Libreoffice Draw works just fine too in some simpler cases. Inkscape
however is more comprehensive. Libreoffice Draw can export in svg
format also so that your graphic can later on be edited/enhanced in
Inkscape.
--
Suchakra
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:57 AM, William Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the software that is used to make images like :
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
>
> Or
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administrators
On Apr 3, 2014 9:27 PM, "William Brown" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What is the software that is used to make images like :
>
>
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
>
> Or
>
>
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administrators_Gui
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
> Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
> already received fairly wide testing.
I'll share here what I mentioned on desktop list...
The gnome-3.12 copr includes a coupl
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 18:08 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
>> reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
>
> Just wondering if you've read this page yet:
>
> https://fedo
Hi,
What is the software that is used to make images like :
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
Or
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administrators_Guide/images/Network_Interfaces-bridge-with-bond.png
I haven't be
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 18:08 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
> reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
Just wondering if you've read this page yet:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2?rd=Grub2
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 23:00 +0530, Gerard Ryan wrote:
> From what I remember, videos directly in my home directory were
> displayed as thumbnails on the main window and they would play fine.
> If I tried to add/open a local video from another location (even
> subdirectory of my home) by clicking on
hi all,
I'm writing today because I have just submitted my first package for review,
huzzah!
My name is Michael McCune and I am a newly minted associate at Red Hat. I have
been a software developer for just shy of 20 years, doing most of my work in
the embedded realm of automotive GPS devices.
On Apr 3, 2014 7:18 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 04.04.2014 03:08, schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
> > Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
> > reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
>
> besides that it is the wrong list:
What's the right list?
> grub2-
On 04/03/2014 06:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
You didn't mention the most important question:
Did the API or ABI change in backward-incompatible way?
If the answer to this question is "yes", then the answer to updating
to gnome-3.
commit 6ada91085a2fa69ef7fc111ad871505bc4bf596d
Author: Ruediger Landmann
Date: Thu Apr 3 14:05:56 2014 +1000
new package for el6
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks.spec | 115 ---
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-F
Am 04.04.2014 03:08, schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
> Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
> reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
besides that it is the wrong list: grub2-install
> Nowadays it's a clusterfsck. I've managed to screw up my bootloader. Is
>
Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
Nowadays it's a clusterfsck. I've managed to screw up my bootloader. Is
there a way to reinstall it without reinstalling the world? Would it make
sense to split the whole bootloader
swarp (astronomical imaging resampling and coadding) has change its license
from CeCILL to GPLv3+ in upstream version 2.38.0
Regards, Sergio Pascual
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproj
sextractor (source extraction from astronomical images) has change its
license from CeCiLL to GPLv3+ in upstream version 2.19.5
Regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 10:32 AM, quickbooks office wrote:
>
> "3.1.4.2.2. Disabling Root Logins
>
> To further limit access to the root account, administrators can
> disable root logins at the console by editing the /etc/securetty file.
>
> This is
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:58:59AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:35 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> > If fixes the problem but that doesn't tell the whole story. You have a conf
> > that implicitly says "load the mouse driver" and then fails because you
> > didn't have the
On 04/03/2014 10:32 AM, quickbooks office wrote:
"3.1.4.2.2. Disabling Root Logins
To further limit access to the root account, administrators can
disable root logins at the console by editing the /etc/securetty file.
This is done in the name of accountability, by forcing an administrative
log
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 22:37:19 +0200
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 20:00, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
> > behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
>
> I'm not the only developer considering unsubscribing from fedora-devel
> b
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:41:58PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
> > The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
> > far, you don't seem to have convinced him or any other systemd
> > developers or, well, anyone els
Am 03.04.2014 22:46, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>>> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
will that below ever get fixed in F20?
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> will that below ever get fixed in F20?
>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
>>
>> The developer does not conside
Am 03.04.2014 22:37, schrieb Richard Hughes:
> On 3 April 2014 20:00, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
>> behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
>
> I'm not the only developer considering unsubscribing from fedora-devel
> because of emai
Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> will that below ever get fixed in F20?
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
>
> The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
> far, you don'
On 3 April 2014 20:00, Adam Jackson wrote:
> We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
> behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
I'm not the only developer considering unsubscribing from fedora-devel
because of emails like the original email. Either the moderators start
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> will that below ever get fixed in F20?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
far, you don't seem to have convinced him or any other systemd
developers
Am 03.04.2014 22:04, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> Bad behavior in response to bad behavior just feeds a positive feedback
> cycle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_feedback ).
>
> The way to break out of it is for the person you control (namely YOU)
> to behave well. If others don't do so, thin
Bad behavior in response to bad behavior just feeds a positive feedback
cycle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_feedback ).
The way to break out of it is for the person you control (namely YOU)
to behave well. If others don't do so, things can calmly escalate and
proper measures taken.
So,
Am 03.04.2014 21:44, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 03.04.2014 20:00, schrieb Adam Jackson:
>>> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
names
>>>
>>> We didn't
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 20:00, schrieb Adam Jackson:
>> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
>>> names
>>
>> We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptabl
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:53:04 +0200
Honza Horak wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 11:20 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> > Since AGPL is fedora-compliant license, there's no blocker to get
> > libdb6 into packages collection.
> > Besides, libdb5 is still critical for many packages (like RM), until
> > we get rid of it
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Gerard Ryan wrote:
>
> I had a problem with the new totem/Videos having a non-responsive UI.
>
Probably https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725063
--
-Elad Alfassa.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Am 03.04.2014 20:00, schrieb Adam Jackson:
> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
>> names
>
> We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
> behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
i know that
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
> names
We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
On 04/03/2014 06:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Looking at http://lbzip2.org/news , lbzip2 is still fixing crashes during
> compression and decompression. That's rather troubling: we need the bzip2
> implementation to be roughly as stable as file system*.*
They say that every non-trivial piece of
Hi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 19:54, schrieb drago01:
> >
> >> Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
> >>>
> > What I wrote does not depend on what the bugs actually are
>
> it does
>
No. You are not entitled to escalate it to any employer unless you ha
Am 03.04.2014 19:54, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
>>> Note: I didn't look at the bugs
>>
>> then please don't answer at all
>
> What I wrote does not depend on what the bugs actually are
it does and hones
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
>> Note: I didn't look at the bugs
>
> then please don't answer at all
What I wrote does not depend on what the bugs actually are.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
> Note: I didn't look at the bugs
then please don't answer at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> will that below ever get fixed in F20?
Maybe ... maybe not.
> should i file a bug against the distribution?
No .. this makes no sense.
> should i file a bug against Red Hat as upstream employer?
Neither does this (unless you have a suppo
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:09:32PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > And I have yet to see any request have been made to the test list to
> > at least do the same validation on Gnome as is done before we release
> > an new GA release.
> Note that I am not asking about armchair opinions about whethe
will that below ever get fixed in F20?
should i file a bug against the distribution?
should i file a bug against Red Hat as upstream employer?
and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
names - because over weeks nobody cared and after i
asked again on this list within 5 minutes Lennarts
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Did you experience crashes or other serious problems with applications ?
Hi Matthias,
I had a problem with the new totem/Videos having a non-responsive UI.
I'm away on a work assignment until the 13th so unfortunately I can't
verify that i
Hi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>
> Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
>
Yes but I got updates for most of them. Couple of them are still broken
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/8/places-status-indicator/
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:05 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > CentOS 6 = gnutls 2.8.5
> > F20 = gnutls 3.1.20
> > The server is a python app and sets the priority string as follows:
> > priority=SECURE256:!CTYPE-X.509:+CTY
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2014 04:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > Now, in reading that policy, there are quite a few things that match the
> > "Things that would make it less likely to grant a request" list. But, on the
> > other hand, by ha
2014-04-02 20:12 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce :
> On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 09:12 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
> > [CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
> >
> > All the info has been sitting here @
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
>
> I ofte
2014-04-03 15:06 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce :
> On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 19:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:12:50PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?
> >
> > Posting here is a good start. You can also add a note in th
On 04/03/2014 04:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Now, in reading that policy, there are quite a few things that match the
"Things that would make it less likely to grant a request" list. But, on the
other hand, by having a longer-than-typical Fedora release cycle this time
around, we are already in
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> You didn't mention the most important question:
>
> Did the API or ABI change in backward-incompatible way?
>
> If the answer to this question is "yes", then the answer to updating
> to gnome-3.12 needs to be no, because such chang
On 04/03/2014 04:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
But we should be careful, so I want to ask for concrete problem r
2014-04-02 19:24 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
> = Proposed System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/lbzip2
>
While the speedup is desirable, it's not really obvious that this is the
right time to do the change.
Looking at http://lbzip2
On 04/03/2014 03:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Also, as someone who has been testing this update in the COPR for
about a month now
Did you ( and others ) run through QA release blocking test cases for
Gnome or is this more "I have been running Gnome for about a month now"
kinda thing?
,
Matthias Clasen redhat.com> writes:
> Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg is still not working in Rawhide (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045669 ). This only affects
Fedora so thought I should mention it here.
--
devel mailing list
d
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > One option we could look into would be for GNOME to set this option on
> > by default for a month or so to give extension authors time to catch
> > up while not breaking any user extension that works unmodified.
> My understanding
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:11:58AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> One option we could look into would be for GNOME to set this option on
> by default for a month or so to give extension authors time to catch
> up while not breaking any user extension that works unmodified.
My understanding was
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 03:52:49PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
> Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
> they'll stop working until updated.
I've had a pretty good experience here this time around. Almost ever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084093
Bug ID: 1084093
Summary: perl-CPAN-Inject-1.14-4.fc21 FTBFS in non-koji mock
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Inject
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Repo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2014 11:07 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2014 02:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work
>> of Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packag
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:07 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2014 02:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
>> Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
>> already received fair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2014 10:52 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:20:30AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>> Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
>
> Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10
> then they'
On 04/03/2014 02:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
But we should be careful, so I want to ask for concrete problem
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:57:10PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2014-04-03 16:52 GMT+02:00 Matthew Garrett :
> > Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
> > they'll stop working until updated.
>
> One, at least theoretical, way to resolve this would be to update
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 07:32 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
What "local" account ?
Is there a problem with logging into the local use
Once upon a time, quickbooks office said:
> This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
> account and then doing su to get root privileges.
The only "local account" on many (most?) systems with network
authentication is "root".
--
Chris Adams
--
devel mailing list
dev
2014-04-03 16:52 GMT+02:00 Matthew Garrett :
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:20:30AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
>
> Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
> they'll stop working until updated.
>
One, at least t
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Gary Gatling wrote:
>
>
> Thanks a lot for the feedback.
>
> I have asked the developers for input. I opened a issue of the github
> issue tracker here:
>
> https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/issues/568
>
>
After further experimentation it seems that
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:20:30AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
they'll stop working until updated.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Re: F21 System Wide Change: RPM-4.12
> From:
> Mikolaj Izdebski
> Reply-To:
> Development discussions related to Fedora
> Date:
> Thursday, April 03, 2014 08:54:18 AM
> To:
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Groups:
> gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
> Reference
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 07:32 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
> This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
> account and then doing su to get root privileges.
What "local" account ?
> Is there a problem with logging into the local user account and then
> typing su and the
Am 03.04.2014 16:32, schrieb quickbooks office:
> This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
> account and then doing su to get root privileges.
>
> Is there a problem with logging into the local user account and then
> typing su and the root password?
i do *not* need a
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
Is there a problem with logging into the local user account and then
typing su and the root password?
You are as such prompted to make a local user account when doing an
install
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> I think the goal _is_ to not add any devices, yes. Bumblebee is
> basically a second X server to run on the nvidia gpu and pipe the pixels
> off that to the integrated gpu. So input only ever happens on the
> integrated gpu's server, so you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084058
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
But we should be careful, so I want to ask for concrete problem reports
with the copr packages, besides dependency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084058
Bug ID: 1084058
Summary: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions-0.11-2.fc21
FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> CentOS 6 = gnutls 2.8.5
> F20 = gnutls 3.1.20
> The server is a python app and sets the priority string as follows:
> priority=SECURE256:!CTYPE-X.509:+CTYPE-OPENPGP
> this is fed to some gnutls function somewhere in the stack.
Do
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:35 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> If fixes the problem but that doesn't tell the whole story. You have a conf
> that implicitly says "load the mouse driver" and then fails because you
> didn't have the mouse driver installed. Which is fair enough, the question
> here is wh
On 04/02/2014 07:47 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> * Support for weak dependencies
Does this mean that rpm-build will be able to create packages with weak
dependencies? Will Fedora packages be allowed to declare weak
dependencies? Is dependency generator interface going to be extended so
that we c
On 04/03/2014 11:20 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
Since AGPL is fedora-compliant license, there's no blocker to get
libdb6 into packages collection.
Besides, libdb5 is still critical for many packages (like RM), until
we get rid of it, I can only agree with your proposal.
Maybe, it's still time to rename
2014-04-03 6:09 GMT+02:00 Peter Hutterer :
> This _will_ break some setups. If you have AutoAddDevices off in your
> xorg.conf then this will break. The main question to ask here is: do these
> setups still exist and if so why do you have that option set and can we fix
> the reason for it being se
On 04/03/2014 02:29 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 04/03/2014 03:46 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I saw that this got voted on in the meeting even though it didn't get
recorded as such for the meeting minutes. The proposal seemed to be:
use obs-sign to sign packages. That's not actually a proposal
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 19:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:12:50PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?
>
> Posting here is a good start. You can also add a note in the FESCo ticket
> for approval once one is filed, a
On 04/03/2014 03:46 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I saw that this got voted on in the meeting even though it didn't get
recorded as such for the meeting minutes. The proposal seemed to be:
use obs-sign to sign packages. That's not actually a proposal that we
can approve here. The proposal here sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081883
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> rpm does use bzip2 *command*
To be more precise, I believe only rpmbuild does.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/cod
Hello,
Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining packages for
Mandriva Linux since 1999 and thought I should give it a try at fedora.
First cut is this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
And, it seems I need a sponsor here. Anyone?
Cheers.
--
devel mail
On 04/03/2014 03:47 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Many of the common users (such as rpm) are linked
> against the library and don't use the command, so they won't be
> impacted.
rpm does use bzip2 *command* and it would be impacted by this change.
rpm uses libbz2 only for compression and decompression
Since AGPL is fedora-compliant license, there's no blocker to get
libdb6 into packages collection.
Besides, libdb5 is still critical for many packages (like RM), until
we get rid of it, I can only agree with your proposal.
Maybe, it's still time to rename the current libdb => libdb5 and get
newer
Hello,
as Oracle is unlikely to re-license the libdb6 back to GPL, I like to
bring up the possibility of the libdb6 package. The idea is that the
current libdb package would still provide the libdb-5+, which is still
under GPL, and the new package would provide the newest, AGPL-ed libdb.
I would l
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>> ** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
>> bzip2.
> Is this necessary?
I don't think so. A better way would be to change them to depend on
the actual executables they use, /usr/bin/bzip2 etc
92 matches
Mail list logo
