Hi,
Because of lack of interest, I plan to orphan the following packages
(Fedora + EPEL)
mysql++ (3.1.0 in rawhide, 3.2.1 available)
Used by sems-dsm
mysql-connector-python (1.1.6 in rawhide, 1.2.1 recently released)
Used by shinken
AFAIK, only connector to mysql for py
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-05-28 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
On Tue, 27 May 2014 08:27:24 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> You could drop something into /etc/rsyslog.d/, not relying on just local0
> but also the program name. See
> (http://wiki.rsyslog.com/index.php/Filtering_by_program_name)
Thanks a lot, that's exactly the hint that I needed.
> Is the app
Hi,
installing Fedora in containers fails strangely (see below). It seems to be
selinux related, since booting with selinux=0 allows the installation to
continue.
Strangely, just 'setenforce 0' does not work by itself. I feel like I'm missing
something obvious here.
The host is rawhide with selin
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-05-27/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As with all the others who've weighed in so far, I agree that the
> optimal path is just for us all to talk to each other. I generally
> prefer workflows that assume everyone's happy to work positively
> together to a consensus solu
23.05.2014 14:40, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Broken deps for i386
> --
>
> [redeclipse]
> redeclipse-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2
> redeclipse-server-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2
> [remmina]
> remmina-1.
23.05.2014 14:40, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Broken deps for i386
> --
>
> [redeclipse]
> redeclipse-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2
> redeclipse-server-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2
> [remmina]
> remmina-1.
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 07:58 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks! So, I quickly bashed out that draft F21 Test Plan I've been
> > threatening to write for the last month or so.
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:36:37AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Hey all-
> I've got a new package up for review and I'd like to expidite it:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426
>
> Its the DPDK:
> http://dpdk.org
>
> willing to do a review swap if anyone is interested
>
>
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> for Fedora 21 testing *overall* - i.e. it's the QA team's responsibility
>> to make sure the WGs do the stuff assigned to them in the plan. If that
>> makes sense. Discussio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 27 May 2014 17:35:26 +0200
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 27.05.2014 17:07, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> > On 27.05.2014 17:06, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> On 27.05.2014 16:14, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hi all,
On 27.05.2014 17:07, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 27.05.2014 17:06, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
On 27.05.2014 16:14, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
the f21-python side tag, containing Python 3.4, has been merged into
Rawhide.
I guess this is due to the merge:
DEBUG util.py
- Original Message -
> > All the other packages built fine for me locally, so the mass rebuild
> > should get the job done for these.
>
> No, you cannot rely on the mass rebuild here. The reason is that the
> mass rebuild goes from a-z, in the alphabetical order and _not_ in the
> dependen
Le 27/05/2014 17:03, Jeff Schroeder a écrit :
> This makes me think it is:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976554
>
>
> For a package as oft used in traditional LAMP stacks as a fantastic cache
> or queue, shouldn't we fix this? I'm happy to work on an updated spec /
> src.rpm, b
With the python3, tcl and boost side tags merged today, I ran a quick
repoclosure on x86_64 to see how much will be broken in tomorrow's
rawhide.
(note that this doesn't include multilib, just a check against current
x86_64 build repo).
If folks could look at and fix these today that would be g
I'm updating this package, but because of the recent FUDCon I didn't
have time to submit the changes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
It obviously has an owner:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/redis/
You'd possibly request co-maintainership then…
Regards,
Dominic
2014-05-27 17:03 GMT+02:00 Jeff Schroeder :
> This makes me think it is:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976554
>
>
> For a package
On 05/27/2014 04:14 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hi all,
> the f21-python side tag, containing Python 3.4, has been merged into Rawhide.
Awesome, thanks for the hard work.
> We managed to rebuild 216 packages out of 452 that BR: python3-devel and 7
> that BR: python3 - these were the packages (o
On 27.05.2014 17:06, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
On 27.05.2014 16:14, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
the f21-python side tag, containing Python 3.4, has been merged into
Rawhide.
I guess this is due to the merge:
DEBUG util.py:282: Error: Package: python3-sip-4.15.5-
- Original Message -
>
> On 27.05.2014 16:14, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > the f21-python side tag, containing Python 3.4, has been merged into
> > Rawhide.
> I guess this is due to the merge:
>
> DEBUG util.py:282: Error: Package: python3-sip-4.15.5-1.fc21.x86_64 (build)
> DEB
This makes me think it is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976554
For a package as oft used in traditional LAMP stacks as a fantastic cache
or queue, shouldn't we fix this? I'm happy to work on an updated spec /
src.rpm, but am not a packager let along a prove packager.
Any advice
On 27.05.2014 16:14, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
the f21-python side tag, containing Python 3.4, has been merged into Rawhide.
We managed to rebuild 216 packages out of 452 that BR: python3-devel and 7 that
BR: python3 - these were the packages (or dependencies of packages) that failed
to b
On 27 May 2014 15:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014 09:05:21 +0200
> Simone Caronni wrote:
> > If this is not the place for notifying such things, please redirect me
> > where appropriate.
>
> Usually a releng or infrastructure ticket or #fedora-admin /
> #fedora-releng on irc. ;)
>
Am 27.05.2014 16:19, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> I've just pushed a change that will make koji use https for all it's
> download links.
>
> Please let me know if you see any issues
confirmed - thanks!
can get relevant by downloading fresh builds
of packages where one made bugreports and
don't want
I've just pushed a change that will make koji use https for all it's
download links.
Please let me know if you see any issues.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
Hi all,
the f21-python side tag, containing Python 3.4, has been merged into Rawhide.
We managed to rebuild 216 packages out of 452 that BR: python3-devel and 7 that
BR: python3 - these were the packages (or dependencies of packages) that failed
to build in my local mockchain build for some reaso
2014-05-27 15:13 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 01:34:25PM -0500, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>> [4] http://serfdom.io
>> [5] http://consul.io
>
> Hi Jeff! Welcome! These look pretty interesting. Do you think they're worth
> integrating with GearD as a possible part of Fedora Atomic
On Tue, 27 May 2014 09:05:21 +0200
Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm unable to commit to the newly unretired ndoutils package in the
> fedora branches (I'm the owner). This is the error I get:
>
> $ git push
> Counting objects: 10, done.
> Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
> Compres
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 01:34:25PM -0500, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> [4] http://serfdom.io
> [5] http://consul.io
Hi Jeff! Welcome! These look pretty interesting. Do you think they're worth
integrating with GearD as a possible part of Fedora Atomic?
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--
On Sunday 25 May 2014 10:51:22 Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > For people who have searching for fedora packages about povray tools
> > (like arbaro, fracplanet, geomorph, ngplant, povtree), I have a
> > repository for building such tools: https://github.com/didier13150/rpm
>
> You're welcome to bring
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:34:43PM -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> I have a bug 1083039 where basically an application logs everything
> to syslog making a mess out of /var/log/messages. The logging facility
> is configurable and the default is local0.
> I'm toying with an idea of doing something like
Awesome !
My opinion is that QA and WG should cooperate directly: no middle-man.
We need to have a QA liaison in each WG.
I didn't see if there's a taskotron hackfest at Flock but I'm looking
forward having one, be it in the lobby.
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks! So, I quickly bashed out that draft F21 Test Plan I've been
> threatening to write for the last month or so.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_21_test_plan
> So, what's the idea here?
Psshh -- s
On 2014-05-27 09:05, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I'm unable to commit to the newly unretired ndoutils package in the
fedora branches (I'm the owner). This is the error I get:
$ git push
Counting objects: 10, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done
On 04/11/2014 01:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
The BerkeleyDB, used between others by rpm [1], changed license between
versions 5.* and 6.* to AGPLv3+ from […]. As those two licenses are not
compatible, packages using the BerkeleyDB either has to change its license to
AGPLv3+ compatible, keep on
Hello,
I'm unable to commit to the newly unretired ndoutils package in the fedora
branches (I'm the owner). This is the error I get:
$ git push
Counting objects: 10, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
Writing objects: 100% (2/2), 270 bytes | 0 by
37 matches
Mail list logo
