Hello,
thanks for your answers.
On 17 June 2014 00:59, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
By using CentOS as the basis and not RHEL 7 we could have all the
channels
that are not used at the moment for building.
As much as I'd like to see CentOS as the basis for *everything* (I may
be
Compose started at Tue Jun 17 08:15:02 UTC 2014
New package: StarCluster-0.94.3-2.el7
Tool for managing computing clusters hosted on Amazon's EC2
New package: nodejs-ansicolors-0.3.2-4.el7
Functions that surround a string with ansi color codes so it
prints in color
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com
wrote:
Aren't we already using CentOS for EPEL 5 and 6 in the koji/mock
buildroots? 32 bit aside, what is the difference for 7?
This has been dealt nicely so far.
No, EPEL has always used RHEL for builds.
-Jeff
On 17 June 2014 16:07, Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com
wrote:
Aren't we already using CentOS for EPEL 5 and 6 in the koji/mock
buildroots? 32 bit aside, what is the difference for 7?
This has been dealt
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 16:14 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
Mock is using CentOS:
[... snip ...]
Don't know for Koji, but probably it's the same. No?
No, Koji uses RHEL as an external repo, and points its mock configs to
it.
--
Mathieu
___
epel-devel
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:14:55 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Mock is using CentOS:
$ pwd
/var/cache/mock/epel-6-x86_64/yum_cache/updates/packages
$ ls -al *centos*
-rw-rw-r--. 1 root mock 20960 May 20 15:33
centos-release-6-5.el6.centos.11.2.x86_64.rpm
-rw-rw-r--. 1
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
786
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
133
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
118
On 16. 6. 2014 at 19:49:35, Peter Oliver wrote:
On 16 June 2014 08:31, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 13. 6. 2014 at 10:09:07, Chuck Anderson wrote:
So I propose we keep calling the project DNF and the package dnf, but
start the transition to a generic command name for the tool
On 17. 6. 2014 at 07:27:23, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Zing z...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Does yum have current developers/maintainers? If so, actually obsoleting
yum seems kind of rude to me. If that's the case why not just leave yum
as is? Those that want to use
fpm (fedora package manager). Flows nicely off the keyboard too
I'd agree that dnf is perhaps not the best name in the world, always makes
me think 'did not finish' which isn't good really.
Jon
On 17 Jun 2014 08:07, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16. 6. 2014 at 19:49:35, Peter
On 2014-06-16, 15:06 GMT, drago01 wrote:
yum-cron can actually apply updates []
That sounds dangerous ... updates are not really atomic (i.e not at
all) doing them silently in the background is a very bad idea.
Yes, yum-cron has been hated by Seth for years, but there was
still this
On 17. 6. 2014 at 08:13:18, Jon Kent wrote:
fpm (fedora package manager). Flows nicely off the keyboard too
Unfortunately this is not an option, the tool will also be in RHEL and all its
derivatives.
Thanks
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
From: Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:07:39 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF
On 16. 6. 2014 at 19:49:35, Peter Oliver wrote:
On 16 June 2014 08:31, Jan Zelený
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice.
rum: {Redhat,RPM} Updater, Modified
rup: {Redhat,RPM} UPdater
packagectl
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:07:39 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice.
Personally, I think adding another name just adds another problem.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 12:00 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:37 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Haller thal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:25 +0400,
On 17.06.2014 09:13, Jon Kent wrote:
fpm (fedora package manager). Flows nicely off the keyboard too
fedora package manager aka fpm in EL8? :)
So for a couple of years here we go again.
BTW yum never finished one are based on the actual package manager - rpm.
man 8 yum
yum is an
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:46 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
fedora package manager aka fpm in EL8? :)
So for a couple of years here we go again.
BTW yum never finished one are based on the actual package manager -
rpm.
man 8 yum
yum is an interactive, rpm based, package
Am 17.06.2014 17:54, schrieb Jerry James:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:46 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
fedora package manager aka fpm in EL8? :)
So for a couple of years here we go again.
BTW yum never finished one are based on the actual package manager -
rpm.
man 8 yum
yum
On 06/11/2014 08:20 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
The transition period is one reason why we want to keep the name dnf.
We'd basically like to keep current yum around for users that have
various scripts and stuff depending on it so they have some time to
migrate to dnf. Also presenting dnf as a
On 6/17/2014 12:50 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 06/11/2014 08:20 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
The transition period is one reason why we want to keep the name dnf.
We'd basically like to keep current yum around for users that have
various scripts and stuff depending on it so they have some time to
Once upon a time, David dgbo...@gmail.com said:
Excuse me. By now I doubt anyone but the Yum zealots really care. Just
do it. Make the switch. The Yum zealots will find something else to
complain about later. Perhaps the size of the default font? :-)
Please do not call people that like
Am 17.06.2014 19:26, schrieb David:
On 6/17/2014 12:50 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 06/11/2014 08:20 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
The transition period is one reason why we want to keep the name dnf.
We'd basically like to keep current yum around for users that have
various scripts and stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/17/2014 1:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2014 19:26, schrieb David:
before you call others zealots you should ask yourself if you
are just only a ordinary user with his single machine or have to
manage *a lot* of machines, some of
Hi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:11 PM, David wrote:
You completely missed my point. The Fedora Devs have been working on
this. The Fedora Devs want to do this. The Fedora Devs have said that
they are going to do this. And when. Which means? You, and others, are
going to have to deal with
Am 17.06.2014 20:11, schrieb David:
On 6/17/2014 1:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2014 19:26, schrieb David:
before you call others zealots you should ask yourself if you
are just only a ordinary user with his single machine or have to
manage *a lot* of machines, some of them even
On 6/17/2014 2:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:11 PM, David wrote:
You completely missed my point. The Fedora Devs have been working on
this. The Fedora Devs want to do this. The Fedora Devs have said that
they are going to do this. And when.
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:03:20 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:07:39 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice.
Personally, I think adding another name just adds another problem.
kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:52:34 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
* package 'dnf-yum-compat-command' is installed by default. It
obsoletes Yum and provides its own
Am 17.06.2014 21:36, schrieb Stijn Hoop:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:03:20 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:07:39 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice.
Personally, I think adding another name
On 17 June 2014 19:11, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/17/2014 1:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2014 19:26, schrieb David:
before you call others zealots you should ask yourself if you
are just only a ordinary user with his single
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:40:45PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:52:34 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
* package
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 16:37 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:40:45PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I am not away of any work to make mock use dnf. dnf will
need to be able to make mock chroots going all the way back to rhel5
since we use mock in the buildsystem and we
Reposted from http://fedoramagazine.org/5tftw-2014-06-17/.
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to each. Here are the five
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:37:32 -0400
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:40:45PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:52:34 -0400
Matthew Miller
On 06/17/2014 09:40 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I am not away of any work to make mock use dnf.
As part of GSoC Michael Simacek is working on improving mock. Among
other features, DNF support is already implemented and working. More
information can be found on his blog [1] (part of Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #768694|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
The SDLx::App::new() changed API between 2.503 and 2.510. The argument keys are
not prefixed with a dash anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825678
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #909426|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 909484
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=909484action=edit
Reproducer
More general test allowing to use undefined values.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #909443|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 909487
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=909487action=edit
Proposed fix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100158
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110272
Bug ID: 1110272
Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-0.08250-5.fc21 FTBFS: 'Cascading
delete on Ordered has_many works' t/60core.t test
fails
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110272
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 96499
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106166
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104544
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110292
Bug ID: 1110292
Summary: perl-Text-Xslate-3.1.2-3.fc21 FTBFS under heavy load:
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-Xslate
Assignee: i...@cicku.me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105161
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110326
Bug ID: 1110326
Summary: perl-Time-Mock-0.0.2-5.fc21 FTBFS on heavily loaded
machine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Time-Mock
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110326
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 96500
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105161
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.45-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Date-Manip-6.45-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105161
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.45-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Date-Manip-6.45-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106197
Yaakov Selkowitz yselk...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||245418
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105161
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105814
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Writer-0.625-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101220
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-DNS-0.76-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100595
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-DNS-0.76-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105814
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Writer-0.625-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Hash-LX-0.06.03-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095263
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100595
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-DNS-0.76-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101220
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-DNS-0.76-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095263
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-WWW-Shorten-3.05-1.fc1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103677
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Socket-2.014-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
68 matches
Mail list logo
