EPEL epel beta report: 20140608 changes

Compose started at Sun Jun 8 08:15:02 UTC 2014 New package: mosh-1.2.4-3.el7 Mobile shell that supports roaming and intelligent local echo Updated Packages: chicken-4.9.0-4.el7 --- * Sat Jun 07 2014 Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com - 4.9.0-4 - Rebuild from previous

Re: [HEADS UP] ogre 1.9.0 building in rawhide

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 01:15:51 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi, I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0]. There was so much changes in spec file, patches. * dropped devel-doc, because couldn't find docs in tarballs (mercurial'ed)

RE: ROLLING FEDORA

There is a problem Packages of rawhide not all stable !!! we need a non-limited repo with only stable packages . Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: ROLLING FEDORA

Hi On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 6:53 AM, مصعب الزعبي wrote: There is a problem Packages of rawhide not all stable !!! we need a non-limited repo with only stable packages . We cannot achieve stability without user feedback. If you like a rolling release model, feel free to participate.

Re: ROLLING FEDORA

Am 08.06.2014 12:53, schrieb مصعب الزعبي: There is a problem Packages of rawhide not all stable !!! we need a non-limited repo with only stable packages Fedora is no rolling release distribution it was never and likely will never be signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [HEADS UP] ogre 1.9.0 building in rawhide

Hi Michael, On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 01:15:51 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi, I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0]. There was so much changes in spec file, patches. * dropped devel-doc, because couldn't find docs

COPR can't download SRPMs?

I thought maybe it was a problem with dropbox but I uploaded my srpms to fedorapeople.org and builds are still failing to download... Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: COPR can't download SRPMs?

Hi, On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: I thought maybe it was a problem with dropbox but I uploaded my srpms to fedorapeople.org and builds are still failing to download... can you provide link? Thanks, Richard -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list

Re: COPR can't download SRPMs?

On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 05:36:45PM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: I thought maybe it was a problem with dropbox but I uploaded my srpms to fedorapeople.org and builds are still failing to download... can you provide

Another bug on OpenSSL

Dear mailing list, Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true_type=blogs_r=0). Some sources talks about that's bug was discovered a long time ago but does not fixed.

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

At present I have more trust in the OpenBSD guys than OpenSSL based upon their previous work. So I'd prefer to move to LibreSSL once stable Just my 2c worth. Jon On 8 Jun 2014 15:21, Álvaro Castillo net...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Dear mailing list, Few days was built an patch to solve an

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

Am 08.06.2014 16:21, schrieb Álvaro Castillo: Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true_type=blogs_r=0). Some sources talks about that's bug was discovered a

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

Am 08.06.2014 16:42, schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 08.06.2014 16:21, schrieb Álvaro Castillo: Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true_type=blogs_r=0). Some

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:21:04PM +0100, Álvaro Castillo wrote: However, OpenBSD was created a fork called LibreSSL try to solve this issues. Should Fedora to move LibreSSL (http://www.libressl.org/)? Or still use OpenSSL and wait what's bug could be found today, or tomorrow, or few months to

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 08.06.2014 16:21, schrieb Álvaro Castillo: Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into

Re: [HEADS UP] ogre 1.9.0 building in rawhide

Hi, On 06/08/2014 03:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi Michael, On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 01:15:51 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi, I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0]. There was so much changes in spec file,

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

That bug was not found by the rampaging libressl people either. Perhaps moving from OpenSSL to NSS would be better if you are that worried about OpenSSL bugs Sent from my iPhone On Jun 8, 2014, at 10:21, Álvaro Castillo net...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Dear mailing list, Few days was

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 12:21:08PM -0400, Paul wrote: That bug was not found by the rampaging libressl people either. Perhaps moving from OpenSSL to NSS would be better if you are that worried about OpenSSL bugs We've tried that: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation

Re: COPR can't download SRPMs?

On 2014-06-08, 13:41 GMT, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I have the same problem for quite a while already: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pingou/subsurface/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/build-17727.log Mee too http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mcepl/xiphos-3.2.1/ Matěj -- devel

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 12:21:08PM -0400, Paul wrote: That bug was not found by the rampaging libressl people either. Perhaps moving from OpenSSL to NSS would be better if you are that worried about OpenSSL bugs We've tried that:

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to compose, and sync out to the mirrors The tagging script tells me it is Checking 13923 builds... there is a

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to compose, and sync out to the mirrors The tagging script

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

Il 08/06/2014 20:20, punto...@libero.it ha scritto: Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to compose, and sync out to the mirrors The tagging script tells me it is Checking 13923 builds... there is a very large number of failures[1]. There

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:20:32 +0200 punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it wrote: hi thanks for your work! now i have some problems for rebuild my packages DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/',

SSL cert rejected

Hi, I getting the usual: Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (58, 'SSL peer rejected your certificate as revoked.') when running 'fedpkg new-sources', even though I've re-run fedora-packager-setup. Is there a problem, or I am missing something? Thanks, Jon -- devel mailing

Re: SSL cert rejected

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 19:52:21 +0100 Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I getting the usual: Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (58, 'SSL peer rejected your certificate as revoked.') Note that you can only have one valid cert at a time. when running 'fedpkg

Re: SSL cert rejected

Hi, That showing: fedora-cert -v Verifying Certificate cert expires: 2014-10-15 CRL Checking not implemented yet Which looks good to me, unless I'm misreading this. Cheers, Jon On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 19:52:21 +0100 Jon Kent

Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

It's not stable yet, and it's not ported to other operating systems. the folks over at OpenBSD do import some powerful security tools and keep them clean, such SSH. (No, they didn't writ it, they ported it and maintain the core code.) But that means it's unlikely to work well on other operating

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 12:37:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: lvm2's spec isn't very friendly to the rpmdev-bumpspec script that the mass rebuild uses, so it is a bit messed up. They seem to redefine 'release' for every subpackage and the bumpspec script tries to increment all of them and the

Re: SSL cert rejected

Hi, Sorted it. Instead of fedora-packager-setup I used fedora-cert to update my certificate and it all working now. Cheers, jon On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, That showing: fedora-cert -v Verifying Certificate cert expires: 2014-10-15 CRL

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

The srpm buildroot was still broken, this time by rpkg. There was a rpkg build 2014-03-24 10:05:16 with a upstream version bump, but it was untagged before going out in a rawhide compose and wasn't ever fixed. Then the mass rebuild built it and landed it in the buildroot. If you commit things

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200 Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: yaboot dwmw2,

[Test-Announce] 2014-06-09 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2014-06-09 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again soon! There's nothing urgent right now, but we skipped last week so I

Re: Qt packages necessaries to develop for Android

So it's more a reason of manpower than any other thing. The question would be: is there any to accomplish this task? I can look for any patented or closed source software and if any of them are critical to build the SDK and NDK. Also I'll ask to the Replicant project for any hint/tip on this. El

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák

Re: Qt packages necessaries to develop for Android

On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Isaac Cortés González w.isaac.cor...@gmail.com wrote: I can look for any patented or closed source software IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad idea to go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought to your

[Bug 1018593] perl-Twiggy-0.1024 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018593 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1105775] pdfbklt does not support A3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105775 --- Comment #3 from Marco Motta marco.mo...@tiscali.it --- Excuse me for the mistake, but you must replace echo Press Enter to exit.; with echo Press Enter to exit.; at the end of attachment 903105 (the script, without the final double

[Bug 1105958] perl-CHI: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105958 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903468 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903468action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1105958] perl-CHI: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105958 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903469 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903469action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1105958] perl-CHI: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105958 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903470 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903470action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1105958] New: perl-CHI: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105958 Bug ID: 1105958 Summary: perl-CHI: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CHI Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de Reporter: den...@ausil.us QA

[Bug 1106035] New: perl-File-Flock: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106035 Bug ID: 1106035 Summary: perl-File-Flock: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-Flock Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1106035] perl-File-Flock: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106035 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903690 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903690action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106036] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106036 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903693 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903693action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106035] perl-File-Flock: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106035 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903692 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903692action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106036] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106036 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903694 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903694action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106036] New: perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106036 Bug ID: 1106036 Summary: perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-MMagic-XS Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1106035] perl-File-Flock: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106035 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903691 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903691action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106036] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106036 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903695 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903695action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106052] New: perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106052 Bug ID: 1106052 Summary: perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer Assignee: bjohn...@symetrix.com

[Bug 1106052] perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106052 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903742 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903742action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106052] perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106052 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903743 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903743action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106052] perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106052 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903741 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903741action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106081] New: perl-IPTables-libiptc: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106081 Bug ID: 1106081 Summary: perl-IPTables-libiptc: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IPTables-libiptc Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1106081] perl-IPTables-libiptc: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106081 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903825 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903825action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106081] perl-IPTables-libiptc: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106081 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903826 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903826action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106081] perl-IPTables-libiptc: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106081 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903827 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903827action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106092] perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106092 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903858 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903858action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106092] perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106092 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903860 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903860action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106092] perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106092 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903859 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903859action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106092] New: perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106092 Bug ID: 1106092 Summary: perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Language-Expr Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1106117] New: perl-Mail-SPF: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106117 Bug ID: 1106117 Summary: perl-Mail-SPF: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-SPF Assignee: st...@silug.org Reporter: den...@ausil.us

[Bug 1106117] perl-Mail-SPF: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106117 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903929 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903929action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106117] perl-Mail-SPF: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106117 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903928 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903928action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106117] perl-Mail-SPF: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106117 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 903930 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=903930action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106166] New: perl-OpenOffice-UNO: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106166 Bug ID: 1106166 Summary: perl-OpenOffice-UNO: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-OpenOffice-UNO Assignee: lkund...@v3.sk Reporter:

[Bug 1106190] perl-Pod-Xhtml: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106190 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904138 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904138action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106190] perl-Pod-Xhtml: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106190 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904137 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904137action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106190] New: perl-Pod-Xhtml: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106190 Bug ID: 1106190 Summary: perl-Pod-Xhtml: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Pod-Xhtml Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: den...@ausil.us

[Bug 1106190] perl-Pod-Xhtml: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106190 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904136 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904136action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106197] perl-SDL: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106197 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904157 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904157action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106197] New: perl-SDL: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106197 Bug ID: 1106197 Summary: perl-SDL: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SDL Assignee: hdego...@redhat.com Reporter: den...@ausil.us QA

[Bug 1106197] perl-SDL: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106197 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904159 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904159action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106197] perl-SDL: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106197 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904158 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904158action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106210] New: perl-Switch: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210 Bug ID: 1106210 Summary: perl-Switch: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Switch Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com Reporter: den...@ausil.us

[Bug 1106210] perl-Switch: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904192 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904192action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106210] perl-Switch: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904193 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904193action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106210] perl-Switch: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904194 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904194action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106265] New: perl-Twiggy: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106265 Bug ID: 1106265 Summary: perl-Twiggy: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Twiggy Assignee: robinlee.s...@gmail.com Reporter: den...@ausil.us

[Bug 1106265] perl-Twiggy: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106265 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904356 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904356action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106265] perl-Twiggy: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106265 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904355 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904355action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106265] perl-Twiggy: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106265 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904357 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904357action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106279] perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106279 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904397 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904397action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106279] perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106279 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904399 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904399action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106279] New: perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106279 Bug ID: 1106279 Summary: perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1106279] perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106279 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904398 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904398action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106282] New: perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282 Bug ID: 1106282 Summary: perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-Hash-LX Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1106282] perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904406 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904406action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106282] perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904407 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904407action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106282] perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904408 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904408action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106308] perl-re-engine-RE2: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106308 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904485 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904485action=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106308] perl-re-engine-RE2: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106308 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904483 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904483action=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106308] perl-re-engine-RE2: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106308 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- Created attachment 904484 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=904484action=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1106308] New: perl-re-engine-RE2: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106308 Bug ID: 1106308 Summary: perl-re-engine-RE2: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-re-engine-RE2 Assignee: boche...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: