On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
can you resubmit with parallel make disabled for ARM?
I've seen this suggestion a couple of times. Not sure if it has actually
fixed some cases, but if it has and continues to be a recurring fix,
sounds to me that _smp_mflags
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07.03.2014 14:09, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 07.03.2014 14:05, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:53:24 +0100
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build qt-creator [1], but the builds fail
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 February 2014 10:20, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs?
I do keep track of the affected
We (the current redhat-rpm-config maintainers) would like to move the
upstream SCM repository for redhat-rpm-config to be the regular
pkgs.fedoraproject.org dist-git repository. Rationale:
- There is no real release process, all changes made to redhat-rpm-config
are immediately destined to
Kevin Kofler wrote:
xine-lib 1.2 depends on a library that is part of FFmpeg (libavutil) for
everything, and thus it was decided to retire xine-lib in Fedora entirely.
It is now shipped only in RPM Fusion. (We decided that it was not worth
trying to split FFmpeg into pieces and package libavutil
Hi Simone
On 2014-03-08 18:28, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for maintaining this so far, I've taken it as I use it every once in
a while.
Co-maintainers welcome.
I would like to be a co-maintainer, as I use Simple Scan on a regular
basis, and as a GNOME contributor I am
Quoting Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:52:27 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
That are the two reasons why I'm not able to support pdftk on
Fedora anymore and was forced to reitred this package. I'm sorry
for nayone who maintaining any
LM wrote:
Good to know. Thanks for the information. I'm still planning on
giving it a shot to remove the ffmpeg pieces or at least attempt to
backport webm and some other support to an earlier version. Don't
know if the xine project will accept the patches if I get the latest
version
On Mar 9, 2014 7:49 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Directory and file interaction is a hard problem. There's no right thing
to do in this case. The many possible things we could do all have one
drawback or another in certain cases.
The right thing
On 03/09/2014 04:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Directory and file interaction is a hard problem. There's no right thing
to do in this case. The many possible things we could do all have one
drawback or another in certain cases.
The right thing is clear: If all the files
Am 09.03.2014 20:05, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On 03/09/2014 04:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Directory and file interaction is a hard problem. There's no right thing
to do in this case. The many possible things we could do all have one
drawback or another in certain
Dear,
I just added a group for D development into comps. I would like to know
if that is 'ok' and if i should to do something ?
thanks
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
But this is where the answers start to have drawbacks. As just one
example, renaming the directory will break other packages which installed
files into that directory.
Oh, I was thinking of unowned files. If the files inside the directory are
owned by other packages,
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Right. CLEARLY this would've been Just The Thing to do when /bin changed
from a directory to a /usr/bin symlink. Right?
That UsrMove nonsense was just the wrong thing to do altogether, we are
still suffering the consequences of the mess, as evidenced by that other
Reindl Harald wrote:
in fact *nothing* at all should refer to /bin and /sbin after UsrMove
as the waeking of the package guidelines is a sign of missing courage
in the context of such invasive changes - well, looks like i need
to continue fix the still extsinting mess of that half-baken change
I notice that after having set up AIDE, and then doing an RPM or YUM update of
a package, I then get spew about the contents of files related to that update
having changed.
How difficult would it be to have a plugin for YUM that allows you to update
the AIDE database with the new values
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Elasticsearch:
6268e094bab937d8b1b6cd82c50bf032 Elasticsearch-1.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
5baf978721a58fbf82b4f3d526a193e7 Mojolicious-4.87.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a9486845ecd872ca8172416f6ecacbb4f7396b2b
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Mar 9 10:13:46 2014 +0100
Update to 1.05
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Elasticsearch.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
commit 4199d8b15c61af4354f45e47bfaf11307e5db597
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Mar 9 10:19:13 2014 +0100
Update to 4.87
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized:
97a45b34081c3b5f611409aec49d77f4 MooseX-Role-Parameterized-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 536a5942615ae2d73669f4c3741059d3461e10fa
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Mar 9 11:50:14 2014 +
Update to 1.02
- Update to latest upstream version
- Drop obsoletes/provides for old tests sub-package
- Don't need to remove empty directories from
Summary of changes:
4713783... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
16c1820... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
536a594... Update to 1.02 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 219aa3af0ab4255325ad4ec768dfca9f7cb76238
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Mar 9 12:33:34 2014 +
Downgrade to 0.27 for compatibility with Moose 1.x in EPEL-6
- Drop tests sub-package for EPEL-6 import
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the
The lightweight tag 'perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-0.27-2.el6' was created
pointing to:
219aa3a... Downgrade to 0.27 for compatibility with Moose 1.x in EPEL-
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-1.02-1.el7' was created
pointing to:
536a594... Update to 1.02
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-1.02-1.fc21' was created
pointing to:
536a594... Update to 1.02
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000318
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000318
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|andrea.v...@gmail.com |p...@city-fan.org
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000318
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-0.27-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 6.
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Validator:
01cf96cd45ef7602efd3e86cd9a1fdae Config-Validator-1.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1d9f4f5b95a13a5609e72d707f737cd7a35d091c
Author: Massimo massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Mar 9 19:55:03 2014 +0100
Update to upstream version, rhbz #1071125.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Config-Validator.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3
Summary of changes:
1d9f4f5... Update to upstream version, rhbz #1071125. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1d9f4f5... Update to upstream version, rhbz #1071125. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1d9f4f5... Update to upstream version, rhbz #1071125. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1d9f4f5... Update to upstream version, rhbz #1071125. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1d9f4f5... Update to upstream version, rhbz #1071125. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071125
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.el5
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071125
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071125
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071125
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000318
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
46 matches
Mail list logo
