The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
764
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
219
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
99
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
764
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
111
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
96
I'm planning to push octave-communications 1.2.0 into rawhide soon,
which changes the license from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+. According to repoquery,
no package in the repository depends on octave-communications.
Does anyone object?
Thomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Broken deps for i386
--
[MegaMek]
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires libgcj_bc.so.1
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
[PyKDE]
perl-RT-Client-REST users should know that the package has changed
license in version 0.49. The license was (GPLv2), the license is the
tranditional Perl license (GPL+ or Artistic) now. This will take effect
in Fedora 21 and forward.
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Isaac Cortés González wrote:
This may be a repeated topic. But is there any effort to add to the repos
the packages of Qt to develop for Android? If there isn't how can I help?
What packages of Qt does this include?
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
1. kernel seen 56703 times (31% of all reports)
http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1597313/ RHBZ#1030988
http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/749325/
2. virtuoso-opensource seen 19395 times (11% of all
Hi Björn,
On 05/25/2014 04:37 AM, Björn Esser wrote:
Am Samstag, den 24.05.2014, 10:47 -0400 schrieb Jeff Backus:
Hey Jeff!
Welcome to the Fedora Package Maintainers! I just approved your filed
review-request [1]. As you already have done some real good informal
reviews as mentioned here,
Hi there,
the rebuilds are mostly over, thanks for everyone who chimed in. Some
packages may have been double-rebuilt, as there was no synchronization
between the partakers.
Maybe next year I'll publish the list of packages on a wiki, organized
by dependencies, so that people at least know in
On Mon, 26 May 2014 17:11:44 +0200
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi there,
the rebuilds are mostly over, thanks for everyone who chimed in. Some
packages may have been double-rebuilt, as there was no synchronization
between the partakers.
Maybe next year I'll publish the list
There's not much to discuss. I'd like to cancel tomorrow's meeting.
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 05/26/2014 05:11 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
6881890 diet (-Werror=format-string)
AFAICT, the maintainer is temporarily out-of-business for health
reasons, so I went ahead fixed this earlier today.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
BTW, thank you Ralf.
Le 26 mai 2014 18:09, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de a écrit :
On 05/26/2014 05:11 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
6881890 diet (-Werror=format-string)
AFAICT, the maintainer is temporarily out-of-business for health reasons,
so I went ahead fixed this earlier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/26/2014 10:11 AM, Petr Machata wrote:
Hi there,
6878306 clementine (namespace org::freedesktop::UDisks)
I am looking into this. Thanks! :)
- --
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
12 packages were orphaned
-
ale [f19, master, f20] was orphaned by silfreed
Combines multiple inputs of the same scene
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099382
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 95901
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100699
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099382
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100702
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100705
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100704
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100709
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for the report. However there are two mistakes:
(1) The IO::Socket::SSL::new option is SSL_verifycn_scheme, not
SSL_verifycn_schema. Thus you could not find it in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100708
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100711
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100701
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
There is no LWP environment variable or command line option to control that
currently.
It's possible to pass ssl_opts = {SSL_verify_mode =
IO::Socket::SSL::SSL_VERIFY_NONE} to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ppi...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100710
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100714
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100716
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101217
Bug ID: 1101217
Summary: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Gtk3-WebKit
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074948
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101220
Bug ID: 1101220
Summary: perl-Net-DNS-0.76 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-DNS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101221
Bug ID: 1101221
Summary: perl-PathTools-3.47 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PathTools
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074948
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074948
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.69-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.69-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074948
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.69-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.69-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101265
Bug ID: 1101265
Summary: perl-libwww-perl: incorrect handling of SSL
certificate verification [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-LWP-Protocol-https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094440
Bug 1094440 depends on bug 1094442, which changed state.
Bug 1094442 Summary: perl-libwww-perl: incorrect handling of SSL certificate
verification [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101265
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-libwww-perl: incorrect |Add an LWP command line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100712
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101265
--- Comment #1 from Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com ---
The current PERL_LWP_SSL_VERIFY_HOSTNAME option for hostname validation is
processed in /usr/share/perl5/LWP/UserAgent.pm so the component probably should
be perl-libwww-perl.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101265
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||al...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100713
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100715
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100717
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087408
Bug 1087408 depends on bug 1087401, which changed state.
Bug 1087401 Summary: Review Request:perl-Signal-Mask - Signal masks made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087401
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087408
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Parallel-Prefork-0.15-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Parallel-Prefork-0.15-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087408
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Parallel-Prefork-0.15-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Parallel-Prefork-0.15-1.fc20
--
You are
On 05/26/2014 01:26 PM, Jochen Schneider wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed recently that for extop plugins the
SLAPI_REQUESTOR_ISROOT parameter is never set.
Is that intended behaviour?
Looks like you're right, don't know if it was intended, but wouldn't
think so. Can you open a ticktet if you
On 26/05/14 14:28, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:26 PM, Jochen Schneider wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed recently that for extop plugins the
SLAPI_REQUESTOR_ISROOT parameter is never set.
Is that intended behaviour?
Looks like you're right, don't know if it was intended, but
Hello, all!
wM here, and I'd like to show a new project that I'm working on in Python.
It's called Sue, and it's my pseudocode-to-Python translator; that is to
say, I'm essentially writing a programming language that takes natural
language input as its source code. I came up with the idea about
That being said, the kernel-style DCO [1] might be worth considering.
Nothing fancy, just documentation that lists the DCO and says that by
contributing code, you agree to its terms. I'm not sure we need to deal
with signing off on code since we don't have a complicated merge
process, though.
56 matches
Mail list logo
