On 01/17/2014 02:25 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 01/16/2014 01:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
The other thing -- getting unicode to include standard symbols -- is
happening. That's why we have 💩 . Yay standards!
Oh man. Change that to 144pt. Is
On 01/16/2014 08:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox compon
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 01/17/2014 02:25 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Assuming you're using Fedora to read your emails, what font do you have
installed that has those glyphs? I can see them on my Android phone,
but not on my Fedora laptop.
You can use Symbola, yum install gdo
Am 17.01.2014 01:32, schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 20:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
>> QT firefox to get rid of GTK-dialogs
>>
>> i know that will not happen, but on the KDE desktop *any* GTK2 or GTK3
>> application
Hi Fedora,
Just a quick note that the latest selinux-policy and
selinux-policy-targeted breaks RPM scriptlet execution (pre, post,
postun, etc).
I've verified this on two separate systems (my laptop, a desktop at
work). The versions causing this is:
0:3.12.1-116.fc20 (for both packages)
This is
On 01/16/2014 08:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
>> consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
>> I know I have not...
>>
>> I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Rubin wrote:
> Hi Fedora,
>
> Just a quick note that the latest selinux-policy and
> selinux-policy-targeted breaks RPM scriptlet execution (pre, post,
> postun, etc).
>
> I've verified this on two separate systems (my laptop, a desktop at
> work). The versions cau
Agenda:
- Self hosting detailed review & discussion & next steps:
http://www.harald-hoyer.de/2014/01/14/self-hosting-fedora-base/
- Inter WG coordination -> FOSDEM, DevConf?
- Open floor
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-
Hi all,
I've encountered something that seems a little weird and wondering if
anyone has any ideas...
My home server has an ext4 root with a btrfs pool mounted at /data (with a
number of subvolumes in there).
Within /data I am able to do cp --reflink=always between
subvolumes and COW works as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2014 02:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> === #fedora-meeting: FESCO
>> (2014-01-15) ===
>>
>>
>> Meeting started by
Hi,
I would like to include the package of the_silver_searcher in Fedora,
so can anyone please cooperate with me as a sponsor?
the_silver_searcher is code searching tool which faster than ack.
And as you may already know, it is widely used.
Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, OS X, ArchLinux, FreeBSD and Ope
On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:06 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> So far as I understand it when in the same pool cross-subvolume COW should be
> valid (as shown in /data on the server) - even if technically under separate
> mounts.
I haven't yet found anything newer than this:
http://git.kernel.org/cgi
On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service
> better use
>
> # journalctl -b -u NetworkManager
>
> "-u" has the advantage, that you can specify it multiple times with different
> units and get a combined output.
Good go know... thanks!
steved.
-
On 17 January 2014 13:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:06 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>
>
> So far as I understand it when in the same pool cross-subvolume COW should
> be valid (as shown in /data on the server) - even if technically under
> separate mounts.
>
>
> I haven't yet f
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:08:29AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I feel like I tried several times to communicate this exact statement
> and was pretty much ignored.
For the record, I said it too.
> I'd love to reopen this discussion, since I really do think the
> %{dist} solution is the easi
On 01/17/2014 02:52 AM, Peter Oliver wrote:
In summary, the emoji font used in Android Jelly Bean is currently in
updates-testing; "yum install --enablerepo updates-testing
google-android-emoji-fonts".
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-android-emoji-fonts
Thank you for the info.
commit ea64a3168635cf097bf821f14d970446fcc19247
Author: Petr PÃsaÅ™
Date: Fri Jan 17 16:32:52 2014 +0100
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-perlindex.spec| 62
...ess-interpreter-declaration-from-T
Meeting minutes. Main points are now to take action on the data Harald
Hoyer produced and contact the 65 package maintainers of potential
immediate cleanup candidates or if not generally fixable for a
%bootstrap flagging.
Inter WG coordination we think would be best tackled by a cross team
co
> Thank you for the info. They aren't coloured like on the phone, but
> at least I have the symbols now.
> Ah, I just read the mailing list post, so this isn't the colour one.
> I did wonder how the font system would handle that.
It's coming:
https://lwn.net/Articles/564944/
--
Matthew Miller
On 17 January 2014 14:10, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> Thanks that commit does indeed match my behaviour ... even if it seems a
> bit messed up all things considered ...
>
> I might use a Fedora Live instance and remove the /home mount point whilst
> maintaining as a subvolume within root ...
>
> I
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 05:24:04PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > > gesture to at least keep the source RPMs around.
> > The thing is those copr repos will likely depend on EOLed Fedora
> > repos. Do we keep *those* around? I guess the answer will be different
> > for each mirror. Some will
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:51:57 -0500 (EST)
"David A. Wheeler" wrote:
> Reproducing the exact build environment, when I tried to do it years
> ago, turned out to be practically impossible and not just "difficult".
There was a recent effort on this:
https://github.com/kholia/ReproducibleBuilds
> I
Puppet (the client side, at least) should be installable with
relatively thin deps, so it can manage lightweight hosts...
I am having trouble disentangling which deps to file a bug against;
maybe virt-what ?
[martin@tp-martin puppet-rlgold.git]$ sudo yum install puppet
[sudo] password for martin:
Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) said:
> Puppet (the client side, at least) should be installable with
> relatively thin deps, so it can manage lightweight hosts...
>
> I am having trouble disentangling which deps to file a bug against;
> maybe virt-what ?
You need to make sure your t
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Puppet (the client side, at least) should be installable with
> relatively thin deps, so it can manage lightweight hosts...
>
> I am having trouble disentangling which deps to file a bug against;
> maybe virt-what ?
Alright, I think I know
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:06:37 + (GMT)
>> Do I first need to wait for the package to make it's way from
>> updates-testing to updates, or can I go ahead and edit comps right
>> away?
>
> You should wait until it's in stable for all stable releases, and the
> next day after
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> You need to make sure your transaction is pulling in classic ruby
> rather than jruby.
Well, ideally something in the dep data should indicate a preference,
and the depsolver should handle that.
What's happening however is that I am getti
Planned Outage: fedorapeople.org - 2014-01-21 22:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2014-01-21 22:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-01-21 22:00
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> There's happily no danger of running out of integers.
Well, isn't there some technical limit? Does rpmvercmp work on arbitrarily
long integers or is it limited to something like 4294967295? And is there
some character limit on the Release tag? :-)
(Now, to be fair, I don't
Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, in the discussion of this, the following was presented as an
> obstacle:
>
> 18:31:13 Requires: foo > 1.0-1.%{release}
> 18:31:22 1.0-1.fc20.copr *satisfies* that
Oh joy, ye olde repotag debate is back!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
Bill Nottingham writes:
> Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) said:
>> Puppet (the client side, at least) should be installable with
>> relatively thin deps, so it can manage lightweight hosts...
>>
>> I am having trouble disentangling which deps to file a bug against;
>> maybe virt-what
On 17 January 2014 17:52, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054903 to get the
> anaconda point of view and a decision on default layout for a BTRFS based
> Fedora system.
>
>
So I moved my home from being alongside root in subvolid=0 to being under
root
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:25:22PM -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Alright, I think I know what's happening: yum resolves the dep on ruby
> by installing jruby AND ruby-mri
>If I do yum install ruby ; yum install puppet, then things make sense. See
We had this before and there was a workaround. I'
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 09:47 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:08:29AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I feel like I tried several times to communicate this exact statement
> > and was pretty much ignored.
>
> For the record, I said it too.
>
> > I'd love to reopen this
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 08:57 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >> journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service
> > better use
> >
> > # journalctl -b -u NetworkManager
> >
> > "-u" has the advantage, that you can specify it multiple times with
> > dif
On 01/17/2014 05:34 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> You need to make sure your transaction is pulling in classic ruby
>> rather than jruby.
> Well, ideally something in the dep data should indicate a preference,
> and the depsolver should han
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Mo Morsi wrote:
> Yes as others have mentioned puppet requires ruby(release) which is
> satisfied by both ruby-mri and jruby
>
... which is fine. However yum install puppet should be pulling in only
one. Not both. I would say almost everybody would expect
If that could be made easier, that'd be awesome. Storage is cheap.
There should be a stock reply to that statement somewhere. IT support
staff seem to hear it a lot.
Besides the stuff Kevin listed, enterprize drives with good seek times
and transfer rates cost more than typical consumer dri
Sorry!
I should start by reviewing other packages.
anyone willing to review of swap reviews?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044580
Thanks,
Kenjiro
nakayamakenj...@gmail.com writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to include the package of the_silver_searcher in Fedora,
> so can anyo
Sorry again!
I made a mistake to link.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063
Kenjiro
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Kenjiro NAKAYAMA wrote:
> Sorry!
>
> I should start by reviewing other packages.
>
> anyone willing to review of swap reviews?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Mo Morsi wrote:
>>
>> Yes as others have mentioned puppet requires ruby(release) which is
>> satisfied by both ruby-mri and jruby
So should it just require ruby-mri?
The divergence from the way up
Hi, first so everyone know the news, SDL2 support for framebuffer (it is,
wihtout X!!!) displaying is becoming lacky. The more near implementation to
work is DirectFB (tested, small trivial patch to go)
So, on another news, DirectFB has been *orphaned* for some time, yes,
astonishing to me too ;)
42 matches
Mail list logo
