Ok, the smesh from sourceforge doesn't appear to be maintained anymore but
I have been patching it to keep it working with freecad but checking
freecad master they've continued to modify it such that I'm not sure my
version will work for much longer. Now the question is what to do about
that... I m
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:00:09PM -0600, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> This may be a stupid question, but can you solve this by putting
> more swap on those builders?
It depends. If the system is sufficiently resource constrained that
malloc() is actually telling you that you're not going to the moon
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:00:09 -0600
Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> This may be a stupid question, but can you solve this by putting more
> swap on those builders?
Possibly so yeah. Currently they have 4GB mem and 4GB swap.
Ideally it would be good to fix in the package or tools though, so
people with
On 02/14/2014 02:53 PM, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
The arm builders all have 4gb of ram. how much ram should the tests
need?
BTW, some "big" application -- seamonkey (former mozilla/netscape
suite) -- fails to build on arm due to the same reason -- not enough
memory on the b
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:01:15PM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> > The fact that the package is calling home (whether or not the location
> > of the IP is checked), is a form of tracking. Particularly since firefox
> > updates are being handled by Fedora and there is no need for our version
> >
On 02/14/2014 01:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 13:02 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 01/28/2014 03:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GUIness'. As to the
latter, I th
2014-02-14 19:41 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> Do you actually want to use a tool like Software to install gcc?
>
> I just can't see why you would. You know gcc is what you want. You don't
> need a shiny description and some screenshots and user reviews on a 1-5
> star scale. 'yum install gcc' see
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
663
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
93
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-12079/bip-0.8.9-1.el6
16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
663
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
154
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11560/fail2ban-0.8.10-4.el5
118
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
The arm builders all have 4gb of ram. how much ram should the tests
need?
BTW, some "big" application -- seamonkey (former mozilla/netscape suite)
-- fails to build on arm due to the same reason -- not enough memory on
the build host.
~buc
--
devel mailing list
devel
What version of libnl3 do you have installed? I was having bridge
problems too this week. I downgraded libnl3 from 3.2.24-1.fc20 to
3.2.21-2.fc20 and restarted the NetworkManager service, and then my
bridge worked. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1063290
- Ken
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jo
I've also noticed a regression in my network bridge setup.
Use bridging for both virt-manager, and development work with aarch64
bringup (emulated ARMv8).
Have seen this happen on two recently updated f20 systems.
I'm using traditional network-scripts, and what happens is the
physical interface ap
On 13.02.2014 19:56, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
>> With a companion libraries. ;)
>>
>> ↗ libmbim-1.6.0
>> ↗ libqmi-1.8.0
>> ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
>>
>>
>> poma
>>
>>
>> Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
>> From glen to glen, and down the mounta
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 13:02 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> On 01/28/2014 03:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>> > On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski
>> > wrote:
>> > > There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GU
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 13:02 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 03:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski
> > wrote:
> > > There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GUIness'. As to
> > > the
> > > latter, I think it's a mistake t
On 01/28/2014 03:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GUIness'. As to the
latter, I think it's a mistake to have a primary application installation
tool that only deals with GUI apps, because it r
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:02:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > That seems reasonable, and in that case, something like "fedora-presets"
> > and "fedora-workstation-presets", etc., seems appropriate, and the
> > corresponding release package could pull them in.
> What about my proposal to drop th
On Sex, 2014-02-14 at 14:36 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi Sérgio,
>
> On 02/14/2014 02:28 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > sorry I don't have time to follow fedora.next tread / discussion , btw I
> > also have a big idea for fedora.stable , pretty simple idea, to a fedora
> > releases m
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:40:26PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:41:09PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > As pre-announced on devel@ I'm updating libicu to 52.1
>
> Note, e.g. texlive hasn't been rebuilt yet in rawhide, it is broken for more
> than 2 days now, which e.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:44:12 -0800
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > icu requires quite a large number of rebuilds, including some tricky
> > ones (I just did tracker, which has to be bootstrapped, and
> > libreoffice is another...)
On 02/14/2014 05:30 PM, Jerry James wrote:
But memory, now, that's an issue. All I know for sure is that the
x86_64 and i686 builds succeeded, so those boxes had "enough" memory;
the ARM build failed, so that box did not have "enough" memory.
Based on the data presented so far, it could also
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It sounds rather ill-defined :-) What counts as large amounts of
> memory or CPU?
>
Yes, I really don't know. CPU isn't so much the concern, anyway. Let
those builder churn away for long periods of time. Bwahahahaha!
But memory, no
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 09:10:23AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>
> > There's no parallel make involved. Drat. Well, I'll figure out which
> > test(s) are eating up the memory and disable it/them on ARM, I guess.
> > Thanks for the replies, ev
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 15:22:26 +,
Colin Walters wrote:
That would mean that if we wanted to enable a new service by default,
admins wouldn't get it on upgrades. Which may be fine with the
traditional rpm-on-client-side installs.
I don't think that has to be the case. If the files i
Covered a quick update on the cleanup work with some nice progress
(first changes landing!).
Moved over to a quick recap of DevConf. Excellent conf there with a
panel of the Fedora WG representatives for Q&A.
Last but not least requirements checkup, at the moment mainly focused on
rel-eng, s
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> There's no parallel make involved. Drat. Well, I'll figure out which
> test(s) are eating up the memory and disable it/them on ARM, I guess.
> Thanks for the replies, everybody.
>
A little bit of digging into the sources shows that I just
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> I think it was g++ (or the ld linker) what went out of memory, not
> unexpected with 4GB memory plus some swap, 4 CPUs and parallel make.
> Jerry, can you retry with parallel make disabled?
>
Actually, the failure occurred while running %check
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:44:12 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> icu requires quite a large number of rebuilds, including some tricky
> ones (I just did tracker, which has to be bootstrapped, and
> libreoffice is another...), so I think it's reasonable to assume the
> icu maintainer isn't going to be
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
That seems reasonable, and in that case, something like
"fedora-presets"
and "fedora-workstation-presets", etc., seems appropriate, and the
corresponding release package could pull them in.
What about my proposal t
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 12:56 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
> > > With a companion libraries. ;)
> > >
> > > ↗ libmbim-1.6.0
> > > ↗ libqmi-1.8.0
> > > ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
> > >
> > >
> > > p
Matthew Miller wrote:
> That seems reasonable, and in that case, something like "fedora-presets"
> and "fedora-workstation-presets", etc., seems appropriate, and the
> corresponding release package could pull them in.
What about my proposal to drop the preset directly onto the file system (but
in
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 13:40 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:41:09PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > As pre-announced on devel@ I'm updating libicu to 52.1
>
> When a shared library has so many dependencies and the SONAME has been
> bumped already ~ 50 times
Well, icu went s
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 02:30:47AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > It really depends on how much it changes, I really do not like
> > > updating fedora-release very much.
> Its something that defines the release, which is done when the release
> is out, we did need to make changes recently to su
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:41:09PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> As pre-announced on devel@ I'm updating libicu to 52.1
When a shared library has so many dependencies and the SONAME has been
bumped already ~ 50 times, wouldn't it be appropriate time to talk to
upstream to consider providing stable A
Agenda:
- Cleanup status/report
- DevConf meet up summary
- Requirements/changes Base needs in Fedora
(https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1178)
As time permits:
- FPC recommendation for future
- Open Floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-4
On 14 February 2014 06:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 07:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries t
Hi everyone,
I’m a Fedora user for about 1.5 years, and I was missing some
software that was available in Debian/Ubuntu but not in Fedora, because
it uses historical technologies (shadow authentication instead of
PAM, …), mainly my favourite screen locker.
Hence, I decided to rewrite it for Fedor
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 01:47:51PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> What do I do about this?
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6526911
>
> [While building and running tests]:
>
> CC ../build/flintxx/test/t-traits
> CC ../build/flintxx/test/t-fmpzxx
> virtual memory ex
- Original Message -
> From the original post at [1]:
>
> "Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for
> first-time users. Some of these tile placements will be from the
> Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic
> location, and some will b
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:51:36 -0600
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:51 -0700
> Jerry James wrote:
>
> > What do I do about this?
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6526911
> >
> > [While building and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:51 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> What do I do about this?
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6526911
>
> [While building and running tests]:
>
> CC ../build/flintxx/test/t-traits
> CC ../build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:31:31 -0500
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 13:44 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:39:40 +0100
> > Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > > > Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this fil
42 matches
Mail list logo
