Hello,
is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7?
I need it but wouldn't dare asking for the branch myself... looks
complicated and I don't have any direct experience with it.
Thanks regards,
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7?
The texlive package already exists in RHEL7. See
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/
Regards,
Parag.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:39:05 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2014 11:26, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:52:17 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2014 11:42, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Ok, I found the issue. The texlive in EPEL 7 is too old and does not
contain the sub-packages I'm using.
I hope they will update it
On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides?
TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex.
Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version in RHEL 7.
I reworked all the BuildRequires in the SPEC file with
On 1 April 2014 13:55, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides?
TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex.
Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Anssi Johansson e...@miuku.net wrote:
1.4.2014 23.11, Tyler Brock kirjoitti:
Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed.
It might be worth mentioning that the Amazon-provided libstdc++-devel is
4.6.3-3.10.amzn1, and it doesn't
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:37:51 + (UTC)
build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
libdmtx has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
libdmtx-utils-0.7.2-11.fc20.x86_64 requires
libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.1()(64bit)
libdmtx-utils-0.7.2-11.fc20.x86_64 requires
Yes, I've received many broken reports caused by ImageMagick since
yesterday.
EPEL7 also affected.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,
the Change Proposals Submission Deadline is coming in one week!
The date is Tuesday, 2014-04-08 for System Wide Changes. Self
Contained Changes deadline will be set later.
I'd like to ask especially WGs to work on the PRD/Tech
Specs break out into the Change Proposals - so the scope of
On 1 April 2014 02:50, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/31/2014 8:37 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote:
Whatever if they can't learn the basics and the fundamental basis of
Linux or the Patent issues and what have you then go somewhere else
like to mac or windows..sometimes you need to work for
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 04:34:42PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Yes, I've received many broken reports caused by ImageMagick since
yesterday.
EPEL7 also affected.
And Rawhide builds which involve emacs:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5429/6695429/root.log
Rich.
--
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 05:17:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 09:17 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
- VLC
Free software video player, but with a requirement (or at least can
use if available) proprietary / patented / ugly / semi-legal
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:47:33AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 04:34:42PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Yes, I've received many broken reports caused by ImageMagick since
yesterday.
EPEL7 also affected.
And Rawhide builds which involve emacs:
I rebuilt
power needs to come with responsibility and understanding
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:50 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/31/2014 8:37 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote:
Whatever if they can't learn
I'd be willing to help with the rebuilds as long as someone in here is
willing to host a refresher or link to such as needed...
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-01)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:02:21 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-04-01/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn't comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to
Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed.
Any other thoughts?
-Tyler
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tyler Brock tyler.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Here is a gist containing the output of
we have also broken deps with kipi-plugins and kipi-plugins-libs from
kde
On Ter, 2014-04-01 at 09:09 -0400, Corey Sheldon wrote:
I'd be willing to help with the rebuilds as long as someone in here is
willing to host a refresher or link to such as needed...
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st
On 4-1-14 16:11:45 Matthew Miller wrote:
5tFTW note
--
This is the third installment of this series, and I'm still
calibrating a few things. I'm aiming at a wide audience, but I'm not
quite sure how much explaining I should do of general Fedora
knowledge. Is it helpful for me to (as
where are you planning to host the final stable listing or blog beyond this
mailing list? if it in a dev minded or dev friendly arena jsut make a quick
2-3 lines in a FAQ like page with futher reading links to the wiki or
respective respcted authority in the particular space I also run in many
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
It wasn't about whether VLC could go into Fedora, but if there going
to be a ring, with the Fedora name, where basically anything goes
including software of insalubrious legality (in the US). And I guess
the answer is no.
Correct - the relaxing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082957
Bug ID: 1082957
Summary: perl does not build with GCC 4.9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit b5da13cc5e392860b74e854f495c09833dda2b64
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 1 11:06:51 2014 +0200
Do not build-require Test::MinimumVersion, xt tests are not performed
perl-Module-Install.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GitHub:
1024b03129995c2034ec72fad9a1fca9 Net-GitHub-0.59.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6bfecc94fe0832e299ea939a75c8099c28b4a1c4
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 1 11:11:47 2014 +0200
0.59 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-GitHub.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 5882c2c3d99647d3aab84a87aa3f16d8ad8be663
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 1 12:48:03 2014 +0200
Break build-cycle
perl-Module-ScanDeps → perl-prefork → perl-Perl-MinimumVersion
→ perl-Perl-Critic → perl-Pod-Spell
→ perl-File-ShareDir-ProjectDistDir
commit b1dfb332af230afcf62b04108a8a73a208933acc
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 1 13:11:00 2014 +0200
Fix tests with Parse::CPAN::Meta = 1.4413
...nstall-1.06-Resolve-RT-93293-test-failure.patch | 59
perl-Module-Install.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082599
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-GnuPG-Interface has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
On i386:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
On armhfp:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-pushd:
11271246807662e9b3615ad7c0cab99b File-pushd-1.006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3944284fd76303ed4557a49ab55463f23d5c8cea
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 1 14:34:09 2014 +0200
1.006 bump, no code changes
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-pushd.spec | 14 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082305
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
Hi Rich,
this breaks the current implementaion for posix-winsync:
Bug 716980 - winsync uses old AD entry if new one not found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716980
Resolves: bug 716980
Bug Description: winsync uses old AD entry if new one not found
Reviewed by: nhosoi (Thanks!)
On 04/01/2014 07:34 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
Hi Rich,
this breaks the current implementaion for posix-winsync:
Bug 716980 - winsync uses old AD entry if new one not found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716980
Resolves: bug 716980
Bug Description: winsync uses old AD entry if new
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47655
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47655/0001-Ticket-47655-Improve-replication-total-update-loggin.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
the Change Proposals Submission Deadline is coming in one week!
The date is Tuesday, 2014-04-08 for System Wide Changes. Self
Contained Changes deadline will be set later.
I'd like to ask especially WGs to work on the PRD/Tech
Specs break out into the Change Proposals - so the scope of
42 matches
Mail list logo
