Compose started at Tue Jun 24 08:15:02 UTC 2014
New package: florence-0.6.2-1.el7
Extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME
New package: perl-File-NFSLock-1.21-10.el7
Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking
New package: pysubnettree-0.23-3.el7
Hi there,
I want to setup a test installation for the next CentOS7. But I can't find
any clamav at the epel beta for el7.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Mr. Andreas Reschke
MAHLE International GmbH
Unix/Linux-Administration (FIG51)
Pragstr. 26 - 46, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
Phone: +49
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
793
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
140
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
125
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
793
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
248
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
128
On 23 June 2014 23:54, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote:
First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree.
I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent
packages. I've seen that also when I've tried to remove a package and
noticed it had a myriad of
Am 24.06.2014 00:54, schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
Regarding your kernel comment, I've been using Fedora since Redhat 6.2 and
DNF since it first came out and I've
never encountered this. When I update the kernel, it leaves the prior two on
my system for rollback, so I have no
idea what you're
2014-06-23 17:51 GMT+02:00 Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us:
This has got to be the silliest thing I've ever seen, but whatever. You
enter the command dnf remove dnf, and guess what? It removes dnf. You enter
the command dnf remove kernel, and guess what, it removes the kernel. What a
On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote:
you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot...
...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times
How many different locks does a gun have? Last time I checked there
was one safety catch -- DNF asks you for
2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote:
you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot...
...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times
How many different locks does a gun have?
Been reading this for a while and I'm getting annoyed by the 'you should
know what you are doing' mob. There can be no reason not to have safe
guards in dnf to save you from the oh sh#t moments. Everyone has those at
some time and those who are learning Linux need these guards to avoid them
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his
private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only
package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rabbitmq-server/
I propose myself (FAS name: peter)
Am 24.06.2014 11:36, schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote:
you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot...
...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times
How many different locks does a gun have? Last time I checked
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:50:31PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his
private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only
package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server.
2014-06-24 11:40 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com:
On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of
attitude.
Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the opposition as
incompetent. You won't convince anyone,
Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of
attitude.
Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the opposition as
incompetent. You won't convince anyone, and it
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Been reading this for a while and I'm getting annoyed by the 'you should
know what you are doing' mob. There can be no reason not to have safe guards
in dnf to save you from the oh sh#t moments. Everyone has those at some time
I'm in two minds about whether to add OCaml 4.02 to Fedora 21:
- The only significant change that we care about is full AArch64
support. Currently Fedora 21 uses an AArch64 backend that I
hastily backported from upstream before the upstream backend was
completely finished (which, to
Am 24.06.2014 12:05, schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune:
Because I totally agree with you and IIRC this kind of stuff has been
added over time in yum. Also IMHO some of those features are very
fedora/el specific, and allows yum to work only on fedora and
downstream distros. Yum expects the kernel rpm
OT Argh, it is quite painful to keep all CC's in loop :(. I suppose
that something is broken with this list. Both of email replies missed my
MAILBOX and both have trimmed CC lists. Trying to reattach but not giving
it a big chance. /OT
- Original Message -
From: Florian Weimer
On 06/23/2014 06:54 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree.
I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent packages. I've seen that also when I've
tried to remove a package and noticed it had a myriad of dependencies
On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of
attitude.
Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the
Greetings!
Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than
2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is
also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date.
At this point, all accepted changes should be substantially complete,
and testable. Additionally, if a change is
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:13:39PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if someone is interested in picking up the maintainance of
SOAPpy
in Fedora.
The upstream we were following [1] is dead for a while. There are some forks
that seems to be moving forward but one would
Am 24.06.2014 12:56, schrieb Ian Malone:
On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of
attitude.
Please don't
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 11:45 +0200, Thomas Bendler wrote:
2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de
wrote:
you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your
foot...
2014-06-24 14:25 GMT+02:00 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 11:45 +0200, Thomas Bendler wrote:
2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de
wrote:
you need to unlock
This is a reminder of the Fedora Code of Conduct, linked at the bottom of
every message. See https://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct if you've
missed it.
It's _abundantly_ clear that there are two sides of this issue which can be
taken by reasonable people. Please refrain from disparaging the
Le mardi 24 juin 2014 à 14:43 +0200, Sergio Pascual a écrit :
2014-06-24 14:25 GMT+02:00 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 11:45 +0200, Thomas Bendler wrote:
2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes
hughsi...@gmail.com:
On
Debi and Toshio resigned, because they have other duties. Thanks for
their time and work in Working Group.
I guess Env and Stacks WG would be a good place for Atomic and Docker.
We are missing members with such knowledge, also there are no
representatives of QA or releng. It would be great if
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-06-24)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:04:47 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On 24 June 2014 12:51, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.06.2014 12:56, schrieb Ian Malone:
On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
Hopefully you don't
One exemplary example of how to or how to not to.
# yum clean all
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Cleaning repos: rawhide
Cleaning up everything
# yum --enablerepo \* clean all
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Cleaning repos: fedora fedora-debuginfo fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
We’ll Build A Dream House Of Net - by Dan Williams
http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2014/06/20/well-build-a-dream-house-of-net/
Geez, are we done yet?
Not even close! Seriously, there’s more but I’m kinda tired of typing.
Try it out (the final release will be
On 06/20/2014 08:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
AIUI, the split in NM split off:
* wifi support into NetworkManager-wifi
* bluetooth (DUN and PAN? didn't one get dropped? i forget) connection
support into NetworkManager-bluetooth
* cellular modem support into NetworkManager-wwan
*
On 06/24/2014 03:23 PM, Tomas Mlcoch wrote:
Hi poma,
the short answer is no.
The idea (to have deltas between two repodata) and purpose (be able to gen and
apply such deltas) is the same, but the used techniques and ideas are different.
snip
So, what will it take to get this into Fedora?
On 06/23/2014 07:35 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
If yum history showed that a protection for critical packages is useful
and appreciated by the majority, why the yum replacement shouldn't
implement that protection saying it's unuseful?
I'd go into a different direction: The fact, yum had such a
Hi,
With the Java 8 Change [0] that promotes java-1.8.0-openjdk to the
default Java runtime, I am going to be retiring java-1.7.0-openjdk
shortly.
I need to make a change to comps to make sure that it does not try and
pull in java-1.7.0-openjdk. Patch is attached. It was reviewed on IRC by
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 08:57 +0200, poma wrote:
We’ll Build A Dream House Of Net - by Dan Williams
http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2014/06/20/well-build-a-dream-house-of-net/
Geez, are we done yet?
Not even close! Seriously, there’s more but I’m kinda tired of
In the commit I see java-1.5.0-gcj, you might want to drop it now that gcc-java
is no longer built.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com
To: fedora-devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:58:46 PM
* Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com [2014-06-24 14:36]:
In the commit I see java-1.5.0-gcj, you might want to drop it now that
gcc-java is no longer built.
Done. This was accidentally overlooked when java-1.5.0-gcj was retired.
Thanks,
Omair
--
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Hi,
* Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com [2014-06-24 14:31]:
With the Java 8 Change [0] that promotes java-1.8.0-openjdk to the
default Java runtime, I am going to be retiring java-1.7.0-openjdk
shortly.
And this patch, for spins-kickstarts, removes all mention of
java-1.7.0-openjdk from the
Gerald B. Cox gbcox at bzb.us writes:
Sigh A gun doesn't require you to go into root mode before using it; and
it doesn't ask you if you are sure before you pull the trigger.
dnf requires root mode _every_ time you use it. Same for asking if you're
sure (unless the -y option is used). Any
Gerald B. Cox gbcox at bzb.us writes:
I also cringe when I see the -y or --assumeyes option mentioned. IMO
that is just inviting disaster.
I'm surprised no one is demanding that be removed. It is dangerous.
Someone might need to use yum or dnf in a script. Personally, that's the
_only_ time
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:16:08PM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
I also cringe when I see the -y or --assumeyes option mentioned. IMO
that is just inviting disaster.
I'm surprised no one is demanding that be removed. It is dangerous.
Someone might need to use yum or dnf in a script.
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them.
I have posted patches for a few of these (some before I realized they
were orphaned), should anyone want
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm in two minds about whether to add OCaml 4.02 to Fedora 21:
- The only significant change that we care about is full AArch64
support. Currently Fedora 21 uses an AArch64 backend that I
hastily backported from
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:12:11PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Depending on: jbosscache-support
hibernate3 (maintained by: gil, jhernand, msrb)
hibernate3-3.6.10-14.fc21.src requires jbosscache-common-parent
= 1.6-8.fc21
On Jun 21, 2014 12:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what you or i prefer don't matter
Sure it does. Otherwise you would not insist that your perspective is
the only right one and everyone else who has a different
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Check the post-install tools; I believe at least one of apper or yumex
still uses them.
Apper also uses those categories, so they both do.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Package(co)maintainers
===
NearTree tmatsuu
The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: NearTree
rasmol (maintained by:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings!
Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than
2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is
also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date.
At this point, all accepted
Was there good reason to change it? For well over a decade across all distros
I've used, I've included this line in root's .bashrc, always:
setterm -foreground white -bold -background blue -blank 59 -store
The current man page has changed to require -- where - was sufficient
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Package(co)maintainers
===
NearTree tmatsuu
The following packages require above
Hello,
My name is David Nichols, and I'm the author of the Qore programming language.
I've recently made a package submission request to Fedora for Qore, which is
under review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
I've been running fedora (and before that redhat) for many
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112553
Bug ID: 1112553
Summary: perl-Cache-Cache-1.06-15.fc21 FTBFS on loaded machine:
t/5_test_size_aware_file_cache.t is time sensitive
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104721
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
It still fails sometimes. Probably there is another race.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112571
Bug ID: 1112571
Summary: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-2.fc21 FTBFS:
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Gtk3-WebKit
Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112571
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112609
Bug ID: 1112609
Summary: perl-PPI-Tester-0.15-3.fc21 FTBFS: %check phase fails
because of Xvfb
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PPI-Tester
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092963
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105167
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Filter-1.50-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105167
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Filter-1.50-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112890
Bug ID: 1112890
Summary: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build.
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom
Assignee: r.landm...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112891
Bug ID: 1112891
Summary: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build.
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl-Locale-Msgfmt
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112892
Bug ID: 1112892
Summary: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build (on
EL7)
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112891
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
I don't have time to maintain this package for EPEL 7. If you want to do that,
you're welcome. I can request the branches for you if you send me you FAS
login.
--
You are receiving
Greetings!
Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than
2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is
also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date.
At this point, all accepted changes should be substantially complete,
and testable. Additionally, if a change is
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
69 matches
Mail list logo