- Original Message -
From: Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
To: epel-devel-l...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2014 5:12:25 PM
Subject: EPEL requesting cloud-init bump in epel7beta
hi guys,
can we get cloud-init in epel7beta bumped to match epel6 @ 0.7.4 ?
Yep, I'll get
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
717
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
64
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
59
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 07:16 +0300, Fred New wrote:
The
Unified Extensible Firmware Interface wiki page is rather outdated and
unhelpful as well.
In what way? I wrote it, just a month or two ago. I'm not aware of
On 2014-04-07, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 07.04.14 15:00, Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
* PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services
URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork
Hi,
just a quick reminder - Change Submission Deadline for System Wide
Changes is today (2014-04-08 23:59 UTC).
It will take some time to process backlog of submitted changes,
not to flood lists/FESCo with a huge pile of Changes. This means
submission (state set to ChangeReadyForWrangler) is
On Apr 8, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Fred New fred.new2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
In what way? I wrote it, just a month or two ago. I'm not aware of
anything in it which is outdated.
Sorry, my mistake. I thought this one
W dniu 04.04.2014 19:43, Mikolaj Izdebski pisze:
On 04/04/2014 07:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
It is definitely useful, but I wish there was some way of
The recent f20 version of OPNSSL is openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20, so my
question is when a secure version is released?
Is this achieved by openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1 I found on kojj?
(See:
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/2014/04/08/openssl-heartbleed/1)
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora
= Proposed System Wide Change: PHP 5.6 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Php56
Change owner(s): Remi Collet remi @ fedora project DOT org
Update the PHP stack to new version 5.6.
== Detailed Description ==
Important changes in this new version:
Security:
* TLS Peer Verification [1]
*
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:56:32 +0200
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
The recent f20 version of OPNSSL is openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20, so my
question is when a secure version is released?
Is this achieved by openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1 I found on kojj?
yes,
I own some packages in EPEL what have been retired for a while
from Fedora, but I want to re-introduce to Fedora.
I have a question about this:
Do retired Fedora packages which are still active/exist in EPEL
require a re-review to be unretired in Fedora?
Until now I assumed the answer was yes,
On 04/08/2014 10:11 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2014-04-07, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
== Topic ==
I sent three Change proposals. If you have any comments, please share them.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SCL
The How To Test reads:
For developers:
0. Install SCL
= Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 21 Boost 1.56 Uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Boost156
Change owner(s): Petr Machata pmachata redhat com with backup contact, co-
maintainer Denis Arnaud
This change brings Boost 1.56.0 (or, failing that, Boost 1.55.0) to Fedora 21.
==
= Proposed System Wide Change: GNOME 3.12 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNOME3.12
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
Responsible WG: Workstation
Update GNOME to the latest upstream release. Depending on the Fedora 21
schedule, this might be GNOME 3.12 or 3.14.
==
= Proposed System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role Deployment =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FrameworkForServerRoleDeployment
Change owner(s): Miloslav Trmač mitr AT volny DOT cz, Fedora Server Working
Group server AT lists DOT fedoraproject DOT org
Responsible WG: Server
A
= Proposed System Wide Change: Database Server Role =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DatabaseServerRole
Change owner(s): Kevin Fenzi and Truong Anh Tuan
ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Responsible WG: Server WG
The Fedora Server Product will provide a standard deployment mechanism for
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role Deployment =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FrameworkForServerRoleDeployment
Change owner(s): Miloslav Trmač mitr AT volny DOT cz, Fedora Server Working
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 3.4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_3.4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz elsupergo...@fedoraproject.org
Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10 to 3.4
== Detailed Description ==
Support for Mono versions 3.0 and 2.10 is been
2014-04-08 10:58 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
= Proposed System Wide Change: PHP 5.6 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Php56
Contingency mechanism: Wait for 5.6.0RC1 for rawhide import, so we'll, at
least, ship a RC
That's covering upstream contingency of slipping
On 4 April 2014 17:59, Fedora Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
Broken deps for i386
--
[solr3]
solr3-3.6.2-5.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.lucene:lucene-stempel)
solr3-3.6.2-5.fc21.noarch requires
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 05:36 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
I own some packages in EPEL what have been retired for a while from
Fedora, but I want to re-introduce to Fedora. I have a question
about this:
Do retired Fedora packages which are still active/exist
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 10:11 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their
packages (and if so,
Hi everyone,
As you may know I am working on updating our package database (pkgdb) to a new
version named pkgdb2. In this process, pkgdb-cli has got re-writen and now ships
a pkgdb2.py python module that can be used as an interface to query the pkgdb2
API.
The thing is that fedpkg relies on
On Apr 7, 2014 10:28 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon)
Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
I sent three Change proposals. If you have any comments, please share
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 07:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role
Deployment =
On 04/08/2014 03:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Apr 7, 2014 10:28 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
mailto:mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon)
Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
==
Dne 7.4.2014 17:47, Honza Horak napsal(a):
On 04/07/2014 05:31 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
... snap ...
Does libdb-6 have the same symbol names as libdb-5? If so, there's
probably not a lot of packages that can be built with libdb-6 without
the possibility of causing symbol conflicts with others
2014-04-08 16:16 GMT+02:00 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
I'm trying to provide feature needed by Cloud WG, that's all. I can file a
new ticket on FPC, but wouldn't it just duplicate communication about
General SCL guidelines?
Ruby193 could test workflow around SCL in Fedora, that's
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:50:25 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
To be specific, the repos that I'm including in this are:
- libtaskotron
- taskotron-trigger
- resultsdb
- resultsdb_frontend
- resultsdb_api
- pytap13
- fake_fedorainfra
The settings that I'm proposing for
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:15:59PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
As I promised, I prepared a benchmark of lbzip2 and bzip2.
Decompression of linux-3.12.6.tar.bz2
-
command| real | user | sys | memory
---+++--+---
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Domain Controller Server Role =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DomainControllerServerRole
Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher, Simo Sorce -
ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Responsible WG: Server
The Fedora Server Product will provide a standard
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:49:25PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:15:59PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
lbzip2 was the fastest compressor and decompressor in all tests.
It the best command for interactive use.
lbzip2 -u always produced smallest files (even
Le Friday 04 April 2014 16:15:59 Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit :
CPU: Haswell B0, Genuine Intel(R) CPU @ 2.20GHz
bogomips: 4389.60
Processors:56
NUMA Nodes:2
Memory:31966 MB
It would be fair to post also a bench that ran on a more usual machine, like
quad-core (8
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:53:59PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role Deployment =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FrameworkForServerRoleDeployment
Change owner(s): Miloslav Trmač mitr AT volny DOT cz, Fedora Server Working
Group
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:54 +0200, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 8, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Fred New fred.new2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
In what way? I wrote it, just a month or two ago. I'm not aware of
anything in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085432
Bug ID: 1085432
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc21
FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 11:02 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:53:59PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role
Deployment =
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:30:25 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Dependency rebuild needed. If you are willing I'll rebuild all after 3
days if you do not answer I should not do it.
Packages for rebuild:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick\* |
fgrep -v 'ImageMagick-' |
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Playground repository =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Playground_repository
Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com, Mirek Suchý
msu...@redhat.com
Responsible WG: Env and Stacks WG
The Playground repository gives contributors a place
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
For now the Playground repository contains both packages that
are destined for eventual inclusion into the main Fedora repository and
*packages that are never going to make it there.*
This sounds like a problem and not a feature. Why would packages never make it
to
On 08/04/14 18:24, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
For now the Playground repository contains both packages that
are destined for eventual inclusion into the main Fedora repository and
*packages that are never going to make it there.*
This sounds like a problem and not a
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-08)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 15:00:31 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Is there a repo available somewhere for those who'd rather be running master
instead of 1.15 branch in Rawhide? Is F21 going to be released with 1.15.x?
The reason I ask is because it appears a fix for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39949 may have been slipstreamed
into 1.16RC1
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 12:41 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Is there a repo available somewhere for those who'd rather be running master
instead of 1.15 branch in Rawhide?
No, but also...
Is F21 going to be released with 1.15.x?
No. Soon.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
Hi there,
I'm about to package gmpy2, a python extension module which succeeds
gmpy without being upwards compatible. That's why it should be a new
package rather than an update.
The old gmpy is packaged as gmpy for python2 only.
The new gmpy2 comes with sources which are intended for being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 12:24 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
For now the Playground repository contains both packages that are
destined for eventual inclusion into the main Fedora repository
and *packages that are never going to make
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ask yourself which is more important to most users:
1) My OS is perfectly maintainable by engineers.
or
2) My OS lets me install the software I need without hassle.
Offering users a slightly-less stringent repository such as this makes
sense.
Adding repos
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 06:02:02AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change. It needs to have
FWIW, I'm happy to have a distinct change because I want to call this out in
the marketing.
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ask yourself which is more important to most users:
1) My OS is perfectly maintainable by engineers.
or
2) My OS lets me install the software I need without hassle.
Offering users a
Hi
08.04.2014 20:12, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:30:25 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Dependency rebuild needed. If you are willing I'll rebuild all after 3
days if you do not answer I should not do it.
Packages for rebuild:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 01:32 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu
mailto:rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ask yourself which is more important to most users: 1) My OS is
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:34:06 +0200
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
There are other packages hard to package properly, which could rotten
in Package Reviews. Mostly it's about bundling, but there is also
stuff like Chromium.
So, I need to fully read the change before making more
Rex Dieter wrote:
Adding repos definitely should not be taken lightly. Frankly, if 2 is
really something worth doing, then perhaps also the (overly?) stringent
policies need rethinking.
I freely admit there's definitely some gray area here, and maybe another
repo is indeed the right (ie,
Gharef Git Hub Archive Ready Employ Fedora
Fedora has rules for packaging projects that hosted
on GitHub.
Downloading and placing in the right position takes
time from developers so Gharef doing that so simply.
Usage of Gharef very easy, Just type:
gharef {owner} {project} {commit}
This is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 03:04 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Adding repos definitely should not be taken lightly. Frankly, if
2 is really something worth doing, then perhaps also the
(overly?) stringent policies need rethinking.
I
On 07.04.2014 21:52, Rich Megginson wrote:
http://port389.org/sources is now open and list-able. The default sort
order is latest first. The http://port389.org/wiki/Source page has been
updated with this link.
\o/
many thanks for this :)
--
t
--
389-devel mailing list
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Playground repository =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Playground_repository
Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com, Mirek Suchý
msu...@redhat.com
Responsible
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 13:04:54 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Similarly, there are a great many useful Ruby libraries and
applications out there for which unbundling them would be an exercise
in futility. Ask yourself which is more important to most users:
1) My OS is
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-04-08/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week. It
isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links to
Hi,
thanks to everyone who worked hard today to push the heartbleed fix, it
was a *thankless task* and they didn't spare their efforts. We are very
*proud* of you guys.
I also denounce Matthew Miller for being part of that, since he's too
modest to add himself on the list -someone has to-
I'm glad to supply a mirror site for initial seeding for such actions as
needed (GMT-4 (US ES/DT)
Also great mailing list but curious do you plan on creating a blog or
podcast with such info for those not always near email client ..been
forwarding to many friends not tied to pc or devel lists
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:44 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Apr 3, 2014 7:18 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.04.2014 03:08, schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
Once upon a time (Fedora 15? --
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 04/08/2014 03:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change. It needs to have
the equivalent filed for the fpc to evaluate, though.
On Apr 8, 2014 3:19 AM, Fred New fred.new2...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
And since Windows on my system places itself first in the EFI boot list
every time it
is booted,
That's likely an issue in your system's firmware or Windows install
(somehow). It shouldn't be doing that.
Yes, it
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:26:23PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 06:02:02AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change. It needs to have
FWIW, I'm happy to have a distinct change because I want to call this out in
the
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role Deployment =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FrameworkForServerRoleDeployment
Change owner(s): Miloslav Trmač mitr AT volny DOT cz, Fedora Server Working
Group server AT lists DOT
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 13:04:54 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Similarly, there are a great many useful Ruby libraries and
applications out there for which unbundling them would be an exercise
in
This Change, as written, is *extremely* vague, moreso that most other
changes that are filed for Fedora. Is it intended to be updated with more
information when that becomes available?
+1 - What are 'server roles'? Are we just reinventing Ansible/Puppet/et al here?
--
Rob K
http://ningaui.net
However, earlier this year it also started using another, as far as I
know locally created buildsystem. GN at first was not buildable from
source at all. However, it seems that they have improved this and you
can now build it from source on x86_64 (only).
That sounds problematic - why x86_64
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 15:54 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 13:04:54 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Similarly, there are a great many useful Ruby libraries and
applications out there for which unbundling them would be an exercise
in futility.
== Detailed Description == A new D-Bus service will be made
available, exposing available server roles, making it possible to
deploy, configure and manage them. Appropriate functionality will
also be exposed as a command-line utility.
What does it mean to deploy, configure, and manage a
BTW shake [1] seems to be able to handle ninja [2].
I posted a review request for it recently. [3]
Erm, okay it seems GN generates ninja files
rather than building them so shake probably doesn't
help here.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'm updating socat to run all its test cases, and I'm running into an
error only on the arm architecture:
test 151 SCTP4LISTENFORK: SCTP4 listen handles 2 concurrent
connections... !port 40157 timed out! FAILED
2014/04/09 01:36:12 server[6004] E socket(2, 1, 132): Protocol not supported
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 20:21:11 -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Who is doing that work within Fedora today? After the initial review,
there is no on-going audit of packages _within_ Fedora to make sure
they aren't bundling (or following guidelines at all). That's not to
I'm updating socat to run all its test cases, and I'm running into an
error only on the arm architecture:
test 151 SCTP4LISTENFORK: SCTP4 listen handles 2 concurrent
connections... !port 40157 timed out! FAILED
2014/04/09 01:36:12 server[6004] E socket(2, 1, 132): Protocol not supported
On Apr 8, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:54 +0200, Chris Murphy wrote:
So everyone just needs to stop recommending reinstalling grub this
way.
I don't think anyone has actually explicitly recommended doing so for
UEFI; I just think the
On Apr 8, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
$ sudo efibootmgr -v
[snip]
Boot0003* grub
HD(1,800,4,75f192ff-2a82-4e4e-b83c-c41f3bb39847)File(\EFI\grub\grubx64.efi)
Option A: This entry is correct if you aren't using UEFI Secure Boot, and
you're using a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 03:24:22 +0100
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm updating socat to run all its test cases, and I'm running into
an error only on the arm architecture:
test 151 SCTP4LISTENFORK: SCTP4 listen handles 2 concurrent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085211
Bug ID: 1085211
Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-4.300023-4.fc21 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dist-Zilla
Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085224
Bug ID: 1085224
Summary: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.15-4.fc21 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085230
Bug ID: 1085230
Summary: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.15-4.fc21 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Starlet
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085230
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Plack-Middleware-Rever |perl-Starlet-0.21-1.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085233
Bug ID: 1085233
Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-3.12-4.fc21 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085224
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085224
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085233
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
commit e98843c538e6868f92ab27d4fae60623a198c27b
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Tue Apr 8 11:56:42 2014 +0200
Add Plack::Test as a BR
perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 1c3fb38f9ae4659400ea55d2c34f6ffd96b5695d
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Apr 8 10:57:18 2014 +0100
Don't BR: CPAN::Meta CPAN::Meta::Requirements when bootstrapping
perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta.spec |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
The lightweight tag 'perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta-1.4414-2.fc21' was created pointing
to:
1c3fb38... Don't BR: CPAN::Meta CPAN::Meta::Requirements when bootst
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085233
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
5b654dc92798b9488e4717da1991dab9 IO-Socket-SSL-1.980.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 28b9bc71adbb856859da10dadee3ebfd85ac0e93
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Apr 8 11:22:31 2014 +0100
Update to 1.980
- New upstream release 1.980
- Disable elliptic curve support for openssl 1.0.1d on 64-bit
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Proc-ProcessTable:
3b21edabad48989c44d784f2059f3837 Proc-ProcessTable-0.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cbd12fcd96232b71eb68eb6c43bcd9800d278d00
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 8 12:32:35 2014 +0200
0.50 bump
perl-Proc-ProcessTable.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.980-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
28b9bc7... Update to 1.980
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6e4f1848de8303c033a25a78f04a83751f9fd6bd
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Apr 8 11:36:46 2014 +0100
Fix typo in spec comment
perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037242
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
commit a377c97441863d833b6ef91e14a6fc9250b70693
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 8 11:00:24 2014 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy.spec | 29 ++---
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
a377c97... Specify all dependencies (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085224
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
