dspam has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On ppc64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.ppc64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On x86_64:
dspam-web-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(GD::Graph::lines3d)
dspa
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.x86_64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as soo
w3c-markup-validator has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires perl(HTML::Template)
On ppc64:
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires
perl(SGML::Parser::OpenSP) >= 0:0.991
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.no
Compose started at Fri Feb 7 08:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
bodhi-server-0.9.7-1.el7.noarch requires python-simplemediawiki
1:centerim-4.22.10-14.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Time::ParseDate)
check-mk-1.2.2p2
Hello,
Is it possible to build sftp module in proftpd package by default? It
is very uncomfortable to rebuild proftpd each time only for one
module.
Thanks in advance
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
Unless there are objections, I will be updating the python-sphinx
documentation generator in Rawhide to the latest 1.2.1 release.
For the convenience of maintainers of affected packages, here are the
incompatible changes since 1.1.3, pulled
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:44:46AM +0200, Alex Domoradov wrote:
> Is it possible to build sftp module in proftpd package by default? It
> is very uncomfortable to rebuild proftpd each time only for one
> module.
It is included/built by default in the EPEL package, so I am not sure
what you mean:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:54:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > What is the underlying problem here anyway?
> I've never been hugely convinced there is one, but the problem people
> *claim* there is is that closing bugs on EOL releases gives a bad
> impression to people who report the bugs.
W
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 04:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:54:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > What is the underlying problem here anyway?
> > I've never been hugely convinced there is one, but the problem people
> > *claim* there is is that closing bugs on EOL re
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:33:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There is a kind of magic trick for this: if you set a bug to be against
> Rawhide and give it the FutureFeature keyword (which is our 'official
> way' of identifying RFEs), it won't ever be re-based to a stable release
> at Branch t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
--- Comment #4 from David Dick ---
The Spec and SRPM files have been updated and built on koji at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6503548
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubsc
Thanks to Jerry James, I'm down to three reviews that needs to be done
for the 0install update. any taker appreciate, will review any of your
requests in exchange.
Best regards,
~ michel
On 01/20/2014 02:57 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
> * ocaml-xmlm - A streaming XML codec
> https://b
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 2:21:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Auto-expiring bugs are getting absurd
>
> On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:50:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 22:48 +, C
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 14:28 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > > Why would it not install xorg-x11-drv-cirrus when it sees the physical
> > > card?
> >
> > We don't have anything like the kernel's modaliases for X drivers, at
> > least not exposed in a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062576
Bug ID: 1062576
Summary: memory leak when including a file with "use utf8"
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl
Severity: medium
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Le Jeu 6 février 2014 21:38, Vidhun Vinod a écrit :
> 1. Most of the hosting companies do not support web-sockets.
And this is unlikely to change.
People deployed firewalls for a reason and I can't fathom why the web
sockets guys actually expected that wrapping protocols people didn't trust
in
This was well intention wiki edit, and possibly unaware of in-flight
changes about to land in Fedora u-boot implementation.
We are transitioning to "extlinux" which has better integration with
other parts of Fedora, and is arguably more user friendly.
It works similar to syslinux, the menu system
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 23:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 13:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Where is the human to notice "comments after EOL" and act accordingly?
In practice, GNOME maintainers have hundreds of bugs apiece and so
rarely respond to individual bug repo
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jon wrote:
> This was well intention wiki edit, and possibly unaware of in-flight
> changes about to land in Fedora u-boot implementation.
>
> We are transitioning to "extlinux" which has better integration with
> other parts of Fedora, and is arguably more user fri
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Find:
abd614f3ebca68b4e7cc474400a8c0f2 Module-Find-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
commit 4a51b3e14be9eca33a2d7af97e4728aae4c1f146
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Feb 7 15:30:02 2014 +
Update to 0.12
- New upstream release 0.12
- Fixed CPAN RT#81077: useall fails in taint mode
- Fixed CPAN RT#83596: Documentation doesn't describe behaviour if a
mo
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Find-0.12-1.el7' was created pointing to:
4a51b3e... Update to 0.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Find-0.12-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
4a51b3e... Update to 0.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
78b84d50e5a04c19b1d3835514dece95 IO-Socket-SSL-1.967.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
commit 961f407eff217ef1ccdaf50a949215bccaa1cc85
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Feb 7 15:58:48 2014 +
Update to 1.967
- New upstream release 1.967
- Verify the hostname inside a certificate by default with a superset of
common verification schemes instead of not ve
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.967-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
961f407... Update to 1.967
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-d
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Adam Williamson wrote:
painstakingly hand-weeding something like M*a's ldetect-lst you can get
some minor benefits, like doing this kind of distinction where we want
to load the native driver for a real card but not qemu's emulated
cirrus.
You are telling me it is hard to d
Am 07.02.2014 17:19, schrieb Paul Wouters:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> painstakingly hand-weeding something like M*a's ldetect-lst you can get
>> some minor benefits, like doing this kind of distinction where we want
>> to load the native driver for a real card but not qemu'
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Synopsis:
9b9f333678d51e32966538b380e3cc41 Test-Synopsis-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
commit eec08e2f72b287a8a77b9c9b81c4e8490ed0
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Feb 7 16:41:19 2014 +
Update to 0.10
- New upstream release 0.10
- Fixed prereqs to allow earlier versions of Test-Simple (Issue #9)
- Removed POD errors from test .pm's to increase Kwali
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Synopsis-0.10-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
eec08e2... Update to 0.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
On 7 February 2014 09:19, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
> Taking out everyone who tries to run fedora or rhel7 using a physical
> cirrus card IMHO is just sloppy and lazy. Yes, people still run P-III
> servers with SCSI disks and cirrus cards. In fact, I think you will
> see it more within the enterpr
> From: mat...@fedoraproject.org
> if someone has a clever way
> to automatically identify the most important candidates from the
thousands,
> that would be very useful.
What about having the ability to vote for bugs? I've seen it used
effectively and in other cases, not so much. Maybe this co
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
656
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
147
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11560/fail2ban-0.8.10-4.el5
111
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
656
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
86
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-12079/bip-0.8.9-1.el6
50
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA
Ok, after sleeping on it, I have a question.
Do I really need a full blown policy? I'm not creating anything new here.
I'm just applying the existing context applied to /var/lib/mongod to
/var/lib/unifi/data, so can I just use semanage from %postrans?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@
Summary of changes:
ce0f02f... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
0088e3f... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
4a51b3e... Update to 0.12 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requir
perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton)
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling)
On i386:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires perl
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 08:48 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 23:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 13:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Where is the human to notice "comments after EOL" and act accordingly?
>
> In practice, GNOME maintainers hav
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 11:19 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Taking out everyone who tries to run fedora or rhel7 using a physical
> cirrus card IMHO is just sloppy and lazy. Yes, people still run P-III
> servers with SCSI disks and cirrus cards. In fact, I think you will
> see it more within the ente
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:19:38AM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >painstakingly hand-weeding something like M*a's ldetect-lst you can get
> >some minor benefits, like doing this kind of distinction where we want
> >to load the native driver for a real
On Thu, 06 Feb, 2014 at 12:40:26 GMT, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I think it's acknowledgement that we don't have resources to fix all of the
> crap. But I'd like if we could better identify the important cases where we
> actually *should* make sure issues are addressed, while finding the right
> balan
45 matches
Mail list logo
