On 01/16/2014 08:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, in the discussion of this, the following was presented as an
obstacle:
18:31:13 notting Requires: foo 1.0-1.%{release}
18:31:22 notting 1.0-1.fc20.copr *satisfies* that
I have no objections against disttag. Hoever I would prefer
Hi All,
As indicated here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgWithoutRootRights
I'm working on making the X server run as a regular user. I actually have this
pretty much working.
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, or rather at
the elephant in the room.
As indicated here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgWithoutRootRights
I'm working on making the X server run as a regular user. I actually have
this
pretty much working.
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, or rather
at
the elephant in the room.
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:53:42 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Is it possible to build a one-time build of selinux-policy without
scriptlets so that the update will succeed?
Define what you mean with update will succeed. Simply replacing the
bad package with a new package doesn't fix it. The
Dne 18.1.2014 07:40, Michael Stahnke napsal(a):
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Mo Morsi wrote:
Yes as others have mentioned puppet requires ruby(release) which is
satisfied by both ruby-mri and jruby
So should
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 10:16 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
As indicated here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgWithoutRootRights
I'm working on making the X server run as a regular user. I actually have
this
pretty much working.
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
As indicated here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgWithoutRootRights
I'm working on making the X server run as a regular user. I actually have
this
pretty much working.
So now it is time to
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
As indicated here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgWithoutRootRights
I'm working on making the X server run as a regular user. I
On 17/01/14 07:27, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 07:11 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I've been trying to do this for a new package, cajun-jsonapi
bodhi refuses to let me request the update, it always gives the
message:
cajun-jsonapi-2.0.3-1.el6 not tagged as an update candidate
Dne 17.1.2014 23:34, Martin Langhoff napsal(a):
Interestingly enough, after uninstalling jruby, rubypick still thinks
it's installed!
[martin@tp-martin puppet-rlgold.git]$ ruby --help
This is Fedora's rubypick - a Ruby runtime chooser. You can use it
to execute Ruby programmes with any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/2014 10:03 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 11/18/2013 04:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
jsynacek:BADURL:xferstats-2.16.tar.gz:xferstats
xferstats.off.net seems to be down. I'll try to contact the author who is
mentioned in the manpage. In case I
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
PRD was approved on mailing list. Possible further discussion about tasks:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document
I can't attend tomorrow, could someone chair the meeting? How to do
Environment and Stacks Working Group approved the first version of PRD.
Feel free to comment what is missing or what should be altered.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document
Thanks,
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:08:01AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, or rather at
the elephant in the room. What about non-kms drivers. We still have the vesa
driver around as most prominent example, and this is useful for some
Apparently RPMbuild has a pair of parameters --with and --without
that can supposedly enable and disable optional features in a package.
Has anyone seen any documentation that explains how those work and how
they interact with a spec file?
I want to be able to easily switch an option between
On 01/20/2014 04:24 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Apparently RPMbuild has a pair of parameters --with and --without
that can supposedly enable and disable optional features in a package.
Has anyone seen any documentation that explains how those work and how
they interact with a spec file?
I want to
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Apparently RPMbuild has a pair of parameters --with and --without
that can supposedly enable and disable optional features in a package.
Has anyone seen any documentation that explains how those work and how
they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2014 04:42 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I think we should have a much higher Karma for SELinux-policy to be released.
5 or maybe 10. The problem with selinux-policy is it gets karma fast, since
each update fixes multiple bugs. And people
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
1 packages were orphaned
pxe-kexec [EL-5,EL-6] was orphaned by kevin
Linux boots Linux via network
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pxe-kexec
12 packages
Dne 20.1.2014 11:48, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 17.1.2014 23:34, Martin Langhoff napsal(a):
Interestingly enough, after uninstalling jruby, rubypick still thinks
it's installed!
[martin@tp-martin puppet-rlgold.git]$ ruby --help
This is Fedora's rubypick - a Ruby runtime chooser. You can use
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 03:18 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:08:01AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, or rather at
the elephant in the room. What about non-kms drivers. We still have the vesa
driver around as most
commit 88dd7be0a25723b4c63752266f71fc475ec21b5b
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Mon Jan 20 10:50:08 2014 -0500
Update to version 0.775
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Rose-DB.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 08:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:02:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
Anyone not aware of the problem and the fix, who applies the -117.fc20
selinux-policy update in _enforcing_ mode (since it has entered stable
updates meanwhile) believing it
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-DB-Object:
b73acf4ddaf7b893ce3cc7ae983b72d7 Rose-DB-Object-0.810.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Apparently RPMbuild has a pair of parameters --with and --without
that can supposedly enable and disable optional features in a package.
Has anyone seen any documentation that explains how those work and how
they interact with a
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:18:22PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We can probably kill -cirrus.
qemu? (I know that people should be using QXL, but cirrus is still
the default in plain qemu, and IMHO simpler and more secure.)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
commit a3f86a1cdab9dc5c47a287835cece6bc3978916d
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Mon Jan 20 10:59:29 2014 -0500
update to version 0.810
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Rose-DB-Object.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 03:18 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
-mga is probably also still relevant in some small number of cases.
Don't we've a kms driver for those? Or you mean for mga cards not supported by
the kms driver?
The KMS
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:58:23PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:18:22PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We can probably kill -cirrus.
qemu? (I know that people should be using QXL, but cirrus is still
the default in plain qemu, and IMHO simpler and more
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 17:35 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 15:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:47:38 -0500
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Since updates don't automatically fix the issue created by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350 and users are
required to run a set of
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, or rather
at
the elephant in the room. What about non-kms drivers. We still have the vesa
driver around as most prominent example, and this is useful for some oddball
cards and for cards which are too new.
-mga is probably
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:58 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:18:22PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We can probably kill -cirrus.
qemu? (I know that people should be using QXL, but cirrus is still
the default in plain qemu, and IMHO simpler and more secure.)
I
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:05AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
18:31:13 notting Requires: foo 1.0-1.%{release}
18:31:22 notting 1.0-1.fc20.copr *satisfies* that
I have no objections against disttag. Hoever I would prefer fc20-copr.
I.e. not to use dot as separator.
That would require
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:10:29PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A simple yum -y update ; reboot ; Oh, everything seems to work has not
been enough this time. And it was an update with a screen full of ticket
numbers for the included bug-fixes/changes. It could have broken something
else,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2014 10:50 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 08:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:02:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
Anyone not aware of the problem and the fix, who applies the
-117.fc20 selinux-policy
On 20.01.2014 16:24, Björn Persson wrote:
According to the Packaging Guidelines we're not supposed to use those
parameters when building the source RPM to be submitted, because they
somehow get serialized into the source package. I don't understand
this, because I don't submit any source
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 12:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:10:29PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A simple yum -y update ; reboot ; Oh, everything seems to work has not
been enough this time. And it was an update with a screen full of ticket
numbers for the included
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:11:48 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:42:34PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
My thoughts are these (in no particular order).
* Treat this branch like Rawhide. All builds targeted at this are
composed to a repo. Signing
Hello devel@,
I'm excited to announce the first public release (v2014.3) of the
fedostree/rpm-ostree project.
The web page is here:
http://rpm-ostree.cloud.fedoraproject.org/#/
rpm-ostree is a quite new, raw, and also quite unofficial project (the instance
above is in the Fedora private
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, or rather
at
the elephant in the room. What about non-kms drivers. We still have the vesa
driver around as most prominent example, and this is useful
On 01/20/2014 07:31 PM, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 20.01.2014 16:24, Björn Persson wrote:
According to the Packaging Guidelines we're not supposed to use those
parameters when building the source RPM to be submitted, because they
somehow get serialized into the source package. I don't understand
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 03:18 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:08:01AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, or
rather at
the elephant in the
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:19:30AM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Does uvesafb actually work? I submitted a patch to the uvesafb kernel
driver a few months back, and not only is the upstream link [1][2] to
the v86d helper dead, but no one on the dri-devel list answered my
request to see if
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:50:09PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Isn't -cirrus still used by virt in a number of cases? I know -mga is
used as a gpu chipset on a number of relatively new server platforms.
What about -vmware?
Virt can use the cirrus kms driver, the server matrox is supported by
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/20/2014 07:31 PM, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 20.01.2014 16:24, Björn Persson wrote:
According to the Packaging Guidelines we're not supposed to use those
parameters when building the source RPM to be submitted, because they
somehow get serialized
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:19:30AM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Does uvesafb actually work? I submitted a patch to the uvesafb kernel
driver a few months back, and not only is the upstream link [1][2] to
the v86d
On 01/20/2014 05:56 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Apparently RPMbuild has a pair of parameters --with and --without
that can supposedly enable and disable optional features in a package.
Has anyone seen any documentation that
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 12:30 -0500, Scott Schmit wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:23:42PM -0500, Scott Schmit wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:47:37PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
I replaced the typo scriplet - scriptlet in several
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:54:22AM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
It'd be pretty straightforward to re-implement the helper if it's
vanished entirely - we haven't retired libx86, and the rest is pretty
trivial.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'd suggest this test should be a high priority for implementation once
taskotron is operational, perhaps equal in importance to re-implementing
the current AutoQA tests.
*nod* Sounds good to me.
what we have. I don't know how
I have a package review I posted today, looking to swap with someone.
Thanks.
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?
pgpmch1w1BF7g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 09:20 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:33:12 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Any thoughts on whether it would be OK to start asking folks to
create herald rules if they want to see all the tickets or if
there is enough value
On 01/20/2014 06:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 12:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:10:29PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A simple yum -y update ; reboot ; Oh, everything seems to work has not
been enough this time. And it was an update with a
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Seems to be bug. Haven't seen any bug report from you yet, so I did one
for you: https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick/issues/4
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubypick-1.1.1-1.fc20
Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Apparently RPMbuild has a pair of parameters --with and --without
that can supposedly enable and disable optional features in a
package. Has anyone seen any documentation that explains how those
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'd suggest this test should be a high priority for implementation once
taskotron is operational, perhaps equal in importance to re-implementing
the current AutoQA
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 17:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'd suggest this test should be a high priority for implementation once
taskotron is operational, perhaps
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 14:53 +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 18.01.2014 03:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 08:57 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote:
journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service
better use
# journalctl -b -u
My old notes at
https://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/confluence/display/TUSKpub/Configure+Pair+Bonding,+VLANs,+and+Bridges+for+KVM+Hypervisor
were pretty good.
If you want stable KVM bridging, pair bonding, jumbo frames, or
consistent network connections of any sort for server grade
installations, my
On 01/20/2014 08:18 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Networkmanager is not your friend for stable servers.
I'm using it on a server with multiple interfaces, multiple vlans,
multiple bridges, a VPN and a VM and it doesn't give me any trouble.
I would say 95% of the setup was done through the
On 20.01.2014 19:03, Colin Walters wrote:
Hello devel@,
I'm excited to announce the first public release (v2014.3) of the
fedostree/rpm-ostree project.
The web page is here:
http://rpm-ostree.cloud.fedoraproject.org/#/
rpm-ostree is a quite new, raw, and also quite unofficial project (the
On 01/20/2014 11:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The bug currently under discussion was caused by a change that came in
inadvertently, not intentionally, and was actually intended for Rawhide.
I can't help wondering if there's an opportunity for process/workflow
improvement right there.
--
On Po, 2014-01-20 at 12:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:05AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
18:31:13 notting Requires: foo 1.0-1.%{release}
18:31:22 notting 1.0-1.fc20.copr *satisfies* that
I have no objections against disttag. Hoever I would prefer fc20-copr.
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 01:01 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 01/20/2014 11:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The bug currently under discussion was caused by a change that came in
inadvertently, not intentionally, and was actually intended for Rawhide.
I can't help wondering if there's an
Hi Dennis,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:40 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand the
setup.
Some bits are documented here
https://people.gnome.org/~walters/ostree/doc/layout.html
Apparently there exist sort of two root trees /
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054233
--- Comment #2 from lionel.c...@cern.ch ---
This new version (1.1) is fully backward compatible with the current one (1.0).
Deploying it on older distributions like EL5 has no drawbacks and some benefits
like allowing new versions of packages
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-experimental:
10b15c5f5cf3fd8dd92b97ee815e6499 experimental-0.006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055289
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Load-Conditional:
1e0ad0077241c32eba7af9cb7c443dc8 Module-Load-Conditional-0.60.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1be4a38a1704fcfbe8731c047860912458d639e2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 20 09:33:34 2014 +0100
0.60 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Module-Load-Conditional.spec | 11 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055292
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053115
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914265
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #6)
(In reply to iaco61 from comment #5)
I wrote a new version of DBD::AnyData to work with DBI 1.623 or greather
(I'm using DBI 1.630).
I sent
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-DB:
a11a2bcb522af44865c8df9e06654428 Rose-DB-0.775.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JavaScript-Minifier:
b82ecded33652b78b3ed8234a0b147fd JavaScript-Minifier-1.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 27e48c3bcbd8ef483361c86e55fe9bcf51a7a19b
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 20 18:00:20 2014 +0100
1.06 bump; Modernize spec file
.gitignore|1 +
perl-JavaScript-Minifier.spec | 36 ++--
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-DNS:
d3d074ba95314fa9627252653a4242b7 Net-DNS-0.74.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 086f458a24962b270c62a1009e9832bb4a3821f9
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 20 19:26:44 2014 +0100
0.74 bump, fixes the server crash on malformed queries
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-DNS.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
086f458... 0.74 bump, fixes the server crash on malformed queries (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton)
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling)
On i386:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055294
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-DNS-0.74-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-DNS-0.74-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Mojibake:
4a6219386553674efb25b611ebb48f1c Test-Mojibake-0.9.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b6227aa6237acbc02c114b93a4fd310a4876d21b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 18:51:24 2014 +
Update to 0.9
- New upstream release 0.9
- More consistent UTF-8 naming in docs
- Dist::Zilla maintenance
- Fixed shebang in scan_mojibake
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Mojibake-0.9-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
b6227aa... Update to 0.9
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d4ecc9ffce2c17e8481148c24a94c20cc25a4869
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 20:14:02 2014 +
Re-enable the test suite
- Re-enable the test suite: Test::Most is not required
- BR: perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) for extra test
Summary of changes:
187124d... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
6b7541e... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
d4ecc9f... Re-enable the test suite (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
The lightweight tag 'perl-Data-Dumper-Names-0.03-17.el7' was created pointing
to:
d4ecc9f... Re-enable the test suite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Data-Dumper-Names-0.03-17.fc21' was created pointing
to:
d4ecc9f... Re-enable the test suite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Image-ExifTool:
1561118c8fe9a8e8078afcf0d1650423 Image-ExifTool-9.46.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build-Tiny:
20befb3dd8d66dd577eb37346596ab59 Module-Build-Tiny-0.032.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7b2a31a9c146d0931d25751e9df9ab909fe9d61e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 21:20:30 2014 +
Update to 0.032
- New upstream release 0.032
- Process argument sources separately
- Use mod2fname appropriately
- BR:/R: perl(DynaLoader)
commit 8b67027873a2e7571fa2948323f2a2c351aab573
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 16:55:26 2014 -0500
update to new stable (9.46)
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 11 ++-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
commit 69080961908095ed369df53da57db5afe8e8976d
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 16:55:46 2014 -0500
update to new stable (9.46)
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 11 ++-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
commit 4dc8148ddee2e92b5a006f66c7afd4fae06b5f90
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 16:56:40 2014 -0500
update to new stable (9.46)
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
commit 972b3b4b174ef67c670d58a89d0524c30fb013fb
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 16:57:16 2014 -0500
update to new stable (9.46)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
commit db00186f2212f06122d97230cd61b2adc1206be4
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 20 22:17:45 2014 +
Revert to version 0.23
This is the last version that didn't require Test::Differences 0.61;
EL-7 has Test::Differences 0.5000, which in perl terms is
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
