
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
What are your opinions about this? I already checked with Dennis
Gilmore, he is ok with this.
Is there a fail against doing this in released versions? (Unless there
is a legal reason to do the retirement, we
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100,
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
What are your opinions about this? I already checked with Dennis
Gilmore, he is ok with this.
Is there a fail against doing this in released
Hi Tako,
On 27.11.2013 15:01, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Sorry for not responding to this before, but lots of other things to do and
this packaging business obviously needs more than just an hour here or there of
reading READMEs.
NP, I just decided that you are in touch with the experienced
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-11-27)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:00:39 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-27/fesco.2013-11-27-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:21:53PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
while cleaning up retired packages (which I did not yet finish), I came
up with an idea to simplify the retirement procedure to avoid
inconsistencies. With the help of fedmsg I would like to make it enough
wrt to koji and pkgdb
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:46:28PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100,
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
What are your opinions about this? I already checked with Dennis
Gilmore, he is ok
Below are the minutes from today's Blocker Review Meeting. We made it
through all the listed blocker (10) and freeze exception (14)
proposals.
The next meeting will be 2013-12-04 at 17:00 UTC.
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F20-blocker-review
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013, 2:30:23 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:46:28PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100,
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
What are your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Final TC3 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-c17858a8 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-6578580c : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
Le Mer 27 novembre 2013 15:39, Petr Vobornik a écrit :
Hi,
I would like to reopen the discussion about packaging web fonts since
its conclusion(below) is not very usable.
The issue I'm dealing with is that we want FreeIPA Web UI to use Open
Sans and Font Awesome(FA) font. FA is being
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
You answered that just below; because OpenSSL is GPL incompatible.
Since gnutls is LGPL, it can be used in most places openssl can be used,
*plus* it can be used with GPL software. Obviously, consult your
lawyers for the
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Jerry James wrote:
The third option is OpenSSL, whose license is GPL-incompatible, and so
not an option for us.
at least in fedora, openssl is considered a system library (for gpl
purposes).
Probably a good idea to
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:01:07PM -0500, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
What about un-retirement? It is critical that administrators be able
to handle this side of the packaging process, even after a release has
been branched.
This is out-of-scope for my proposal, except that no packages should be
Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from
the list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I
to watch a VOB file?
Linux 3.11.9-300.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 20 22:23:25 UTC 2013 x86_64
Thanks
--
Richard
--
devel mailing list
On 25.11.2013 17:35, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 25 November 2013 06:58, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Personally, I use VMs.
I think the majority of developers do this. I have f19, f20, and
rawhide VMs with multiple versions of the images I use nearly every
day. For rawhide, it's
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 10:30 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
At the KDE SIG meeting today, we made the hard decision to push
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
change/feature back to f21. There were simply too many sddm-related
blocker issues that would not be safely resolvable
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:28 +, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
Hello all,
My employer, ONELAN, have been using Fedora as a baseline Linux system for
our
products for a while now, and I've just hit a situation where no-one's
packaging gstreamer1-python, but we're going to start depending on
On 11/27/2013 10:46 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 09:27 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
The second option is gnutls, which is various flavors of GPL and LGPL,
and so is fine for us. We did have one developer wonder why gnutls is
preferred over openssl, though. Can anyone answer
Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting,
and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order
to be able to complete testing in time for the go/no-go meeting
comprehensively and comfortably, we would need a build with all these
bugs addressed by
On 28.11.2013 03:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 grubby fatal error
updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs - grubby - the problem here is
clearly defined. We are waiting on pjones to decide how to move forward
with this. Gene Czarcinski has
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 06:17 +0100, poma wrote:
On 28.11.2013 03:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 grubby fatal error
updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs - grubby - the problem here is
clearly defined. We are waiting on pjones to decide how
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from
the list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I
to watch a VOB file?
This has nothing to do with the kernel
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 07:59 +0100, Johannes Lips wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more
stable one from the list that is compiled - is probably the
answer to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035139
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
commit e1f89c415c458f34776fa1e1b0a37e6c26c16c03
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Nov 25 12:57:59 2013 +0800
Initial package for Fedora
This was submitted on Mon Nov 25 2013:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034017#c0
commit d4892a91c69755e6f1221e9f72dae4171c6636bb
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 16:06:18 2013 +0800
Drop the explicit requirements, rpmbuild finds them itself
perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
commit 3627db34a542a400ba0979dabe36aab8072dc59b
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 15:51:26 2013 +0800
Added missing build requirements
perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 7d2bca98dda7a133eebaed82a0ba1665d07b45fb
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 15:50:56 2013 +0800
Improve the package summary and description
perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
bbe983f... Initial setup of the pre-review repo
e1f89c4... Initial package for Fedora
54ffa23... Also drop the inc files from the MANIFEST
7d2bca9... Improve the package summary and description
3627db3... Added missing build requirements
d4892a9... Drop the
commit 54ffa23d1a22fed942c54deb0fb7752634771b89
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 15:50:01 2013 +0800
Also drop the inc files from the MANIFEST
perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit bbe983fb7539010e582ac49e90496b3f59a7c0aa
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Nov 25 12:47:35 2013 +0800
Initial setup of the pre-review repo
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index
commit 8bcfea485653014c1b999e0f7c7cb74a0e108686
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 16:44:46 2013 +0800
New package for Fedora
This was submitted on Tue Nov 26 2013:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034017#c2
commit b5ef3da26fa18e2585e5080d047551c66121adfa
Merge: 9f694f8 8bcfea4
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:36:24 2013 +0800
The package was approved in Fedora
perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec | 76 ++
1 files changed,
commit 8ce4ba38522e7198f5560380ec8dfc0d0c76e241
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 16:06:35 2013 +0800
Drop the unneeded build requirement
perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 438909c42ff7e9d3bfd7a535dfbdb87f12b99cd1
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:37:03 2013 +0800
Upload the sources
.gitignore |1 +
sources|1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Name-FromLine:
e7e7637079d127b411738aeff5612502 Test-Name-FromLine-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
commit 693e0bc81227b929b477a833e5601dbd46ad2fb3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 27 12:23:39 2013 +0100
Do not use already existing temporary files
...-not-use-already-existing-temporary-files.patch | 45
perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec
commit 2dacff0c7d0ec4b40aad0f4c47ce6be7195e749a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 27 12:21:34 2013 +0100
Croak on failed write into a file
...y-0.038-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch | 36
perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec|
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable:
f44a056e92c1d9df89e190591879d84f Lingua-EN-Syllable-0.251.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit fb5193a73265773200349435afb2c99e74377c7d
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 28 10:56:13 2013 +1000
Import new package
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable.spec | 48 ++
sources
commit ba679f2b85c317cb2d7b49398f9ee75063da8153
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 28 10:57:25 2013 +1000
Import new package
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable.spec | 48 ++
sources
commit bb7b6c0486dadb57109df256401a75d65f874218
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 28 10:58:13 2013 +1000
Import new package
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable.spec | 48 ++
sources
commit 48a7b09003ad10b36d9130e9156779ddcb7b56e4
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 28 10:58:59 2013 +1000
Import new package
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable.spec | 48 ++
sources
commit e41958f406252a1fda0770ef97e38d2c16a66a08
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 28 10:59:46 2013 +1000
Import new package
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable.spec | 48 ++
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017576
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023711
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026218
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47457
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47457/0001-Ticket-47457-default-nsslapd-sasl-max-buffer-size-sh.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/28/2013 12:42 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
I hope I covered all the important points. Basically, we can make this work
in a way acceptable for upstream, if we package setupttols and pip as wheels.
It'll require some extra effort, but I think it's worth it.
Thoughts? Anyone has
jdulaney added a subscriber: jdulaney.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T12
To: jdulaney
Cc: qa-devel, tflink, jdulaney
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
#439: IRC bug order does not match web bug order
--+-
Reporter: kparal| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component:
#439: IRC bug order does not match web bug order
---+
Reporter: kparal| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component:
tflink created this task.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a project: blockerbugs
TASK DESCRIPTION
I got a report of a failed proposal today where the form said there were
errors but everything looks fine and no details were provided.
There is currently no logging of form
68 matches
Mail list logo
