Dne 23.4.2014 20:23, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
Hello,
2014-04-11 13:18 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
= Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6
At the FESCo meeting, we were unclear what happens to packages that don't
On 2014-04-24, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
What about D-Bus? D-Bus uses AF_UNIX currently. But as you can know,
there is an aim to move D-Bus to a new protocol family. Is it possible that
all the daemons with a D-Bus
Well my point is I spoke to Red Hat legal before I even posted the
original proposal to open up to more 3rd party repositories some
Months ago. There are a lot of repositories that it is perfectly
fine for Fedora to include from a legal perspective. But they will
need to be reviewed by legal on
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516
Jiri asked for removing Copr (and Playground) DNF plugin out of
dnf-plugins-core.
Since this is not technical but merely political question I would like to ask
wider audience:
Put your voice here please:
On 4/24/14, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
So decisions need to be general to allow us to look for a variety of options
to fulfill them. Lets say Fedora decided we want to make it
easier for our users to get more multimedia codecs. We would not get the
go ahead from legal to
On 04/24/2014 01:57 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/21/2014 03:44 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Would it
make sense to audit all spec files to look for instances of
'systemctl.*enable'?
I'm attaching the hits for
Hi,
I'm writing today because I have submitted my first package for review :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090933
I'm a sysadmin since a few years in a public research center and we are
using (a lot) of free and open-source software. So I will probably work
on sysadmin /
Heya !
Welcome here and I'm glad that you finally jumped onboard :)
Feel free to ping me if you're looking for a sponsor.
best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
All this time I thought you were already maintaining packages :)
Cheers,
Dridi
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Marianne Lombard maria...@tuxette.fr wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing today because I have submitted my first package for review :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090933
I am doing spring cleanup and getting rid of most of my packages. The
full list is a bit too long (mizdebsk agreed to take over all of my Maven
related packages as primary maintainer). Here's the remaining bits that
need a new home:
* plotutils
* python-gudev
* python-icalendar
*
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
I am doing spring cleanup and getting rid of most of my packages. The
full list is a bit too long (mizdebsk agreed to take over all of my Maven
related packages as primary maintainer). Here's the remaining
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
I am doing spring cleanup and getting rid of most of my packages. The
full list is a bit too long (mizdebsk agreed to take over all
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:55:09 PM
Subject: Re: Orphaning most of my packages
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Jon Ciesla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/24/2014 02:46 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I am doing spring cleanup and getting rid of most of my packages.
The full list is a bit too long (mizdebsk agreed to take over all
of my Maven related packages as primary maintainer). Here's
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 14:46 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I am doing spring cleanup and getting rid of most of my packages. The
full list is a bit too long (mizdebsk agreed to take over all of my Maven
related packages as primary maintainer). Here's the remaining bits that
need a new
I'm working on advice on automated X.509 certificate generation during
package installation.
One aspect is that these files obviously have to be generated on the
system during installation (or first service start) and cannot be
shipped in the package. Some existing RPMs just drop files into
On Thu, 20.03.14 18:34, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
Heya!
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
for it by default, but I am not sure I want to do that unless we can
The lightweight tag 'perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3.fc20' was created
pointing to:
86c1077... Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3.el7' was created
pointing to:
86c1077... Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3.fc19' was created
pointing to:
86c1077... Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3.fc21' was created
pointing to:
86c1077... Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm working on advice on automated X.509 certificate generation during
package installation.
I would strongly recommend doing it on first service start. I've lived
through the FreeS/WAN times and my experience with it for 15+ years
caused us (in
Hi,
for the F22 I am planning some bigger changes regarding initscripts and
I would like to ask for comments.
Initscripts package was in the past a crucial part of the system. They
basicaly set up whole system during the boot. Currently initscripts
package contains support for initscripts
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:47 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm working on advice on automated X.509 certificate generation during
package installation.
One aspect is that these files obviously have to be generated on the
system during installation (or first service start) and cannot be
On 04/24/2014 02:57 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:55:09 PM
Subject: Re: Orphaning most of my packages
freemind
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:31:43 +0200
Jan Staněk jsta...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, in the current plan (make libdb5 compat package and updating
the libdb to v6), after the mass rebuild the packages would start
using v6.
Yeah, which makes technical sense... but the concern is packagers who
aren't
Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca writes:
[...]
How many packages would actually perform any kind of opportunistic
encryption? I know the mail servers prefer a selfsigned cert over no
cert whatsoever, but what other applications have this issue of better
unknown certificate than plaintext ?
On 04/24/2014 04:20 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm working on advice on automated X.509 certificate generation during
package installation.
I would strongly recommend doing it on first service start. I've lived
through the FreeS/WAN times and my
Hi everyone-
This is a notice in accordance with the mass bug filing procedure.
A number of packages install systemd units and enable them
automatically. They should not. Please update these packages to use the
macroized scriptlet
On 24 April 2014 02:49, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
Well my point is I spoke to Red Hat legal before I even posted the
original proposal to open up to more 3rd party repositories some
Months ago. There are a lot of repositories that it is perfectly
fine for Fedora to include
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Yeah, which makes technical sense... but the concern is packagers who
aren't paying attention rebuild for some other reason and are not on v6
when it's a licensing problem. ;(
I need some advice on how to handle this for
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:
I don't think openssl genrsa 2048 has this issue on today's machines. (I
know I saw it with GNUTLS.)
I was sceptical, so I tried this on a freshly booted VM:
root@bofh:~# virsh start north
Domain north started
root@bofh:~# ssh root@north
Last
2014-04-24 17:22 GMT+02:00 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Yeah, which makes technical sense... but the concern is packagers who
aren't paying attention rebuild for some other reason and are not on v6
when it's a
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
You'll have the option of moving to libdb5 , without a license change or
need to convert data. That should be easiest, at least in the medium term
while libdb5 is actively maintained.
Sure, but long term I still have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/24/2014 11:01 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 24 April 2014 02:49, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com
mailto:cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
Well my point is I spoke to Red Hat legal before I even posted the
original proposal to
Hello,
2014-04-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com:
We must keep initscripts support, but I can imagine a setup where every
service uses a systemd unit, so this part does not have to be installed by
default, but could be pulled in as a dependency.
Are you sure? If you take an
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/24/2014 11:01 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 24 April 2014 02:49, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com
mailto:cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
Well my point
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
OK cool. What is the plan for when repositories change what they
are carrying and add stuff that may be legal for them but not for
others? Will there be periodic reviews to make sure that this
hasn't happened or some
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:04:41 -0600
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
One practical difference is that there's no bug trackers for
individual COPRs. At least when a package is in Fedora, communication
can happen in a central place (Bugzilla), and there's an FE-LEGAL
blocker mechanism,
Agenda:
- Status update on merge reviews, tech spec, securetty proposal
- Open floor
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
2014-04-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com:
We must keep initscripts support, but I can imagine a setup where every
service uses a systemd unit, so this part does not have to be installed by
default,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com wrote:
Agenda:
- Status update on merge reviews, tech spec, securetty proposal
The securetty proposal was settled at yesterday's FESCo meeting. I
doubt there's much to discuss further on it.
josh
--
devel mailing list
2014-04-24 18:13 GMT+02:00 Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
2014-04-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com:
We must keep initscripts support, but I can imagine a setup where every
service uses a
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:04:41 -0600
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
One practical difference is that there's no bug trackers for
individual COPRs. At least when a package is in Fedora, communication
can happen in a
On 24 April 2014 09:56, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/24/2014 11:01 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 24 April 2014 02:49, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com
mailto:cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
Well my point
If you want people to vote for something, It would be a good idea to say
why and what the pro/cons is for
having copr as a separate package.
Tim
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516
Jiri asked for
On 04/24/2014 05:39 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:
I don't think openssl genrsa 2048 has this issue on today's
machines. (I know I saw it with GNUTLS.)
I was sceptical, so I tried this on a freshly booted VM:
root@bofh:~# virsh start north
Domain north
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:29:15 +0200
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516
Jiri asked for removing Copr (and Playground) DNF plugin out of
dnf-plugins-core.
Since this is not technical but merely political question I would
like to ask
Hello Marianne,
On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:20, Marianne Lombard wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing today because I have submitted my first package for
review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090933
Welcome on board!
I'm a sysadmin since a few years in a public research center and
- Original Message -
From: Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 6:46:03 PM
Subject: Re: The Forgotten F: A Tale of Fedora's Foundations
On 24 April 2014 09:56, Stephen
On 24 April 2014 16:06, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
These were things that people were wondering when this came up in the
past.
Once again this is becoming a debate about hypotheticals which rarely
leads anywhere
constructive.
It actually isn't hypothetical. I have had
On 04/24/2014 04:02 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello Marianne,
On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:20, Marianne Lombard wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing today because I have submitted my first package for
review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090933
Welcome on board!
I'm
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:38:07PM +0200, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
Hi,
for the F22 I am planning some bigger changes regarding initscripts
and I would like to ask for comments.
Initscripts package was in the past a crucial part of the system.
They basicaly set up whole system during the boot.
I've been using Fedora since it started and have packaged up personal
programs before as rpms. After doing a presentation on Bt Builder for a
local linux user group, the only option I had for them to try the program
was to compile from source. (Which isn't hard but not the user experience
I would
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:10:15AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:47 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm working on advice on automated X.509 certificate generation during
package installation.
One aspect is that these files obviously have to be generated on the
I have started a new dnf-utils project for commuty plugins/addons there is
not maintain by the core dnf team
https://github.com/timlau/dnf-utils
copr / playground is welcome here is the core dnf developers, think its
dont fit into dnf-plugins.core
It is not submitted as a fedora package yet,
On 04/24/2014 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:
I don't think openssl genrsa 2048 has this issue on today's
machines. (I know I saw it with GNUTLS.)
I was sceptical, so I tried this on a freshly booted VM:
root@bofh:~# virsh start north
Domain north
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086545
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-No-Worries-1.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085905
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.60-5.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086545
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-No-Worries-1.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087327
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.63-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085905
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.61-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087327
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.63-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087334
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087334
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Twitter-4.01004-1.
commit e4f2bfec436f93e7371c4914953845ebb1dabb26
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Apr 24 09:18:36 2014 +0100
Update to 0.07
- New upstream release 0.07
- Revert the change in 0.06
- Update patch for building with Test::More 0.88
...
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Section-Simple:
5a079d3d7712fa3c8256494cf026a153 Data-Section-Simple-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9494664acd481423e1d595b92e7aa5bb6f1320d0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Apr 24 09:27:15 2014 +0100
Upload Data-Section-Simple-0.07.tar.gz
sources |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 78e3a86..13649e6
The lightweight tag 'perl-Data-Section-Simple-0.07-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
9494664... Upload Data-Section-Simple-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084093
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Starlet:
a5f51de210537229bfdc5615a7867dd1 Starlet-0.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1eb618f3082ba9fd4cda5a94a8e2e5fca20af0d6
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Apr 24 12:35:51 2014 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-Starlet.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3
Summary of changes:
1eb618f... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8169d89aaa094638f522bd300f8c66cd8c18e914
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Apr 23 15:10:58 2014 +0200
Run tests in a new home and noninteractively
perl-CPAN-Inject.spec |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 66128023201f9e302e24484c1800bbd94c2caa50
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Apr 24 12:34:52 2014 +0200
Work around CPAN bug mangling working directory
...king-directory-after-loading-CPAN-configu.patch | 66
perl-CPAN-Inject.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084093
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit c5c8d6905e75f5aaef9110925071a75dd83474da
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Apr 24 12:09:49 2014 +0100
Downgrade Module::Build version requirement to 0.40 (for EPEL-7)
Fennec-2.017-M::B.patch | 22 ++
perl-Fennec.spec| 11 +--
2
Summary of changes:
018aa5f... Update to 2.016 (*)
146cddc... Update to 2.017 (*)
c5c8d69... Downgrade Module::Build version requirement to 0.40 (for EP (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090929
Bug ID: 1090929
Summary: perl-Alien-SDL-1.442 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Alien-SDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090931
Bug ID: 1090931
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.26 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090932
Bug ID: 1090932
Summary: perl-Digest-SHA-5.89 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Digest-SHA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Fennec-2.017-2.el7' was created pointing to:
c5c8d69... Downgrade Module::Build version requirement to 0.40 (for EP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Fennec-2.017-2.fc21' was created pointing to:
c5c8d69... Downgrade Module::Build version requirement to 0.40 (for EP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088892
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
1eb618f... Upstream update. (*)
f5e8cac... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f20' into f19
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit f5e8cac31878542a0175b53b2250ba9f1aa6ea95
Merge: 8a4f8a5 1eb618f
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Apr 24 12:39:06 2014 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f20' into f19
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-Starlet.spec |5 -
sources |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile:
f6dc7f738085611949510c07301402ca MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 86c1077faa64212af1884ecabeb347b5bfa96f9e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Apr 24 14:06:07 2014 +0100
Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3)
This is an abstract role that provides an alternate constructor for creating
objects using parameters
Summary of changes:
86c1077... Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
86c1077... Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Search-Elasticsearch:
de9b9cf28f6e7e83fb13f7b8d389f6fd Search-Elasticsearch-1.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3e3284dfb1c07cb062b73eb74eff8515dfbf2249
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Thu Apr 24 15:26:18 2014 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Search-Elasticsearch.spec | 95
sources
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Search-Elasticsearch:
2ba179e636a26c88310c20e911663833 Search-Elasticsearch-1.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
86c1077... Initial import (perl-MouseX-ConfigFromFile-0.05-3) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Pari:
84cdf890a82f06a8fa1307ecea5db76c Math-Pari-2.01080606.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c2eb2b0df2f2a3701587d38400f55e3fafe03731
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Apr 24 16:24:29 2014 +0100
Update to 2.01080606
- New upstream release 2.01080606
- Fixes for downloading pari and Windows builds
- Fix dubious permissions from upstream's
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Markdown:
26dbe72090775a9b3ada904a36d1995f Pod-Markdown-2.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
