Re: Need instructions with packaging

The comment is from 2007 Ralf Ertzinger 2007-11-28 06:44:41 EST Apart from the IOS files, the sources contain two binary files (mips64_microcode, ppc32_microcode) which are somehow incorporated into the emulator. I do not know what these files contain or where they come from and what license the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good > time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that > fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this > is the first run after a

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > > Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good > > time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that > > fail to build for two releases will

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On 05/29/2014 08:43 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good > time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that > fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this > is the first run after adapting the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > > > > Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good > > > time to start cleaning up Fedora. After th

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On 29/05/14 15:31, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > > Since the mass rebuild will start in a

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 29/05/14 15:31, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt > > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8

CUnit pkgdb bug? / Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:31:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > If someone doesn't step up soon I'll take CUnit. I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty "Branch" field and doesn't let me continue. I'll look into reporting that as a bug first. :-( -- devel mailing list

Re: CUnit pkgdb bug? / Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:31:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > If someone doesn't step up soon I'll take CUnit. > > I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty > "Branch" field and doesn't let me continue. I'll

Re: CUnit pkgdb bug? / Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:59:00 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty > > "Branch" field and doesn't let me continue. I'll look into reporting that > > as a bug first. > > > > :-( > > > > Odd, I took it with no issues. If you'd like i

Re: update of ipython in rawhide

On 05/23/2014 11:01 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython, > > I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0. > This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [2]. Any chance you could push this now? The ipython that's cur

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:50:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > CUnit being required by curl. So maybe the output needs restructuring. > And one of the CUnit comaintainers needs to take ownership. Do you have a suggestion about how to restructure? It seems to me that the limits of plaintext emails

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:50:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > CUnit being required by curl. So maybe the output needs restructuring. > > And one of the CUnit comaintainers needs to take ownership. > > Do you have a suggestion about how to

Re: Build lua libraries also for compat-lua?

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Jan Kaluža wrote: > Hi, > > I'm playing with an idea of building lua libraries against compat-lua to > allow luajit working with them. My initial motivation for this is that there > are projects which don't work with Lua-5.2 and developers for various > re

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > xorg-x11-drv-cirrus orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl, > caillon, caolanm, glisse, > hadess, johnp, >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

Hi Jochen, On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 15:43, Till Maas wrote: > Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good > time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that > fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this > is the first

Re: selinux issue with containers

On 05/28/2014 05:26 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:52:23PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 05/28/2014 01:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:32:04PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:41:45AM

fedoras default cflags & clang

I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282 Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?   -- Cheers, Tim Freedom, Features, Friends, First -> Fedora https:

Re: fedoras default cflags & clang

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Tim St Clair wrote: > I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282 > > Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various > reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?

Packaging: bin subfolder

Hi, I'm working on packaging Salome (The Open Source Integration Platform for Numerical Simulation) [1], and the cmake scripts there install tons of binaries and python scripts to the /usr/bin/salome folder. Is this acceptable? Thanks, Sandro [1] http://www.salome-platform.org/ -- devel ma

Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

2014-05-29 18:27 GMT-03:00 Sandro Mani : > Hi, Hi, > I'm working on packaging Salome (The Open Source Integration Platform for > Numerical Simulation) [1], and the cmake scripts there install tons of I packaged and maintained it packaged in Mandriva for a few years. If I recall correctly, it

Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

binaries and python scripts to the /usr/bin/salome folder. Is this acceptable? I believe a symbolic link should be acceptable. Actually creating a subdir would probably have a lot of opposition, but it should be possible to reconfigure salome to use %_libexecdir/salome or %_libdir/salome Yea

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

Hi, I'll take ownership of python-ZConfig as I already maintain a few Python packages and I'm interested in keeping python-ZODB in the distribution. Eduardo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http:/

Re: update of ipython in rawhide

2014-05-29 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kalev Lember : > On 05/23/2014 11:01 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: >> Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython, >> >> I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0. >> This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [2]. > > Any chanc

Correct way to unpush an update?

Ok, so I don't get bit again by bodhi letting me do something I shouldn't... Do I just unpush the update but NOT delete it? I have a newpackge update and one of the three packages has a problem so obviously I don't want to push it to stable. Once I get the email that's it's been successfully unpu

Re: Correct way to unpush an update?

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, so I don't get bit again by bodhi letting me do something I shouldn't... > > Do I just unpush the update but NOT delete it? > > I have a newpackge update and one of the three packages has a problem so > obviously I don't want to push it to

Re: Correct way to unpush an update?

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, so I don't get bit again by bodhi letting me do something I shouldn't... > > Do I just unpush the update but NOT delete it? > > I have a newpackge update and one of the three packages has a problem so > obviously I don't want to push it to

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Is it true actually? Last time I was checking the Ruby packages contained > different/modified version of upstream JS files. AFAICT they're both fine. rubygem-uglifier includes the main uglify-js via git submodules: https://github.com/lautis/

Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:56:02PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > >>binaries and python scripts to the /usr/bin/salome folder. Is this > >>acceptable? > > I believe a symbolic link should be acceptable. Actually creating a subdir > >would probably have a lot of opposition, but it should be possib